The Educational Branch of COLONTOWN

COLONTOWN University

COLONTOWN University

Categories
DocTalks Hide from search

HAI for metastatic CRC

HAI for metastatic CRC

DocTalk
2024
Dr. Connell
Liver
Stage IV
HAI

In DocTalk, Dr. Louise Connell from Memorial Sloan Kettering discusses HAI for metastatic CRC with Betsy Post. Recorded in January, 2024.

Betsy Post 00:01
Welcome, everyone. Thank you so much for joining us this evening for our latest DocTalk. I’m so pleased tonight to be with us here for our COLONTOWN DocTalk. Dr. Louise Connell from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Dr. Connell, I think is very well known in COLONTOWN. So if you’ve been around for a while, you definitely know her name. If you are familiar with liver Mets, and especially if you’re interested in the hepatic pump, I know that you definitely have seen her name. And our groups such as Liver Lovers Lane and HAI Pump People, I’m sure that we have some of her patients here tonight to support her as well. So we are so thankful for your time, Dr. Connell, especially for doing this after hours so that we could get maximum participation from our patients and our caregivers. So thank you, again, for agreeing to do this, we’re really excited to hear from you on how you treat patients specifically with the pump. I know that you have some things about the future about the pump, which is really exciting. I’m very excited to hear that. And then we did have patients and caregivers submit questions in advance. So we will get to those questions at the end of Dr. Connell’s presentation. So at the end of her talk, she will, we’re going to do some Q&A based on some questions that we received in advance. As she is presenting, we would ask that you please stay muted so that we can make sure we’re being respectful of her presentation her time, but do put your questions in the chat. So please do use the chat feature to submit your questions. And we will get to those live questions at the end of the presentation and the pre-submitted Q&A. So with that again, Dr. Connell, thank you so much for being here. The floor is yours.

Dr. Connell 01:55
Okay, thank you, Betsy. And first of all, I just want to say thank you very much for the invitation to speak here tonight to you all. COLONTOWN is is a resource that I hear so much about from my patients, and a platform that I think provides so many of you with information that you bring to the clinic, to advocate for yourselves and to, you know, advance your care. And I think, you know, it’s been such an important resource that, you know, if there’s any way that I can help provide additional information, particularly about the liver pump. This is an honor to be asked to do this. So tonight, my slides section is small on purpose, because I really wanted to give you all an opportunity to ask questions. And I would encourage you to submit any questions that you have for me. I did just want to provide some background on you know where we are today, today in terms of metastatic colorectal cancer treatments, and in particular, the role for HAI therapy. I think many of you already know much of this information. But in particular, for patients and caregivers who perhaps are new to this or maybe considering a pump, I did want to provide just some background slides on the pump treatment.

Dr. Connell 03:15
I’m going to just advance my slides here. So first of all, I just wanted to put up this disclaimer to acknowledge some of my consulting work. But truly the presentation today is purely for informational and educational purposes. And it’s really based on my clinical experience with patients and my knowledge in terms of pump management.

Dr. Connell 04:16
And at diagnosis, we see approximately 20% up to a third of patients will have liver Mets at diagnosis whereas the majority of patients will go on to develop liver metastatic disease during their follow-up. The question is what are our treatment options nowadays for metastatic colorectal cancer and, I’ll just briefly run through this on this slide on the next slide. But essentially we have or our cornerstone standard of care chemotherapy treatments, and we combine these drugs with biologics. I think increasingly we’re hearing about biomarker-driven approaches and I’ve highlighted here are the four key targets that we look for in patients who are newly diagnosed being microsatellite status. Their RAS status, BRAF status and HER2 status. 

Dr. Connell 05:00
And, of course, you know what I think I’ve always in patients because of the work that I do is the role for local regional approaches and particularly in patients who have liver only disease or liver dominant disease and looking to intermix this and combine it with my chemotherapy drugs and with biomarker-driven approaches to get the best outcomes for patients. So in terms of patients with liver dominant or liver only disease, you know, I consider resection, ablation, of course, hai therapy and also y 90 as well as I should mention radiation treatments to the liver. And also, I think local regional approaches have a role to play in patients who have lung metastases or illegal metastatic disease which is out where you may have an isolated tumor or a small tumor. And you know, maybe you can be more localized with your treatment approach and for the lung that would include ablation resection and also stereotactic radiation. D=So the progress that has been made in the last you know, 50 years is phenomenal. Unfortunately, a long time ago, when patients were diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer, and there were no drug options, the recommendation was for best supportive care and, then over time, really, it was single agent 5FU. And this slide shows where we are today in terms of drug treatments. On the left hand column, you really see our cornerstone drugs, which is the Fluorouracil, Capecetibine have been being the oral version Irinotecan and oxaliplatin, and this is what we all know, as, you know, fall Folfox, Folfirir, the combinations of these drugs, looking at VEGF inhibitors such as Bevacizumab, EGFR inhibitor, centuximab, or, or panitumumab in patients who are RAS Wildtype and then on the right column, we see the newer drugs that are out there, right. 

Dr. Connell 07:01
So with patients who have BRAF mutated colorectal cancer, the combination of NRAS and Centuximab, HER2 is now you know, very to the fore in terms of drug therapy, which a centuximab and trust panitunamab. And then there’s been a lot of focus recently in terms of MSI, high disease and Immunotherapy options. And what I always say to my patients in clinic is that this is very important to determine for patients, but it’s such a small group of patients that we see.

Dr. Connell 07:21
And then the third line drugs you know what I would say briefly about these drugs Regorafenib Taz 102, which I typically combined with Bevacizumab, or for Fruzaqla is that these are drugs that, you know, have limited clinical benefit, and they have a high side effect profile. And I’m very selective in terms of which patients I decide to use these drugs for. More commonly, I would personally use TAZ102 with Bevacizumab and but that differs from patient to patient. And what I’ve highlighted on the far right is what I consider the star of the show which is liver directed treatment. And I think it’s so important to think about it in our patients and the core drug that we have is fluoxetine, and then we use Mitomycin you know, further and, you know, down the line for patients or if they’ve, you know, beginning to develop progression on fluoxetine, and I can talk about that a little bit more in the question and answer section.

Dr. Connell 08:52
So what is a Hepatic artery infusion treatment so traditional chemotherapy is delivered through through a vein. You know, in colorectal cancer, we typically have a meta port in place because of the fight through fluorouracil being given in an infusional form. The drug travels through the body’s bloodstream to reach the liver, and only a small portion of the drug will ultimately reach tumors in the liver. And as many of us who are patients and on treatment know, and it comes with side effects and typically, you know, issues such as diarrhea, mouth sores, you know, low blood counts such as neutropenia has. The benefit of hepatic artery infusion therapy is that it’s delivered through a pump first of all, which is implanted just below the skin in the abdomen. The drug is administered through the hepatic artery, directly to tumors in the liver, and it delivers up to 400 times a higher drug concentration to tumors in the liver. So we’re really getting to directly to the problem. And this is just a graphic showing. You know how that works with the pump.

Dr. Connell 10:13
Basically that the liver is a unique organ in that it has a dual blood supply. And we manipulate this information through the use of hepatic artery and fusion treatment. So there’s essentially two vessels which supply the liver, the hepatic artery and the portal vein. And liver metastases are perfused by the Patek artery, whereas what we call normal parenchyma, or normal liver tissue is perfused, primarily by the portal vein. So with hai therapy, we’re delivering the fluorouracil, which is a prodrug of 5FU or so into the hepatic artery, and we get very high concentration of the drug to the liver. And as I mentioned in the previous slide, it’s almost 400 times higher than those achieved by intravenous administration. And, and the important thing here is that essentially, the drug is entirely soaked up by the liver around 97% of the drug, it has a very short half life. So there’s minimal systemic exposure for patients and toxicity from the drug.

Dr. Connell 11:42
So I have two very brief slides just looking at some of the clinical evidence. And on this slide, we see the clinical evidence for HAI therapy in patients who have unresectable colorectal liver metastases. So the first study highlighted here was published in 2017. And basically, this was a case control study, which looked at the use of HAI with modern systemic chemotherapy combinations compared to systemic chemotherapy alone. And you can see even from the bar charts, there’s a there’s a difference there that’s quite visible between the purple bar, which is essentially the combination treatment and the orange colored, which is systemic treatment alone. And what was seen in this case control study is that median overall survival was doubled in patients, when they received combination treatment at around 32.8 months compared to our modern systemic chemotherapy options, which was 15.3 months. And this was even when conversion to resection was not achieved in patients. And this was statistically significant.

Dr. Connell 12:43
On the on the right side, then we see another paper and this was published in 2018. And this looked at like long term results from a prospective trial, and which again, looked at the response to hai therapy, and with systemic treatment, and basically, the overall tumor response rate to the combination of HAI with systemic chemotherapy was 73%. And there was a very high response rates in patients who were chemo naive. So when it was given in the first line, it was 86%, whereas in patients who were previously treated, it’s still very high, it’s 67%. And what we saw here is that 52% of patients were converted to resection with the combination treatment, despite the fact that the majority of these patients had what we would consider a high disease burden within the liver, and many of them had had previous chemotherapy.

Dr. Connell 15:19
I just briefly put up here, and this is really to January questions, you know, what’s the future for HAI therapy? Or how can we further advance what we know? And I think there’s two very important points to bring up here. And I know, these are questions that come up for me in the clinic is, you know, can we combine hai therapy with other systemic treatment options? One that’s very topical, you know, is kind of get it with Immunotherapy. And another would be, you know, some of these other newer drugs that are out there, you know, in particular for a patient to perhaps is her2 positive, BRAF mutated patients. So, you know, can we give them and right now, the honest answer is we don’t have the safety data to combine these drugs together. But it’s something that we do need to consider going forward in terms of trials. And, and also, I would like to highlight the HAI Consortium, and I think that’s a very important group. And it’s essentially a group of centers within the United States and also outside the United States, where we’ve come together, and we’re trying to generate trials. And there is a trial, which has been activated, which I know has been previously discussed here. And I think this is going to be a group that’s going to help propel forward future trials on hai therapy and and help all of you as well as patients in the future going forward. And it’s a very important collaboration to be able to replicate. I think what we’ve seen achieved at Memorial Sloan Kettering in particular with HAI treatment, and can we, you know, replicate that throughout the United States and more globally for patients.

Dr. Connell 17:01
So, what does it mean for a patient then to live with the palms, so just to get to some practicalities, so it does require a surgery to place the pump. And that’s important to say to patients and the majority of patients it’s placed at the time of an open surgery. In some patients where, for example, the colon primary, or the rectal primary has already been removed, and there is going to be no liver resection. There are some newer techniques such as robotic, placement and minimally invasive which are done by some of our surgeons. In terms of recovery. The honest answer is you can you can travel. And you can also continue to do most of the activities that you’ve enjoyed doing before. And during active treatment, the pump has refills every two weeks, you do not get drug every time it alternates between fluoxetine with heparin saline. And it is important to be mindful of the travel schedule. And I do say that to my own patients, because there is a residual within the pump, but you do not want the pump to run dry. So it’s very important to you know, mention any travel to your your treating physician and to try to accommodate that for patients as well. And otherwise, what I also want to highlight, and I mentioned this a little bit with the consortium, but there’s been a huge increase in terms of the number of centers since 2019, that are able to put in a level upon number one, and also for local refill centers. And this is something that is continuing to gain momentum. I think this is something that I learned, I’ll be honest with you during the COVID pandemic was so important for patients because there was huge difficulty in in people being able to commit to coming here every two weeks to New York at for pump refills and, and there’s a lot more physicians out there, and who who can now help assist with local refills. And that can be huge for patients, even if they’re not able to get the flux your dean locally, for example. But coming to coming to New York once a month is much better than having to commit to traveling every two weeks for example. And, and you know, it is important to also to mention that and we are trying to help train local oncologists also who maybe don’t have experience with the pump, but to be able to help some of some of you and some new patients who really want to commit to this to have refills locally. And then just to briefly mention, you know, some of the safety elements with fluoxetine. So, the anterior pump is indicated for the use of fluoxetine and it is contraindicated to the use of this and patients who have extensive extrahepatic disease or if you have limited liver function. And then always important to mention, you know some of the adverse events that can occur with the pump which are rare but serious and we can discuss them a little bit further in the q&a section.

Dr. Connell 19:59
So with that, I’m going to hand it over to Betsy, and we’ll go through the questions. So I’ll stop sharing here.

Betsy Post 20:08
Great, thank you so much. And then please, as we go along, if you do have questions, actually, I have one, two for the end, please do put those in the chat and we will get to those shortly. So the first question we have Dr. Connell is Why is HAI therapy generally done at the same time as systemic chemotherapy?

Dr. Connell 20:31
Yeah, so, you know, this question comes up a lot. And I think the important thing here is the there is a synergy between fluoxetine through the pump and giving it with systemic treatment in particular arena Tekin, and our EGFR inhibitors, but also importantly, we have to protect against the risk of extra hepatic disease, right. So if I have a patient and they’re on track to try to get to a liver resection, what is absolutely devastating for a patient is to get to a surgery. And the procedure is aborted because extra hepatic diseases detected and or for something to develop on a scan prior to surgery. So it’s really to help protect outside the liver, to allow us to focus on the treatment of the liver metastases with the flexibility and treatment.

Betsy Post 21:23
Thank you. How do you determine which systemic regimen that you’re going to use with the metastatic colorectal cancer liver met patients? And how does having a pump alter that?

Dr. Connell 21:35
Yeah, and so the first thing to say is that, while we typically and in the majority of patients give systemic chemotherapy with the HAI therapy, the dosing is automatically lower than it would be if a patient was receiving systemic chemotherapy alone. Because we have to balance the toxicities from using the two in combination. And so there is a different standard dosing of this systemic FOLFOX, for example, as opposed to somebody who’s on FOLFOX own in terms of what to use for patients. So there’s a few things to look at. I think the first thing is, in a patient who is previously untreated, the standard would be to use Folfox.

Dr. Connell 22:19
With the liver pump, and in somebody who possibly comes and they’ve had both treatments, what I take into consideration is I look and see, you know, what response, did the patient get to each individual systemic treatments previously, right? Did their cancer previously progress on Folfox? Do they maybe have stable disease on full theory, but they didn’t get enough of a response, and also the side effects that patients have had from previous treatment. So if somebody comes into me in clinic, and they have very severe neuropathy from previous oxaliplatin, I’m not going to jump to using that drug. So I think what’s important to consider is how the patient’s cancer has responded to previous drugs before the time interval that they’ve had from a particular regimen to perhaps another recurrence or something else developing and also the side effects for the patients from previous treatment.

Betsy Post 23:13
Thank you. The next question is, are there any situations where the HAI therapy might be done without systemic chemotherapy at the same time,

Dr. Connell 23:27
Um, very, very rarely, I have one patient since I began practicing here that I’ve done it in so I very, very select patients. In general, the preference is to give with systemic chemotherapy. Again, you know, in, in the scenario where I decided not to do it, it was a very detailed discussion with the patient about why we were not doing it and the risks of of not doing it together. But in general, it’s given. It’s given with some form of systemic chemo. And, you know, what I prefer for my patients is at least we give a single agent even if a doublet such as you know, 5FU with oxaliplatin or 5FU with Ironotecan is too much. And but as I said, it’s very rare that I do it. I’ve only done it once since I’ve been practicing here and had very real reasons for not doing systemic side effects may be possible in the liver area during HAI therapy.

Dr. Connell 24:28
Yeah, so the side effect profile is very different to systemic chemo. The two main things that I say to patients is we learned early on and many of the studies that were done with the liver pump the the risk of ulceration in the gut in the GI tract, so all patients are put on a medication to help prevent reflux. So pantoprazole protonix, and in patients who say to me that they’re having increasing reflux symptoms, for example, or they’re having some pain or discomfort, you know, just under the chest, and I’d have a very low threat To get an endoscopy to look for an ulcer, so that’s the first thing. But it’s much less common nowadays because we’re routinely giving protonix with it. I think what the big thing is, you’ve got to watch the delivery of blood work very closely. And in the majority of patients, you don’t come to clinic with any symptoms, right? You feel fine, you feel well, in general, patients feel better than they felt on previous systemic chemotherapy because okay, I’m still giving it but I’m giving a little bit less than you would have had previously. And what I always say to people, actually, when they come to me is it can be a little bit frustrating, right? If you fly to me from San Francisco, or you come from Canada, and you feel great, and then I see the liver enzymes, and I say, sorry, I can’t give the drug today or you know, we’ve had to give a few weeks holding off on the drugs. So the honest answer is we’ve learned from experience that we do have to be very mindful of the liver bloodwork, and then the majority of patients picked up on the bloodwork and the patient doesn’t have any symptoms themselves. However, in some patients, if you begin to develop any symptoms, such as jaundice, you know, anything like that, then a very low threshold to get your liver enzymes checked. And even if you’re local, to check them to see because that’s the biggest thing that we have to watch for is liver toxicity.

Betsy Post 26:16
How long does active treatment last? And what is the average number of treatments? And does this change? Does this change if the HAI therapy is being done before or after liver resection?

Dr. Connell 26:30
Yeah, yes. So the answer to the final question is yes. So if somebody has had a liver resection, and we’re using this as an adjuvant treatment, it’s six months of treatment. And then we stop. And in the majority of patients, we’ll get four doses in of the fluoxetine of the liver drug in the six month period, when we look at, you know, liver enzyme alterations, but we stop automatically at six months, and however many doses the patient has managed to successfully get that’s it. And in a in a person who is not resected, or I’m trying to convert to resections, when unresectable disease or in the conversion setting, there really isn’t a limit in terms of the number of doses that a patient can get. And the it really depends on how their liver is tolerating the drug, you know, what kind of response that we’re getting, you will have to make a change to the to the drug dosing. And what I’ve seen in practice is that typically, that happens around two to three months into treatment. It’s not uncommon, that it could happen even after the first dose, but there will be some dose modification. And patients can still respond on low doses. And that’s also important to say, because again, I also acknowledge that, you know, really, you’re committing to come in here for these treatments or to hai center. And it’s very disappointing, if you hear you’re getting a quite a significant dose reduction. And but you still respond to this. And it’s different to what we know about the dose reductions that are done with systemic chemo.

Betsy Post 28:04
Thank you. Is it possible to do treatment again, with the pump later on, if needed? 

Dr. Connell 28:14
Yes, exactly. Yes, you can. And this is why, you know, our, our preference is for patients to keep the pump, right, because particularly, what I would say to patients is, if you are using it as adjuvant therapy after liver resection, or you’ve been converted to resection from the pump, at the time of surgery, the recommendation, so your NED at that point, right is at least two years. Ideally, we prefer patients to keep the pump in longer. But the highest risk period for recurrence is the first two years and the rationale behind that is because the pump is not something that can be put back in right a little bit like a metal porch, right? So we want to keep that option open. Particularly if, if it’s helped you get to your surgery, number one, and you know, so that we can use it again. So absolutely, yes, you can use the drug again.

Betsy Post 29:11
Thank you already answered the next one, which was does the pump stay in when active treatment is done? And for how long?

Dr. Connell 29:18
Yes. Yeah. Yeah. And so yeah, and this question comes up and the honest answer is as well what I would say is i i Never tell someone to take a pump out I wait for them to tell me that they’re ready for it to come out because I think it’s a very personal decision. I think it’s something that for many patients has been you know, revolutionary, I guess and and I think, you know, we can educate and guys and that but it has to feel right to you as a patient to know when is the right time to remove it. If somebody really wants it out within six months. I’m like, please keep it for two years but beyond that, I really leave it up to the patient’s decide

Betsy Post 29:59
Are there other drugs ever used in the pump like oxaliplatin?

Dr. Connell 30:05
Yeah, so, oxaliplatin has a very low extraction rate into the liver. It is used in Europe because they have a slightly different device there. We don’t routinely use it here. But we do use Mitomycin and that’s something I referred to briefly during my talk. And I have seen patients who perhaps are beginning to develop some resistance to Flox your deen or maybe are beginning to run into more issues with their liver enzymes. And I’ve used Mitomycin in those patients and seen you know, some very good responses with the middle myosin what I would just say about that is you can give it in combination with fluoxetine. So you can give both drugs at the same time if your liver enzymes are good. So if the liver bloodwork is good, if the liver enzymes are high, tickling the outsource or perhaps the bilirubin, and that it’s safer to give Mitomycin on its own, but that’s typically our second drug that we use. We don’t give oxaliplatin.

Betsy Post 31:09
What are the causes for the mitomycin following HAI therapy with the traditional treatment?

Dr. Connell 31:19
Why would we give it right?

Betsy Post 31:21
I think you already spoke to that. 

Dr. Connell 31:24
So yeah, yeah. So I think if you’re getting a slowing down in response, possibly to flux, your routine, maybe you are getting some response, but you’re beginning to run into some of these liver toxicity issues. And so they would really be the main reasons that we do it. And really, I would use it in a situation where it’s liver only progression, of course, like I wouldn’t use it if there was signs of anything happening

Betsy Post 31:47
Um, and then since I’m not an oncologist, I might mess up these names. But what are the views on the use of Bev, which I know is Avastin. So we’ll take that one first. The new third line or a drug that was just FDA approved for colorectal cancer, liver Mets, or the EGFR inhibitors. So what are the views on those three and maybe address them separately? Because I know it could be different after the HAI therapy when the pump is running glycerin.

Dr. Connell 32:18
Okay, so I’ll start with EGFR inhibitors first, because that’s probably the easiest ones you can give EGFR inhibitor is at the same time that you give fluorouracil safe to do works very well with the liver pump.

Dr. Connell 32:32
And you can also give it after liver treatments. So there’s no limitation at all with EGFR inhibitors and actually works very well with with FUDR, or Avastin is something that we’d urge early on, that should not be used the same time that we’re giving fluoxetine. So it’s it’s a combination, so it should not they should not be used together. And but a patient can have Avastin or Bevacizumab later on, if you’re simply just getting glycerol through your pump. And so, if for example, I have somebody who the liver is still no evidence of disease, there’s, you know, issues arising outside the liver in the lung, perhaps or lymphnodes. Have I given Avastin? Absolutely I have, I generally prefer to try to delay the use of Avastin further out from using the liver drug because I have seen in some patients some delayed issues with billary complications if I’ve tried to use the Bevacizumab a little bit too quickly after stopping the liver pump treatment. And but yes, you can use them separately but not together and then forget never the honest answer is we don’t know yet. Because it’s such a new drug definitely would not use them together. And I think you know, you would think along the same lines as you know, what we do with Stivarga, etc. You know, they can be given but not together. And the honest answer is and I kind of led to this during my sliders, I really reserved the use of any of these drugs too much, much later on for patients. I think if you can do something like long ablations or radiate, I think you’re helping the patient more than jumping to any of these newer, third fourth line drugs that are approved.

Betsy Post 34:17
Thank you. And these are questions that we see in Colin town all the time, and these were the most frequent questions that I received for you. So these have to do with Y90 So if a patient has had Y90 How does this affect their ability to receive HAI therapy after?

Dr. Connell 34:38
Yeah, okay. So this comes up quite a lot. The honest answer is if I see a patient before a Y90 Maybe they come with a second opinion we usually prefer to give the pump before Y90 that’s the honest answer. So usually what I say to patients is, you know, pump first and any of these proceed procedures like Y90 or radiation I would reserve for later on. And have I had patients who’ve had y90 And I’ve given pump treatment to absolutely, I think we have to look at those cases individually. And it’s something that we would show at our tumor board. And we would really look at the extent of the Y90, for example, how the blood vessels in the liver look after the Y90.

Dr. Connell 35:24
Often you need to dose reduce the flux your routine a little bit faster in those patients so I can get the drug in for the patient, but I can’t get as much drug in. And but I’ve had people respond after y 90 I think our preference is to do pump first.

Betsy Post 35:45
If a patient has HAI therapy, and then does Y90? Would the patient be able to use the HAI pump again, if it is still functional?

Dr. Connell 35:56
Yeah, and so this is an interesting one. I haven’t personally ever done that myself. I think from a technical point of view, it would come back to what I said previously, is that you’d have to really look structurally at the liver and see, you know, there’s there’s newer Y-90 techniques out there. And I know whether our interventional radiologists here they do more selective Y90 So if perhaps, you know, there was a regional Y90 And then you’re trying to treat the rest of the liver. Technically, you could. I think just with with my own practice, and the way that I view it, because I keep Y90 for Later on, it just hasn’t worked out that way with the patients that I’ve seen. But again, I think this is something that you would have to have the right imaging, it would have to be viewed as a multidisciplinary team, whether that’s the right thing for the patient, you know, including an interventional radiologist, including a radiation oncologist right, is radiation safer than Y90 A surgeon and a medical oncologist to decide what’s the right thing for that particular person.

Betsy Post 36:56
Some additional questions have to do with transplants. This is something that we’re hearing more and more about, especially for unresectable disease, obviously, and we have patients a lot of times that are making a decision, sometimes between the pump or transplant, but something that we’re hearing now is the question first, could the pump be used as a bridge to liver transplant?

Dr. Connell 37:18
Yeah, so this is very typical? I think without intentionally setting out that way. And I’ve had some patients who’ve done very well with transplantation after pump treatment, I think the tricky thing about the transplant process is that it’s a long process for patients. Right. So my own experience with my patients has been is that sometimes they’re waiting like 12 to 18 months. And I’m trying to control everything with the pump at the same time. So I have used it but not intentionally. I’m on discussions with transplant centers. And speaking with surgeons here, this is something that I think we’re going to need to study. And we’re going to need to collaborate on to see if we can help more patients by combining the two techniques.

Betsy Post 38:37
Another question, how do you consider the option for liver transplant as part of your overall treatment plan or approach for patients?

Dr. Connell 38:47
Yeah, so. So when I see patients, you know, this can often come up. And I think with transplant, what I say to people is we got a real sense of how the pump is helping a patient in unresectable disease, like, you know, about six months in, you know, look, and you’re talking back and forth with the surgeons, you know, do we think that we’re going to be able to convert to resection here? Do we have any of these options like why nine tear or radiation? And I think it’s always appropriate to get an opinion from a transplant center, and particularly if it’s something that the patient themselves is questioning, right, because you want to hear directly. And there’s a little bit of bias right between different different specialties and obviously I’m very Hai and but I’ve certainly collaborated with transplant centers, and then you know, when somebody is listed for transplant in practice, what I do is I follow what they want me to do, so I don’t change any treatment, you know, they tell me what they want to do. The important things about transplant is a few things. So you cannot have any extra hepatic disease obviously so there can be no evidence of extra hepatic disease. And the second thing is that the primary tumor has to be removed.

Dr. Connell 40:03
So, you know, they would be the two things. But if you have liver only disease and and resection is not feasible, and you’ve heard that from the liver surgeon and you’ve heard that from your medical oncologist then then I do think transplant is something that needs to be considered. And they removed the pump at the time of transplant as well. 

Betsy Post 40:26
So is there data available to show how successful ATI therapy is? And I know that we did talk? You talked about that earlier, but I didn’t know if you wanted to elaborate on that a little bit more.

Dr. Connell 40:39
Yeah, so we do have data. And I’ve shown some of the data here, I think what’s important is that we need more randomized to data. And I think, you know, that’s what the consortium is going to help with and why we’re trying to collaborate with other institutions. And I think trying to address this question of, is the pump so successful? Because it’s given here in New York or you know, Kansas, can I get the same level of care? Or in Chicago, or, you know, Atlanta? And I think the honest answer is there’s so much more knowledge out there about the pump. And we do need to do more trials. And also, I also mentioned this as well, there’s so many newer drugs out there, right. And patients want to know can kind of get them together, is it safe to get them together? And this has to be done in a trial setting.

Betsy Post 41:27
So another question we get quite a bit. So now that Dr. Kemeny has retired, how was care being distributed for patients that are being seen at Memorial Sloan Kettering?

Dr. Connell 41:39
Yeah. And so what I would say about that is, honestly, all of us can can can do pump treatment, I think a huge part of Dr. Kennedy’s legacy. What’s visible to patients and caregivers is is what she did for you, right? Understandably, a huge part of her legacy for us at Memorial is the teaching and training that she gave to us. And, you know, she was a phenomenal mentor to me. And to many of my colleagues.

Dr. Connell 42:10
All of our practices differ a little bit. So some of us do more pump than others. But honestly, all of us can do pump in terms of her practice. And it’s been divided between Athol I think for for active patients, understandably, because I was mentored under her I have many of her patients. I think, what’s also important to say, though, is that, for any of you who have, you know, some complex decision making, there’s something to be to be, you know, figured out, you know, is it now the right time to think about y 90, you know, have I achieved what I can with the pump, that’s never a decision that’s made in isolation by an individual, whether that’s a medical oncologist, it’s our tumor board is a huge resource for people and, and that’s often what I what I see myself as like, You’re not coming here to memorial for me, you’re coming for the expertise from the whole group. And never think that a decision a very important decision like that, look, will I say to this patient that you should go and get a transplant opinion, you’re not going to hear that just for me, I’m going to speak with my surgeons I’m going to speak with with them, and we’re going to show your case at the tumor board. And I think that’s very important to know, is that there’s huge collaboration amongst us as medical oncologists, and also multidisciplinary team involvement in any major decisions for patients.

Betsy Post 43:31
I know that you spoke about the Consortium, and that all the pomp programs, especially since my team that have opened up, but How can patients across the country get good access to HAI therapy?

Dr. Connell 43:44
Yeah, so I think there are more centers, who are implanting the pumps, number one, and also so many more centers where, you know, they’re able to assist with with local fields, I think the consortium is really helping with that. I would also say that there’s a huge collaboration between us, you know, I definitely speak with medical oncologists at other institutions. You know, I relied on mentoring, when I started off with this, and I try to share what I’ve learned in the nuances, you know, with oncologist with other centers, I think, when you start off, you know, what I always say to people is, you have to be comfortable with the person that’s treating you, right. And whether that’s having a pump or not having a pump, I think, number one, you have to be comfortable. So, you know, and you also have to think from a practical point of view, you know, look, if financially and with my family or my work commitments, is it feasible for me to fly up and down to New York every two weeks? And for many patients, it is for others. It’s not. Do I have a local doctor who can do this? Did I did We did our personality match? You know, and but I think there is so much more knowledge out there nowadays and there’s also huge camaraderie between us and sharing of knowledge. And, I think the consortium and the trials and everything that’s going to come out of that is going to further reinforce that for patients.

Betsy Post 45:11
One more question, and then we’re going to take the live questions, we have quite a few. How does the start of that new pump trial impact the ability of new patients to receive HAI therapy?

Dr. Connell 45:23
Yeah, so it’s a very relevant question. And you know, what I would say about the pump trial, it’s a very, very select group of patients, right? It’s a very important study, right to help answer this question, in a randomized setting of, you know, conversion to resection for patients with HAI versus modern systemic chemotherapy. So it’s for patients who’ve had more than three months, but less than six months of systemic chemotherapy in the first line. So it’s a very small group of patients. And the honest answer is the reason that we’re doing that is because we don’t know the question, right, we are the answer, we wouldn’t be doing it if we already knew that one was better than the other. And that’s important to say about any trial. If you’re a patient who is untreated, you had no chemotherapy, you can have a pump off trial, if you’ve had more chemotherapy, like you’ve had a year of chemotherapy, you don’t, you don’t qualify for the trial. So it’s a very, very select group of patients. And that will be explained to you as well, in the in the in the clinic setting.

Betsy Post 46:30
So moving on to some of our live questions, we have one, is there a certain temperature that you have to keep your body under while you have a pump?

Dr. Connell 46:42
Yeah, so this question comes up quite a bit, you know, I think you have to be sensible, right? So he will speed up the rate of infusion of the drug. Hot tubs are a no, no, you can get in a swimming pool. And so body temperature can affect us, I don’t give anyone like a specific number. But I just say like, you have to be mindful of it. And I have a patient who said they have a hot tub with that, put it on regular temperature. So you know, swimming, and all of that is fine. But sitting in heat, you don’t want to put heat pads directly on the pump. If you have pain in your back for another reason, you can put heat out there, but you just want to do want to put it directly over the pump.

Betsy Post 47:25
Is it true that you can’t lift more than 10 pounds when the pump isn’t?

Dr. Connell 47:31
Yeah, so again, this comes up quite a bit. So usually I say around 15 pounds to patients. In the beginning, I think you have to be very mindful of that similar with any surgery to be honest with you. Over time, honestly, what happens is you have a very good sense of your pomp and also scar tissue forms. And so I tell patients that, you know, using a binder, you know, be sensible. But a lot of people say, Well, you know, my toddler is 30 pounds, you know, and I’m never gonna say to somebody, you can’t lift your child up, you know. So I think within reason, and I think if you’re, you know, the further out, you get the sense you have your palm, the binder, scar tissue, and, and, you know, for lifting children in the beginning, I usually say to people, you know, sit down and lift them up onto your knee, you know, things like that. So I try to be creative with how you do things. But I do think we have to be practical in that regard. And the concern about the weight lifting is the connection between the catheter and the pump, and also the risk of, you know, the pump flipping, and the more secure it is over time that the lower the risk of that

Betsy Post 48:39
Um, there’s a question about the drug and mutations. And I know specifically, we do have some BRAF patients here. So question, there’s a question about, is the HAI therapy equally effective for all mutations?

Dr. Connell 48:56
Yeah, so it’s a very good question. I think what I would say to you is, is that we do use the pump and in all patients, I certainly have myself patients who have BRAF mutations, and I’ve used the pump, and I’ve seen some very good results with it. So I wouldn’t discriminate based on that. And but I think it’s something that we’re going to need to study a little bit further to see how we best serve people going forward. But I definitely have patients who’ve done well. And you know, maybe later on I’ve used the combination I mentioned earlier, such as graphics to toxic map, and but if they have liver only disease, we still put pumps and we still get flux your routine and I’ve definitely seen good responses. I have a patient who was probably an outlier but from from early 2019, and still NED

Dr. Connell 49:47
and had, you know, resection, had liver pump to get your resection and as BRAF mutated, you know,

Betsy Post 49:55
right. I think you answered this, but I’ll ask it for those pursuing liver resection, is there a recommended number of fudr treatments from the pump before considering surgery?

Dr. Connell 50:10
And so the honest answer is there isn’t a set number per se, if somebody has unresectable disease. So what we do is we scan every two months because we want to keep a close eye on the response that we’re getting and how the liver is tolerating it, right? So you’re scanned every

Dr. Connell 50:29
which is a little bit different to the adjuvant in the adjuvant setting, you’re scanned every three. But what I usually say to people is that honestly, at two months, it’s it’s not very common that patients are ready for surgery, it’s typically around the four to six month mark, but there isn’t a set number is really depends on the location of tumors, the technicality if somebody has liver, you know, bi lobe disease, so both the right and the left side involves the surgeon will say to me, Look, we need to do these portal vein embolization, you know, certain procedures to help get to a second stage liver surgery. So the some of those factors to come in. But there’s no hard and fast rule with the number of doses that a patient has to have

Betsy Post 51:13
HAI pump decisions require very close coordination between the medical oncologists and surgical oncologist Are there any best practices from that cross specialty communication that you would highlight is beneficial to apply? Even beyond the HEI application?

Dr. Connell 51:31
Yeah, so, you know, what we’ve learned to serve patients best is that multidisciplinary involvement is so so important. Right? And, and I kind of, you know, said that earlier on, like, any major decision point you need to think about, you know, how am I helping the patient right now? And also, how is this going to affect what I want to do in the future for the patient? Right. So in my own practice, here, I do my clinics alongside the surgeons at for that reason. And you know, when I asked some of these questions, we also have very heavy input from our interventional radiologists. And I think that’s very important is to try to get the different options there. And sometimes there is there’s two options, right maybe let’s say for the liver, it could be resection or it could be ablation, and then we can see both and help make the decisions by getting the input from from both specialties for example.

Betsy Post 52:32
Are there restrictions on jogging and working out?

Dr. Connell 52:37
Okay, so what I would say about that is if you put 20 of us in a room, a mix of surgeons and medical oncologists, everybody would say something different and it’s very controversial. And I allow my patients to light jog and the the concern again is really the connection of the catheter to the pump. And again, what I say to people is exactly what I said weightlifting you know, if someone comes in to me and you know jogging is your is your your cam time, you know, your therapy so to speak. You know, it’s very hard to say to somebody, you know, don’t jog and but I say you know, try to be sensible about it, have a binder on Wait a while and I do allow patients to do like jogging. The surgeons do lap people jog and there’s other medical oncologists who say no, and we love stationary bike. We love the peloton. That’s, that’s probably the safest thing that you can do and the best thing and a good form of workout. But yes, I do say to patients, they can jog.

Betsy Post 53:41
So if there is a patient that has, for example, ovarian or peritoneal disease, but the patient was potentially able to have all of that removed. Could they still get pumped?

Dr. Connell 53:56
Um, so for over a yes. So if you have liver and ovary because we know that colorectal metastases to the ovary, are quite resistant to chemotherapy, so in general, the bias is to lean towards surgery in that situation anyway. So you would often do if you can do a liver and you would also remove the ovaries at the same time. So yes, with peritoneal disease, there’s a little bit of pause. I’ll be honest with you. The tricky thing about peritoneal disease is that you often can’t fully appreciate peritoneal disease on scans. And and it’s only at the time of surgery that you really have an understanding. And I’ve had some patients where perhaps there’s been like limited peritoneal disease, you know, a year ago it was removed and maybe they come looking for a pump. And and usually if there’s, you know, a period of time, typically a year, year and a half, not thing happening in the parish name again, then, you know in select cases we’ve put pumps in. And but I wouldn’t say to you upfront that I’ve put a pump in for a patient when they have active peritoneal disease at the same time.

Betsy Post 55:14
For every two to three months scans, do you do CT MRI, and I’m gonna throw in there you PET scan stew? Might as well add it in.

Dr. Connell 55:24
Yeah, and, okay. Um, so in that regard, what I would say to you is I started off using CT and patients. So I do routinely, CT chest, abdomen and pelvis. Over time. From looking at the CT scan, you understand with the individual patient, whether you’re seeing things clearly in the liver or not, if not, particularly in patients who maybe have, you know, a lot of chemotherapy prior to the pump being placed, because the chemotherapy changes the texture of the liver, what we call like fatty liver change, or sclerosis. So in those patients in MRI may give additional information. So the honest answer is, my starting off rule is CT only, I’ll involve an M or liver if I feel like I’m not seeing things clearly with a CT. And I really don’t routinely use a PET scan, unless I get to a point in a patient where a specific question has come up on a on a CT, for example, I do a patch, and I see that the patch is giving more information than the CT has. Similarly, if I do a patch on a patient, and I see that I’m not getting anything different from it, then I don’t routinely follow with Pat. And I think that would be the standard approach. For most patients. The tricky thing with PET scans is there can often be you know, false positive things on a PET scans and something lights up. And it’s it’s not anything related to the cancer and then it causes, you know, a lot of concern, understandably. Yeah, so that’s how I would view it. But I do have some patients where I know that only MRI shows that are only pet shows that and then once I learned that with the patient, then I continue to use that imaging modality. But I still always do my CT as well.

Betsy Post 57:12
We have one more question about I think exercise I see here. What about horseback riding? I’m a serious equestrian.

Dr. Connell 57:21
Yeah, so this came up for me recently. The issue with with horse riding is the bouncing activity. Right and the concern for the catheter? Again, I don’t think it’s a complete contraindication I think, and I know I’m repeating myself a lot but wearing the binder, a similar lead to what I’m seeing with light jogging. I mean, you can I don’t even know the word for isn’t trotting. for horse riding, you know, you have to be mindful of that. And but I wouldn’t, you know, I wouldn’t say you can’t do it again, if that’s something that a patient is passionate about, and it’s their form of relief, or escape from what’s going on, then I think that’s important to consider. So have a binder be mindful. That’s what I would say.

Betsy Post 58:07
We just have two or three more. So how would you know if there’s a problem with the connection from the pump? Perhaps from over lifting, etc?

Dr. Connell 58:19
Yeah, the honest answer with that is that most patients don’t know. And it’s picked up on scans. That’s the most common scenario. And that’s really where we see it. If somebody has, you knows, for example, they’ve had a trauma, you know, so So I had a patient a few years ago, and they were in there on a regular bicycle, and they flipped over the handlebars, and they were like, This doesn’t feel right, you know, so I scanned and you know, there you knew there was some incident proceeding, and you would check for it or they had pain afterwards. But the honest answer is in the majority of patients picked up on scans and you don’t feel any difference.

Betsy Post 59:03
Let’s see, I know I’m gonna mess this this word up.

Dr. Connell 59:08
So what are the thoughts around using the capecitabine with the pump while receiving radiation to treat the primary replacing traditional systemic treatment? Okay, yeah, so this comes up quite a bit. So when patients have a rectal tumor and you know, you can treat them with chemo radiation. So we do, you know, and you know, that’s in terms of a rectal tumor, the surgery is much more life altering. So if you can effectively get a complete clinical response or fully treat the rectal tumor than chemo radiation is recommended. What do I do in my patients? So the issue with Capacetibine Xeloda is that it causes more increase in liver enzymes, and it can affect the dosing of the fudr. So what I do for patients is if

Dr. Connell 1:00:00

We have a rectal primary and we’re doing chemo radiation. And we’ve just put a pump in for liver disease, you can give the fudr you can give the liver treatment during the chemo radiation. But instead of using the Xeloda and or capecitabine of being I use fluorouracil which is sort of the old way that they that they used to do chemo radiation. And because again, I want to try to maintain the higher doses in the pump and keeps it being tends to interfere with that more. So.

Betsy Post 1:00:36
I think I got to almost every question, one of my questions that I have, if I can just sneak one in I know it’s 802. But with all the centers opening up, I feel like we’re seeing some oncologists are using the Urso dial and some are not. And I don’t know if you feel comfortable speaking to that, and how you use it in your practice and how the decisions made to use that or not?

Dr. Connell 1:00:59
Yeah, it’s a very good question. I mean, I think what I would say to you as well is there’s even differences in the practice here at Memorial as well. I, I use it quite early on in patients, because I think, you know, the two ways we manage the liver inflammation are the steroids through the pump at the time of the flush as well as versatile. And, and in the long term for patients being on steroids continuously. You know, there’s this kind of late side effects with that there’s the weight gain that comes from steroids, there’s a few patients where versatile can be a little bit tricky. So sometimes patients can notice the very loose stool. So if I have a patient who’s struggling with, you know, diarrhea issues or anything like that, from arena Tekin, or even five floor yourself, I kind of hold off on the earth a dial, but I tell them why I’m not doing it, you know, but I do tend to use it early on. And I also tend to keep it on board longer, even after I’ve weaned down the steroids in the pump, and I have someone off treatment, because I think it helps with the liver inflammation, I typically start off on twice a day in some patients, you may have to go up to three times a day. But again, if you even select 10 oncologists here at Memorial, everyone would do something a little bit different. But I give the options to patients. And I also explain, as I said, when I don’t use it and what my concerns are for that particular person.

Betsy Post 1:02:31
Well, it’s 8:04. And I think we have gotten to most of the questions. There is one here that I’m not sure we may have to get back to because it’s you know, the top centers for ATI. And with so many new centers that have opened up since 2019. I think by volume, we’d have to kind of look into that to see who they are. I know Duke is one of them. I know they’re very, they’re a high volume center now. But with the opening of the consortium, I know we have a lot more centers throughout the US. So I can take that offline. And definitely I can talk to the folks at inteiro on that as well. Just about the volume at the other centers. But yeah, so I just wanted to say again, thank you so much for your time, I learned a lot. And it was so good to hear just from a medical oncologist. So in addition to Dr. Kemeny and hear how you’re using it, your practice, and I learned a lot of just about the trial and other things. And your take on that. And I really appreciate it. I know you were so generous with your time and answering all of these questions for the patients. And we really all appreciate it. So thank you so much. And I know we’ll be in touch if we have additional questions. So thanks for everybody that attended tonight and thanks for all your participation. We really appreciate it. So have a great evening. Thanks again. And we’ll see you soon.

Dr. Connell 1:03:46
Thank you everybody. Bye

DocTalk
2024
Dr. Connell
Liver
Stage IV
HAI

In DocTalk, Dr. Louise Connell from Memorial Sloan Kettering discusses HAI for metastatic CRC with Betsy Post. Recorded in January, 2024.

More Videos

Liver transplants — Examining the evidence
Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro
2024
Surgical options for peri-mets
Dr. Turaga
2024
ERASur trial: Local treatment options for limited stage IV CRC
Dr. Hitchcock
2023
Advanced surgical treatments for CRC liver mets
Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro
2021
Transplant patients are in the house!
2021
Hepatic Artery Infusion (HAI) chemotherapy for CRC liver mets
Hepatic Artery Infusion (HAI) chemotherapy for CRC liver mets
Dr. Gholami
2021
Modern-day management of liver metastases
Dr. Soares
2022
Why liver transplant for mCRC is taking off
Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro
2022
Categories
DocTalks Hide from search

State of the art liver surgery with robotic technology

State of the art liver surgery with robotic technology

DocTalk
2024
Dr. Sucandy
Liver
Stage IV

In this DocTalk, Dr. Sucandy from Advent Health in Tampa, Florida discusses state-of-the-art liver surgery with robotic technology with host Betsy Post. Recorded in April 2024.

This transcript is automatically generated.

Betsy Post 0:04
So welcome everyone to this evening’s Doc Talk. We are so excited to have with us, Dr. Sucandy. He’s going to talk to us about state of the art liver surgery with robotic technology. And we’re very, very fortunate to have him. I know that we have, I think, at least a couple of patients or people that have consulted with him in the past. And of course, this is being recorded so we can share it in COLONTOWN University and help many patients in the years to come as well. So just to tell everyone how this is going to work, if you’ve not been on one of the doc talks before, just remember that you’ve all been muted, and we’re going to let Dr. Sucandy do his presentation and talk and educate us. And if you have questions as the presentation goes along, please put those in the chat. So in the chat feature is where you will put your questions. At the end of the presentation, we will go over the questions that are in the chat. So again, I’m going to turn it over to you. Dr sukhandi, thank you so much for being here with us and for doing this presentation. I know this is going to help so many of our patients now and in the future. So I give it to you.

Dr. Sucandy 1:14
Thank you. Thank you. So thank you for the honor and privilege to be part of this program, and I feel when, when I heard about COLONTOWN, I said, Wow, the name is kind of interesting. It’s a COLONTOWN. But you know, immediately I realized that there are a lot of patients who have colon cancer with liver metastasis, and they are kind of sometimes in a difficult situation where the liver tumor are many and they are significant. And you know it is, it is a complex disease to take care of. I am privileged to talk about evolution of surgical treatment for Stage IV colon cancer with liver metastasis. And specifically, I want to raise the issue about robotic liver surgery, which I feel like it is important to know, because many people actually don’t know this. I am the Chief of HPG Surgery at AdventHealth in Tampa. I’ve been in practice for almost 10 years. I trained in Pittsburgh and many places, and we do this on a routine basis. I do liver surgery actually every day, and since 2016 we have performed 1000 liver surgeries, and approximately 600 of them are actually minimally invasive. So you can see how we try to really improve and bring the best surgical option for patients with colon cancer, with the liver metastasis.

Dr. Sucandy 2:51
So the outline is my talk will be five items. One is mechanism and how the colorectal rheumatist is occur. The second is how the treatment changes since 1960 to today, the rise of minimal invasive surgery. What are the trials that compare minimal invasive versus traditional open resection for liver? And where are we going in the future, and what is the new technology there? This is just opening slides. Colon cancer is the third most common cancer United States. 50% of colon cancer result in liver metastases, either synchronous, meaning that they are diagnosed within the same six months of the primary cancer, or metachronous, where they are diagnosed at a different time beyond six months of primary diagnosis. The fortunate thing is, liver is the only site of metastasis in about 40% of patients. It means a 40% of patient they only have liver disease. Now the standard of treatment is to try to remove all the liver tumor with the goal of achieving our zero margins. Now when the patient come to the office, they ask me, doctor, should I get this done or not? The answer is, in this red box, unresectable. Patient has poor outcomes, with five year survival. OS is over survival of zero to 10% resectable patient, however, have significantly better outcome with five years of overall survival of 60% so if the patient come with 12345, liver tumors, and they ask doctor, should I have liver surgery? The answer is, in five years, do you want to live or you don’t want to live? Because if you have this liver clean up in five years, 60% patient will still Arrive alive if you don’t. The statistic says only zero to 10% this kind of big difference. This is why it become a standard of care in United States. So let me. Mechanism of colorectal metastasis. Many papers discuss about this, but basically this is the bottom line. The bottom line is the cell from the colon cancer or rectal cancer, they shed into the small or large bowel venous system, so those tumor cells get carried to the Liver. Liver act like a filter for the cells. So those tumors, they got stuck in the filter, and they grow in the filter. So in some patients, those tumor they stay in the liver for a long time. They don’t grow. But in some patient, immediately they hit liver, they start proliferating, or start making so many tumors, but that’s how the tumor from the colon and rectum get to the liver. Now there have been many papers that discuss about the natural history of hepatic metastasis. Natural History means there’s a patient who come with the coronal metastasis and they watch them, how they do if no treatment is given. So if you can see the diagram on the left hand side in the x axis, is years. It means, at the beginning, everybody alive, 100% but in five years, you can see here barely anyone survived without treatment. Now in 19 8340 years ago, the three year survival for solitary it means single liver metastasis, is 21% if they have multiple metastasis in one side of the liver, the survival dropped down to 6% so the number of tumor does have implication from prognosis standpoint, you know, in terms of the survival in the three to five years. Now, this is a slide that I want us to all look at. The dotted line on top is the patient who have resection with clean margin and then no evidence of disease. The bottom line, the red arrow, is the patient who have no resection for whatever reason. So you can see here at five years, I hope you can see the pointer five years the survival is essentially like 1% while here the survival is about 35 to 40% this is in 1983 many things have changed since 1983 and the Survival has increased significantly. This is another paper from Rene Adam from Paris showing a comparison between resected patient versus non resected patient. This is at 10 years. This is beyond five years. Is 10 years, and you can see here patients who are resected aggressively and leave with no tumor in five years, a quarter of patients are actually cured. I know it’s hard to believe, but 25% of patients are actually cured, five in 10 years. So the take home message is, resectable, patients should undergo live resection due to the increased survival the comparison of surgery versus others, a lot of oncologist has difficulty understanding this, especially when I came to Tampa, I found out a lot of oncologists actually don’t know what the surgical treatment should be, and they keep the patient with chemotherapy forever. I’ve offered a patient who have chemotherapy for seven years to appoint the patient’s like, oh, adapter. I’ve, I’ve tried all chemotherapy, and they have circled me with like, three times because they’re running out of chemotherapy. You can imagine, seven years. So surgery plus chemotherapy. Give you the first line on top. They have the best survival you see chemotherapy alone. This is a second line, much inferior survival. The third line is do nothing. It’s called Basic supportive treatment. Barely the patient live a year plus with chemotherapy, only two and a half years with surgery, they live much longer with the five year survival now reaching 70% now I want to talk about how the treatment has evolved. In the last 40 years, the treatment has changed dramatically. Why the surgical treatment for liver and extra hepatic disease, meaning that the tumor outside the liver is now more aggressive. The systemic chemotherapy has improved as well. It’s getting better. Now we have immunotherapy. All the stage four patient get genetic testing, by definition, is automatic in our program, they all get the. Analysis and PDL, one inhibitor testing the outcome of surgical liver recession also improved. How it’s improved in a 1970 to 1980 to split the liver in half and remove half of the liver, it leads to about 20% mortality. It means five patient one died from this today, the mortality of well done operation to split the liver is less than 1% so you can see here the technology has improved, the understanding of the liver surgery has improved. Equipment has improved. The liver surgery now is more casual. It’s no longer something that is scary, something that is like the end of the world. No, this is a big surgery, yes, but it is done widely. It can be done safely with very little mortality. Now, a little history about this in 1976 the surgical treatment started with a minor liver section. At that time, the surgeon were a bit unsure of how to do big liver surgery. So what they do is they do a little bit of surgery just kind of, you know, taking 5% of the liver and call it, and those tumors were on the edges of the liver, not in the central part of the liver. Technically, it is much easier to remove patient tumors that is smaller. It is much easier to remove the tumor that is on the edge of the liver. Now they study the patient as well solitary lesion patient with the single tumor in the liver, some patient actually live more than 10 years. You see here, eight patients live more than 10 years out of 60. Patient now, patient with a multiple lesion, a lot of lesions, they all died before five years. So at that time, the conclusion was, you can operate on the patient as long as it’s minor and it’s as long as a single lesion. But remember, this is 1976 when the chemo was not good, surgery was not good. Now fast forward. Fast Forward in 1980 so this is six years later. Another paper on analysis surgery that says, Well, you can actually do major liver section, and at least 20 to 30% of patient will gain benefit, survival benefit, from this. You can see the picture here. The tumor is big on the right side. In order to remove this, you have to split the liver and remove the right side. And even with this operation, at least 20 to 30% of patients were able to gain survival benefit. And remember, this is 1980 This is when I was one year old. Fast forward, 2000 in 2000 people started to offer patient with multiple bilobal hepatic metastasis. They have tumor here, here, here, here, both sides of the liver. When I came to Tampa first time, 2016 a lot of oncologist said, Well, if the tumor is both sides, it’s game over. The answer is not. This is actually understanding from 19, 1980 so even in 2000 resection of bio both sides of the liver, brain results similar to a survival for a simple metastasis, single metastasis, at that time, the survival five years is 37% so you can see on the previous slide it was 25 it’s slowly rising up to 37 now, at that time, extended resection was avoided, and also concomitant resection of the colon orectal primary was also avoided, because the technology was not very good, and it brought a higher mortality rate. So at that time, it was avoided. Now it’s no longer avoided. It’s actually recommended, as long as I said. So the bottom line at that time was resection of multiple tumor both sides resulted in true survival. Fast forward, five years later, 2005 What if the patient have liver metastasis resected today? How about in three years, if the patient have another tumor? What should What should we do about it? Should we let the patient go? Should we do nothing, put them on chemotherapy forever, radiate them. What do we do? So the answer is, the patient needs a repeat liver section, as long as the patient is able to undergo live resection. Why? Because it further improves survival with lower and lower operative risk, even with three to. Section, it is harder to do. It is higher potential complication a little bit. But in the right hand, it can be done safely with low, low operative risk, and this will bring lots of survival for the patient. This has been published extensively. Now, how about if the patient have liver metastasis and then lung metastasis, this is something that also is an issue in the medical oncology literature. You know they they will say, well, liver metastas is bad enough. How about the lung metastasis? But also, this is an old school look at this paper here, the patient with Synchro metastasis of lung and liver when they get resected, the sort of Apple is much better than the patient are not resected. You see the two curve here, curves here, so the upper RAS section, Lars and non resection. This is for synchronous metastasis. It means the diagnosed together. If they are not diagnosed together. It means they come, you know, a year later, for example, that lesion in the lung should be resected. Also, why? Because look at this curve, also, different patients got resected. They live a lot longer, improve survival. Another paper from America that basically also have the same conclusion, surgical resection of both liver, hepatic or and Pulmonary metastasis is associated with prolonged survival in selected patients. Obviously, you cannot offer them to everyone, but there are a lot of patients who can benefit from this. The most common location of colorectal metastasis is the liver. The second most common location is long. So those are number one and number two, and you can see here overall survival after the section of the other metastasis, even in 10 years, 10 years a long time, about 19% of patients still alive, and there is no way to achieve this without reception. No way. Now we can see the evolution of treatment. The surgeon become more aggressive. The patient can live longer. Chemo is getting better. Everything work for the patient. So now what? Now the question is, where is the limit? Is there any limit? Yes, there’s a limit. So what is the limit? One is the general health and performance status of the patient. The patient has to be acceptable risk for surgery. How is the liver working? And if had the liver disease, any cirrhosis, how much chemo the patient has gotten? As we know, the chemo also give a negative impact for the liver function. So sometimes the patient got so much chemo to a point where the liver is so damaged, it is difficult to offer the patient a micro surgery because the quality of the liver is poor. We also need to know, did the patient have a liver section in the past, because that can affect the planning for the future. Did the patient get y 90? Did they get particularly pumped? Did they get ca mobilization? They all have to be known take into consideration, because overall this kind of treatment affect the liver function to some extent. Now the question is, how much liver to live with the patient to avoid not having enough liver. It’s called post operative liver insufficiency, or also called liver failure. How much is live is enough to leave behind? Now in our program and also in all the centers that perform serious liver surgery, this needs to be studied before surgery, the surgeon cannot just, oh, I just eyeball it, and I know, no, it’s not. It’s not, it’s actually not true. You actually have to spend some times to study the liver to see if I do this, I remove how much percent of the liver and how many percent I leave behind. So it is from the CAT scan and MRI. It is entered into a software they can actually reconstruct the liver in a 3d fashion, and this can give us a measurement, milliliter by milliliter of each segment of the liver to know how much to take out and how much to leave behind. This, also called functional test, is a test to see how much the overall liver function is. The patient who drink a lot cirrhosis, for example, patient who have a lot of chemotherapy, they may have a big liver, but it may not have the same function as the small liver, but healthy. So you can, if you can imagine, like a big, obese patient, right? They are 200 pounds, but they are not necessarily stronger when we compare the patient who is 70 pounds or not 71 like 100 pounds, but it’s all. Muscle, you see. So there’s a difference between liver to liver, and this is something that oftentime we study in order to get true measurement of the liver function before we put them through a major different surgeon. So this is something that we do, for example, I want to show you. This is a routine procedure in our center, actually. So you can see here we reconstructed the liver. And you can see, let’s, let’s use this, for example. So the red, the red structure, is the tumor is deep inside the liver. And we say, okay, if I’m going to split the liver, I’m going to remove this much, and I’m going to keep this much all, all the, all the lines on the left, left hand side. Here it give us. It give me how much, how big is the liver on this side? How big is liver on this side? So I know if I cut here, I remove, for example, 40% and I leave 60% and similar to others. Other diagram here, you can see different type of resections. The software also help us with the tumor localization. The green is the Balder, because we need to, we need to plan this better. In order for the liver to be successful, to be safe, they’re able to grow back. You have to keep the pipe in, pipe out in the balden. It is very common for the patient to ask me, oh, Doctor, the liver grow back? The answer is yes, but there is, there are factors that you need to meet in order the patient liver to grow back. The liver has to have enough fuel in exhaust pipe, out and about, even if the liver is big, but it is missing one of the component, the growing back is not going to happen. And in fact, the liver can quit and and kill the patient. So, yes, it can regenerate, but it has to be done well. So is extended. He protected me, meaning that can a big resection, justified for liver cancer. This is a very important slides in the patient with normal liver, normal liver, it is safe to leave only 20% of the liver.

Dr. Sucandy 22:15
So we can remove 80% patients who have chemotherapy. You have to leave 30%. You can only take out up to 70%. A patient with liver cirrhosis, you have to leave at least 40% it means you can see here, as the liver gets sicker, the less part of the liver can be removed, because otherwise the patient can get into liver failure. And liver failure is a big reason for mortality, death after surgery. So if the patient come with liver remnant that is too small, should we say to the patient, I’m sorry, you have no option, or it is something that we can try to improve dances. There are few things that we can do to improve the small remnant liver to a big one. How to do it? One, this is a very common way. It’s called portal vein embolization, meaning that we block of the blood supply to one side of the liver, and this will induce a growth of the other side of the liver. Uh, number two is we combine the portal embolization with hepatic vein embolization. It means we close the blood inflow to one side and also the outflow on that side, so it is more aggressive closure of the blood vessel on the on the resected side, on the part that is going to be resected in order to induce more hypertrophy of the remnant liver. The other way to do it is to do two-stage. It means, if the patient have 10 tumors, five on the left, five on the right, to do 10 altogether, sometimes it’s too major. So what you do? Do five first, one side, have the patient recover. Two months later, go and do the other side and clean everything. And then the last way of doing this is called ALPS procedure. It is something that not very common in the US. However, in our center, we obviously offer this even robotic ALPS procedure. We have done many of this just because we have a lot of patients with difficult tumors and small liver remnant, and they have been seen by many surgeons in the past. So it is something that can be an option. It has to be done carefully. The calculation has to be done carefully, and the surgeon have to be experienced with major different surgery like this. So this is just the example. The picture of this you can see here, if the patient have a four. Tumor, for example, if we close this portal vein here, the blood will be shorted to the other side. This will make the other side larger. And we wait for about six weeks or so, and we go back and we’re going to take up this now the remnant liver is now huge, and it works well without procedure, and we have the benefit of doing split of the liver with closure of the blood vessel at the first operation. And also, if the patient have a tumor on the other side, this can be wedged out at the first operation, the second operation, the surgeon come and remove this bar altogether. And both of this actually can be done minimally invasively in our program, done robotically, both stage first both the first stage and the second stage of ours can be done robotically. The initial description of us was open for both stages. This is just a picture of how much liver growth that needs to be done, needs to be achieved to avoid liver failure, we are trying to get the liver growth at least 2% per week. So if the liver is growing more than 2% a week, at least 2% a week, it is going to be safe to do a major liver section. So this calculation of this, this is what I said about the double embolization called PVE plus hve. So the radiologist actually going with the catheter close the vessels. The tumor is on this side right. So we got to take out the right side, so the blood vessel to the right side is being close here, occluded, occluded here, and also the outflow is also being occluded. This will induce a lot more hypertrophy versus just inflow being occluded. And this is two diagram that I said before. When you occlude both vessels, the growth is much faster versus one vessel only. This is some modification of Alps in our we started our Alps program maybe about six years ago, and we have modified how we do it over the years, we tried to do it minimal, invasive both stages, and also we tried to be less invasive on the first stage, which make the second stage easier and down the down the line. So there’s a bit nuance of how to do this, and I don’t want to go into detail here, but the center has to be able to explain to you what’s what’s expected at the first stage and also expected at the second stage. So now shifting toward minimally invasive surgery. You can see here minimization surgery started with the general surgery, and then going to pancreatic surgery, and finally, go to the robotic liver surgery as the most modern, minimal invasive, live reception. This is the two pictures comparing open operation versus robotic. This is open operation. The abdomen is opened widely. The rest is used while minimal invasive, you can see this the troca, usually five or six trocar. This is a green port. This will deliver is pulled out. The patient always asks the doctor, how can you pull the liver through a small incision? And actually there’s a way to do it, because the specimen is placed in the bag, and we actually pull the bag with the liver in it, through the small incision. When the patient’s anesthetize, the abdominal wall is so relaxed we we sometimes extended the incision a little bit, but with relaxation, we are able to remove big specimen, even the right lobe through the small incisions there. The question is, why minimal in phase of surgery? Is it better or it is easier? The answer is, minimal invasive surgery is better for the patient, harder for the surgeon, actually. Now the question is, why the surgery wants to do it, because it’s harder for them. Yeah, because we do it, because we like it when it’s better for the patient. That’s why we we do it. Many publication have compared minimal invasive versus open liver section. The minimal invasive leads to less blood loss because you’re losing less blood, there’s less blood transfusion. The patient can drink on the same day, less pain medication requirements, shorter length of stay in the hospital, lower wound complication, infections, incision, open up, hernia. Yada yada, cosmis is better, and it bring a comparable, or potentially better, oncological outcomes. Now we used to be debating about this topic, whether minimal invasive lead to inferior outcome. You can see these two lines here. So the outcome of minimal in facing process open in five years are similar. So at least minimally physical surgery does not compromise the outcome of oncological treatment of this colon cancer, between cancer. So we now quit debating this, because every surgery knows the minimal invasive surgery does not lead to inferior oncological outcomes. We are not missing tumors with with minimal invasive why? Because the camera give you 20% magnification, so it’s actually easier to see the tumor on the camera versus naked eyes. There’s so many papers have been published about this, and the criticism was, well, those paper are not randomized. It is just a publication from one center and the other centers. We need a randomized trial where the patient is blinded, the surgeon is blinded. It means the patient, when they go to surgery, they don’t know whether they’re going to get minimum vegetable open. And the first randomized trial was actually started in 2015 in Oslo, comparing open versus laparoscopic for COVID analysis. The outcome was published three years later into 2018 on end of surgery. These two guys are my friends. So the outcome is the minimal invasive surgery, liver surgery leads to lower 30-day complication rate, shorter hospital stay and less premedication requirements, similar or time similar blood loss. And they also follow the survival at 60 months, 60 months, meaning over five years, look at the survival are equal, the same as recurrence free survival is actually be better laparoscopically. But the bottom line is, oncological outcome is not inferior with minimal face of surgery. Now, as soon as the first trial is done, the second trial came. This is two, 2019 This is a year later, after first trial, this is from Spain, that also compare open versus minimize surgery. And the outcome is well, almost similar. The minimizing surgery bring lower morbidity, shorter hops will stay with similar or time, blood loss, trans fusion, rate, mortality and similar, three, five and seven year disease free and overall survival. So you can see here if, if a patient able to get minimal assisted surgery, that is what they should get, unless it cannot be done, minimally invasively. Minimally invasive. It needs to be done open, then they need to be done open, shifting gears to what is press what is the future of liver surgery? Technology is getting better. We have more modern robotic surgical system. You can see here. This is how the equipment for liver surgery now, the robotic liver surgery is now expanding for a Baltic cancer surgery, benign biliary surgery, if the surgeon needs to put together the blood vessel used to be the surgeon is very scared doing this so the patient that has tumor close to the blood vessel, they do it open, because the technical skill is not there. So today, however, in our program, at least, we started to do vascular surgery robotically. We don’t have to open the patient for a portal, very constructions, or hepatic vein sections. And it is something that we continue to push the envelope for to make this operation as safe as possible and more more minimal invasive, which enable the patient to go back on the systemic chemo quicker. Now the 3-D is coming, the artificial intelligence is coming, more modern technology for liver surgery. So this is just a few paper we published in cooperation with the European centers for a billion surgery. We have also a. Have actually developed this, what we call Tampa, because we live in Tampa, Tampa Difficulty Score, a scoring system for difficulty of robotic liver surgery. We have a training center for robotic liver surgery for us and the world. So a lot of surgeons come to the Center in Tampa to learn how to deliver surgery from me, and we designed this scoring system to see how difficult the liver surgery will be, so that the surgeon can get prepared. Am I ready to undertake the surgery? Or I have? I have to have my partner or my senior surgeon to help me doing this in order to arrive in the best outcome and safe outcome. So then we develop this. We can, you can actually check this on the website, and you can come with with a score, the higher the score, the harder the liver surgery will be. The lower the score, the easier. So this is a website that is alive. You can, you can play with that. Actually, it is useful for surgeons. We published this on the general gi surgery two months, two months ago, so you can see here, this is how the blood vessel being cut and put together robotically. We used to have to open the patient for this. We can do this with robotic surgery. The conclusion is, liver surgery for metastasis is safe. It can be done aggressively, and it should be done aggressively however. You need to find a an experienced surgeon for this, because not all the liver surgery are straightforward. Some of them needs a two stage. Some of them needs vascular reconstruction. Some of them meet bad reconstruction. Those are not easy. Those are much harder than doing a weight resection. And if possible, always ask for a minimum physically for surgery, unless technically not feasible. Now, they are, they are cases that needs to be done. Open, for example, in our center, if the patient have more than eight tumors throughout the liver, we give a consideration to do it. Open, can we done minimal invasively? The answer is yes, we can, but it is not practical, because the operation can take six seven hours to do, versus open it may take three hours to do so that we also take into consideration the time on the operating table, so we try to determine the difficulty of all the aspect not not just the cutting of the Liver, but the timing of the operation, how much time on the operating table, how old the patient and how complex the operation will be, the best long term outcome come from multimodality treatment, where the surgeon was work together with the radiologist, IR, medical oncologist, radiation oncologist and other people. Now I want to show you a video clip, so then you guys know how the liver surgeon robotic looks like. So the video on the left is resection of the liver tumor after a local recurrence from ablation. We know that ablation has about 6% of recurrence in this patient. He’s only 52 years old. He had colon cancers on the back of the liver get ablated somewhere else, and he came to to our center with single tumor occurance. And you can see here the cancers on the upper side, the ablation on the lower side. And we decided that this needs to be cut out the the the interesting part is the tumor actually grew to the diaphragm, so we have to cut out the diaphragm as well. So this is the tumor we’re going to cut it this way. The picture on the right side. Let me pause on the right side. So otherwise too confusing. So this is how the surgery is done with the robotic you can see the scissors. You can see the the grasper. You can put a stitch on it. We can pull on it. We can dissect the blood vessels that bring blood to the liver. It is almost like open surgery, except it is done with small incisions. This patient have five ports, and each of the port is about eight millimeter in size, eight millimeters, less than a centimeter. And you can see we can we can tie the blood vessel to the liver to be resected. And we can really clean up and see the festival, the structure that we need to see. This maneuver takes some experience, some training to do it. We can call. Encourage the surgeons to learn how to do this in order to gain the benefit for the patient, it is important to apply (-inaudible-) , ICG, it is technology where we inject into the bloodstream to see the perfusion of the liver, and also to help us to see where is the cutting line for this case, you can see here we have a scissors that can deliver energy. And you see here on the diaphragm, there is something that is stuck, that is the cancer that is stuck to the diaphragm. A brick vessel being skeletonized is a stamping device that actually can seal both side and cut in the middle. It is a question that I hear from the patient a lot, Doctor, how do you cut the liver, not bleeding? Not bleed? The answer is, we have a technology that will help us do that. We can cut in the middle, and the device will see both sides, so both sides will not bleed. This is an ultrasound. We can see the liver tumor deep in the liver. On the ultrasound, you can see how now we are cutting, the liver is bloodless, and we will see the crossing branches, and those branches is clipped. You can see the white stuff there. It’s the clip. We place it, we cut in the middle. They don’t bleed. And sometimes the clip is not perfect. It bleeds a little bit. We can just put a switch on it and tie it many times we tie first and then cut second. I’m going to start a second video now the second video is actually alt procedure, except it is more than ALPS. Why? Because the patient have a single metastasis in the left adrenal gland. So Betsy asked me to talk about, what if the patient have tumor outside the liver? Obviously, the patient need to be selected. But both both videos shows you the tumor outside the liver. One is in a diaphragm. One is in the right adrenal so the video on the right lower quadrant, right side, I am taking down the blood supply to the adrenal gland that got canceled it. So you can see here the the clip is done cuts, and in about 10 seconds, the adrenal will come out. You see the adrenal gland got canceled in them, it’s removed. The left video now is going through the deep liver. We are splitting the liver inside the liver. Is this how this look like? It’s a little bit of oozing here and there. This is not a big deal. On the right side, I’m trying to find the portal vein in the artery because I need to like it. This as a first stage of alt procedure. The goblet is taken out the first stage, obviously. And you can see here we set this operation to be successful or easier for the second stage. The video on the left side, move towards the end of the operation. You can see here we can cut the liver with very little bleeding, as long as it’s done well. Now the specimen now is being removed. The last staple was done. Now the clamp is released. Now the tumor is stuck to the diaphragm. We can see the yellow stuff. This is the prior ablation cavity. So I clean up that, I suction out the yellow stuff as I try to remove the specimen, I knew that the the diaphragm needs to be reset it now we have resented the diaphragm. You see the lung at the background, and now we’re closing the diaphragm. So this is relatively difficult for surgery. It can be done well. It took about six hours to do. It is done minimally invasively, depending on five days. Now, the video of the right side now we’re going to the second stage of alt procedure. We actually combine the second stage with the reversal of the ileostomy. The patient have a temporary ileostomy. Now, the volume of the liver increased from 25 to 35% so you can see here on the second stage, we go back, and this is a different instrument for Synchro seal robotically as well. We cut the liver, the liver to be removed on the right side, on the on the left screen. So. You see the vessels being ligated, clip divided, safe, no bleeding. The vena cava is at the back there with the robotic instrument you see here, we are creating a tunnel to split the liver. So in this patient, essentially, I remove tumor from both sides of the liver, tumor on the diet, on the adrenal gland, and tumor in the rectum, and those who are done during this alt procedure, combining first and second stage. So this is a tumor outside the liver as well, because the adrenal gland, they’re outside the liver. This patient is only 40 years old. He’s doing well. This case was probably done about maybe a year, a year ago or so. Patients doing well, no recurrence, enjoying life, two kids, and we are very happy to see him. This is the website of mine that you can see if you like to read few things, and thank you.

Betsy Post 46:06
Thank you so much. That was amazing. And we definitely have some questions in the chat. Also, if you have time, you should look in the chat, because you have people thanking you for what you’ve done for them and for being here, which is great to see. The first question I see for you is, how long after liver resection? Do you usually recommend to wait before a lung resection? This would be a second liver resection for me, much more minor than the first. So the surgeon is expecting an easier recovery, but it is an open resection, right?

Dr. Sucandy 46:39
So, so just just to review the recovery from liver section. So the most common question is, how quick can you put the patient on chemotherapy after liver section? For open liver section, typically wait for two months, for minimal invasive typically one month. So it is easier to go back. Now the recovery is easier for minimal deficit as well. So to go on to long resection, I would say six weeks is enough time to go back to lung resection. I We actually have a lot of patients who needs a lung resection afterwards. So we have thoracic oncology service as well. I don’t do lung resection, but I have surgeon that does the resection, and this is obviously a part of our comprehensive cancer center. The lung infection also actually done robotic so minimal invasive lung resection after minimal invasive liver section, so the recovery from lung section, middle, invasively, also much, much earlier, much easier for the patient. As long as it’s it can be technically done safely.

Betsy Post 47:59
Then, oh, sorry, it was the next question. If you’re, are you ready for that one, or are you going to continue to answer that one?

Dr. Sucandy 48:07
Look at this. There’s my patient here. Can you believe it? I remember.

Betsy Post 48:14
You definitely remember. She’s unforgettable.

Dr. Sucandy 48:20
She gave me, okay, good.

Betsy Post 48:26
I wanted to go to the next question, which is, are the guidelines for tumor size, amount of tumors and tumor location? The same for open surgery and robotic surgery?

Dr. Sucandy 48:39
The answer is the same, the answer the same. There have been a lot of discussion that is basically revolving around, can you take more liver if you do minimize phase CT versus open, because it’s technically less stress for the body, in theory, minimally invasive resection should should be able to remove more liver because less stress. But for now, we are using the same the same cut off of having to preserve 20 or 30% of the liver behind. Now the difference is, though, if you need a stage resection, meaning that you will need more than one resections, it is better to do minimal invasively, because, as we know, every surgery in the abdomen, including the liver, it will leave scar Tissues behind, scar tissues, and it is difficult to go back to do the second time, third time, if the patient were done all open you see, because open surgery will leave a lot more scar than the minimal in festival sections. So we know that the colorectal bone analysis is. Not a one time deal. Many time patient have a recurrence, they need to go back. The surgeon needs to go back. Do do some more work. So at the beginning, giving the minimally invasive resection will preserve the window. We don’t burn the bridge for the future resection. It is, it is LA, it is less problematic to do resection in the future after minimal invasive less problematic means it is easier with a surgeon, but also it is less chance of developing complication. From the patient’s perspective, there are patients that operate actually five times over the last 10 years or so, so we have to redo the operation every two three years or so because the new recurrence even with chemotherapy. So it is quite common to have to redo the operation. Therefore, we believe that minimum active surgery is the way to go for this

Betsy Post 51:01
great this is a question on I’m hoping to have liver transplant. I’m doing chemo preparation. I watched another doc talk with Dr Hernandez, who said every liver he’s removed from a cancer patient for transplant came back positive with microscopic tumors. So recurrence is, you know, going to happen? That thought alone leads me to want transplant. I don’t want multiple surgeries and long term chemo and treating Whack a Mole every time something comes up. Are there other ideas and technologies that don’t use surgery? I know about histotripsy, but my mets are in the right lobe, unfortunately. Also curious, if you do transplants?

Dr. Sucandy 51:48
This is a very loaded question. So liver transplant has become a new… it’s actually not new. When I was in Pittsburgh back in the days, liver transplant for colorectal metastasis has been tried with the poor outcome, actually. So this is not a brand new idea. This is old idea that is brought back with the hope of improving the outcome with with a tighter selection process. The issue is, many times this patient, they have multiple lesion in the liver, and this is what this patient actually concerned about. But you have to remember that most patients, they have a systemic disease. So the idea of replacing the liver, unfortunately, it is not kind of like, you know, one time deal, because the issue with liver transplant is many times the cancer occur in the new liver. Why? Because the bloodstream got cancer. So it is not only the liver got cancer, right, the bloodstream also get cancer. So the downside delivers last month is the recurrence in the new liver is high. So unfortunately it is, it is not easy to say, I’ll, I’ll I’ll be away from recurrence, because even the new liver will return too. There are many other treatment that is available today. Obviously, systemic chemo is one of them, regional chemotherapy with hepatic artery pump to try to keep the recurrence lower. The new case in the block is called histo trip C the issue of digital trip. See, is it is such a new technology, the outcome has not been studied well, I actually know very well histo trip. See, at this time, it is difficult to do histo trip see in the very deep tumor behind the rib, because the energy cannot penetrate rip. So it is still limited. In the future, I hope the technology get better so we can reach the deep, deep tumor. So it is, it is a bit difficult to do on the right low because right lobe is deeper at this point. We still don’t have we still not offering liver transplant in the future, maybe the selection criteria is strict, and actually it is different from center to centers, and even on the same centers, they keep changing the criteria, because everyone wants to select the patient see how they do before transplant in order to really maximize the benefit of it, because, you know, you need to use an organ. For this. Some program use a living donor. Some program use a DCD. DCD is as kind of like donation after cardiac death. So this delivers a bit marginal to use. So sometimes to do that in order to, you know, to be able to get the graft, because otherwise, how are you gonna do? How you’re going to get the BRAF? So I think it is, it is something that we need to use in a very selective manner, only about maybe 1% of patient ended up getting transplant, maybe, maybe less even so we need to maximize all the other treatments before a user transplant. Now sometimes the patient go to a center and the surgical oncologist told them, you know, you are not resectable, but if the patient go to the different surgeon who have a lot more experience, they’re going to say, Yes, you are resectable. So you see the definition of resectable is different from center to centers, and many times the oncologist is the one who tell the patient you are not resectable. It is, it is actually something that needs to be. It is something that needs to be to be done by surgeons. This is my daughter, so it is, it is good to console the surgeon to really know, am I resectable or am I not resectable? Because even if you go to a center that offer liver transplantation for this, they have a protocol for this study protocol, because this is our study protocol. At this point, this is not standard. They will still first evaluate whether you’re acceptable or not, and if you’re acceptable, they’re going to reset you. They’re not going to give you transplant. So that is probably what I can tell for. Now,

Betsy Post 56:58
Great. Another question would be, would checking for cancer outside the liver be a reason to do open versus robotic

Dr. Sucandy 57:08
No, no, a tumor outside the liver, as you can see on the video, the tumor on the adrenal gland, we actually remove it robotically. Those are outside the liver, right? So this the look the organ involvement, which organ actually does not, does not lead to whether open or robotic. The decision to do robotic, mainly depending on the number of tumors, the location of tumor, the size of the tumor, and, more importantly, the technical experience or family familiarity of the team to robotic surgery. I think that’s probably the most important. You know used to be when I started this program, 2016 we only offer about 70% of patient robotic, and 30% patient got open operation because at that time we are learning how to do this, and we got no teacher back then we are inventing this operation pretty much over The years we we perform many hundreds of this so we become more confident, technically improved, to be able to undertake more complex, difficult operation, minimally invasively, even the patient with y 19, which is usually very difficult to do after 190 We are able to minimally invasive patient after prior operation, stomach resection, gas intersection now can be Daniel invasively. So our rate, our rate of robotic reception today, is about 90% so there are still 10% of patients. We still do open so it is, it is not like a center do only one thing you have to do everything. You have to be able to do everything, even open or even memory facing. It is, it is all depend on the patient condition and the tumor condition.

Betsy Post 59:19
Thank you. One question would be, also, is there a limit to how many lesions you can remove robotically? This would be for a recurrence five lesions in the liver and two in the omentum.

Dr. Sucandy 59:33
So this is, this is actually a good question, because this is a moving target. So, you know, back in 1980s the recommendation was only to remove three lesions, only three. So if you got four lesions, you’re unresectable. And this probably holds through maybe about three years only the guidance was changed if you have more lesion five. Five, you can resect more than five, no and it probably stay for maybe another two years and change again. Basically, the bottom line is this, the number of tumors actually do not determine whether the patient can be resected or not, but what determine is how much liver to preserve. If you can preserve the tumor, the liver enough 40% or 30% of the patient to live, you resect them. So it is important to preserve as much liver as possible, because if the, if the patient needs to further resection, you need to have liver to work on, right? I have seen, actually, a colleague of mine who work in Italy, who actually resected 72 tumors at once. So you go figure that in America we are discussing, we are arguing about 1015, tumors, how about 72 so go figure that sometimes they have or mental nodule two or three. The guidelines is now becoming more clear about this or mental lesion, because the patient with limited extra hepatic disease in the omentum, in the small bowel. Medicine theory, they should be resected. This patient will gain survival benefit. When I was in residency, when we see a tumor one.on the ormental we cancel the case, you know, but it is no longer true now, if the patient have limited disease in the omentum, you scoop them out and then do the liver section. Patient go on to systemic chemo and get observed periodically by the oncologist, and this has improved the long term outcome as well.

Betsy Post 1:01:57
Great. Think I just see one or two more. Can you do this procedure if a patient has a non functional HAI pump, so if they already have the pump, and then also this follow up to that is, is the robotic surgery available if there are lung mats?

Dr. Sucandy 1:02:18
The answer is yes to both I mentioned before many, many patients I do a robotic different surgery to clean up the liver, and then after that, four to six weeks later, I send them to my colleague to do a robotic lung surgery. So they get robotic both. Many patients come with the HAI pump as well. I actually, recently, actually offered somebody with the non functioning pump. I end up removing the pump, actually, because it’s no longer working and it’s actually causing problems. So the bowel is tangled around, around the tubing. So I removed the tubing so presence of presence of pump, make the opposite be complicated. But it doesn’t mean that you cannot offer the patient robotic surgery. You can. I think what I want to say is this, I’m happy that there’s a lot of enthusiasm about liberal transplantation. I do enjoy, I do love liver transplantation, but I think at this point we have to be very cautious. We have to look at the data. The data from Norway, CEA one, CEA two, is promising, but the criteria is very tight. As I mentioned before, even the criteria in the United States are evolving. Used to be its offer for everyone, like when I was when I was in Pittsburgh, the early days of Pittsburgh transplant service, they used to offer to a lot of people, and the outcome is bad. Why is that was bad? Because the selection criteria is bad. So a patient with a big tumor with the high CEA, they offer transplant, and sure enough, the the tumor occur in a new liver within three months. So if you see the criteria for this, the CEA has to be less than 80, and the tumor size and yada yada yada. So people are kind of learning what is the best selection process for this? And, you know, it is very selective in offering design. I don’t, I don’t want people to think like, this is just like, you know, you know, kind of like, okay, I can get it anytime, and this going to fix the problem. No, it’s not. It does, because there’s still things afterwards, tumor, cancer, new liver is a new problem as well, you know. So I hope it doesn’t occur, but it does occur in your liver.

Betsy Post 1:04:59
You. Thank you so much. And we have one last question. This is our last question for the evening, and hopefully you don’t mind, are you able to see a CT of the liver well without using contrast?

Dr. Sucandy 1:05:16
The answer is no. So some some lesion, some tumors can be seen without contrast. But if we are talking about trying to see all the tumors in the liver with this disease, having a contrast, enhanced CT scan is very helpful, because the tumor can be easily highlighted when the background liver is a bit brighter, colorectal liver metastasis is hypodense on the portal venous phase. So there is a way of looking at the CAT scan, and there is a way to differentiate tumor versus non tumor based on the timing of contrast being perfused in the liver, the same as MRI as well. The MRI is also done with contrast. It’s just a different contrast. Both are good. MRI is a bit more sensitive than CAT scan, but the Cath is better at looking at vasculature, so both are complementary in terms of a diagnosis. The you know, over the years, we have issues with the patient with the contrast allergy, actually, so we develop a protocol of how to get a good quality imaging, despite of having a contrast allergy. So, you know, sometimes it’s better to get an MRI if they have a contrast allergy with the cat skin or vice versa. But the worst thing that can happen is the surgeon miss your tumor. So you want the surgeon to be able to see the tumor, because otherwise, you know, after the surgery, oops, you still have tumor, by the way. So so you want to have the best look during evaluation, so the surgeon can do a complete job in your liver. You

Betsy Post 1:07:23
Oh, someone said I missed a question. So is it okay to just do one more or anything? Any questions? Sure, let me Oh, I see it now. Just so you know, when I scroll down the chat, it kind of bounces if someone’s seeing a question below, so it bounces around. So I apologize. So is it true, in your experience, that every liver will have microscopic tumors remaining after resection?

Dr. Sucandy 1:07:52
That’s actually not true. So let’s put it this way, right? It is common. It is common that the patient have a micro metastasis. But it doesn’t mean that all to all liver will have micro metastasis. I mentioned earlier, at the beginning of representation, 20% of patient, 20% patient actually cured with surgery alone, without chemo. So, so So think it this way, right? 20% patient cure with surgery alone, no chemo, if all liver would have had micro metastasis. There is no way they can be cured. 20% right? If all liver had metastas, it means they will recur at some point. So it means that 0% patient will be cured. But that fact is not true, 20% of patient will be cured without chemotherapy. So a lot of people have micro metastasis, but some people don’t, because they are pure with surgery alone, we learned this on the liver section. It is quite often that I remove half of the liver and the pathology report came back as no no viable tumor. Actually, it means the patient did not need the operation, because they’ve been treated before and there is no viable metastasis. So you know, it all depends how reactive the tumor to the chemotherapy. Sometimes the chemotherapy wipe out the whole tumor. So means the patient got no tumor deliver. So I think it is all depends on the circumstance, but to say all the metastasis will leave with the micrometas with all liver is not true.

Betsy Post 1:10:20
Well. Thank you so much once again for all of your time and your attention, and also your family for sacrificing your time tonight. It was sweet to see your kids, but thanks to all the patients and families that showed up. Thanks for your attention and your great questions. And thank you, Dr sukhandi, very much. We really appreciate this. And as I said, this will help people, not just now, but in the future, as we put this out on COLONTOWN University, and refer back to it, and you had several patients here, and they said, one patient, I don’t know if you saw the comment, but said, Thank you, and you’re our hero. That was from the Durand family. So so so we are.

Dr. Sucandy 1:11:02
I work in Tampa, and basically we see a lot of patients from from far away. Actually, if we look at our statistics, we have about 20% 20% of patients actually come out of state. So 80% patient come from Florida. Like I said, we have Canadian patient on the floor today is we’re going tomorrow, we offer a lot of robotic liver section. But it doesn’t mean that, you know, everyone will have liver section robotically. It’s interesting to me that everyone that come to the office before I talk, they said, Doctor, it’s going to, it’s going to be robotic, right? I said, Hang on, let’s, let’s look at the CAT scan, press, okay, and let’s, let’s actually sit down and talk about this. But, but a lot of patient they have, it’s like the you order pizza. You order pizza, they make pizza. You know, I think it’s important to look at case by case. It’s true that in our service, most of the time you’ll get the liver section robotically. But sometimes, if I feel like it is better to be done, open with it, open. But the goal is to enhance the recovery with minimal infer,

Betsy Post 1:12:28
perfect. Well, thank you so much once again. Thanks for your time and attention, and we’ll see you all around COLONTOWN. Good night. All right. Thank you

Dr. Sucandy 1:12:35
Thank you. Thank you everyone. Thank you. Bye. Bye.

DocTalk
2024
Dr. Sucandy
Liver
Stage IV

In this DocTalk, Dr. Sucandy from Advent Health in Tampa, Florida discusses state-of-the-art liver surgery with robotic technology with host Betsy Post. Recorded in April 2024.

More Videos

Liver transplants — Examining the evidence
Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro
2024
Surgical options for peri-mets
Dr. Turaga
2024
ERASur trial: Local treatment options for limited stage IV CRC
Dr. Hitchcock
2023
Advanced surgical treatments for CRC liver mets
Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro
2021
Transplant patients are in the house!
2021
Hepatic Artery Infusion (HAI) chemotherapy for CRC liver mets
Hepatic Artery Infusion (HAI) chemotherapy for CRC liver mets
Dr. Gholami
2021
Modern-day management of liver metastases
Dr. Soares
2022
Why liver transplant for mCRC is taking off
Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro
2022
Categories
DocTalks Hide from search

Optimal management of colorectal liver mets & HAI discussion

Optimal management of colorectal liver mets & HAI discussion

DocTalk
2024
Dr. Padmanabhan
Liver
Stage IV
HAI

In this DocTalk, Dr. Sekhar Padmanabhan from Vanderbilt University discusses optimal management of colorectal liver mets and HAI. Recorded in May, 2024.

Betsy Post 0:05
So welcome everyone to tonight’s DocTalk. Thank you so much for being here to watch this live, and then for those of you that will be watching the playback, thanks so much for your time. I am so excited to bring Dr. Padmanabhan here to talk to us about the optimal management of colorectal liver metastases, the perspectives from a liver surgeon. Dr P has many fans in COLONTOWN, in the hepatic pump group, as well as in the main liver group, really passionate fans of his work and the life saving techniques that he uses at Vanderbilt. So it’s such an honor and a privilege to have him with us tonight. Thank you so much for being here. I’m going to turn it over to you in just a second, but just as a reminder for anyone that’s joined us live, please know that there have been some questions that were submitted in advance. So if you did have some questions that made the cut off to be submitted in advance they were submitted, and then he is going to do his presentation. And then any questions that you have along the way, please put those in the chat. So there’s a chat feature. Please use that to put your questions in the chat, and then at the end, we will save some time to go over the questions that come up throughout the presentation. So you’re all muted. Please put the questions in the chat if you have tech issues, Megan is here. She’s under COLONTOWN cabinet, and then I’m here under my name, Betsy post. So please just ping one of us if you have an issue. I’m going to turn it over to Dr P again. Thank you so much for being here. The floor is yours.

Dr. Padmanabhan 1:41
Great. Good evening, everybody. Thank you Betsy, Thank you Megan and thank you COLONTOWN for the opportunity to speak to you all tonight and to any of my patients who are logged in. Thanks for being here. I am eternally humbled that all of you have put your trust in me to sort of play whatever small role I have in your treatment. It’s truly, truly. To say that I’m humbled is an understatement, and I really appreciate you, know, you guys trusting me. So for those of you that I don’t know a little bit about me, so I’m a I call myself a hepatobiliary surgical oncologist. I practice at the Cancer Center at vanderwald Medical Center. And you know, for those of you that sort of don’t know how you become an HPB surgical oncologist, the path is not a short one. So after four years of undergrad and four years of medical school. I did my general surgery training here at Vanderbilt, and then I went to Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York City for two years, where I trained both in surgical oncology and hepatobiliary surgery. So that’s why I sort of call myself hepatobiliary surgical oncologist. I was fortunate to get recruited back to Nashville, and my family and I have been back here, and I’ve been on faculty for coming up on three years now this summer. So some of you might be wondering what this portrait is. So it’s actually a portrait painted by Peter Paul Ruben, 1618, it’s, it’s on display in the Philadelphia Museum of Art, and it’s actually entitled Prometheus Bound. So for those of you, I was a, I was a classics minor in college, and about the only thing that I remember from my time then is, you know, so Prometheus was a Titan, and he actually steals fire from Zeus and the gods and gifts it to mankind. Zeus, you know, as petty as the Greek gods were, was sort of enraged by this, and he chains Prometheus to the side of a mountain top and sets his golden eagle to sort of feast on his liver during the daytime and during the night time the liver regenerates. And so this sort of happens day in and day out. And it’s just interesting to me that the ancient Greeks, even at their time, had this concept of liver regeneration, you know. And basically, my field is dependent on hypertrophy of the liver after, you know, we remove portions of it. And so I just find this painting fascinating and and so I always have it as my, sort of my first slide, you know. Fast forward 2500 years from the Greeks, you know. And in 1931 a lot of the groundwork for sort of liver hypertrophy after resection was sort of done in early animal studies. And so I just sort of find this concept very fascinating. Real quickly. I don’t have anything to disclose. I have no financial incentives or commercial interests, though, my partners joke that they’re going to start to. Pay me to stop talking about this topic, since it’s all I seem to ever do. I don’t really claim to be an expert in anything. I am very passionate about this. For those of you who know me, this is sort of what I have devoted my life to, in the in the in the in the rest of this talk, I will try to differentiate fact from opinion, because I think that’s very important sometimes in in cancer care, cancer medicine, cancer surgery, a lot of people have a lot of opinions, and usually when there’s a lot of opinions, there’s not a lot of sort of definitive evidence or facts to base the opinion on. So I think it’s important to differentiate that, and I’ll try to do my best to do so. And lastly, I am not, you know, some none of these thoughts are original. Let me put it that way. I stand on the shoulders of giants. You know, I got trained at one of the best cancer centers, I think, in on this side of the Atlantic Ocean. And the faculty there, you know, train me to be who I am today. And you know, the faculty here at Vanderbilt also did the same. So I stand on their shoulders truly. So you can’t know where you got to go without knowing where you came from. So we’ll sort of talk about, you know, colorectal liver metastases really quickly, where, where treatment sort of was, where we are now. And then I’ll sort of talk about some, some future directions, and how we how we sort of plan to hopefully shape the field moving forward. I don’t need to tell this group, so I’ll sort of blitz through this stuff. But you know, we know, we all know that colorectal, colorectal cancer, is the second most common cause of cancer related mortality in this country. And I also don’t need to tell this group you know that it’s highest. Rate of incidence increasing is in younger and younger patients. And the liver is the most common side of metastatic disease, and 50 to 60% of people will develop liver metastases at some point, right? So, and we know that the metastatic disease is what drives the mortality with this, with this disease. And it’s interesting, if you go back to, you know, Memorial Hospital in New York City was called Memorial Hospital back then, in 1948 they were writing about this concept of the inoperability of cancer. George T pack was one of the preeminent surgeons in New York City at that time. And you know, he wrote this in this paper. You know, perhaps the strongest indication for hepatic resection occurs when a very long latent period intervenes between the treatment of the original cancer and the discovery hepatic metastases. And in some sense, that’s still sort of true today, although we are much more aggressive because we have much better treatments to do that. But this is, you know, back in 1948 you know, they were thinking about this problem. And you know, fast forward to the 1990s you know, you look at patients who, sort of, were diagnosed with colorectal liver metastases, this study had 1200 patients in it, and you can see that the patients who were unresectable, or were resectable, but didn’t get resected, did not live very long, and the people who did get resected live much longer, and many of them actually were cured of their disease. So if you look at at the line here, you know it’s about 20% 10 year survival, and this is in 1990 right liver surgery in 1990 or even before 1990 is not what it is today. A lot of it involved moving massive chunks of liver, you know. And the chemotherapy agents that we have today were not even existent or in use at that time. And so that’s pretty, pretty amazing, that that’s, that’s sort of what, what they were able to accomplish. You know, obviously, things have gotten a lot better since 1990 and you know what was a very, very high risk operation of dying just from the operation now is not so high risk. You know, you look at major academic centers like Vanderbilt, you know, Duke Memorial, Sloan Kettering, etc, the mortality after liver surgery is so much lower these days, and that’s why we’re able to sort of do what we do. And a lot of that is because of, you know, we’re able to prevent liver failure, you know. And we use specialized techniques. We were just talking about Alps before, you know, letting the group on, you know. So there’s all sorts of techniques out there that allow us to sort of preserve liver function after liver resection, and it really allows us to be much more aggressive than some of our predecessors were able to be. And you know, we’re able to assess the liver remnant. So you know, for my patients on the call, every time I tell you, I need to make sure that I remove all the tumors, but leave you enough liver behind to survive, right? That’s assessing the liver remnant. What am I going to leave behind, and how? And how am I going to make sure that it’s healthy enough, so that you live? And then, if it’s not healthy enough or big enough, then how do we grow it? Right? And those are the things that we’ve gotten better at. The other thing that we’ve gotten better. That is, you know, we’re better at surgery. And when I say we’re better at surgery, you know, we’ve realized that that less surgery can accomplish the same goal with similar results. And so you can see here, this is published by Peter King and one of my mentors from Memorial Sloan Kettering, that many of you may have heard speak in this forum at others, you know, you look at decade by decade from the 1990s onward, and you know, you can see that the number of major liver resections has gone down each decade, so less than almost a third. Now, if patients get get major liver resections, and you look at the mortality, and it’s gone down from five to 1% and that’s because, you know, you can get the same cancer outcome with removing less liver. And this was a study published at out of MD Anderson. And you know, I don’t want to delve into the weeds of all of this, but if you look at these curves, they’re essentially superimposed. And the two curves, the blue represents, you know, not removing a ton of liver, and the red curve represents removing a ton of liver. And so you can get the same result without removing, you know, massive amounts of liver. And that’s sort of how we’ve especially, I, you know, have continued to practice and trying to remove as little normal liver as possible, which I think is very important, and this is translated into much better outcomes. And you look at this study, also published by my good friend, who was at Duke, you know, so they looked at over 1200 patients who underwent initial liver resection for colorectal liver metastases, 34% estimated 10 year disease specific survival, so meaning 34% of people diagnosed with liver metastases were alive at 10 years. And that’s a that’s a big deal compared to where we were even 10, 15 years ago. And not only that, but people are living longer and people are having improved quality of life. And I don’t think we stress that enough in our surgical and medical communities about quality of life, because yes, you know, we can all sit here and high five where people are living longer, but we need to make sure, and we need to stress that the quality of life is improved, and I think that that’s really important. So who should get an operation in 2024, if you walk into my door, or if you walk into a, you know, any hepatobiliary surgical oncologist store, you know, who gets, who gets an operation? Right? This is a person you know who this is, you know, these are generic CT scans, but, but, you know, this is somebody with one tumor. And I think everybody sort of thinks, Okay, one tumor for sure, they should get get a liver resection. This is another patient that I’ve seen and treated before. You know, these are, you know, several more, but still, you know, very distinct tumors. This, in my opinion, is still, you know, somebody who should get an operation, you know? And then I think the ultimate thing is, this is a, this is a patient that I took care of when I was a fellow in New York, you know. But even this patient got several operations, you know. And I think that we really shouldn’t be thinking about, you know, tumor number, tumor size, you know, some of the things that we historically have looked at. But rather, we need to think about, how is the cancer behaving? How are we testing it? And, you know, figuring out who is going to benefit from an operation. So I think, you know, there are degrees of respectability. You know, there’s people whose disease are is resectable up front, there’s people who need to have two stage liver sections, and there are people who are not resectable, you know, up front, but we try to get them to resection. And, you know, I think each of those require a very, very trained eye, by, you know, a trained eye of a liver surgeon who understands the disease process, who understands the disease biology, and ultimately does whatever they can to get these patients to a liver resection, because we know they do better. So what do we do in the modern era, right? What do we do in 2024 right? So chemotherapy, for sure, plays a role, you know, and so does surgery. And I think that one of the issues you know, that we see on my side of the things you know, especially here in Nashville, is a lot of times, you know, patients coming from from rural areas or areas that don’t have, you know, specialized liver surgeons sort of available, sort of get put into this chemotherapy only pathway. And, you know, I am by no what means saying that chemotherapy should not be done. I think that it has a very, very important role, but I think that it’s really. Important, and you’ll hear me say this a lot. You know, getting the opinion of a liver surgeon early in the disease process, early in the diagnosis, is really, really important, because it helps, basically provide a roadmap for how the treatment is going to progress, with the ultimate goal of getting to an operation, you know, and then chemotherapy has a big role in that, but it shouldn’t be the only thing, in my opinion, and that, you know, just, and I use the word opinion there, because, in my opinion, all patients should try to get to a resection if possible, when they’re talking about liver metastases from from colon cancer or rectal cancer. We know that chemotherapy can be toxic, right? So those are, that’s when you have your when you have your meetings with the medical oncologist, and they’re checking your blood work every couple weeks. They’re looking for toxicity. They’re talking to you about toxicity, and they make their decision to, you know, hold doses, dose, reduce, etc, based off of those toxicities, you know, and I’m not going to belabor this point, but these are some of the things that happen. But if you notice, you know, all of these things result, all of these drugs, which are sort of the mainstays of the chemotherapy that we use, are directly toxic to the liver. So we have to be really careful with how much chemotherapy we give before we do liver surgery, because if you give too much, it really increases the risk of liver failure, and it really increases the risk of having a bad outcome after liver surgery. And we know that, you know, it’s associated with not only liver failure after liver resection, but also complication after liver resection. So that’s why it’s really important to involve a liver surgeon early, so that we only give as much chemo as needed before we can get to an operation, you know. And this is sort of hitting those points again, you know, the more chemotherapy people get before liver surgery, the higher the risk of complication and liver failure is, you know. And I’m not going to belabor the points on this slide you guys can read, but, but, but, you know, the more chemo you get, the riskier the operation is. And so again, trying to minimize how much chemotherapy you get before a liver operation is extremely, extremely important. And I put these on not that I know what any of these things look like under the microscope. I rely on my pathology colleagues for that, but, but really, this is what I see, right? So on the left, that’s a completely normal liver. On the right, you know, we’ll see blue livers like this because of all the chemotherapy that’s been given. And in the middle is sort of a fatty liver from chemotherapy. And those things can be really, really challenging to deal with in the operating room. Not, not deal breakers, not, not, you know, we can’t do this at all, but it definitely just increases the risk of a complication, you know. And my ultimate goal is to get you through your liver operation with minimal risk of complication. So when somebody comes into my clinic, I break it down by, you know, is this something that I can remove up front in one setting? Is it something that can be removed but may need two settings, or is it something that can’t be removed and I need to get some response so that I can get to an operation, right? So initially resectable disease, meaning I can remove it up front. Okay? This is a really busy slide. All I want you to focus on is, is that when we tested whether chemotherapy should be given after removing liver tumors or liver metastases from colorectal cancer. None of the studies that we have shown have ever demonstrated sort of a five year overall survival benefit. Okay, it’s a mind blowing concept that often gets glossed over, but when you have tumors in the liver that can be removed. Giving chemotherapy after, systemic chemotherapy after removing the liver has never been shown to provide a survival benefit. It’s mind blowing, you know? And then you even go to chemotherapy before and after. So some people are like, okay, maybe it doesn’t work after, but maybe it will work if we give some before and some after. And again, this is for tumors that are removable up front, even then, you can see that the five year survival benefit is not there and it’s mind blowing. And we don’t truly understand in the cancer world why that is, but we have to be really, really selective of who gets chemo upfront, because it seems like it may not be helping, and so I usually reserve, you know, chemotherapy for detectable disease, for patients whose tumors are big, and if we can get a little bit of response. It’s we can do less liver surgery. Right? In my mind, I want to take out as little normal liver as possible. And if I can get a little bit of shrinkage here, getting the tumor to move away from this blood vessel here, or this bile duct there, and I think that if I get that couple millimeters, it will spare, you know, a bigger liver resection, and we can do a smaller liver resection, then I think it makes sense. But again, I have to in the back of my mind, I always have to think about the fact that, right, we’re not improving survival with this, and we are definitely increasing the risk of complication. So again, we try to do some chemotherapy if we have to. I love to do it without it if we don’t need it, but if we have to, trying to do just enough to get response without causing too much toxicity in the liver. I’m a big, I’m a big the office fan. And oftentimes when I think about, you know, chemotherapy and colorectal liver metastases and all the data out there, none of it ever seems to make any sense. You know, like, in your mind, it’s like, well, chemotherapy should work for this. I don’t understand why it doesn’t, and I think it I think it does work. I’m not saying it doesn’t work. I think it does work, but I think we have to be really, really selective in who we use it in for people that have disease that’s resectable up front, people like this, where you know the tumors are so widespread you can’t remove anything up front. I mean, obviously I think chemotherapy up first. Here is the right answer. Okay, we need to get these things under control. We need to get them to start responding. We need to get them to shrink. We need to make sure that, you know, the disease is not sort of growing gangbusters. And we lose, we lose control, you know. And so in the last decade, you know, 2014 to 2020, or so, we studied this to figure out what chemotherapy, you know, we should do, and we should use, you know, and so, you know, most of you are probably familiar with FOLOFOX Avastin FOLOXIRI plus Avastin, FOLFIRI plus Avastin, and that’s typically what we use based off of this, excuse me, this first study here, the tribe study, right? That’s pretty much first line for anybody who comes in, unresectable. Upfront, colorectal liver metastases. Now, there are unique scenarios where we may use, you know, full Fox plus panitumumab or an EGFR inhibitor. Those are very unique. Most people were talking about full Fox hearing Avastin, okay? And it’s a really, really good regimen, okay? And if you’re able to be healthy enough and strong enough and well enough to get all three full Fox hearing Avastin, the response rates are really, really high. They’re really good, but at the cost of complications, diarrhea, issues, with neuropathy, I’m sure anybody who’s gotten Oxaliplatin on this (inaudible). You don’t need me to tell you what the neuropathy is and how that, how that can affect your your day to day well being. And so I think, you know, we have to be really, really careful, because, again, we get really, really good response rates at the cost of complication, you know, and then in the unique scenarios where we can use panetumab, again, the response rates are unbelievably higher compared to not using it. But we have to be really careful, because in some studies, if you’re doing a liver resection and you get some of these drugs before liver resection, it can actually increase your risk of dying from the operation. So all of these things are going on in my head, in our heads, in terms of trying to find the right cocktail, trying to find the right treatment for you. It’s really personalized medicine at its finest, even though it does, you know, it’s the same 2-3-4, drugs that we’re using, trying to find the right ones, and for how long, is really, really important. And so, you know, again, we typically reserve FOLFOXIRI and Avastin if you are really, really healthy, really, really strong. Otherwise, we typically will do FOLFOX and Avastin, or FOLFIRI and Avastin at the expense of higher toxicity. And you know, the unfortunate thing, though, is that the systemic chemotherapy alone rarely allows for conversion to resection. Okay, and so again, I put, I put, I put this here because I just sort of want to summarize chemotherapy helps. We don’t really know who truly benefits. If you have upfront resectable disease, if you have upfront unresectable disease, it might help convert to resectable disease, but you know you have to be really, really careful about toxicity, and then you know the risk of developing complications after liver surgery and involving the liver surgeon early, if it’s one thing you take away from this, involving a liver surgeon early in this process. Process is extremely helpful, because it helps us plan which chemo to use, how much of it to use. What are the goals of chemotherapy? Right? What are we trying to shrink? What are we trying to sort of move away from major blood vessels? What operation are we trying to plan for and potentially avoid if we’re talking about a major liver resection. So I cannot stress that enough, get a liver surgeon to look at your case early. Is it’s extremely important. And again, it just, you know, I love this Michael Scott look, because every time I look at these studies and just it just baffles me that we can’t, we can’t, in a scientific way, show you know, who actually benefits from what. But obviously, you know, chemotherapy has a role here. I’m not trying to say that it doesn’t. Where do the liver surgeons fit in, right? So, so moving on to sort of what we do and what I do, right? So colorectal liver metastases, yes, they have spread beyond the colon to the liver, but it’s a regional problem, right? The liver can be treated regionally, if it’s just there, you know. And surgeons are really, really good at dealing with regional problems, you know. So in 1994 or so, Nancy Kemmeny and, you know, Humon Fong and Les Bloomgard and Bill Jernigan and all these people thought, you know, why not add regional chemotherapy to liver resection? And if you don’t know those names, those are the sort of the people who were at the very, very forefront of HAI chemotherapy at MSK in the late 90s and early 2000s you know. So my pump patients don’t need to, you know, have a reminder, but this is what it looks like. And if you’ve if you’ve not seen it, this is what we do, you know, we put the pump in and the abdominal wall and, you know, feed the catheter to the artery that goes to the liver, and it pumps the high dose chemotherapy into the liver, treating the liver tumors. You know, this is sort of what it looks like when we, when we do the operation. Now, I’m going to warn you, my next slide actually has intraoperative pictures, so if that stuff sort of grosses you out, maybe just look away for a little bit. But this is sort of what it looks like, you know, in the real world, where we, where we put the catheter into the artery and and, you know, you can see the blue dye. I don’t know if you can see my mouse here, but you can see the blue dye in the liver. That’s how we check to make sure that the liver sort of is getting what we wanted to get, you know. So why do we use this? Well, you know, the liver has a dual blood supply, you know, he has an artery and a vein. And we, you know, we know that the normal liver gets most of its blood supply from the venous system. And tumors, especially colorectal liver tumors, derive their blood supply from the hepatic artery, you know. And so we can give chemo directly into the hepatic artery. And this is, you know, from 1951 right? Not new. You give, you give stuff in the artery and it goes to tumors, you can sort of see the liver tumor here, and you see the dye going into the arteries, and the tumor lights up. So what do we use? We use a drug called fudr. You know, it’s a it’s a drug that is similar to five fu but, and it’s not new, but what it allows us to do, and my, you know, my patients on the call hear this all the time, it allows us to give a concentration of drug that’s 400 times strong to the liver. And the reason for that is, is that the liver metabolizes it all, and you know, so none of it gets out into your systemic circulation. And we’re able to sort of blast these tumors with really, really high doses of chemo, you know. And you go back to the original studies from the 1970s and you can see, when you give the chemo in the hepatic artery, the tumor gets much more drug than if you give it in the portal vein, you know. Again, it’s not new. This is sort of the original 1962 this is how they used to do it, you know, thankfully, it looks a lot better and cleaner. Now, you know, these are the, these are the these are the studies that they show. These are the X rays. This is, this is the, for those of you who’ve had the the pump study down in nuclear medicine and the big donut that you sit under, this is what they used to do in the 1960s so, obviously not new. But you know, when do we use it? So we use it after liver resection to treat micro metastatic disease in the liver, meaning disease that we can’t see, that may still be hiding in the liver, after liver surgery that we want to treat. And then we also use it to sort of in a neoadjuvant, or what we call conversion, where we want to convert somebody who may not be resectable yet to resection, because, again, I showed you those initial studies, right? If we can resect the tumors, you’re going to live longer, and increases your chance of cure. And so that’s sort of, those are the ones that we sort of put this in, you know, and we’ve referenced Nancy. And Humon Fong and Les Blumgard, you know, these are the people who who were on this initial study published in the New England Journal of Medicine, you know. And not to belabor the points here, but you know, we compared liver section with pump chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy after liver resection, you know. And again, this is sort of looking at, you know, we had a wide range of patients with a wide number of tumors in the study. So it’s a good, broad representation of, you know, who we treat in this in this fashion. And this is sort of just pointing out, you know, we did a lot of big liver surgery back then, right tri segment techniques and lobec, to me, those are big liver operations that we try to avoid at all possible costs these days, if possible. And you can see here that the patients who got the pump, they hai P, they did better, right? They had better two year overall survival. They had better median overall survival. Their recurrence in the liver was much improved with the pump versus not having the pump, you know, and their progression everywhere was better with the pump versus not having the pump. And this study, you know, published in 1999 in the New England Journal of MSS. I mean, this is the seminal study that Nancy Kemmeny published. And she just for those of you don’t know, she just recently retired, though she may be still giving talks on COLONTOWN, I’m not sure you know. And then long term follow up. I mean, you don’t need a magnifying glass to look at this and say, like the patients who got the pump did a lot better than the patients who didn’t get the pump right. This is sort of why we do this, because I think it really gives you all the best chance of having the best possible outcome after a liver operation, you know, these things were sort of shown in the long term, you know. And you can still see that your progression everywhere was better with the pump, the yellow line, and then the liver progression was, was, was much less with the pump compared to without the pump, right? So this is why we do this, and obviously there’s evidence for it, and I use this line in my clinic all the time. You know, it’s the only adjuvant chemotherapy, meaning chemotherapy after liver resection, that has been shown to demonstrate an overall survival benefit, a progression free survival benefit, and a hepatic progression free survival benefit. So really, you know, we should be doing this much more than you know most centers are doing, in my opinion. Okay, again, that’s an opinion, not a fact. Biggest argument that people have with the hepatic artery infusion pump is that, you know, those studies were 20, 30, years ago, and chemotherapy has come much further along since then. And that’s true. There’s no question that we’ve developed new chemotherapy agents, better chemotherapy agents, and we really have not, sort of tested it head to head in the modern era. You know, we’ve had some retrospective studies, meaning, you know, patients who we go back and look, but we’ve never tested it sort of in a prospective head to head setting, you know. And this study is out of the Netherlands and memorial sloane Kettering, you know. And again, the yellow line is pump patients, and the blue line is no without the pump. And you can see that patients with the pump did better. And you know, here, yellow line higher than the blue line means they did better, and they live longer, right? Almost 20 months longer. And you know, the issue with the study is, is, it’s the they use this fancy technique called propensity score matching, and it’s like this really advanced, complex statistical thing, you know, but you got to be really, really careful when you do this, because, you know, I can make anybody look the same, right, if I use these, if I use these characteristics, right, and try to find, you know, two people who would, who would potentially be the same to study and look at, and they’re wealthy and famous. I mean, you get two very, very different kinds of people, right? For those of you that don’t know Ozzy Osbourne on the right, and hopefully everybody knows the person on the left. So you have to be careful with these kind of studies and how you interpret them. And I bring that up, you know, for that reason, because, you know, sometimes you get a lot of people that say, Oh, well, you know, in this study, we compared pump patients with without, pump patients with moderate chemotherapy, and the pump patients did better, and that’s true, but I have to stress that it’s never really been tested head to head. You know, again, a lot of the studies this one was done in 2006 so that was a long time ago, but, you know, it was the only study that demonstrated better quality of life in patients who got pump chemo versus systemic chemotherapy. And as I said, that’s really, really, really important. We see you every two weeks. We pump you full of this stuff, you know. We do these operations, you know, but we need to make sure that your quality of life is good and not enough of the. Studies that we do these days take that into account. And I think, you know, we’re making a push to start including that in our studies these days. It’s really, really important, in my opinion, that we need to take that into effect, you know, and then, and then, you know, when we talk about conversion therapy, for for using the pump, you know, comparing it to modern chemo. Yes, patients who actually were converted to resection did better than than those that didn’t. Furthering, you know, trying to get to liver resection is key. But I think this is the slide that you know that I that struck me the most. And this is the one why I, you know, offer the pump. You know, as much as I do in these scenarios, right? People who got the pump, who had unresectable disease, 52% of people converted to resection. Okay, that’s over half that. That’s sort of unheard of when you’re talking about systemic chemotherapy. Nothing has ever been shown to be that high. Most of the systemic chemotherapy trials or studies that you’re looking at, we’re talking about converting to resection, 1520, 25% when you talk about the pump, 52% okay, and I’m not going to name them, but I know that there’s some patients on the call who we’ve we’ve used this to convert them to resection. And this is why, because it really gets them to where they need to be. And, you know, even, even if we can’t get you to resection, right, you know, you can still get really, really good responses with this, with this pump. And so I’m a big believer of it. Obviously, I, you know, I come from a long heritage of pump believers in New York City, but I truly believe that in the right patients in the right setting for the right reasons, it can really, really be helpful. You know, I showed you this scan, you know. So, these are patients that I took care of in fellowship. This was a 38 year old, a man who who presented after, you know, his son. He was playing soccer with his son. He got hit in the belly, and he had pain, you know. And he had really, really high CEA, you know, his liver was not happy. He got some systemic chemotherapy. He got really, really, you know, bad side effects from it, you know, but he did get some response. We, we, this is what happened after the systemic chemotherapy, you know. We put a pump in, we were able to get him to a liver resection, got his primary tumor out, and he was no evidence of disease for three years. At three years and that I left New York City, so I haven’t had a chance to follow up, but he made it to three years with no evidence that his disease, which is pretty amazing considering where, where he started. This is another patient that I saw when I rotated with Nancy Kemmenyat her clinic. And, you know, presented in 2008 37 year old, you know, had a lot of liver tumors, right? You can see all the liver tumors here. Got treated with pump and systemic chemotherapy for six months, got a portal vein embolization, got two stage right? Hepatectomy, and, you know, 2008 was when she was diagnosed, and she’s NED in 2019. Okay, so this really, really does happen. It’s not a myth, it’s not a it’s not a story, it’s not something that we’re feeding. It really, really does happen. The the biggest issue is, is that we just don’t know, you know, who these people, these remarkable stories, are going to be, right? But they they definitely are there. They definitely happen. And I think that, you know, it happens more frequently in patients who are treated with the pump. Okay, so what? What are my take home points here?

Dr. Padmanabhan 38:50
One size fits all strategy should not apply to anybody anymore. I think it’s really, really important to be really thoughtful about, how are we going to plan this treatment strategy with the ultimate goal of getting to a liver resection? Okay? And it’s really, really, really important to involve a liver surgical oncologist or compatibility or surgical oncologist, whatever you want to call it. really, really important to get that person involved early and then plan the roles of systemic chemotherapy and pump chemotherapy in that plan to get you to a liver section. Those are sort of how, what I think the important take take home points are here. I’d be remiss without you know, giving props to my team so many of you know these people. Dr Siagmore Dr Agarwal, were the two medical oncologists who started this program here at Vanderbilt with me. Sarah is our amazing pharmacist who helps us with the dosing, has helped us develop all the treatment plans and helped us sort of. Try to make this as seamless and as smooth as possible for our patients here, we’ve thankfully recruited several other medical oncologists here, Dr Humon, Dr Gibson, Dr Koloff, to help us with this. We have a lot of people in the infusion clinic help us, help train all the nurses, and we have a lot of people in the or as well who you know behind the scenes make this program, make this program grow. So I cannot This is not a one man show or one person show, and that’s really true anywhere at any of the institutions that do this, you know, yeah, the surgeon definitely plays a role, but, but we can’t do this alone. This is a team sport, and getting the right people on the team, I think, is really, really important. So with that, I’m gonna stop sharing my slides and because I can’t see you guys, unfortunately, if I share and I’m happy to answer questions those that have any.

Betsy Post 41:12
okay, so I’m going to go back to the beginning of the chat and ask some of the questions that are here. Or did you want me to try to take some of the ones that I did get that I sent you an email yesterday too.

Dr. Padmanabhan 41:30
Yeah, Betsy, you do it however you want, I’m happy to, I’m happy to answer any of these. I can stay on for as long as people want. But truly, I really don’t, really don’t mind at all.

Betsy Post 41:40
perfect. Well, one that is actually coming up quite a bit in the liver groups in COLONTOWN is, can we ask him about disappearing disappearing mets due to chemo, and what happens to those if they can’t be resected because they’re gone? So there, this has been coming up a lot lately, and patients have a lot of questions about that. Are they really gone or not gone?

Dr. Padmanabhan 42:06
It’s a it’s a really, really challenging question that we struggle to deal with. In fact, a lot of what I a lot of the research that I’m participating in now sort of focusing on, what do we do about that? How can we find them? How can we detect them? I think people approach it differently. My approach, you know, and the thing that I do, pretty much the night before every operation that I do, is I pull up the very, very first CT scan or MRI before that patient started any treatment. That is the most important. And I tell the residents and fellows that rotate with me the most important scan is the very first scan, because that tells me where all the tumors were, and if any of them disappear, I can still tell where they were based off of that initial skin and so what my approach is, is I try to look for them. And yes, oftentimes I don’t actually see the tumor, but I can sort of figure out where in the liver the tumor was, based off of its relation to other critical structures like blood vessels and bile ducts. So in the operating room, I will actually use an ultrasound and have the CT scan right up in front of me, and I will say, Okay, this tumor was this many centimeters away from this, this many centimeters away from that. Let me find it with the ultrasound. Okay, here’s that structure. Here’s this many centimeters away, here’s this many centimeters away. And I’ll look at that area, and oftentimes I’ll actually see something there. And if I do, I think this will probably answer some of the other questions. That’s where I really utilize ablation, because if it’s that small, ablation is an excellent technique that spares a lot of normal liver, but still treats these tumors extremely effectively. So I spend a lot of time looking for these tumors, looking for where they were, and then treating those areas with ablation and other ablative techniques. Now, some of my patients know that sometimes these tumors, I can’t ablate because they’re too close to critical structures. I think one of the one of the questions that that was asked was the role of irreversible electroporation or ire I think that is a really, really nice technology that allows you to ablate things that are near critical structures a little bit more safely than ablation. Unfortunately, not all centers, like my center doesn’t have ire so I can’t use that. So in that scenario, I tend to use sort of radiation techniques if need. It sort of external radiation. I think another, another question that was brought up was histo trip See, I’m sure all of you have heard about that at this point. I think that histo trip see, is it’s a very, very exciting technology. I think that it’s really, really new and in its infancy, and has not been rigorously or appropriately tested to bring it out into prime time yet. I know that there are a lot of centers out there that have them and are doing the appropriate studies that need to be done to make sure that it’s safe, to make sure that it works, to make sure it does what it claims to do. And I think that that’s great. There are some really big limitations with histo trip. See, mainly the right side of the liver, where it’s covered by the rib cage, you can’t treat as well with histo trip. See, I think in the future, my hope is, is that that company works on intraoperative way to do histo trip. See, that’s down in the road, but hopefully I knocked out some of the questions there. Bottom line, I don’t think those tumors ever truly disappear. I have seen them truly disappear with pump chemotherapy. I have not have them ever truly disappear with systemic chemotherapy. So I try to go looking for them if I can.

Betsy Post 46:20
Thank you. One other question was about diets. So on a scale of one to 10, separately or collectively, how important do you find dietary intake, even a radical diet change, like veganism to help combat cancer recurrence?

Dr. Padmanabhan 46:39
Yeah, that’s a question that I get a lot. Actually, I don’t have any great evidence to say one is better than the other, or one diet is better than another diet. I think this is where, sort of what works for you, right? Like you guys are going through a lot in this treatment process. Your body is going through a lot. It’s going through a lot of changes. And I think the important thing is to eat healthily, you know. And that’s just the standard, you know, don’t eat, you know, the stuff that your mom didn’t want you to eat when you were a kid because your teeth would fall out. Right? Don’t eat that in excess, everything in moderation, and I am not aware of any evidence that suggests that veganism, vegetarianism, or any other diet, is better than another diet. Now, one thing that I get asked a lot is is like, do I need to quit sugar? And the answer to that question is, is universally No, you don’t need to quit sugar. Cancer does use sugar to grow, but it is irrespective of your dietary sugar intake, right it? It hijacks your cells to use the sugar that’s already there. And so you eating sugar, or you not eating sugar is not going to change anything. So if you want that brownie, I love brownies, go ahead and eat that brownie.

Betsy Post 48:02
I’m going to quote you, “eat the brownie”. I love it. Do you see any advances or anything down the road, anything with the HAI pump method of fighting metastatic colorectal cancer, or any brand new technologies that aren’t really being talked about too much, that you see promise in Yeah,

Dr. Padmanabhan 48:27
that’s a great question. I think that the next big thing that we need to figure out is how to get our immune system to attack metastatic colon cancer once it’s metastasized to the liver. Colorectal Cancer once it metastasized to the liver, right? All the studies right now for microsatellite stable which is like 99% of the cancer that spreads to the liver, immunotherapy does not work, and I think it the way that we need to move forward as a medical field, as a surgical field, is figuring out how to get our immune system to sort of get primed in the liver to start, to start tackling these tumors. I think the pump has a unique ability to provide sort of direct access to the liver while bypassing the rest of the body to do that we are, you know, we and others are looking at ways to sort of supercharge the immune system, to sort of seek out and attack these tumors in the liver. We are nowhere near where we need to be, but I think that is where the field needs to go. Even there, even the early studies that have shown promise for tumors that have spread to everywhere else but the liver, where immunotherapy seems to help in those situations, for for reasons that we don’t truly understand, the tumors in the liver don’t respond as well. So we need to figure out how to make that happen. I think the pump could be used as a tool, because it’s a gateway to the liver and bypassing the rest of the body. But we’re not there yet, and we definitely need a lot more progress in that, in that, in that arena.

Betsy Post 50:12
Great. One more question before I go to some of the live questions, it’s interesting. You sort of talked about this, but I do want to ask it outright. So you as a liver surgeon, working with your medical oncologist, you have a patient that perhaps has just one or two mets. How do you make the decision on ablation, IRE, resection? How do you make a decision on those patients with very minimal disease?

Dr. Padmanabhan 50:39
I think that most people, myself included, if you can remove the tumors without having to sacrifice a lot of normal liver, that’s that’s usually the best way to go. I think that ablation techniques definitely have a role in the upfront setting, especially if you’re talking about maybe one or two really, really small tumors that are really, really deep. The problem you know that I have with with ablation up front is when you when we do it percutaneously or through the skin, the ablation zones end up being really, really right. In my mind, the purpose of ablation is to try to minimize damaged liver, right, or removing too much liver. And when you have these massive ablation zones, you’re really sort of, you know, killing normal liver cells that, you know, we want to try to preserve, right? Because we’re playing the long game here, right? We want to make sure that you have enough liver, you know, I would love for me to remove, remove tumors, and the liver tumors never come back, and everybody’s cured and everybody’s happy, right? But realistically, that’s not what happens in the majority of cases, right? We need to play the long game. We need to make sure that we leave enough liver behind so that if it were to come back, God forbid, we have options, right? That’s how I every time that I look at anybody, anybody’s scan, anybody’s story, anybody’s, you know, what they come in and present with, I’m trying to play the long game. And I worry that sometimes when we do these percutaneous ablation techniques, we end up damaging too much liver and and sort of hinder our ability down the down the road. So I try to, you know, if we can remove them and remove them with minimal liver resections, I think that’s the way to go. Ablation has a role, but I think we just have to be really, really careful as a field, not to ablate too big of a zone and really spare the normal liver, because the normal liver is key. Hopefully I answered the question.

Betsy Post 52:57
Yes. Thank you. Let’s see. Is there any data around mortality rates for individuals who were able to have early resection versus patients who have had several rounds of chemo in order to get to the point of resection?

Dr. Padmanabhan 53:17
Great question. We don’t have any, any when you say mortality rates, I’m assuming you mean sort of survival from the cancer long term, and not mortality from the operation itself. I think that that we don’t have a great we don’t have any great evidence to suggest one is better or worse than the other, if it’s a small number of cycles of chemotherapy. Now we do know that as the number of cycles of chemotherapy before liver surgery increases your risk of having complication or liver failure or even dying from the liver resection increases exponentially. So in that sense, your mortality is higher if you get too much chemo before your liver resection. But as I said, I think that you know, for if you have a small number of tumors in the liver, usually less than four is pretty reasonable cut off that most people use, and they are all upfront, removable. The best data that we have says that they should be removed and that you don’t need to have chemo upfront. And so that’s sort of where most, most liver surgeons sort of practice that way. There are unique scenarios, as I suggested, where if you can shrink a little bit and spare a bigger liver resection, then it makes sense. But there’s no data to suggest that you know mortality is or survival is worse in patients who get a few rounds of chemotherapy before their liver section.

Betsy Post 54:50
And I think you answered this one, but I just want to hit this point home, because it comes up quite a bit for new folks in the liver groups. So for some of. With just one or two liver mets, would going to a surgeon before any chemo be a good idea?

Dr. Padmanabhan 55:06
Yeah, yes, absolutely. Because, again, it’s, it’s, it’s all about planning the treatment. And oftentimes, if you have one or two liver mets, you may not need systemic chemo right away, right? And again, we’re trying to play the long game. Every time you get exposed to systemic chemotherapy, it’s giving the chance for the cancer cells to become resistant, right? And if you don’t need it, then why give the cancer cells the opportunity to get resistant to that therapy? Why not save that therapy for if and when you may need it down the road when you have more tumors or tumors elsewhere? That’s sort of my thought process for people who have a small number of liver metastases. And again, it’s never a bad idea to get evaluated by a liver surgeon early, and sometimes that means before seeing a medical oncologist. And that’s okay.

Betsy Post 56:09
Thank you. We have a patient who had a question. She had a solitary liver met five weeks after LAR surgery in 2021 it was ablated, had chemo. So far, all the CT scans have been clear. She did have some lung nodules, but she hasn’t had an MRI Since 2023, and since you know it’s there’s a lot of talk that MRI is the best imaging for the liver. Should she be getting regular liver MRIs in addition to the CT scans?

Dr. Padmanabhan 56:43
So, you know, that’s an interesting question. Yes, I think in general, MRI is more sensitive at picking up these liver tumors than CT scan, especially if you have pre existing fatty liver disease or chemotherapy associated fatty liver disease, I don’t think that getting regular MRIs is necessary. I think that especially if you were able to see the tumors in the first place on your CT scan. Now, there are some people where you just never see the tumors on the CT scan, and you only see them on an MRI. And so I think in those patients, it makes sense, but I don’t advocate getting surveillance MRIs of the liver, sort of just for everybody. I think there are unique situations where where that’s important. We have other ways of detecting, you know, cancer recurrence, in addition to CT scan, so tumor markers, and then, more recently, circulating tumor DNA, you know. So I think that it’s a, it’s a, it’s a combination approach of how we do these surveillance, imaging and and I don’t think that doing an MRI every time is going to be helpful, especially if you can see them in the first place.

Betsy Post 58:06
Thank you. Now, while you were doing your presentation, talking about the toxicity, a couple patients said, is the liver toxicity reversible after chemo is done?

Dr. Padmanabhan 58:17
sometimes and sometimes it is not. And I can tell you, it’s the worst feeling in the world as a liver surgeon, when somebody comes into my clinic and, you know, they got started on, you know, the three or four drug regimen, you know, because they’re they’re young and healthy, and they can tolerate it, you know, and then they develop irreversible liver injury, because then, especially when those tumors were removable, because it I can’t, I can’t safely do liver surgery. When the liver is is permanently damaged. It’s not common, you know, it’s not, it’s not like it happens all the time, I think the incidence is very is still it’s quite low where it’s irreversible, sometimes, most of the time, it is to some degree reversible. But again, I don’t know why you take that chance, especially if you have a small number of tumors that can be removed. I think that, again, getting the liver surgeon involved early can help prevent those scenarios. And, you know, and then, and then, and then making a plan, right? That liver surgeon should be working with the medical oncologist and having a plan right, and making sure that we do the right thing. First, very important.

Betsy Post 59:45
Thank you. So for a patient that has had lung mets in the past, and then liver mets, is there any evidence or studies on the benefit of chemo post liver resection? So for those patients that had had lung metastases in the past also.

Dr. Padmanabhan 1:00:03
I just want to make sure I get it so the lung metastases came first, and then the liver metastases. Is that the question?

Betsy Post 1:00:10
Are there studies on the benefit of chemo, post liver resection for patients who have also had lung mets?

Dr. Padmanabhan 1:00:16
I see, I see. So, yeah, I think that. I think that if you have existing disease outside of the liver, but we’re still going to go after the liver disease, there should be a plan to somehow manage the lung Mets. That plan can involve chemo, but usually, if we’re talking about doing liver surgery in the setting of lung metastases, we’re usually going to be treating the lung metastases with some form of local therapy as well, whether that’s microwave ablation, cryo ablation, radiation therapy, you know, we want to, we want to, we want to do the liver surgery, you know, with a plan to be able to treat the lung disease as well, at least that’s sort of our approach here at Vanderbilt. And so that may involve some chemotherapy to allow for sort of liver surgery, you know, healing time and planning for the lung stuff. But we don’t want to, we don’t want to do again. We don’t want to do too much chemotherapy for too long. And I think that if you have a small number of lung metastases, and we’re going to go after the liver first, doing the liver first, you know, maybe doing a little bit of chemotherapy between and then doing some form of local therapy to the lung would be how we sort of go about doing it here. And so, has that been sort of officially studied? No, it has not. It’s sort of, you know, think this is the best

Betsy Post 1:01:50
Have you seen any research on high fructose corn syrup and the liver?

Dr. Padmanabhan 1:01:56
Ooh, I have not. And admittedly, I have not gone looking for that. So I don’t think that I’m I can answer that any sort of knowledge.

Betsy Post 1:02:07
No problem. Um, when should one do a PET scan after colon and liver resection? What if the pet caught one lesion? Ultrasound caught us, caught seven lesions? Which one would be considered accurate?

Dr. Padmanabhan 1:02:22
Yeah. I don’t usually use PET scan after liver surgery. The reason for that is, is because PET scans pick up areas of cells that are using a lot of sugar. Okay, whenever you have an operation, your body is healing, and whenever you’re healing, those parts of your body that are healing are using a lot of sugar. So the PET scan will light up, and it’s only lighting up because you know you’re you’re healing, your body is in an inflammatory state, and it’s rapidly dividing and using a lot of sugar to heal your operation. And so I rarely will use a PET scan after a liver surgery or even a colon surgery, for that matter, for very, very, very unique scenarios. That’s sort of our approach here, my approach here. So I don’t, I don’t know. I think an ultrasound is sort of the best of those two modalities. The better, the better modality. But if there was any concern about a lesion in the liver, I mean, you’re going to be getting a CT or an MRI, okay, if you come to see me, because, without fail, those are better than ultrasound or pet every time.

Betsy Post 1:03:50
Thank you. This one is I’m very interested in as well. We have a lot of patients that seem to be on supplements. In your experience, do you see any effects of supplements on the liver? I’d just love to hear your opinion just generally on supplements, and what your take is on that for patients with liver meds. Yeah,

Dr. Padmanabhan 1:04:12
I am not an expert in supplements. I do think that some of them certainly have a role. I do think that some of them can cause significant liver injury, and so you have to be really careful. What I tell my patients is that if you want to take them, make sure you keep a list and you run each and every single one of them by your medical oncologist, because that medical oncologist will then run it by the pharmacists, and then the pharmacists go into all their databases and like they compare each one and see which one could interact with whatever chemotherapy that you’re getting. You don’t want to have any issues with liver toxicity, because the supplement is interacting with therapy agents. So if you want to do it, I think you need to be really, really smart about it. And. The list, be honest with that list, and run it by your medical oncologist, so that they can run it by the pharmacy people, because they’ll be able to find the ones with known interactions. They’ll be they’ll be able to tell you which ones those are. And I would recommend not doing that while you’re getting treatment, because the last thing that you want is to have an interaction that then prevents your liver from being able to get you know a therapy that we know is helpful.

Betsy Post 1:05:26
Thank you. So for a patient that is trying to get to resection who has used hai systemic chemo including Cetuximab, what if any recommendations would you make to minimize potential complications from surgery.

Dr. Padmanabhan 1:05:43
Yeah, there’s not going to be a lot that you as a patient are going to be able to do. I think again, the key is trying to get the fewest number of chemotherapy cycles before to get to where you need to get to. You know, there are some interesting stuff that’s coming out of some of the cancer centers in the Northeast about trying to reverse chemotherapy induced liver injury. Nothing has been has sort of been approved in the FDA yet to be able to get there. I think the important thing is exercise, eating a good, healthy diet, making sure you’re not losing a lot of weight while you’re getting all this treatment and staying physically active. You know, your doctor may sort of talk to you about fatty liver disease. Sometimes we will sort of change your diet before liver surgery to try to reduce the amount of fatty liver disease before we get you to the operation. But again, I think the most important things are staying physically fit and making sure that you’re eating a good, well balanced diet, so that you’re not losing a lot of weight. Those are the two things that are within a patient’s control to minimize post operative complications.

Betsy Post 1:07:01
Thank you. I’m really interested in this one too. It comes up a lot. How does a patient select a good liver surgeon? I have one in mind, but I’m not sure exactly what to look for.

Dr. Padmanabhan 1:07:13
Great question. I think you want to look at where they trained, and I think you want to ask them how much they do, how much liver surgery do they do? You really, and that goes for any surgery, right? Like, you don’t want to go get your colon or your rectal surgery from somebody that does one or two a year. You don’t you don’t want to go to a liver surgeon who does one or two a year. And you should ask, you know, I have people ask me, how many of these do you do? How many? How many, how many liver operations do you do? How many have you done? And then the other thing is, you know, I promise, I promise. Betsy didn’t pay me to say this, but, but I tell all my patients to get on COLONTOWN, because who knows better than you? You know, I always tell my patients, you know, this idiot can talk to you about all sorts of things, but I probably haven’t had all those things happen to me, but you all are sort of the community that I on and, you know, and get that information from and you know, you can ask all the patients that I that all my patients who are on here. I tell every single one of them you should get on COLONTOWN If you’re not on it, because it’s one thing for you to hear what I’m going to do from me, but it’s another thing to hear from somebody that’s actively undergoing it, or has undergone it, and I think that that opinion is actually more important. So.

Betsy Post 1:08:50
Gosh, I just love it, and I didn’t pay you to say,

Dr. Padmanabhan 1:08:55
No, you didn’t pay me.

Betsy Post 1:08:56
What would you suggest patient advocates and nonprofits like COLONTOWN, for example, do to help spread this important surgical point of view.

Dr. Padmanabhan 1:09:09
I think just continue to talk to each other, you know. And really, really, really, look, I think, you know, one of the things that we’re doing here is this really trying to figure out, how can we get, how can we get what we do out to the people who need it? Because there are a lot of people that aren’t on Facebook, that aren’t on Twitter, that aren’t on all these, you know, groups that we can’t get this message to. I think, I think really just continuing what you all are doing, you know, holding events, community, getting the word out there, I think, is really, really important, you know, I think what I’ve come to learn over the years is, is that, you know, doctors, doctors sort of get really entrenched in sort of the way they do things. You know, they’re in their. Small community and and, you know? And I’m calling other people out without calling me out, you know, we really rely on, on on, I think we really should rely on patients to sort of help us figure out where we need to improve. And I’ll give you an example I didn’t even know what histo trip, see, was, I hadn’t heard of it. I had not come across any of it, any of it in the in the journals and things that I read. And there was one clinic, like, in end of January or February, right? I think I had like, four people come in, and they asked me, Do you do I do histo trip? See, I’m like, I don’t even know what that is, but what did I do? And I go look it up. I, you know, read about it, I learn about it. And, you know, and I wouldn’t have done that if a patient didn’t ask me, you know. So, so I think, I think, you know, keep challenging us, keep forcing us to sort of, because you guys are all over it, right? Like you read all the stuff. You know, I’m, I’m standing in an operating room for 12 hours a day usually, right? I’m not, I’m not like out there looking at this stuff all the time, you know. So, so challenge us, you know, keep, keep forcing us to get better. I think that’s really important.

Betsy Post 1:11:12
Q2, people were asking, how much damage does the pump chemo do to the liver to complicate future resections. Yeah,

Dr. Padmanabhan 1:11:22
it’s not free, for sure. I think the biggest thing that we worry about with pump chemotherapy is not direct liver toxicity, but it’s bile duct toxicity. And any of my patients tell you that that’s what I’m that’s what I’m concerned about, right? So the pump chemotherapy does a really, really good job of treating the liver tumors, but it also does really, really good job if we’re not careful, to sort of injure the bile ducts. Now, thankfully, if the bile ducts get injured, we usually have ways to treat it and fix it, and that involves, you know, stents and, you know, endoscopies and things like that, but, but But you have to be really careful. And sometimes we’re really careful, and it still happens, you know, you sit there, you monitor the liver tests and the in the blood work every two weeks, and you put the steroids in the pump and all that stuff, and you do all the things that are right. And sometimes it happens anyway, right? But I think that’s the thing that we worry about, is the biliary toxicity, you know. And I think that’s where the experience comes into play, you know, really, really understanding the nuance of what the liver tests are doing, what the what the Alkaline phosphatase is doing, and understanding how to dose reduce, how to hold the doses at the right time. And I think that’s where the experience comes into play.

Betsy Post 1:12:41
And I think I’m down to the last two questions here, and they’re very similar. So one person’s asking if I’m no evidence of disease based on my latest MRI, but I’ve had to resect two, respectable two ablated tumors in the past. What do you think about getting hai as a preventative measure even though I’m Ned now, or should I wait until more tumors pop up?

Dr. Padmanabhan 1:13:04
I think you wait, because we don’t know if you will benefit, based off of the studies that that we have, in the studies where the pump showed benefit, the pump was started within two to four weeks after liver resection, so I don’t, I can’t, I can’t tell you if it would work or not for you, and therefore, if I don’t know, then I shouldn’t be experimenting at you, just sort of willy nilly, in my opinion. I think it’s an interesting question, and one that I’ve thought about a lot, but we don’t have a good answer from a rigorously, you know, performed study to be able to answer it.

Betsy Post 1:13:53
And I think that answers the other one, because the other one is basically when the the Mets are no longer visible, and scans and blood work, you know? I mean, I guess you’re saying I can’t treat what I can’t see,

Dr. Padmanabhan 1:14:05
you know. So I in those scenarios, I usually say, let’s wait, you know? And if something comes back, and it’s a liver, we can cross that bridge when we get there.

Betsy Post 1:14:16
There’s one more that I actually have, one too. What percentage of resection plus pump patients. Do you do robotically or laparoscopically? And how do you decide that versus open? Yeah,

Dr. Padmanabhan 1:14:28
laparoscopic zero. I don’t do any laparoscopic liver surgery. That’s there. There are few people, I would say in the world that do that and do it really well. I am not one of them. I do do, I do do robotic liver resections. We did our first robotic pump in at our program a few months back. I think that it’s sort of, it’s sort of robotic surgery takes longer, okay, especially with the liver, because you’re. Limited by angles that the robot can get to certain places in the liver. And so I think it becomes a law of sort of diminishing returns, right? Like if you’re in the operating room for 14, 16, 18, 20, hours to do it robotically, there are risks associated with being in the operating room and under general anesthesia for that long. And so I’m very selective in who I do robotic liver resections and robotic pumps in and I think a lot of it depends on whether or not you’ve had open surgery before. So is there going to be a lot of scar tissue that I’m going to have to sit there and cut through robotically that’s going to increase your operative time, increase your risk of having a general anesthesia associated complication? If you have a lot of tumors that we’re trying to remove that can increase operating room time, it can change, you know, and you can’t with the robot, you can’t really utilize ablation techniques as well, because it’s the technologies just don’t mesh yet. So if I have to do ablation, and a lot of ablation. Usually I’ll do that open if I’m just putting a pump in and nothing else. Often, I have switched my practice at this point to doing it robotically, so that’s sort of how I decide with that.

Betsy Post 1:16:17
So my question has to do with Dr Kemmeny was pretty specific about her protocol she had, and I may mispronounce it, so just I apologize in advance, but she did put her patients prophylactically on protonics and Ursodiol. That was just standard for her. And what I’m seeing with the new pump programs that are opening up. It’s not consistent. Do you have an opinion on that?

Dr. Padmanabhan 1:16:44
We definitely do. Protonics, the literature is pretty good. Ursodiol is a little bit of a wishy, washy thing. In my opinion, I usually will reserve it for when people have symptoms of biliary issues. I don’t, because people don’t. It’s not a great drug to take. It has just doesn’t. People don’t like it very much. But to my patients out there that are on it, I’m sorry that I’m doing that to you, but, but, but, but, yeah, I don’t, I don’t do it. We don’t do it routinely, the Ursodiol, we definitely do the PPI, the protonic. So the omeprazole, for sure. So, okay, there’s no, there’s no, I love Dr Kemmeny. I still have to call her Dr, Kemmeny. I love her. You know, she certainly has the most experience in the world. But the there’s no, there’s no real good evidence for the for the Ursodiol. So.

Betsy Post 1:17:41
it’s okay to have a different opinion. It’s okay. And one last one that I see, did you want to talk anything about? We’ve talked a lot about ablation. How do you make the decision between something like SBRT for a small met versus ablation?

Dr. Padmanabhan 1:17:59
Yeah. I mean, I think if I can get to it safely, I will try to ablate it, microwave, ablated. Here we, you know, SBRT. I typically will reserve for tumors, for for reasons, you know, whatever reason that I cannot get to to do an ablation, or if, you know, people have had a biliary issue and they had to have a stent or something like that. You can’t really ablate people after they get stented. Microwave ablate, I should say. And the reason for that is because you’re a very, very high risk of developing liver abscesses. And so in those scenarios, I will tend to use radiation if I need to sort of treat smaller tumors when they have, when they have had some sort of bile duct intervention, stent, ERCP, etc,

Betsy Post 1:18:52
Well, I know you have done such an amazing time this evening, and you have been so generous of your time away from your family, you know, resting, relaxing, eating some brownies. So hopefully you can see your patients up there. I don’t know if you can see them, but they’re waving at you. They sing your praise. In COLONTOWN, and we just really appreciate you being here tonight, being so generous with your time and your information, answering everyone’s questions and being so patient. So I just want to thank you on behalf of all of your patients and everyone in COLONTOWN that gets to benefit from this.

Dr. Padmanabhan 1:18:59
Thank you for the opportunity. I do want to end with one last thing so Mike Lidsky, who is sort of a few years senior to me, at Duke University, is opening, has opened a very, very important clinical trial involving the pump, and it is going to be the first trial that’s going to compare the pump to the modern systemic chemotherapy in patients who have unresectable liver metastases, okay, really, really important trial, and I think that this community would be really, really helpful in sort of getting patients with that disease to be evaluated for a pump on that trial. Really, really important, really, really important study that we need to do, and we need to accomplish as a group, and this is where I think we as doctors and surgeons can work with the community and the patients and and I think it’s really, really important that we we do that. So I wanted to mention that Linsky has put a lot of hard work. I know Betsy. Betsy knows Mike, and he’s put a lot of hard work into that, and we’re going to open that trial here. And I know a lot of other centers are as well. I think really, really important to do that.

Betsy Post 1:21:31
Yes, thank you so much. And I we had a great talk on that from Dr Lidsky, and I’m really excited to hear about when that you know, when it’s opened and recruiting, that’ll be great. And lots of thank yous for you in the chat. And Kenzie says, Thank you, Dr P for doing this and taking the best care of my Sissy and my sweet friends. So lots of love for you in the chat also. So thanks again for being here, and thank you to all the patients and caregivers for being here as well, and all of your attention and your great questions. So have a great night, everyone.

Dr. Padmanabhan 1:22:04
Bye, thank you. Bye.

DocTalk
2024
Dr. Padmanabhan
Liver
Stage IV
HAI

In this DocTalk, Dr. Sekhar Padmanabhan from Vanderbilt University discusses optimal management of colorectal liver mets and HAI. Recorded in May, 2024.

More Videos

State of the art liver surgery with robotic technology
Dr. Sucandy
2024
ERASur trial: Local treatment options for limited stage IV CRC
Dr. Hitchcock
2023
Advanced surgical treatments for CRC liver mets
Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro
2021
Transplant patients are in the house!
2021
Hepatic Artery Infusion (HAI) chemotherapy for CRC liver mets
Hepatic Artery Infusion (HAI) chemotherapy for CRC liver mets
Dr. Gholami
2021
Modern-day management of liver metastases
Dr. Soares
2022
Why liver transplant for mCRC is taking off
Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro
2022
Paths to long-term survival with CRC liver mets
Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro
2023
Categories
DocTalks Hide from search

Liver transplants — Examining the evidence

Liver transplants — Examining the evidence

DocTalk
2024
Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro
Liver
Stage IV
Transplant

In this DocTalk, Dr. Roberto Hernandez-Alejandro from URMC discusses liver transplants for colorectal cancer patients. Recorded in June, 2024.

This is an automatically generated transcript.

Betsy Post 0:03
I’m really excited to have Dr. Hernandez from the University of Rochester Medical Center with us this evening for tonight’s DocTalk on liver transplants. I think there’s truly something for each one of you that are here, because Dr. Hernandez is going to talk about some of the basics about liver transplants. He’s going to address everything from who makes a solid candidate to get screened for a transplant. And then he’s going to talk a lot about some of the evidence that we’ve seen in the last couple of years for transplant, including, I think a lot of people are really excited to hear him talk about the information that was just released at ASCO in June 2024, just a couple of weeks ago. So we’re very excited to have him here. And I don’t know if he’ll tell you this, but he was up all night doing a transplant last night, came home, took a shower, had a little snack, and went back to work. So we’re so happy to have him here tonight. Really, I want to be really respectful of his time. Let him get through his presentation. At the end, he will do Q and A with us. So at this point, I’m going to turn it over to you, Dr. Hernandez.

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro 1:25
Well, thank you.Thank you very much. As always, it’s a great honor to be in front of patients and caregivers. Thank you very much, Betsy and COLONTOWN for this opportunity. I like to see that there’s a lot of names that I don’t know, and hopefully we can have an impact, and we can help and guide patients and caregivers here. That is my objective. While Betsy was making the introduction, I was able to see some names. I know a few of them. And two big names from the West Coast that make me smile a lot. Over the next several minutes, what I’m going to be talking about is just the specifics about the role of liver transplant for colorectal metastases, and show some of the evidence of what is happening nowadays, especially in our country and what do we know about new data? Because probably people want to know new data, and I think hopefully this helps patients and caregivers for decision making. I want to be clear and disclose that I’m a liver surgeon. I do this procedure that I’m going to be talking about, liver transplantation for colorectal metastases. I do liver resections. I do many other treatments I don’t want to cover in that aspect right now. It’s going to be concentrated into liver transplantation. With that, I’m going to start and again, I will share my screen. And thank you very much for this Betsy. I want to know if my screen is perfect?

Betsy Post 3:16
Yes, it’s perfect. We can see full size.

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro 3:19
So Betsy mentioned who I am and what I do and where I work, in Rochester, New York. Many of the slides that you will see if you have seen other presentations, not many, but several are in already-presented and I have shown. But for me, this is very important and I want to show this because this reflects the impact of the topic that we’re talking about, and I will try to make it more clear here. Remember for some that maybe some people are familiarized with graphs. Others are not. But if you see here, for example, the yellow line, or the purple line or the green light line, here you see that with the years it has been going down. So this is a population of 85 years old, 80s, 70s, 60s. The incidence of colorectal cancer, it’s decreasing in this population up to the 50s. Why? Because we are the countries doing a good job on doing colonoscopies nowadays, even in patients of 45 to above. But look at these numbers here. These are going up. All these younger people who were not used to have cancer. When I was in my training, I didn’t see colon cancer in this population. It was very uncommon. Nowadays I see a big majority of my patients that I assess for liver metastases from colon cancer are within these ages, from 20s, 30s, 40s, early 50s increasing. It doesn’t mean that doesn’t exist in the 60s, but it is happening. But it’s the incidence is decreasing. Less people having this because we’re doing colonoscopies, removing polyps. But this population is disadvantaged. I’m not here today to fix the healthcare system about who should be having colonoscopy or not, but there’s more than 150,000 patients, people in the country each year, in the US that there are diagnosed with colon cancer, and we know that probably half of them will develop liver metastases. So this is a big problem, and that’s what we’re talking about. What does it mean when we talk about unresectable colorectal metastases, as the majority of you know, and the caregivers as well, surgery would be the best result. And what does that mean, if we can go and remove the cancer, the tumors in the operating room leave enough liver to survive, because the liver is going to regenerate, but if we are able to remove all the tumors, then the patient will have the best prognosis. Chemotherapy helps, but it’s not going to cure patients. It’s a help. I want to see that a lot of the things here are “friends” – they shouldn’t be competing. They are friends. The importance of this, of a team, when you see a doctor or a physician, an oncologist is someone who really creates good allies with the other specialties and is able to think a little bit out of the box, especially with those patients who have metastases, multiple metastases in the liver, like these cases, where we see a lot of metastases here in this liver. What happened with these patients who have unresectable that we cannot go on remove it, because if you see in this case, if I remove all the spots of cancer, I’m going to leave this patient without a liver, and you cannot survive. So what do we do? The only treatment normally for this patient will be chemotherapy. Maybe you can say, “Okay, I’m going to give that Y-90 as well.” Maybe we can do some ablation. But all of these are too much disease and it probably won’t work doing other local, regional therapies. Probably the only option will be chemotherapy or the pump in this patient and what happens with these patients from 100 patients, only five or 10 will be alive at five years and with cancer, So the outcome is not very good. But what makes chemotherapy of advantage, not only giving a little a little bit of survival to these patients, because if we compare chemotherapy with nothing, chemotherapy gives an advantage, but I see that chemotherapy allowed us to identify which patients might be the ideal candidates, or better candidates for going to other treatments such as transplantation, because it give us a chance to understand the behavior of the tumor, what we call ‘tumor biology’, and I would like all the patients and caregivers to understand what this is. When a doctor talks about tumor biology, it’s the tumor behavior. How we know how the tumor behaves, if it’s very aggressive or mild or moderate is if we give chemotherapy, we see how it responds. It allows us to evaluate how bad or aggressive it is, and then we can make decisions on how can we treat these patients. This data that I’m showing here is very important. This is from 2023. I was showing for the first time, a lot of new data coming. This is from LiverMet Survey (2023). This is from Europe and this is in patients with liver resections. I’m not talking about transplantation here. A lot of the information that we know and we use in transplantation, we adopted from liver resections for colorectal metastasis. And this is telling us that: number of metastases matter. Patients who have resection and have metastases between one and three and they go for resection, their survival of five years is around 76%. In this group of patients of 27,000 patients in Europe, when they have metastas between four and seven, look at this, how it drops to 16% at five years, and if they have more than seven to 7% that five years. What is this telling us? If we have a lot of metastasis, our outcome, even with surgery, is not very good, probably better than only chemotherapy, probably better than non-treatment. But we want to do something different for these patients, because this is very small amount of benefit of this patient. And again, this is just showing in a different way, the survival of these patients who have one to three, four to nine or more than 10, that clearly tumor burden matters – how many metastases and what are the size of those. So, look at the date of this paper. This is 1990 1991 so in the late 80s, Austria and France, they started doing liver transplants for colorectal metastasis, and they published this paper in this journal, which at that moment, it was important, but nowadays, it’s not an extremely important journal, “Transplantation Proceedings” in 1991, and they showed what I want to show is here. It is the patients who have had a liver transplantation. Here it is – the dark line here is liver transplantation. They compared patients who have advanced liver disease that they transplanted, compared it to patients who have had chemotherapy and some type of hepatic artery pump. It’s not the same pump of what we use nowadays. It’s not the same that what the patients who go to MSK and get this pump, you can’t get this pump. It’s different. It was a different chemotherapy, but it was intra-arterial so they compared this patient with transplant, and the ones we did that pump at that time, and they saw that the survival of this patient was better, but really, at five months, around 20% of the patients were only alive, and the vast majority of the cancer came back. So clearly, in the entire world, liver transplantation was decided that it’s prohibited. It was not an indication. It was a contraindication. So everybody abandoned the few cases that started transplantation. So we’re talking about 1990; so we’re talking about we’re taking 25-30 years later. Now there’s a lot of things that have changed, and this is how we understand that tumor biology that I was telling you, I showed you that size and number of tumors matter. Now we can measure better with tumor markers, with the CEA. A lot of you know about Signatera, or Guardant 360 that we can use to measure the circulating tumor DNA. We can understand – I was mentioning this – for me, this is a very important one. How would the patient respond to chemotherapy? When patients do not respond to chemotherapy, normally, the outcome is not going to be good if the patient has disease outside the liver. Not always. It’s very important – it depends where it goes. Sometimes, if it’s in the adrenal gland or in the lungs, is different than if it’s in the peritoneum, which is the layer of of tissue that covers all our organs, in the abdomen, the presence or not of lymph nodes around the liver or in the retroperitoneum, which is the area which is behind the organs, more into our back. This is very important as well. And I always talk to my patients, we need to understand more about the tumor genetics. So what mutations exist? Very few people have BRAF mutation, but that could be pretty aggressive, or the KRAs and RAS TP53 etc, etc. The more mutations apparently, we know that the prognosis is worse, but it’s not the only thing. And now we know that the presence of tumors in the right side or left side, the prognosis is different. When patients have cancer of the primary tumor, the colon cancer in the right side, we need to be more cautious, because the cancer normally is more aggressive, and tumors in the right side of a colon are associated not always, but are associated more with mutations. So what have we done up to this moment over the last 25 years? So we have chemotherapy agents you might identify, many of you. What are these? FOLFOXIRI is a combination of FOLFOX and FOLFIRI. These are two different chemotherapies, kind of the same families, but they are different. One uses oxaliplatin with normally patients, there are some patients that are very strong, that they tolerate many months of FOLFOX, but they develop some neuropathy. It’s very common to have that, but the response is pretty similar. A lot of the times we start FOLFOXIRI, then the OX, it gets removed, and then we continue with irinotecan, which is FOLFIRI, which also has some bad side effects of GI symptoms. We also use some biologics, depending if what type of tumor it is. You can use all of these, which are bevacizumab, cetuximab, panetumumab. There are some generic names that we know. We can nowadays, there’s some oncological centers where they’re able to give biomarkers driven approaches to patients who have RAS mutations, BRAF mutation. I remember a patient from Australia who got a trial on BRAF and did extremely well, hopefully she continued doing well. And also local regional approaches, which are resection. It’s a local, regional approach, ablation, the pump, the Y-90, and now the histotripsy that I’m not going to be talking about that. Another day we can talk about that, because there are very interesting things that we’re seeing. And the only sentence that I’m going to say here is, it’s not a silver bullet, but I think histotripsy is a good tool and bridge to be able to get, perhaps surgery, to get perhaps transplantation. It’s a bridge that has, that’s the way that I’m seeing. There’s not too much data, but this is pretty interesting. Another day we can talk about that. Everybody knows that this new era is not that the Norwegians started doing liver transfer for colorectal metastases. You saw that the French and the Austrians started doing this, but the Norwegians said, “All right, let’s do this again” after 25-30 years later, and then they started doing it. And what was the difference? Remember, only 15, 20% of the patients were alive, and now 60% were alive. What happened? Well, we are better in science. We’re better surgeons. We’re better in selecting and understanding the tumor biology. I’ll repeat it again, and they were able to see this outcome. Now, the majority of the patients in that trial have recurrence at two years, and these were only 21 patients that were treated in Norway. But instead of dying, many of them, 60% were alive at five years. That is a big thing. I remember reviewing this paper, and I was so impressed. In 2013 they created this Oslo score, which I think is very clinical. It works very well at my institution. We follow it in some ways, but not all. We’re a little bit more strict in my institution, but it helps. The more points that there are, the better, the higher points, the more complex or more difficult outcome, the less points, the better. So if someone has zero or one, apparently their survival is much better. And we see here that this is only six patients who have a score of zero or one, and all those six patients were alive at five years. If the patient has a score two and three, around 70% of those five were alive at five years. If you have four and you get transplanted, your outcome after three years, nobody survived. So it was pretty clear, the more points you have, the worst the outcome, and these are the size of the tumor, the largest tumor in the liver, the level of the CEA, if the patient is progressing on chemotherapy, and the survival from the moment of the patient was diagnosed with liver metastases to the moment of transplant. This is something that we have been doing more and more in Rochester with some of our patients, and we are practically adopting to do these, the MTV criteria. It’s a specific formula where you, as a surgeon or physician or oncologist need to work with the nuclear medicine department, because this is a specific formula that they have to do a study in the this nuclear medicine physicians, where we do a PET scan, but they measure with a formula, the uptake, and if it’s more or below, higher or below 70 cubic centimeters. And we know that if patients have lower than 70 cubic centimeters, that means that the cancer is less active, and the outcome of those patients is very good. If it’s more than 70 you can see here that majority of the patients will have recurrence, and their survival is shorter. So it’s a tool that help us now we need to be cautious, because when we do a PET scan for MTV, for calculating this MTV, and we do it after a run of chemotherapy of the last few days, then the the results are going to be alternated, because it might be negative, but it’s false, because the chemotherapy put the tumors to sleep, and then the results that we have might not be very reliable after the Norwegians started. This is an explosion. Look at this in these are, if you PubMed is a way to try to find a specific topic on surgery or medicine, something that you want to search. And this is where all the doctors, when we publish our names, are going to go there. So you type liver transplantation for colorectal metastasis, and you see what has been happening over the last year. There is a boom of number of publications. And this is impressive, because it has been like more right now, maybe like 900 articles, publications, and you will say, “Oh, my god, who’s doing that many? It’s quite impressive.” Probably in the world there are 200 or 250 liver transplants for colorectal metastasis only. So a lot of these are letters. A lot of these are just repeated things that are happening. But this is opening the flood gates, and more importantly, after Betsy mentioned, this is Dr Rene Adam, a good colleague and friend, presented in ASCO, the randomized control trial, which I will talk about that later, but that is going to be this is opening the the gate now, when the paper gets published, hopefully soon, this is going to make a big revolution in that. Let me talk about North America. My country is not here Mexico, which is North America, because in Mexico they don’t do liver transplants for colorectal metastasis. There are two centers or three centers in Canada doing that, and much more centers in the US. You maybe of many of you might be familiarized with this paper, that this was the first paper in North America on liver transplants for colorectal metastasis. Here you can see some of the surgeons at work in my institution, people from Cleveland and people from Toronto, and we saw here clearly that there was an advantage and overall survival. But these are only 10 patients between the three centers. As you can see, 10 patients, seven to zero. So at three years we the survival was close to 80% so that was pretty good, similar of what the Norwegians showed. We’re not the only ones. This is ? for Abhi Humor and Chris. They published this paper where you can see the overall survival. Again, this is at three years showing around 80% – similar of what we were showing with the three centers before. Now Kazunari Sasaki, is my good friend in Stanford. They are not doing transfer for colorectal metastasis yet, but he was working in Cleveland. He’s a good friend. We worked together, and we published this paper. We analyzed, there’s a registry where you have all the transplants in the United States that are happening, kidney, liver, pancreas, face transplant, hand transplant, anything that you want, you need to have a special access. But so we requested access, and we analyze how many transplants had been done in the United States from December 2017 which this the new era to March 2022, we published this, and it was published here in Surgical Oncology at that moment. We’re talking about more than two years ago, 46 liver transplants and 50 centers. And you see the outcome here. There were some done with living donor some of them with deceased organs. These are cadaver organs, and you can see that the living donor has a much better outcome compared to the diseased donor. I want to be cautious here. I’m not saying that living donor is a better organ than diseased organ. What I’m saying here is we need to understand what type of organs were these. How come these patients got these organs? Is this a marginal organ that nobody wanted and it was transplanted in this patient and the patient accepted? This is a fatty liver. So because probably the outcome of this organ, which is not as good as the living donor, is because of the quality of the organ, not necessarily because of the cancer perspective of the patient. So this is something that we are investigating, and we want to learn more about it, but this is new data. Until March, two years later, and I haven’t published these and I worked with Kazu again, but I want you to see here, this is the amount of cases. There’s 10, 20, and 30 per year, transplants for colorectal metastasis. Look what happened last year. Last year, we did more than 30. It’s probably 35, so you know what’s going to happen in 2024 and you know what is going to happen in 2025, this is just going to go up. And now with the paper of Rene Adam that maybe gets accepted, this is going to change. The medical oncologists are going to be referring more patients for transplantation. But I want to show something interesting. Here is when we are divided. I’m going to go back. These were, this is organs, and these were living donors. The green: a little bit more activity with living donors in the US. Here is the overall survival of all of the patients that were transplanted, 65% at three years, not as good as we would like to see, like the Norwegians that they have, right? They have this number, but at five years. So at three years, they will have much, much better. So why is this? So when we divide between living donor and disease donor, here is a very important gap. The overall survival of living donor went up, and of course, this one go down. So that’s why it was 60 something percent and now 74 and 54. Why is this? Why the patients who receive living donor do better, or the ones who have disease organs do worse? I don’t have that answer. We are trying to investigate, and I need to be very cautious with the message here. We need to see what type of quality, the quality of that organ that patients are receiving here, or the selection of patients. Maybe, maybe the selection of patients is not ideal. Maybe these patients are not fulfilled the criteria, but we’re working on that. And unfortunately, it’s a srtr, it’s a transplant registry and it’s not an oncological registry, so we don’t have the details. Remember, when I talk about tumor biology, if I want to analyze and all these patients in the US srtr database to analyze the tumor biology, I don’t have the data, unfortunately, so we’re working on that. There’s a lot of things that we’re doing. I want to share our protocol in Rochester. As I mentioned to you, we’re a little bit more aggressive in the aspect like, for example, these two criteria from the Oslo score. We don’t follow them. If a patient has more than 80 of CEA, even if it’s the only one, even if this is zero, this is one, zero and zero and it’s only one, we won’t do the transplant. We believe, and I personally believe, that a CEA above eighty is bad, and it’s even worse if the CEA start coming up, you know, from eight to 12 to 15 to 32 to 42 and then you do a transplant going that way? I don’t think it’s a good idea. And even if it’s only one point progression of chemotherapy, that is a contraindication for us. So we really look at: we ask for the patients to have a colonoscopy if there’s a year interval between the colectomy, the surgery in the colon or rectum, and the date of the transplant, as you know, in our institution, we just living donor only, and the primary has to be removed more than six months prior to the planned living donor. As I mentioned, the CEA less than 80, if the patient has BRAF, we are extremely cautious. That would be normally a contraindication. But if the patient has double mutations of KRAS and TP53 we’re going to observe the patient a little bit longer. This is just to justify why we don’t do transplants when a patient has progression on chemotherapy. This is showing in liver resections, when a patient got a liver section while the patient progressed on chemotherapy. Look at the outcome the when we compare to the patients who respond to chemotherapy. It’s pretty bad. Now imagine in liver transplantation, putting a donor on risk when we’re going to have very few advantages in the recipient. I don’t think would be ethically justifiable to do that or to take a cadaveric organ. You’re taking an organ from another patient who could do better. So I think there’s a lot of things that we have to be cautious the more mutations, the worse the outcome in liver resection. So we are adopting these in transplantation, and we are very careful. In my practice, what we do is if the patient has a lot of mutations we do not necessarily say no transplant, but we observe the patient for a longer period of time to understand the tumor biology. This is when patients have metastasis in the lymph nodes. The outcome is worse, even when we do resection. So you can imagine liver transplantation is going to be worse. So when there are positive lymph nodes around the liver or around the retroperitoneum we don’t do transplantation. In Rochester during this period of time since we started our open donor program, we’re talking about five years, at that moment, until May 2024 so we’re talking about a little bit more than a month. We evaluated 225 patients from around the country. Of those ones, 23 were transplanted only. There were several patients, few patients still on the workup and we have two that we’re going to go for surgery in July, and hopefully, hopefully one or two in August. We have the appropriate follow up of 20, and then this is what I will show you in some data. One of our fellows did that study here, you can see. Red is going to be the recipients that we have, the donors that we have, and the referrals from different places. These are the referrals from many – I think there are 35 states where we have assessed patients. We do a lot of these things from telemedicine, a lot of them located in the East Coast, especially in the northeast, but many here, a lot of patients that we have seen from Georgia and some of them here in Texas as well. These are the donors, who have donated, for those recipients who receive a transplant. You can see there’s three of them coming from Canada, from Ottawa, Toronto, Vancouver, and we have a lot of other patients coming from different parts of the country. And the red are the recipients where they got transplanted. And we try to follow up them as much as possible, and as well to follow them with support from other teams. Sometimes that works in those areas. For those, I mentioned 23 patients, but 20 patients, we have continued having these very detailed follow up, and I want to share these that three year overall survival of 90% so the outcomes are pretty, pretty, pretty good.

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro 33:10
This is 60% of the patient at this moment will have recurrence. But they some of them, they have recurrence only in the lungs. Sometimes we just observe. I know one of our patients recently went for surgery and it was removed, and he’s of chemotherapy, and hopefully he doesn’t have more lung metastases. And I think this patient probably had that lung liver metastasis that was not resected before, and then now it got resected. I hope he’s got no evidence of disease. Now, Matt Byron, one of my research fellows, did this study when we evaluated only 162 patients. But this is very interesting. I want you to – hopefully I can explain this well. These are 20 patients transplanted, who were transplanted in our group, and these are 13 patients who came to see us virtually, or something like that, and they were candidates for transplant. They were candidates, if I would have a liver in my hands, I will transplant them. But they themselves decided I don’t want to go for transplant. They decided I’m going to go to get more pump, or to get pump, or to get more chemo and ablation and whatever. This doctor is saying that he’s going to go do some robotic thing and cut here and resect here and do ablation, and, you know, a little bit of of everything. So because they were our patients, we are allowed to follow their records. So we compare these 20 patients who were transplanted, who would feel the criteria for transplant, and compared to those 13 who were candidates for transplant, but they decided to go to other place. In this short period of time of following up after they decided, 70% of them progressed. That means the cancer progressed, even that they went to more chemo ablations, Y-90 Etc, from the 20 patients, right, only 25% had recurrence during this follow up. This is, clearly, this was just accepted in JAMA Surgery, which was the highest impact factor journal in surgery, and we published this graph over there, which is, I think it’s very important, and it’s telling us that transplantation, at least in this study, has better outcome in patients with very advanced disease compared to other options. This is the same graph, and now you, many of you, are away about this. This is something that we study in our patients, that shows that when we remove their liver after transplant, 64% of the time, there were more cancer, more metastases that were we were able to see in their images, CT scans or MRIs, so there’s hidden tumors in the liver. So I think that is when we go and do resections in patients who have high tumor load, and we do resections, that’s why six months later, 12 months later, eight months later, they have recurrence. I don’t think it’s recurrence. I think it was disease that was already there that we couldn’t see. Now we have been talking about three years outcomes. Five years outcome. Is there data that has long term outcomes? Well, the only ones can have that is their Norwegians. And here it is the Norweigans. This center here, they’re looking at more than 10 years, and they have close to 40% survival at five years. But wait a moment. These are the patients, all the patients in Norway that are like 70 something patients where they were initially treated. But many of those patients, I want you to know are the ones who were not a very strict criteria at the beginning. So there are some ones that have an Oslo score of three there for of course, probably they will have very good outcome when they do these at 10 years. For only patients who have an Oslo score zero or one, their outcome goes as high at 10 years at 60% so that is pretty impressive. That is very similar of the outcome when we do liver transplant for cirrhosis, liver transplant for other type of primary liver cancer in the liver. So this is where colorectal metastasis, when it’s well indicated the patients do well. Now, timing. This is a slide that, you remember when I mentioned about the Oslo score, the Norwegian guys analyzed it again in this long term follow up, and they were able to see that if, when they analyzed from the diagnosis of liver metastasis to transplant, if it’s one or two years, there was no difference. The biggest difference was if it’s more than three years. But as I mentioned to Dr. Paldacline, I said, “Well, if I from all the 24 patients that we have done. If I would only take the ones who have more than three years, probably of those ones, I’m going to be only doing two transplants or three”. So I think having that one year, it’s what we adopted in our institution. Of course, if there are mutations and more complex things, we observe more than one year, maybe one year and a half. I mentioned to these that the recurrence in the liver after the liver is transplanted. It’s very small compared to when we do liver resections. I have the opportunity of being invited to the ihpba, which is the largest center of liver cancer in the world this year, was in Cape Town, South Africa. And I give, and I was have the honor to give their give three state of the art lectures, one each day. And I give the state of the art lecture of worldwide activity. So I needed to not only present what I’m showing you in Rochester and in Norway, I needed to find out what’s happening in the world, and I did a survey, and I contacted these surgeons that I know, surgeon from all over the world. You know, Europe has been pretty active, and there’s a lot of centers in the US doing liver transplant. So the 45 Respondent of the International Group, around 36 The rest were from the US and and when we asked them, How many transplants you have done for colorectal metastasis, look at this. The purple is the 97% of the programs they have done, less than five. So very small experience, only 3% have done more more than five, between five and 10. When we ask them if they use a tumor board. interestingly, 20% they don’t use a tumor board if they follow the Oslo criteria. 1/3 of the people who responded, they don’t use those criteria. 26% they didn’t use genetic testing, or they don’t do a laparoscopy, or laparonomy to see the lymph nodes. So that was pretty impressive to me to see those things. I think it’s it’s a little bit concerning that part what is happening in many places of the world, so routine treatment with chemotherapy after liver transplantation. There we asked that, and very few people are doing that, nine out of 30. But the ones who responded, and they were saying that they expect to have five year overall survival between 54% between 50 and 74 and more than 75% at five year survival, 35% I think we personally, we should target this, because that’s what is justifiable with other diseases that we do liver transplantation. Now, this is Rene Ada, and this is the highest level of evidence. Briefly, what is a randomized clinical control trial is the highest level of evidence. Let’s pretend that we, I don’t know quite example, I can say, imagine that we are going to do one randomized trial. And if I, if I tell you, if you use helmet when you jump into motorcycle, your chances of being alive at higher. I am sure all of you will say, Yes, that’s true, right? But someone of you can come No, no, no. There’s no randomized control trial. We need to do that. We need to do a randomized control trial to see the perfect statistics and to see if it’s true or not. So why would you do you’re gonna get 100 people and you’re gonna tell them you’re gonna go on your motorcycle from here, from Rochester, New York to Atlanta, in your motorcycles, 50 of them are going to be wearing helmet, go and hit the road, and 50 of them are not going to use helmet. Now we’re going to see what happened, who has an accident, who survived, who doesn’t survive, and you know what most likely will be the outcome? Right? That is a randomized control trial. You probably knew what’s what’s going to happen, but this is going to be the highest level of evidence. And in medicine, in oncology, in transplantation, a lot of people want to know the result of randomized control trial, because the highest level of evidence the Norway people show us that transplant, they do, do well, Rochester people show you, show you that, right? But now the French came and with Belgium and Italy, they have, there were very few patients from here. Majority were from France, and they did this. They have 94 patients. Half of them were for chemotherapy alone with unresectable liver metastases. And 47 received chemotherapy and then went for liver transplantation. And what is very interesting is the chemotherapy for liver transplantation. 81% achieved to get liver transplant, because there are some of them who progress Unfortunately, while they were on the list, nine patients have tumor progression, which were those ones who were here, who didn’t reach but what do we call it intention to treat? So even if these patients, not all these patients reach transplantation, but they were in this arm of liver transplant, plus chemotherapy, five year survival of 50, 57% compared to 13% this is a huge difference at five years, but with the benefit of the patient who have liver transplantation, If I am here, I want to liver transplant, because I have 57% chances to be a light at five years. Compare if I have 13. And these are very similar populations, but now those ones who reach transplant not intention to treat 73% compared. To 9% is huge. This is we knew that because Norway show was that, but this is the highest level of evidence. Now, what now? This is really opening the gates. Now, the medical oncologist, the day that he was show in ASCO I started getting a lot of emails from my colleagues saying, “Oh, we’re so happy that we’re working with you now.” They are trusting and believing that this is happening. And let me show you, this is the outcome that it was happening. This is intention to treat that. I show you the data. These are the patients have chemotherapy. You don’t need to be an expert in stats. You just see the difference between the red and the black, the black is chemotherapy alone, and this is chemotherapy followed by transplantation. Here is, again, the intention, the overall survival once you get transplanted. And it’s huge. Look at this gap. It’s impressive to see that. And this is the progression-free survival. This is patients, a lot of them probably here in France. What is happening is around 80% of the patients will have records at some moment here in the chemotherapy. Of course, they they have progression of disease and they die at some moment. But this will probably 20% are cure on this population of patients, but many of them, as I mentioned, they have only lungs or only other things that can be treated. Now, what happened when we convert when do we decide that the patient is unresectable? So this patient, clearly, here, is unresectable. Lot of metastases. There’s no free liver that I can live. But what about if we give chemotherapy and look what happened to the same patient? Oh, my God. Patient responded so well to chemo or to a hepatic artery infusion or something like that. What does that mean? Based on what we have learned, patients who have this response, they will have very high recurrence if they go for surgery. And many of you know that I’m telling you the truth. That is true, because those disappearing liver metastases, they still exist there. And this is what I show you with that paper from Rochester, that 64% of the patients have more cancer of what we can see in image. This is a case that looks similar. Look at the amount of cancer, multiple cancer, you cannot resect these. Patient received treatment, and look at this very it’s the same patient. The calcification got smaller. You can say, maybe we can tabulate these, or if you want to use histotripsy, or you want to do whatever you want to do, and then what happened? The patient have more metastasis when we did the transplant that we were able to find that we were not seeing in the CT scan. I show you that. And this is just kind of showing. I put this like, where are we at this moment? The places who are doing a lot this is all the country together, in the US now, 65% at three years. Only, not because we don’t have too much data to get to five years Norway, which there are champions, five years, 60% and then at 10 year and 10 years, they go like around 40% five years overall survival in the data from Rene Adam in Paris, 73% that is pretty good. Rochester, we’re here. We have 90% I don’t want to show off, but this is three years. This is not five years yet. Hopefully we can continue doing well, which, that’s my expectations. I think we are very cautious, perhaps on patient selection. Maybe in the future, we’re going to be more open, and maybe we can lose our criteria. But in this moment, what we’re doing is good for patients, and we follow them very closely. And you know, I want to be sure here that the message is, you know, life after transplantation is not that everything is perfect. There are some patients that is have a beautiful and amazing life, but there are some patients that, especially the first month, they have some bio leak, some complications, some bleeding, or they have to stay longer. Here are they coming from far away? I feel so bad for that, but I know that long term is for them, majority of them, I cannot guarantee everybody for me, just to conclude this liver transplantation can provide a substantial survival benefit in patients with colorectal liver metastases, it’s very important that we reflect all the parameters of tumor biology, as I mentioned and the concept of technical resectability that we can remove in high tumor load where there’s a lot is not by itself, valid exclusion criteria for transplant. What I’m trying to say with this and this sentence, I took it from Rene Adam in France. He clearly said here that many patients will have a lot of tumor load, and even if we can resect them, he believes that they will benefit for transplant, and I agree with him. The multidisciplinary management including transplant oncology, which is what we’re doing, might improve outcomes in selected patients. The question is not resect or transplant, it’s to choose between partial or total resection. Total resection is a transplant. Partial resection is just a resection. So with this, I want to finish. I will stop sharing, and I would like people to ask questions, please.

Betsy Post 50:57
Great. Well, I have questions for you in the chat, are you able to hear me?

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro 51:05
I I can hear you, perfect.

Betsy Post 51:07
Okay, so your first question is, if someone has the NRAS mutation, is that person eligible for transplant?

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro 51:18
That person could be eligible for transplant? Yes, I will be more I will be more cautious. I will analyze more things and everything. But that patient could be a candidate for transplantation for sure.

Betsy Post 51:29
If a patient has stable extrahepatic mets. Does that automatically make you not a candidate for liver transplant?

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro 51:41
Alright, I know you’re recording me, so the answer is, you have a traumatic disease. I would say no, but if you tell me, the patient have metastasis in the lungs, one or two and they were resected, and if the patient comes and see me one year later and there’s no evidence of disease, it will be hard for me to say no, so probably that would be a candidate, right? So I think it depends on how it’s treated. But in the moment, if you tell me I have disease in the lungs that I can clearly see, and the patient needs transplant, the answer will be no, because there’s the evidence of extra-hepatic disease. If it was treated and it’s removed and there’s no evidence of recurrence, then I would say yes.

Betsy Post 52:33
I think I’d like for you to expand a little bit, because I understand, because I’ve been studying transplant with you for a long time. But I think it’s important maybe for folks to understand why, if you have disease outside the liver, the problem that presents for transplant. Why is that a problem for transplant?

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro 52:56
In transplantation, we use in immunosuppression. Immunosuppression are drugs that bring your immune system down to avoid rejection, even if your sibling or someone donate part of their liver to you, even if there are a lot of genetic similarities, the action of our bodies is to reject what is not ours, so they’re going to go and try to fight that. So that’s when we started using immunosuppression. 50 years ago, the life of patients with liver transplantation and kidney transplantation changed completely, and immunosuppression is extremely well tolerated. It’s not chemotherapy. It’s not like dialysis is very well tolerated. But the problem is that if the patient has active cancer and you give immune suppression, we are just enhancing and pushing the cancer to spread quicker. And that is very, very, very dangerous. And so that is a reason that we don’t do liver transplantation with patients who have extra hepatic disease when they have metastasis in other places. Did that explain it Betsy?

Betsy Post 54:15
Yes, and I think that’s important, because I know we might have newer people that don’t know too much about transplant at this point. So I thought it was important to clarify that point.

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro 54:25
Can I expand something here? There have been some patients that have connected with us at my institution asking for an assessment for transplant, a few, perhaps a handful of patients who, perhaps they are not candidates for transplant, because they’re exactly what you’re describing. There have extra hepatic disease. However, when I saw the images I was I was like, wow, I think I can resect you. I cannot do a transplant, but I can resect you. We have to push the envelope and try to do something, and maybe we can go and remove that metastasis that is in the peritoneum, in the abdomen, or something like that. I think that is more justifiable because you’re not involving a transplant, you’re not involving a donor into this. And you can push the envelope a little bit in some of these patients. So there has been a handful of patients who they have the sad news, no, you’re not a candidate for transplant for our team. However, we can consider resecting you. You probably won’t have the amazing outcome, but probably you can have a good outcome if we resect you. So with the message here is there might be opportunities, and you just need to explore teams that are willing to do more for patients.

Betsy Post 55:47
Thank you. There’s a question about, is there anything we can do to have more livers available to cancer patients so we don’t have to rely on living donors? That’s

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro 55:57
A great question, and we’re working on that. One of my colleagues who works in University of Cincinnati, he brought the bush for trying to get — in transplantation, you receive an organ when according to a score that is called male score. And this we’re talking about patients with cirrhosis and those things, the meld score, the higher you have it the word, the more sick you are. A patient who have cancer have a normal liver function, so their meld score is going to be very low. So what they are trying to do is to if we list these patients with colorectal liver metastasis, they will get 15 points at least. I think with 15 points is nothing, because it’s until 40 I don’t get, I don’t transplant anybody with the meld score of 15 in New York State. But I think it’s a good start. At least they go to the list, they get extra points. And I think the next step is, okay, let’s push and get more. But what we have to do is, as a country, we need to show good results. If I when I show you the data from the US overall, the outcome is not very good, as you saw with deceased organs and that and that and living donor is helping that data overall to get better. But if you remove the living donor, the deceased organ, the Calibrate organ comes down. Why is that? I want to learn why? Why their outcome is not that good, because the organ probably is not the ideal, or maybe they are not selecting the recipient the most, the best way. But there’s much more to work on this and understand.

Betsy Post 57:44
Thank you. Do you foresee transplant becoming a first line treatment for patients with low Oslo score and high disease burden? Or do you think response to chemo is an equally important factor in determining eligibility?

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro 58:00
Well, I would say both things are true.

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro 58:04
Chemotherapy is helping us to decide who could be a candidate, according to the response, that’s very important. And definitely, I think what we have to do clearly here, the message is, if you have a low Oslo score and you have a high tumor load, like a lot of two cancer and there’s no evidence of your body disease, you should potentially be a candidate for liver transplantation. Definitely.

Betsy Post 58:29
If you don’t qualify for liver transplant today because of a high Oslo score, because of disease progression on chemotherapy or pre transplant, CEA as too high. Do you have a recommendation on a path to get on track for a transplant qualification?

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro 58:49
I Well, it has to be case by case. Analyze it patients. Needs a doctor who thinks and it’s transparent with the patients, and let them know we can do this. And sometimes the patient to me, they push me. And, you know, there’s, I don’t know, there’s a patient who recently came and was progressing, not doing well, got the pump progressing. So we know that biology is very bad. And the patient told, can you do? Is to trypsy. For example, I cannot transplant. I can do another resection. This patient is not going to do well. But the patient asked, Can you do histotripys. And I said, Well, why is the reason of doing histotrypsy. It’s not going to help you to get into something right say, let’s give it a try. The insurance approve it, and we treat it. And we didn’t cure him, but tumors get reduced inside. I don’t know if it’s going to help him to survive a little bit longer or not, but it was very interesting to see that, and probably it happened in some Patients, not in all the patients. But I think what we have to do as healthcare workers, oncologist surgeons, transplanters, or whoever we are, is to try to offer options to patients. There are some things that there’s not that many, but we have to think about, how can we help? Because, when I knew you guys know better than me, because you are the patients or the caregivers, when patients have these diseases is bad, they they want to have options and have hope, and that’s what part of our big part of our job.

Betsy Post 1:00:40
How long do you have to be off chemo while you wait for transplant, and what happens if CEA increases or disease progresses while you’re waiting? So basically, like you’ve been approved, but then that happens while you’re waiting, and you’re off the chemo waiting.

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro 1:00:57
Oh that’s a great question. So this is what happened in France. In France is not Norway. You don’t have the access of transplant like in Norway. In Norway, if you’re in the transplant list, you get transplanted in a month. It doesn’t matter your meld score, boom. You get transplanted with cirrhosis or whatever. Now in France is more like in the US or in other countries, where you only transplant the sick patients who have a high meld score. So how does that those patients in the trial got transplanted? Because it was an agreement between the opios, which are the organizations control organization in the country, in Belgium, Italian France, and the opios said, All right, we commit, with this trial that patients who are listed for colorectal liver metastasis in this study, that is just 47 patients. We’re going to get them an organ within two months, within two months, no more than two months. Guess what? There were some places that you cannot guarantee that, and they have to wait three months. What happened to those patients? They progressed and they lost their chance to be transplanted. Are there some that even were two months waiting, and when they open, they have progression so clearly, to me, that’s why I think living donation works very well, because you don’t have to wait, especially in this country, you don’t have to wait. And then we can plan it, we can continue to give in chemo, chemo, chemo, chemo, chemo. Patient is tired, but it’s going to get transplant, all right, two weeks, three weeks before the transplant, stop the chemo, but we know there’s an organ, and we’re going to do it in the best way. And it works when you Okay, get listed, and you’re waiting for be transplanted or cadaveric organ. We don’t have that access here, you’re waiting to get an organ which probably is not the ideal organ, or extended criteria organ, or something like that. Especially if you have, of course, you will have a kind of score. That’s why we want to, at the end, be able that our patients with colorectal metastases In the future, they can get exemption points, right so they can get a good quality organ, but in this moment, is, it’s difficult, and I show you the results that they are a little bit of questions there,

Betsy Post 1:03:32
Does utilizing the HAI pump complicate eligibility for living donor liver transplant?

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro 1:03:41
Definitely, definitely true. Definitely true.

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro 1:03:46
We have done four transplants after the pump. One was miserable. This is one of the few times in my life as a surgeon that I said what I am doing here. You feel like even though there are 25 people in the operating room, you feel that you’re in the middle of the desert and nobody’s around you. It’s It’s pretty bad. But that patient survived and did well. We were four surgeons and operating, and it was very bad because of the bleeding, the inflammation and those things, the artery, what gets very damaged. But I’m fortunate to have an amazing team, one of my colleagues, her disease expert with micro vascular anastomosis, when you put together the arteries, and we were able to do this type of complex liver surgeries and reconstructions of arteries. So it is doable, but there’s going to be more technical complexity, but it’s doable.

Betsy Post 1:04:50
Can you talk about some of the things that disqualify people from transplant when they’re in the review process?

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro 1:04:59
The number one. Is presence of extra hepatic disease. This is outside the liver, which could be lymph nodes that are positive around the liver, under the retroperitoneum, multiple metastases in the lungs, in other places: that would be one. The other one would be progression, when the patient is progressing, even if there’s no disease outside the liver, even if it’s contained, but it’s progressing, and we’re giving chemo and the patient is progressing, that is a bad sign. And as I show you, the data, progression under chemotherapy is a bad prognosis for resection, and even if it’s bad for resection, even worse when transplantation. So progression, evidence of extrahepatic disease, are the most common way of Not, not to be a candidate. So those, those should be the major ones that happened here. One of my colleagues, of my researchers, analyzed from all the 200 and something patients that we have. Probably we already have assessed 300 from all these patients. If you analyze which ones have more chance to get to transplant compared to which ones didn’t. There was an something interesting here that is the timing for referral. So when the patient came to see a transplant center for analyzed transplantation, if they come very late, the chances of getting transplant is small. If they come earlier, they have better chance. And perhaps it’s because the communication of the transplanter with the Oncology Center is okay, let’s do this. Let’s continue chemo. So there’s a very good feedback back and forward, and they can treat the patient when there’s when transplanters get late, or the referral is late, then patients have less chances to get into transplant.

Betsy Post 1:06:54
That’s one thing that I really work hard on in COLONTOWN, is just trying to educate patients that are unresectable in air quotes, you know, by a good liver surgeon with a tumor board or more than one, I try to talk to them about this as an option, not as a Hail Mary at the end. And, you know, to follow that process. So I think that’s definitely something that, you know, we’re it’s just going to take education anyway, right?

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro 1:07:23
Yeah, early referral is the best. And some patients come and say, Why do you want to see me if I still have the primary and we have to remove it? So because we want to make a plan, we need to create a good connection here, a good relationship between physician and patient, and then work together into this and follow up. I prefer to generate that communication without my patients.

Betsy Post 1:07:52
Next question, if looking within my own circles for a possible donor, what are some things I should look for whether the person would be a good candidate or not to waste our time with.

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro 1:08:06
You know, I think I can. I will tell you something that happened with this. A lot of the times, there’s some patients, and I know you’re talking about colorectal metastasis only. I’m talking about many types of of diseases, cirrhotic and those things. And sometimes patients come and say, How come I don’t have a donor? You know, all my friends are telling me that they’re calling you and you’re not answering or sometimes, probably my team is busy, but I doubt it. But it happened. It could happen. So I’m not saying that that’s not an option, but many times people tell us, I’m going to do this, and they don’t do it. And we cannot go and tell you as a patient, a this patient call and now he’s not responding. Or this patient call, we send them the questionnaire, and he’s not responding. We for HIPA regulations, we cannot say that we cannot go and tell you your your patients, your people, are not responding, or someone is telling you, yes, I I call. And that’s not true sometimes. So what type will you need to have someone who really wants to do this for you, who really is invested, who really is open for for doing this? Of course, it has to be a healthy person, someone who is, you know, if it’s someone who drinks a little bit of alcohol or something, they can stop drinking and they can prepare and get their liver better. Is if someone who has a little bit of overweight then, okay, hit the gym. There’s going to be time. We have two, three months for for getting better, and people can change a lot. Within three months, there’s a lot of change, things that can change in a donor. And there’s a risky operation. It’s a big operation, but we are. We’re fortunate to have pretty good outcomes with all our. Donors, people who are the same blood group that’s ideal, or at least being compatible, right? But someone who’s between our criteria is between 18 and 60 years old. I saw a patient today that is a patient that is going to turn 60 in the next weeks, and it’s going to be a donor for another person in the fall. So that’s amazing, and it’s a super healthy, beautiful woman. And I think, I think it’s going to happen, hopefully, so people who are willing to take the next step, to put their life on risk, someone who is willing to to to help and not necessarily needs to be a family member. No, there’s a lot of people who come with friends or friends of a friend, or sometimes, you know, people use social media, and it’s impressive to see the results that that social media creates people you know, your high school friend that you haven’t seen in 20 years come and say, I want to donate to someone. And some of the patients said, Okay, I want to donate to that person. That person doesn’t know that I want to donate. Please do my work up, but don’t tell that person that I’m willing to do this, and we need to respect so we cannot tell you that. We can mention there’s a potential donor, and that’s it. We cannot see more. So it’s a very interesting concept. And our, you know, our program, and I’m sure there’s other programs, our coordinators in the best try to invest time and education with the patient and the family that needs a light on.

Betsy Post 1:11:48
If a stage four patient is currently NED, but at a high risk of recurrence, would they be eligible for transplant? Or must there be a recurrence first?

Betsy Post 1:11:59
Again, if a patient has stage four, no evidence of disease,

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro 1:12:07
okay, so late treatment, right?

Betsy Post 1:12:10
So, for example, this patient, if the patient had a liver resection, was no evidence of disease, negative ctDNA, but high risk of recurrence, would they be eligible to start the process of transplant, or do they need to have a recurrence first?

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro 1:12:29
Okay, what’s going to happen if I do the transplant and the patient had a bad outcome, and then in the pathology things comes and there was no cancer? Can you imagine that? So, yeah, there’s always risks, right? That could happen. So the way that I would do these, if the patient has resection, if I see recurrence, this is where I will say, Okay, let’s go for transplant, let’s ablate it, let’s give chemo. Let’s have a control, and in a few months, we do transplant,

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro 1:13:06
I think at this moment, if I don’t see evidence of disease. So this is is very different if there is disease and you treat it with chemo and it disappear, than if the patient go for resection, thinking the patient go for resection, there is a chance that that patient could be cured a little one, but there could be a chance. So I will have the I will give the benefit of the doubt. So if patient have resection, no evidence of disease, I will wait for recurrence to think about transplantation. If the patient has disappearing liver metastasis from that disease that wasn’t resectable, then I would say that patient should be transplanted.

Betsy Post 1:13:51
Okay, so if a patient’s been on chemo for over a year, overall, really good response. You know, tumors decreasing, but there’s one liver lesion that progressed but was ablated successfully, no evidence of any other progression. Would this be a disqualification for transplant?

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro 1:14:11
No in my problem that patient. Of course, I will have to read and do all the detailed work up on that patient. But I think, you know, there’s in this moment, there’s no evidence of progression, right? There was progression. You hit it, you, I would say, Okay, you have been on chemo. You have been responding, except one now, and the other one is treated. Let’s observe it for a few months, while you and then if, and then we can do the workup of a donor. And if it’s okay, then we do the transplant.

Betsy Post 1:14:43
Are there procedures you prefer for patients not to have done if their goal is to have transplant? Y-90 specifically but any others?

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro  1 1:14:58
Again, I didn’t understand the. Question. Betsy,

Betsy Post 1:15:01
sure, so the patient’s asking if there are any procedures that you would prefer patients not to have done, if their goal is to have a transplant. So specifically, like Y-90, would you prefer a patient not to have Y-90? Or any other procedures you’d prefer a patient not to have if what their goal is, is to seek transplant.

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro 1:15:23
Who did that question? I’m gonna I want to know, that’s a very smart question.

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro 1:15:33
Well, you know all the questions I think I presented here a slide I remember a long time ago where I put the Arc de Triomphe and just trying to put the streets together, and, you know, trying to get to the the center. And it doesn’t matter if there’s traffic in one street, you take one street parallel and go up, etc, etc. So I think that is the goal of having Y-90 ablation, pump, resection, and trying to go into transplantation, if you are candidate for that, right? So, but if there’s something that I would like not to have is I have two one answer that is very clear, and another one that I will leave it in the air. (So don’t pay too much attention.) The first one is, if you are a patient who are responding to systemic chemotherapy and wants to go for transplantation or resection, why changing to the hepatic artery pump infusion, if you respond when you can continue in the systemic chemotherapy without opening your abdomen, without putting a pump in your artery, just continue with chemo, and then we do the surgery or the transfer, and the life will be easier and less complex. Now I think pump can be used in patients when it’s progressing on systemic chemotherapy, and you might come back for being a candidate for transplantation. So that will be one of the things that I would say, if a pump could be avoided, go ahead, avoid if you are responding to systemic chemotherapy, that will be one of my things, which I don’t know if I would be talking to my colleagues from MSK, with Dr Kingamara or or probably Dr D’Angelica or Dr Charnic, and they will be debating me, and they could be mad, but well, we need to respect each other, and I like them. They’re my friends, and I have dinner with them, and they respect that. I’m not against a pump period, not against the pump. The pump is very good. Patients responded very well. They they do very well. But a lot of the time it’s long term, these patients are going to have biliary complications and problems of the artery. It’s very common. I see those patients happening. So that would be and now, now also is that in the data that we’re trying to publish now, my research resident Matt found that those patients who have Y-90 have less chances to reach transplant. So we have to be careful, because are we gonna see bad things about Y-90? I don’t think we can see bad things. Probably that group of patients were the ones who were having more progressions, or they were exhausted of chemo, and that’s why they went for Y-90. So that will be understandable. So not necessarily the fact that they not necessarily the Y-90 did worse. I have operated patients in the resections and transplantation after Y-90, and I haven’t seen a big problem, but I think this is an area that we have to understand more in the future, if there is one or other of the local, regional therapies that might get better outcome or worse outcome as a bridge for transplantation,

Betsy Post 1:19:13
What does recovery time look like for transplant patients that don’t live local to Rochester, but I think it would apply to any you know, what’s recovery time look like, generally for the patient.

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro 1:19:26
So, you know, we, we normally tell our patients, you know, you’re going to be here for, you know, the donor comes here. The donor gets discharged on day six or sometimes five or seven, and they we want them to stay in Rochester, if they are not from Rochester, for another two weeks. Majority of the time they leave on day nine or 10, because normally they do very well. Our donors now the recipient is different, because if you get to have a very good outcome, and you don’t have any body leak, and you don’t have any one. Their problem. There are patients who in after three four weeks, they leave and they go back home. But there’s a good amount of patients that they have a complication. Some of the times, this can be managed long term at their home hospital in the West Coast, in the East Coast, in the center, Midwest, whatever. And we have the connections, and I personally know a lot of people around the country who do a living donation or something. We don’t need, not sometimes a surgeon, we just need a GI doctor who put this stent or remove it, or they or they need a drain. But this is, this is a little bit sometimes exhausting and frustrating for patients when they have a complication, but I can tell you that long term is going to be good. There was, I remember one of our patients still here from, I think, one month, two months and a half or three months probably, and I know that. I think he is listening to me here and and I understand he’s doing very well, but it happens sometimes that they have to stay longer.

Betsy Post 1:21:05
Okay, we don’t have too many left, so thanks for hanging in there. How long does all the eligibility testing take?

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro 1:21:17
I meet with the patients few times before that, I like to meet with them. I do a lot of zoom meetings with them, like this one. What we’re doing now with this course, we learn I introduce part of my team, and when things are getting ready, like the timing of observing, and it’s a candidate we bring for the patient for evaluation, and all the team is like any other transplant there, either psychiatrist, social worker, etc. And sometimes the biggest complaint and painful thing is the insurance, as many of you know, but I think we have been able to do a lot of work, and then we we’re having less complications, like less problems with insurance. We have a patient recently from California who was ready to go for transplant, and insurance didn’t accept and they said that the patient needs to stay in California. And I said, Well, California is not doing any Center in California has done one of these cases yet. Then we contact one of my colleagues there saying, Okay, we might be able to do it, and the insurance didn’t accept it. So I am worried about that patient, like, who’s going to transplant this patient? There’s nobody doing this there. I will be happy if someone is doing there, because they’re very good surgeons, right? Probably they don’t know the details of the of the of the protocol, how to do it. We can guide them. I have helped a lot of other programs to try to set it up, but if the patient is not getting access, I think insurance should be able to give opportunity to patients to go out of the state and go where they wanted to go on and find opportunities for them.

Betsy Post 1:23:02
So we’re down to our last three questions, what happens when there is recurrence in the liver after transplant?

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro 1:23:10
Good questions. And apparently the outcome is worst. When there’s recurrence, it can progress faster. But I remember, I haven’t had a case where we have to do anything on that but the only case that I remember having metastasis in November is one of our first cases. And this is our a single patient who die after transplant. But I know that

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro 1:23:36
is it Norway? I think so they did some liver section in a couple of patients after that. I wouldn’t do a liver resection. I will wait to see, you know, give treatment chemotherapy, trying to do ablation or histotripsy or something like that, try to control and if things are key, and there’s no more rigorous later on, then I will go and do surgery, but normally it’s not associated with a good outcome.

Betsy Post 1:24:15
And then does this portal hypertension complicate transplant?

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro 1:24:23
Depends. That’s going to be a funny answer. Depends on your surgeon. So remember, I do liver transfer for cirrhotics patients. That is the worst portal hypertension, the portal hypertension that a patient with a lot of chemo. Any of you cannot compare with the portal hypertension of a cirrhotic patient. The cirrhotic patients, they have this massive case that I did last night. It bled a lot, and it was portal hypertension. So I. Certain transplanters, we know how to manage portal hypertension, so it won’t disqualify you. That won’t be the answer.

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro 1:25:12
That’s okay. It’s going to be complex, but it’s going to be okay.

Betsy Post 1:25:16
Think there was one question I saw, but I feel like you answered this one. It was, when can someone be a candidate for transplant after colon and liver resection if there’s a reoccurrence? But I think you answered that one already. I think that came in after we had already answered that one.

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro 1:25:34
Yeah, once, once you have recurrence. You know, I have seen some of these patients say, okay, hold on, let’s control it. Let’s have systemic treatment or something. Let’s control it, and then start thinking about transplantation as an option, and we can work on that and and hopefully the patient is stable and get a donor into the transplant data.

Betsy Post 1:25:54
And we have quite a few of those patients in COLONTOWN, you know, that went the transplant route after recurrence or after multiple recurrences. So definitely you can ping me to the person that asked that question, ping me, send me a message, and I can definitely talk through that with you, or connect you to some of those folks. So at this point, Dr Hernandez, there’s just a lot of love and thanks for you in the comments. So people are just thanking you so much for your great DocTalk and all of the time all of the great answers that you took the time to give. I think you have several patients here, so definitely they’re also, you know, thankful for you and happy to hear the survival information and all of the information that you boiled down for us from ASCO I know, I learned a lot this evening, even though I feel like I try to stay up to date on transplant, I still learned a ton of things.

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro 1:26:54
My pleasure. I wish I could answer all the questions. Thank you for the comments. I saw some people that I know. Thank you very much. I send hopes to all the patients and the people around there. Thank you Betsy, and thank you COLONTOWN.

Betsy Post 1:27:11
Thank you so much, and we’ll see you again soon. And thanks everyone for coming. We really appreciate your time, your attention, your great questions, and thanks a lot for all the love in the chat that means a lot talk to I know it means a lot to me, and I know it means a lot to Dr. Hernandez too. So thanks everyone. Have a great night.

Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro 1:27:30
Have a good night. Thank you.

DocTalk
2024
Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro
Liver
Stage IV
Transplant

In this DocTalk, Dr. Roberto Hernandez-Alejandro from URMC discusses liver transplants for colorectal cancer patients. Recorded in June, 2024.

More Videos

Liver transplants — Examining the evidence
Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro
2024
Surgical options for peri-mets
Dr. Turaga
2024
ERASur trial: Local treatment options for limited stage IV CRC
Dr. Hitchcock
2023
Advanced surgical treatments for CRC liver mets
Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro
2021
Transplant patients are in the house!
2021
Hepatic Artery Infusion (HAI) chemotherapy for CRC liver mets
Hepatic Artery Infusion (HAI) chemotherapy for CRC liver mets
Dr. Gholami
2021
Modern-day management of liver metastases
Dr. Soares
2022
Why liver transplant for mCRC is taking off
Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro
2022
Categories
DocTalks Hide from search

Y90 for CRC liver mets — What patients need to know

Y90 for CRC liver mets — What patients need to know

DocTalk
2024
Dr. Dayyani
Liver
Stage IV
Y90

In this DocTalk, Dr. Farshid Dayyani from UCI Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center discusses Y90 for liver mets. Recorded in August 2024.

This is an automatically generated transcript.

Betsy Post 0:01
Good evening, everyone. We are going to go ahead and get started and kick off this evening’s program. Our DocTalk this evening is on Y-90 for metastatic colorectal cancer, “Liver, Mets and What Patients Need to Know”. I do want to say that everyone has been muted, you have been admitted on mute. We would ask kindly that you please remain on mute this evening for the duration of the program. We really want to be sure that we’re giving all of our attention to Dr. Dayyani and we want to make sure we don’t have any interruptions. So if you’ve never attended a DocTalk with me before, just keep in mind that we will have a live Q and A at the end of the presentation. So those questions please put in chat. So here in Zoom, there is a chat feature. You just click on chat, you can put your question there in the chat. We did submit quite a few questions to Dr. Dayyani in advance, so I think he’s ready for some of our FAQs. But as we go through this evening’s program, please do put those questions in the chat. We will have some live Q and A after the presentation, and please remain on mute. So with that, I am going to turn it over to Dr. Dayyani. I just want to thank you so much for being here to present to our COLONTOWN family of patients and caregivers. Dr. Dayyani joins us from the University of California Irvine. He is a medical oncologist with a wealth of experience in Y-90. He is specifically a GI oncologist. He works with a multidisciplinary team. He really is big on the patient selection, making sure that the right patients get routed for Y-90. So he’s going to educate us this evening all about this treatment. And Dr. Dayyani, I am so pleased to have you. You are our first ever Y-90 DocTalk. So we are very, very excited and honored to have you! With that, I’m going to turn it over to you. And thanks again for presenting for us.

Dr. Dayyani 2:00
Thank you. Thank you so much, it’s pleasure to be with you guys. I wish we were all in person, but then fewer people would be able to attend. Yeah, I’m a GI medical oncologist. I’m the Medical Director of the clinical trials unit, and I joined UC Irvine in 2016. I trained at MD Anderson Cancer Center in oncology, but really since joining UC Irvine Dr. Abi-Jaoudeh our Chief of Interventional Radiology, and I have been championing the radio embolization of Y-90 treatment protocol at UC Irvine for patients with liver disease, but especially colorectal cancer patients with liver metastatic disease. So it’s about 40-42 slides. It’s not too long. And don’t worry, I’m not going to stay too long on each slide. But I think the interesting part of it is maybe half of the slides are actual patient cases since 2017, obviously all deidentified, from my patient panels, just to show you the spectrum of patients eligible for Y-90 treatment in a multimodality setting. So I’m going to give you a brief overview of the biology of colorectal cancer. I think every speaker does that. We’re not going to dwell too long on that. Some treatment strategies for what we call liver-dominant disease, meaning the majority of the metastases are actually in the liver, confined to the liver. Then the rationale for SIR-spheres of Y-90 microspheres in radio embolization, or of liver metastases and then, as I said, we’ll go through the cases from the clinic, and then I’m happy to engage in a discussion with you guys. The numbers are improving. 154,000 new diagnoses in the US with cancers of the colon or rectum in the US. About 80% are presented stage 1,2,3, meaning the tumor might have maybe gone through the wall and lymph nodes, but not to other organs. So that’s stage 1,2,3. Those patients, as you know, undergo surgery with or without chemotherapy afterwards to mop it up, but unfortunately, half of those will have a recurrence. The cancer will come back despite the surgery and the chemotherapy, and we consider that another 20% present with stage four disease. That tells us about 40, 50% of these patients, at some point, will be diagnosed with stage four. And the liver is the most common site of tumor spreads from the colon due to the anatomic drainage of of the majority of the colon, so 70% of the patients with stage four, we have either liver-only or liver plus other sites of disease. So it’s a very important organ that we have to talk about because liver failure from the increasing liver burden from the tumors is the most common cause of patient demise. So as I said, this is the most common sight of disease. And the problem is the chemotherapy drugs we give, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, the staples of treatment of stage four disease, they can cause over time, also underlying liver damage. So what we’re dealing with here is now a tumor that preferentially goes to the liver, starts growing there, replacing normal liver, and at the same time, we’re trying to treat that tumor with chemotherapy drugs that further attack the liver function. And now that can lead to a perfect storm. So the idea is, kill as much tumor in the liver, and at the same time try to spare as much normal liver so the patient can a) be able to function longer, be able to access treatments longer, and hopefully not going to liver failure. So that’s the overarching concept of giving Y-90 into the liver in within this treatment spectrum of patients with liver disease try to kill tumor with a different mechanism of action, and at the same time try to spare some of the chemotherapy drugs and spare the normal liver. This is what happens at UC Irvine every Monday from 1 to 2pm local time. So that would be 4 to 6, 4 to 5pm Eastern, for example, we all come together. It’s actually hybrid. When I happen to be at the hospital, I go to the basement where the surgeons and the radiologists sit. But the important part is we have two to three liver surgeons. We have two to three radiation oncologists. We have maybe four GI-focused medical oncologists who treat patients with liver disease. Interventional Radiology is very important, two or three, and then radiologists, pathologists and trainees, residents, fellows, etc. They all come together, review all new cases for patients with colorectal liver metastases at these, and then the rest of the week we page each other, we text each other. I mean, these are becoming more obsolete, so it’s either email or or texting. So we have real time management of our patients, because the best outcome for the patients are achieved if everybody comes to the table and you bring in every single modality you have. Very few patients will be cured with one modality alone, certainly not chemotherapy alone. Surgery, I’ll show you, maybe 10, 15% but really, in order to bump that 17% five-year survival to 25, 30% we need to bring everybody to the table. You don’t need to memorize that. This just highlights that the best treatment for a patient with stage four colon or rectal cancer is to look holistically. You look at the patient: age, what are the comorbidities, how fit are they, what’s their preference, what’s their quality of life, how much toxicity can there tolerate? And that becomes very important when we think about Y-90 treatment. Which side of the colon is the tumor: on the right side, or we’re closer to the rectum, left or right? And then more and more – what are the molecular characteristics? So every single patient with a stage IV cancer should have comprehensive molecular testing and IHC testing at a minimum for mismatch repair proteins for colon cancer, RAS, RAF, BRAF, HER2, etc, etc, and we do both liquid biopsy and tissue testing, so we come as comprehensive as possible to the best treatment of our patients. So if you look at the guidelines and liver-specific treatment options for patients with colon cancer with liver metastases, about one in six patients might be candidates for upfront surgery. And even in those cases, as you might know, we tend to give some maybe two months of chemo upfront, make sure nothing new pops up, maybe shrink the tumors a little bit, present them to a tumor board, and then take them to surgery, remove or ablate the liver lesions and then clean it up with some more chemo. The problem is, 80% of those, the tumor will come back because there’s hidden tumors in the liver that we don’t see, and the chemo doesn’t get rid of them. But more importantly, eight out of 10, or 85% of the patients with that diagnosis, they have too much disease in the liver. They’re not really candidates for surgery. Even after chemotherapy, they might not be a candidate for surgery. And what do we do for those patients here? That’s what you see down here, there is what we call intra-arterial options, meaning the interventional radiologist takes a catheter and goes through the groin into the artery to the liver, and from there, injects these radioactive beats into the tumors. That’s called selective internal radioembolization, or Y-90, that actually has the highest category based on the NCCN guidelines for intra-arterial therapy to treat liver metastases. I’m sure most of you have heard of hepatic artery infusion. It has a category 2b, so a little bit lower level of evidence and recommendation based on NCCN. But importantly, if you think about quality of life, I hope you’ll find out within the next 30 minutes, that Y-90 is a single treatment to the right lobe. Four weeks later, a single treatment to the left lobe, and you’re done. Whereas hepatic arteries, you have a permanent catheter in your belly going into your liver, and you show up every two weeks to get chemotherapy for up to six months, and the catheter stays there. And then you come back so really, giving more of the same of the chemo into the liver. We think at UC Irvine, maybe complementing the systemic chemotherapy, the IV chemotherapy, with some radiation from inside, might be a better strategy to further shrink these tumors. Why is the liver important? Liver does a lot of things. It’s a storage for vitamins, as everybody knows, it’s an organ that does the drug metabolism, detoxification of all the things that go through our system. It helps with heme breakdown, all the red blood cells, billions and billions of red blood cells that we have, and only a few days in the system, it it makes sure that the thyroid hormone levels are regulated from from from T4 to what we call this, the active hormone level, T3, importantly, many, many important serum plasma levels like albumin, are made in the liver. And if your albumin levels dropped, and you’re more prone to get swelling and edema, right? And importantly, it makes bile, and the bile salt is then stored in the gallbladder. And every time you eat something fatty, some of that bile goes into your small bowel to help with digestion of the fat and the other so the liver is a more, if not the most important organ for your life, if you’re a patient with stage four colorectal metastases, so the name of the game is preserve as much liver function as possible and kill as much cancer in the liver as possible. The rationale, or the way why radio embolization, or Y-90 treatment to liver metastases works is based on anatomy. Turns out there are two separate parallel blood flows through the liver, the majority of the lower body, and all the draining blood from the bowel, where the food is absorbed, goes into the portal vein. So all the blood drain from the small bowel, from the colon, all the nutrients go through there. And this portal vein goes through the liver, and it’s full of nutrients and really supplies the majority of the normal liver. And then from there, it’s drained and goes through the inferior vena cava into the heart and goes through the lung to be reoxygenated. Whereas the tumors, they’re not part of that system, they’re part of the separate system where the aorta, which brings the oxygen-rich fresh blood into the organ, so they get oxygen through the hepatic artery supplies the tumors. So as you see here, these are a couple of the tumors in the liver. They’re almost exclusively fed by the hepatic artery, but the majority of the normal liver gets their blood supply from the portal vein. So now, when you go through the groin, through the artery, and go right up into the organ, and you start showering these tumors with with with these radioactive Y-90 SIR-Spheres. They preferentially go where the tumors are, but try to avoid the normal liver, because it’s a parallel highway system of drug delivery. And that’s really the basic principle why Y-90 works in patients with liver metastases, especially in patients with colon cancer, liver metastases. So what are Y-90 SIR-Spheres? These are resin spheres. Tiny, tiny, tiny. They have a half life of 64 hours. That means in about every 64 hours, the activity drops by 50%. The penetration is very small, 2.5 millimeters is a 100th of an inch. So that is part of the principle why you can treat the tumor. Because these tiny beads – you see here, these are tiny, tiny beads that you shower into the hepatic artery. They go and they distribute where the tumor vasculature is, and they kill the tumor from inside. But because they don’t have a huge range, shortly, a 100th of an inch later, you spare whatever normal tissue is outside of the tumor. And that’s the principle why you can, what we call internal radiation. You give it from inside. It goes through the bloodstream into the tumors and from inside, radiates them without trying to damage the normal liver outside. And that’s how it works. As you can see, you guys have heard of transarterial chemoembolization, embolizing with those – you take particles for embolization. Embolization works differently. You take big particles and you put them through the artery, but then they get stuck right before they actually reach the tumor. What they do is, embolization cuts off the blood supply to the tumor, so anything beyond that just gets hypoxic – the oxygen level and tries to kill it by suffocating it. It’s much more toxic. It causes much more inflammation, and maybe not the best treatment for colorectal whereas, if you give SIR-Spheres, Y-90 microspheres, these tiny things, they don’t embolize, they don’t cut off the blood supply. So the blood supply keeps going, meaning you can afterwards still deliver chemotherapy. Because here, once you cut off the blood supply, afterwards, you can’t give any more chemotherapy. It’s all done. But here you sent these small spheres. They go locate into the tumor, start radiating it from inside, and what we do at UC Irvine, two weeks after Y-90, the patient comes back and restarts the chemo, systemic treatment to further damage the tumor and try to avoid damaging the normal liver. So: what are the basic criteria to find the optimal patient for Y-90 treatment with SIR-Spheres? Well, there are some basic things that you have to think about. Obviously, if a patient is a surgical candidate, we send them to surgery. Importantly, at UC Irvine, we try to make them surgical candidates by giving them Y-90 first to get additional tumor shrinkage, and then we present them again to the surgeons. I’ll show you that in a second. They’re not qualified for ablative therapy, meaning it’s not a small tumor. Liver-dominant, meaning the majority of the disease has to be in the liver, so maybe one or two tiny lung nodules, maybe half an inch fine, or a couple of lymph nodes outside of the liver, fine. But if a patient comes and the lungs are full of tumor and the liver is full of tumor, those patients don’t benefit, but the majority of the patients will actually have liver-dominant. Radiation takes time to work. That’s something to realize. It’s like sunburn. You do it, but then the the the sunburn comes maybe hours later or the next day. Similar with radiation. You do the radiation, you don’t see the effects the next day, you see them over the next weeks. So you have to think about it, refer the patient. Consider Y-90 at a time where the patient actually has enough time to start seeing the benefit.

Dr. Dayyani 17:45
If your physician refers to, down the line after you went through 10 different chemo treatments and says, “Oh, I don’t have anything else, let’s try Y-90” a) your liver is way too predamaged, so you’re more likely to get toxicities, but you might not have enough time to actually see the benefit of the radiation. Good performance status, meaning the more active you are, the less damage from the prior treatment, the more benefit. This is an absolute for us, and your doctor will check the bilirubin level. A lot of patients when they have liver metastases, they present with jaundice, or they turn yellow, and then they have to have ERCP and stent placed. That’s because of the back of the bilirubin that then goes from the liver into the skin. So a bilirubin less than two is very, very important. Again, that happens earlier in the disease course, the longer you wait, the longer the damage, underlying damage deliver, the more likely that your bilirubin is going up. Lung shunt is something technical that you don’t need to be worried about in the preparation for your Y-90 treatment, the radiology intervention radiologist will determine that. That basically needs to make sure that when you shower through the artery, when you give these small beads, that not more than 20% of that goes through the bloodstream into the lungs, because then you get pneumonitis or inflammation of the lungs, but that’s all done as part of your workup. Right-sided primary tumor, I’ll talk to you about that. In the United States for two decades now, the SIR-Spheres, the SURTEX Y-90 beads, are indicated for the treatment of metastatic liver tumors from colon cancer. It used to be in adjuvant into intrahepatic artery, but we don’t do that anymore. We do it now at UC Irvine be embedded into the systemic treatment, meaning chemotherapy, biologic therapy, shrink the tumors, then go with Y-90, shrink them more, and then maintain with chemo to see whether the patient can go to hopefully curative, intense surgery. So what does the procedure look like? Patient is presented at the tumor board, as I showed you. Everybody comes together. Everybody. It determines if this patient is a good candidate for Y-90 treatment based on what I showed you, the evaluations are done – the tumor mapping. You do a vessel mapping, an angiogram to exactly determine which vessels or which arteries the interventional radiology radiology should be looking for, for injecting. Then the team looks at the imaging, does the dosimetry, how many beads do I have to deliver, based on number and size. Then you go for the treatment, and then right away, the radiologist can see if the treatment was delivered correctly. That’s shown here. So prior to the treatment, you do imaging to see if that’s where it should go. And then afterwards, you repeat the imaging to see if the beads went there. You can actually image those beads, the activity to make sure you got it to the rat. In terms of practical premedication, and analgesics. You know, Tylenol you don’t need. Most patients will not require narcotics. Proton pump inhibitors, antacids or H2 antagonist – so famotidine or omeprazole, or any of those is recommended to be started and maintained for a couple of months afterwards to minimize the risk of gastric ulcers, and I talked about that a little bit. Whether you give steroids or not, that’s based on your institution. We don’t routinely give antiemetics or antibiotics unless we think there is a risk for infection or there’s signs of infection, but really reducing the risk of gastritis and gastric ulcers with PPIs or H2 blockers, that’s, I think, good practice to do. Is it safe if a patient is treated with Y-90 for the people around them? Yeah, it is. You know, the further away you stand from the patient, the less radioactive they become. So if somebody is standing three feet away from a patient who just had Y-90 they get the same radiation they would get if they flew from, well, I guess from Orange County, where I am, to San Francisco. That’s an hour, right, which we do all the time, going back, back and forth. And the important thing is, the further you go away from a patient, the lower the exposure. But the exposure even within three feet is very slow. The half life is about 2.6 days. So by about 13, 14, days, all the activity is actually done. So that brings me to our tumor board, and how we sequence patients. Every single new patient with colon metastatic liver metastases is presented at tumor board. If they’re resectable, meaning a surgical candidate, no question. We give them a little chemo, send them to surgery, remove the liver, ablate the liver, remove the primary tumor, give them some — (inaudible) and then we watch them, as I told you, unfortunately, more than half of those will have recurrence. The disease will come back. But 80, 85%, 90% of the patients, depending on population, at the time of presentation, there’s just too much. The surgeon can’t remove all of it. So those patients, we start with the best systemic treatment we have: chemo plus biologic based on the sidedness and mutation status. We shrink those tumors for about three months. And if you know FOLFOX, FOLFOXIRI, these are two week regimens. Three months is six rounds of chemo, only six rounds of chemo. After that, we’ll take them back to tumor board. And if the tumors are small enough that they go to surgery, for sure, send them, because the goal is to remove all invisible disease that gives the patient the best chance for long term survival. So whenever surgery is possible, that we do. Again, that happens only maybe 10, 15% of the time, but when we get to that point by three, three and a half months, the best chemotherapy has not made it possible for the patient to go to surgery, more chemo is not going to shrink it, especially if you give your best treatment anyway. That’s where we think you go and give radiation, because radiation is not cross resistant, or resistance to chemo doesn’t mean resistant to radiation and vice versa. So after the initial three months of chemo, if the most of the tumor is in the liver, but still not surgically removable, that’s where we think you send the patient for radioembolization – Y-90 treatment. That extra kick from the radiation might actually further shrink the tumors, and two, three months later, we present them again. And if they’re surgical, we’ll send them, and I’ll show you cases of what we’ve done with our patients like that. We try to cure everybody, and for that, we need to remove all disease. We can’t cure if we don’t prolong survival. We can’t prolong survival if we don’t delay disease from growing, and a disease that doesn’t grow improves the quality of life of the patient, especially if your treatment is less toxic than the other available options. And I’ll show you cases for all of these, including a case of a very, very sweet Vietnamese lady who went through years of treatment and couldn’t take it anymore, but had this huge liver tumor that was causing a lot of pain. And for that patient, we used Y-90 for really palliative but based on what I showed you, this is usually where we try to bring in Y-90 before the liver is beat down, before the patient has seen three years of chemotherapy where everybody is ready to try to get them to surgery. Conceptually, TARE means transarterial radio embolization – is basically another term for Y-90 treatment. The more disease in the liver, the more likely we use Y-90. At the same time, the less chemosensitive, the more likely the radiation will work. And that’s why, in the beginning, when the tumor is more chemosensitive, meaning likely to respond to chemo, we start with chemo, shrink it, then as resistance to the chemo starts to come up, that’s where we go and do radioembolization. What this tells you is that colon cancer is not colon cancer, – it’s not colon cancer. It’s hundreds of different diseases based on which side of the colon we’re talking about. This is called the left side, towards the rectum. Where the colon starts, is called the right side, transverse, and different mutations. The issue is, even if you normalize for all these mutations, these tumors on the right side: cecum, right sided, ascending colon, appear to be less responsive to chemotherapy. You don’t need to understand these curves, but it just tells you the same patients on the same trial, if you separate them by whether they started on the left side or right side and whether they received anti-EGFR or anti-VEGF, had four very, very different outcomes in the same trial. So a right-sided tumor with anti-EGFR only 13.7 months, perhaps a left-sided tumor with anti-EGFR for 40 months and in between, but what you see is orange and yellow, the right-sided tumors have worse survival, even in the best case, worse survival than left-sided tumor. That tells you, in a trial that was testing chemo with biologics, that right-sided tumors appear to be less chemosensitive. So we need to, early on, think about, how can we control the disease? Because they’re not going to benefit for too long from the FOLFOX or FOLFIRI, or FOLFOXIRI that I’m giving them. Some of the data we have for that come from the so called FOXFIRE analysis. We don’t need to get into the weeds of that. But the bottom line is, patients with colon cancer and liver metastases were randomized to get FOLFOX bev or FOLFOX wet with Y-90 between cycles one and two. What I want to highlight here is if you look only at the patients within that trial who had right-sided tumors, you see early integration of radioembolization or Y-90 treatment with SIRT improve the survival by about five months from 17 months to 22 months hazard ratio .64. Is it perfect? No, but it’s certainly better than they did with chemo alone. Importantly, the increase in what we call objective response rate, or the tumor shrinkage rates, by about 10% tells you even if the tumor might be resistant to the chemo I’m getting, the radiation will still give us the extra kick of tumor shrinkage. That’s the message here. They actually did a secondary trial out of that FOXFIRE data. What you see is they basically took seven liver surgeons. They didn’t tell them which patient received Y-90, which patient didn’t receive Y-90, they just showed them the CT scans, and they told them which of these livers are surgically removable and which are not. At baseline, it was exactly the same, because the patients were randomized. But importantly, after treatment, at the time of best response, the surgeons did not know what treatment the patient had received. They just looked at the liver on the CT scan. 38% were potentially surgically removable with the addition of Y-90 versus only 28%. So, you do see some response to chemo, as I said, about 10, 15 but you get another 10% extra, which is a lot. If you have 70,000 patients, 10% is 7000 additional patients who might go to surgery and remember, removing all disease is the first step into long term survival. It’s not a guarantee, but it’s necessary. What are the side effects to look for?

Dr. Dayyani 29:35
It’s feared, radiation, radioembolization, induced liver disease, but it’s very rare. 99% of your patients will not see it, maybe less than that, seen within the first four months. Really try to avoid it by don’t refer patients who are too beat up. Livers that have seen too much chemo. There’s too much liver disease, right? The ulcers, that’s more common. Gastritis Patients will ??(inaudible) be aggressive with it. Give antacids, give PPIs, add a H2 blocker, if needed. Be very aggressive with the management of the gastritis. And there is some less common side effects, mainly if your intervention radiologist is not very experienced and there is leakage of the beads, for example, into the lung or to the other organs, then you might sometimes get pancreatitis, etc. It’s not very common. And the more you do and the more experienced you are, the less your team will see these guys here. So one way to do that is you start a patient with newly diagnosed disease and your best systemic treatment. And the reason I say systemic is because it’s chemo plus something else, right? Anti- EGFR, anti VEGF, biologic. Shrink it for about 2, 3, 4 months, not more than four months. At UC Irvine it is usually three months. And then, if they’re not surgically removable, and the majority of the disease is in the liver, that’s where we go and try to radioembolize with Y-90 and further shrink the tumors. So that was the introduction, and maybe for the next, last seven to 10 minutes, I’ll show you actual cases. And some of these patients are still around, like this gentleman, 44 year old gentleman, two daughters, comes with rectal cancer with unresectable liver metastases. Here are the MRIs. 2019 – So that’s five years ago, more than five years ago, five and a half years ago. It was diagnosed late 2018 but by the time he came to see me, — the important message is he only got six cycles of strong chemo, and then I stop. Six cycles of FOLFOXIRI panitumumab, shrink the tumors. Then after six cycles, remove the chemo so a) I don’t damage the liver more from oxali and irinotecan. The patient has less nausea, less fatigue, less anorexia, less neuropathy, numbness, tingling. Then I send him, because he’s not a surgical candidate, I SIRTex or Y-90 the right liver in between, we give him a little panitumumab – that’s not chemo, just a biologic to control the tumors. Then treat the left liver and look at that. A year after his diagnosis, we further shrunk the tumor so it could go to surgery, right liver resection, microwave ablation. Long-term survival means that we remove all tumors. So what we did two months after the liver resection, we removed his rectal cancer, because that’s where it all started. I gave him a little bit of chemo afterwards, mop-up chemo with capecitabine. A year and a half, there’s one site of recurrence where it came back on a PET scan, we removed that. He finished two years from his diagnosis. So, diagnosed March ’19, March 2021 – he finished all chemo. He went off all treatment. I checked, his circulating tumor DNA in the blood remained negative for three years off anything until last year. So for four years, this gentleman, who was diagnosed with stage four in 2019 had only six cycles of oxaliplatin irinotecan. Talk about quality of life. Unfortunately, he had recurrence, and he’s now in a clinical trial, but he’s still walking around, and he actually married during the time, and had a second kid. So a different case, 51 year old lady sigmoid, as you can see here, the spots in the liver presented the same. The remarkable thing about this lady is I met her within a few months of joining UC Irvine. Within six months. I gave her the same thing – she was young, 50. I gave her six cycles, only six cycles of oxali, irinotecan, I shrank the tumors. I maintained her with a little over 5FU maintenance until we set up for radioembolization, Y-90 in June and July, a month apart. So we only gave Y-90 to the liver. Never went to surgery. Two months later, I removed the colon tumor, because you have to remove everything. This lady has been in surveillance for the last five years. September, no, seven years now. CEA negative, liver function tests – great. Four years out. Without I actually discharged this lady from my clinic last year. I said, You’re five years out, you’re cured. Never had surgery. You cannot tell me that chemotherapy alone would have done that, because the disease didn’t disappear. With chemo alone, it shrank, but we had to bring in radiation early on before it got out of hand, because smaller is better for radiation. So you wait for tumors to grow more and they’re three dimensional, then you have a much harder time. Even if you shrink them, you have a much harder time to get them to go away. This is an engineer from Syria who came to me with a very high CEA, as you know, three and a half is normal. It was 3400 times higher, with lots of big tumors in the liver. I gave him the same. You see the CEA going down. Your biggest bang for buck from the chemo upfront is really the first three, three and a half months. Afterwards, you just maintain it. You just give toxicities. So the same here. He had some complications from the chemo that he didn’t like, so it took a bit longer, but we brought his CEA down. Tumors get smaller, but they were still not resectable. I presented a tumor board. Then we do Y-90, the CEA takes a second dip, as you see here, the CEA was going up, the tumor marker, and we radiate and boom, it goes down to normal. And a year out, we go and remove his colon with minimal, minimal exposure to things that give you neuropathy, numbness, tingling. Unfortunately, not all patients are diagnosed at UCI. This lady was diagnosed somewhere else with stage III, had surgery, chemotherapy, and unfortunately, the tumors came back with a vengeance, as you see here, multiple tumors in the liver. I gave her standard FOLFIRI, Bev for six cycles. That’s the theme. Three months, if it works, you’ll see it. And then after that, you have to find a different mechanism of action. We had a very young and talented Dr. Utrich surgeon with us. She came in and did a huge six, seven hour surgery, removed everything, but within two months, two small spots came up. I cleaned it up with some chemo, and right away sent her to radiation for that lady. Again, another case of this huge tumor. So remember, this is the liver, and virtually all of it is replaced by this big, huge tumor. But everything gray here is actually normal liver function. The same thing. Three months of chemo, bring the CEA down, maintain it. Now you see the tumor shrank, but there’s still a lot of tumor left, especially the whitish part is still live tumor. So that represents a) I can’t get any more mileage out of my chemo, but I have side effects. So we treated both sides of the liver a bit with radioembolization, Y-90. And now you see a lot of this is now calcification. You see calcium deposit. That means the tumor is dead and the CEA normalized, so quality of life and efficacy. And the last case I want to show you is the lady I told you, 72 year old. Lovely lady, her son was a pharmacist who’d come with her all the time. She had everything. She had brain metastases, brain surgery, radiation to the brain radiation to here. She was done. But this huge tumor in the liver was really causing her a lot of pain, pushing and all the pain meds didn’t work. We took her to radioembolization Y-90 to shrink it and remove the tumor from the capsule that causes the pain and that got a great palliation for the time she had left. So what’s the rationale? To summarize a benefit of giving Y-90 in colorectal liver metastases, it’s because it’s selective, meaning the majority of the blood supply to the tumor is from the artery, that’s where you go in and shower the tumors. But the normal liver gets their blood from the blue one, the portal vein. So you spare normal liver, but you attack tumor from inside with radiation, which is not the same as resistance to chemotherapy. Most patients go home the same day. You can treat many tumors or very large tumors, and still try to spare as much healthy tissue as you can, because remember, it’s only about the 100th of an inch the rate radius of the beads radiation, and it works synergistically with the chemotherapy drug. That means when I refer patients to Y-90, I already know they come two weeks later and get more chemo and they go back. So it’s really integrating it in your spectrum, rather than just to send them and say, “Okay, let the radiation work now”. No, we collaborate. We synergize as a team, but also as different treatment modalities. So colon cancer is heterogeneous. It’s hundreds of different diseases based on sidedness, molecular profile, patient profile. Systemic treatment is more than chemo. You have to do your molecular profiling and add an appropriate biologic to further shrink tumors. You really need a multidisciplinary team and multi modality: systemic treatment, chemotherapy, biologics, immunotherapy, radiation, radioembolization, surgery and Y-90 treatment in the majority of the patients. You can’t bring the Y-90 at any point, but sooner is better, because the patient is fitter. They have still have a chance to go to surgery, and their liver is not beat up, meaning they’re less likely to have the toxicities. Obviously, we’re all working on further clinical trials and research to to provide or define better when, and in whom to use and when to use Y-90. — So I’m going to stop here. Okay, this is my email, and happy to engage in any discussions. I think we wanted to talk 40 minutes, and that’s pretty much it.

Betsy Post 40:10
We definitely have some questions for you. I have some questions that were sort of pre-submitted, so a lot of those have to do with the HAI pump, which you sort of alluded to a little bit. But we have a large patient population of liver mets patients, and they’re a lot of times they’re really torn between HAI and Y-90. So if you could elaborate a little bit on the Y-90, HAI and specifically, one of the things we get asked a lot, can you do Y-90 after HAI? And can you do HAI after Y-90? Those are two big questions, but we’d love for you to elaborate on that HAI, Y-90 conversation.

Dr. Dayyani 40:54
So, hepatic artery chemo infusion, if the UR is a pro-drug of 5FU. In modern times, as you saw, my patients, the majority get FOLFOXIRI, if they’re fit or FOLFIRI or FOLFOX whatever, and we treat them to best response. So the idea is, if you give hepatic artery infusion, there’s there’s a quality of life, and there’s efficacy. The data are there, you know, there’s some efficacy in there. But what I teach my trainees, fellows, when they come and my pharmacist and other people, is start thinking conceptually. The premise of hepatic artery infusion is that you deliver very high dose of the prodrug, of the drug 5FU that you already gave the patient, that you can deliver higher doses than you would be able to deliver in an IV fashion, but it’s still the same drug. If a tumor cell becomes resistant to 5FU then it’s unclear if a higher dose will actually eradicate the disease. The analogy that I use is this, if somebody is hard of hearing, then you can speak louder and they will hear you. So if a tumor is sensitive, you can give a higher dose and it will shrink. But if somebody does not speak a word of English, you can scream as much as you want, they will not understand a single word. That’s resistance. Radiation, that’s what was my point, is not cross-resistant to chemotherapy. And in 2024 where we give everybody per NCC and guidelines the best IV chemo up front and the all IV chemo up front has either capecitabine or 5FU in it. By the time the tumor stops responding, they have seen a lot of 5FU. So conceptually, should we go and give them just a higher dose of 5FU? So what I’m saying is maybe the tumors are starting to speak a different language, or we start screaming at them in English. Or should we go and find the language they speak, meaning radiation, and further shrink it? That’s the efficacy part, the conceptual. Now, having said that, there is no head to head trial between HAI and Y-90, and because of that, there’s zero good, high level data in terms of sequencing. So anybody who tells you you should do HAI first, and then Y-90 or vice versa? Maybe they have a little bit of experience, but they don’t have a large experience. And there’s no published good level data how to sequence again, how safe it is. We are looking into that. But the second part is quality of life. So you have radiation that is not cross-resistant to chemo, and you shrink everybody with chemo upfront anyway. So if you need to treat the liver, would you like to go for an outpatient procedure? Boom, get the right liver treated with radiation, go home four weeks later, come back. Boom, get the left liver treated. And you’re done. Or would you want to come and get every two weeks, 48 hours being hooked up to a pump that will also, over time, damage the liver. That’s why they don’t give it indefinitely, right? Three to six months. Quality of life, all the patients after bad maintenance, tell me, can I go on a pill? Now you want to treat the liver with the same drug, just at a higher dose? So these are things you should discuss with your doctor and everybody, based on their experience is biased, obviously, but there’s not enough data for anybody to be confident. To tell you that’s how you sequence it, or you should sequence it like that. In my practice, I never use – maybe because I didn’t treat – we do have HAI. We do offer it. I think there are situations where HAI makes sense. For example, a patient with stage III who had surgery, all disease removed, but we know this patient is at risk of tumor coming back in the liver. We actually have data that if you go and do hepatic artery infusion in that patient, you might reduce the risk of recurrence. But there is no tumor that we can’t treat with Y-90. So it’s a completely different patient population where I think it makes sense. But what we’re talking about today is stage IV patients metastatic disease to the liver, who are all treated with 5FU or capecitabine, upfront combos and now become resistant or stop responding. Should we really give them just higher dose of 5FU, or should we give them something else? And I hope that answered the question.

Betsy Post 45:39
Thank you so much, I have some questions in the chat for you. So for those of us that are heavily pretreated, think 50 plus rounds of chemo in, is Y-90 dangerous for us if we are running out of options, is there a way to do it safely?

Dr. Dayyani 45:56
So that’s a very good question. Unfortunately, the reality in the US is exactly this case, cases like yours, and that’s why we have very, very strict criteria performance that is 01. Patient is minimally impaired, able to do almost all their daily activities. Maybe they don’t function at 100% but otherwise they’re able to live their daily lives. Their bilirubin is less than two, the albumin is greater than three. So there is criteria that minimizes the risk that the liver is predamaged enough that you might get toxicity. But the majority of the cases currently in the US referred, are patients after 50 cycles. Remember anything beyond three months of oxali and irinotecan starts to give you underlying liver damage, it microscopically, you don’t see it, but it sort of increases. Is it safe to do? for sure. That’s the majority of the patients, who get Y-90 in that setting, what we call salvage setting. But you have to be very careful to do it somewhere where there are experienced – have high volume, and are not too cavalier that they say, “Oh, okay. Bill is three, that’s fine”. We have certain hard stops to minimize the risk of toxicity.

Betsy Post 47:16
Thank you. It seems like the patient stories that you shared indicated that Y-90 decreases the risk of recurrence. So why not add that on for those who are already resectable, just with chemo? Is it weighing a risk and benefit of radiation?

Dr. Dayyani 47:35
Yeah. And so if a tumor is already resectable, you remove it. There is zero points to give more radiation, because, remember, the reason we give chemo before we send them to surgery, if they’re resectable, is not to treat the tumor that’s going to come out anyway, the surgeon is going to cut it out. We give chemo because the fact that there is some tumors visible, increases the risk that there’s other tumor cells we don’t see, so we want to kill them before the patient goes to surgery. So when the surgeon does their job, the risk of the cancer coming back is lower. That’s why you give chemo IV, if you remember what I showed you, Y-90, goes directly where the tumors are visible. It doesn’t go to places where there is no tumors, because it can direct them that way. So there is no benefit to shrink a tumor that’s going to come out anyway, but that’s only 10% of your patients. So to change the answer to your question in the majority of patients after the initial chemo, they’re still not candidates for surgery, maybe because there’s too many tumors, or they’re too big. There we go and Y-90 them and shrink them further, and remember, 38% response in the RESECT trial, and then we send them to surgery. That’s where the benefit is. If you have a small, two centimeter tumor, less is more. Take it out. Be done with it. But if your tumor is five, six centimeters and you need to get it to three, that’s where we do the radiation.

Betsy Post 49:14
Thank you. Is Y-90 safe for patients with innumerable liver tumors?

Dr. Dayyani 49:19
As a matter of fact, the prime treatment is patients with innumerable liver lesions as long as it’s done before it’s too late, meaning the liver is so damaged that the numbers are LFTs, liver function tests are up. But the prime patient is a patient who comes with innumerable liver metastases, never gone into surgery, had their three, four months of chemo. The CEA came down, but now it’s plateauing. How can I further reduce the disease burden? Y-90 radioembolization. Yeah.

Betsy Post 49:52
So for a patient that’s had 50 plus doses of chemo since 2021, colon liver resection. Her liver has a tumor that has not responded to microwave ablation or histotripsy. The last scan showed two small additional subcentimeter lesions, six lung nodules, which they call stable. Would this patient potentially be a candidate? The interventional radiologist at Sloan Kettering thinks so.

Dr. Dayyani 50:20
I would agree with that. The extrahepatic disease, meaning the tumors outside of the liver are stable. And lung nodules are not going to get you in trouble. A couple of half centimeter, one centimeter long, if they’re stable, then the action is in the liver. And based on the description, the treatment would not be actually huge. Maybe they can do radiation segmentectomy and remember, the liver had never seen radiation. These tumors had never seen radiation. So certainly, I think that would be our recommendation as well. I agree with the Sloan colleagues.

Betsy Post 50:55
What size of tumors are ideal for Y-90 are three centimeters and above, too big?

Dr. Dayyani 51:01
No, it’s the opposite. There’s tumors that are too big for surgery or TACE or ablation, anything bigger than the three centimeters too big for ablation, for example. We Y-90 those. But obviously, I’m a medical oncologist, so all of these decisions are done based on tumor port, looking at the actual pictures, location, etc. But there is technically no upper limit for Y-90, whereas there’s upper limit for the other ablative therapies.

Betsy Post 51:27
What is the follow up like to determine whether Y-90 has worked?

Dr. Dayyani 51:32
So that’s a great question. Because you cause inflammation and you kill tumor, your CEA will spike. So we don’t check CEA within the first four weeks, because it really gets freaked out. Radiation works over weeks and weeks. For example, people who have rectal cancer, when they get chemo radiation, we wait six weeks before we see what’s going on. So do not get the scan too soon. Don’t get too excited. There will be some inflammation, the tumor will grow or get a bit bigger from the inflammation before it gets smaller. And sometimes it might not get smaller, but it dies from within – the color changes. So we recommend not getting any scans until six to eight weeks after the Y-90. Sometimes, if the patient is doing well, and the CEA is coming down, and we do a liquid biopsy, it’s coming down where we know it’s responding. We sometimes image them by three months, but in reality, we do it by about eight weeks, six to eight weeks after the second Y-90, not the first. Remember, each lobe is treated separately if needed. We wait till we treat the second time, and then about six to eight weeks after that.

Betsy Post 52:41
How does HER2 positive status affect eligibility for Y-90?

Dr. Dayyani 52:46
Remember I said systemic treatment. You use your best systemic treatment. And in a HER2 overexpressed or mutated, you have an anti-HER2, you shrink the tumor. But even in those cases, at some point you will stop shrinking, and HER2 overexpression is not resistance to gradiation. So you use whatever your biomarker has, the best systemic or biologic treatment for that biomarker, and then when it stops shrinking, where you plateau, that’s where you’re going with radiation. That’s what we think.

Betsy Post 53:18
Great. This is a question we get a lot from our BRAF patients. So how does the BRAF mutation affect eligibility for Y-90 and outcomes?

Betsy Post 53:28
Same answer, same answer. A lot of the BRAFs are very aggressive, right-sided, as you know, very little response to chemo from FOLFOXIRI, Bev. We have encorafinib, cetuximab. But even there, the PFS is, what, four months, five months, right? And the majority of patients, those are the patients that are right-sided where you want to start thinking about radioembolizing in between, or earlier on. So none of these biomarkers is a contraindication or exclusion for Y-90. It’s all about the timing issue, and again, smaller response better. So if you have one of those biomarkers, for sure, I give my patients the targeted treatment first to shrink these and at the smallest size, that’s where I go and radiate to give the extra kick.

Betsy Post 54:17
How many times can Y-90 be performed on a liver if there are recurrences in the liver?

Dr. Dayyani 54:23
That’s a really good point. You can repeat it. The longer the interval, the better, the less the risk of toxicity. There’s, reports of patients who have had five times. In our hands, we usually try to wait 18 months, minimum 12 months or not. Because, we have trials and remember, these patients, my patients only get three months of oxali or irinitecan. So if a tumor is growing after the Y-90 3, 4, 5, 6, months later, I can still give them a little FOLFOX or a little bit of FOLFIRI. I buy them time to remove them. But you can certainly re-challenge patients, as long as the liver function is appropriate and all the criteria I told you, yeah, we certainly, we treat patients as well.

Betsy Post 55:11
I asked my husband’s oncologist, about Y-90, and he said it had a high risk of death, and totally dismissed me. Is there a reason he would be so hesitant?

Dr. Dayyani 55:20
Because they probably never trained with it and never used it. The problem is, medical oncologists are not exposed to Y-90 treatment. That’s something that the interventional radiologist does. So unless the attending you trained with was knowledgeable and using Y-90, you’re a medical oncologist, right? You’ll never heard of it, and you just go by hearsay. The fellows that come through my clinic, when they go into practice, they will think about it differently. I was at MD Anderson, the largest fellowship program in the country, in the world, and I was not exposed to Y-90 until I became junior faculty, started treating GI and worked very closely with our chief of intermission radiology. He said, “hey, we can Y-90” and, I was like, “What are you talking about?”. And then you start doing it, and doing it now, the last 10, 12, years. That’s where I’ve specialized. That’s why. I would definitely get an interventional radiology consult.

Betsy Post 56:15
I love that answer. At what point is Y-90 no longer a viable option?

Dr. Dayyani 56:24
If the patient does not fall within the criteria: performance status, underlying liver function, elevation, bilirubin is too high, or there’s so much disease. Sometimes you wait so long and four years, three, four years. There’s so much disease in the liver that you take a 10 inch tumor and you shrink it by one inch, it’s still a nine inch tumor. That’s too late. Take a one inch tumor and do it. Shrink it down to a quarter inch. Now you changed it significantly, or a patient where the life expectancy is, unfortunately, three months or less because of the disease volume, radiation doesn’t work tomorrow. It takes weeks and weeks to work. So these are the cases, and the problem is, it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. I’m sure the colleague that said that, if that colleague sends their patients two months before they’re expired for Y-90 because he wants to do something. But he or he or she went through everything already. That patient has so much disease that even a small shrinkage is not going to change anything, and the liver is so damaged that the patient is more likely to get toxicity. So it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. We’ve published our data. We’ve published our data in earlier line of treatment, 42 months median survival. So the problem is, that colleague has never referred a patient who is newly diagnosed after three months for Y-90. So that colleague has never seen the actual tolerability. Try to give it to this same patient who has had 52 rounds of chemotherapy. Now tell that patient, ‘okay, I’m going to give you FOLFIXIRI Bev’, see how that patient will tolerate FOLFOXIRI Bev. Not at all. And then say FOLFOXIRI is toxic. So it’s all about timing, right? That’s what it is. It becomes a self-fulfilling, because we do not train – as medical oncologists, we do not train with radioembolization. That’s a problem.

Betsy Post 58:27
And I have one last question for you. It’s seems that you follow CEA pretty closely for response to treatments. What do you do for individual patients where CEA is not a good marker?

Dr. Dayyani 58:42
20, 30% of patients don’t have a tumor, so don’t have a CEA elevation, or very minimal CEA elevation. So I use a holistic approach, all hands on deck. Every single decision point will help. All my patients get liquid biopsy, tumor-informed or nontumor-informed ctDNA. That’s, especially for those patients, it’s a must for me to to monitor ctDNA. Obviously, imaging, but if I use liquid biopsy and the tumor is responding and the patient looks good, then I don’t even have to do CT scans every six weeks. People just reflectively do scans every six weeks. If I’m knowing the tumor is responding and the patient is doing well, I wait till the ctDNA starts going back up, and then I do my scan, right? So in 2024 for stage four patients, especially if the CEA is not very high to start with, liquid biopsy, to me, is a must. The other thing is they can check CA 19-9. About 15% of the tumors will have CA 19-9 elevation and you can follow with all these old tumor markers, CEA, CA 19-9. The higher you start with, the more reliable as a marker. A patient with a lot of disease and a CEA of 10, that CEA is probably not a very good marker. It’s as bad as someone with 3, but the short answer is, we use circulating tumor DNA and other modalities to monitor response.

Betsy Post 59:28
Thank you. I did get one last question, if your cancer center is not experienced with Y-90, where would you recommend a patient go to look for a Y-90 consult?

Dr. Dayyani 1:00:18
Well, I can give you a list of places, or a first good step is to find an NCI disease cancer center, where you deal with people only CGI. I don’t treat breast cancer, no lymphoma, you know? I refer them, so that’s the first one. But I think asking for an intervention radiology consult, those people will refer you. If they don’t do it, they know who does it in their neighborhood, because they are the ones doing it, and they’re invested in it. Intervention radiology consult seeking that, and they can. I’m not sure who else is from maybe Sirtex is on the call and maybe there might be actually a list of centers that you can access. I know, I know my colleagues. When people come to me I know who were to send them; to Stanford, to UCSF or East coast, or MD Anderson. But not everybody has that. So if you ask for intervention radiologists, they will tell you.

Betsy Post 1:01:18
I do see one last question. This is the last one we’re going to take since we’re over time a little bit, and you’ve been so generous with us this evening. Thank you so much. Would you recommend someone newly diagnosed to seek this treatment out, essentially from the beginning?

Dr. Dayyani 1:01:37
Well, from the beginning to us, means by three months or so of best treatment. Too early does not make sense, because they might not benefit. You need – and part of the reason we give the first three months, the best chemo plus biologic is to kill everything else outside of the liver, but also to kill as much of the colon tumor. So when I’m doing my Y-90, the rest doesn’t go crazy and grow outside of the liver, right? So early to us is about three, three and a half months. Should they be thinking about it? Yeah, if you do your three, three and a half months of your best treatment, and the surgeon says, “I can’t take it out”, seek it out, see an interventional radiologist, ask them to think about radioembolization. The more chemo you get, the more underlying liver damage, the more likely you have toxicity. So early for us is about three, three to four months.

Betsy Post 1:02:32
Thank you. So I’ve learned so much tonight myself, and I’ve run the COLONTOWN groups for liver for years. There’s a lot of thank you’s in the chat for you. People are saying they’ve learned so much that you’ve given a lot of hope to them tonight. I just want to thank you on behalf of all of us here at COLONTOWN. And if there are additional questions, you guys can send those to me. So please just you can send them to me through private message, email me, chat me. Dr. Dayyani also did provide his email address, so we’re happy to take some follow up questions if needed. Thank you all so much for joining us tonight. We really appreciate it and Dr. Dayyani thank you once again. This was fabulous. We really appreciate it all. Thank you everyone. Thank you.

DocTalk
2024
Dr. Dayyani
Liver
Stage IV
Y90

In this DocTalk, Dr. Farshid Dayyani from UCI Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center discusses Y90 for liver mets. Recorded in August 2024.

More Videos

State of the art liver surgery with robotic technology
Dr. Sucandy
2024
ERASur trial: Local treatment options for limited stage IV CRC
Dr. Hitchcock
2023
Advanced surgical treatments for CRC liver mets
Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro
2021
Transplant patients are in the house!
2021
Hepatic Artery Infusion (HAI) chemotherapy for CRC liver mets
Hepatic Artery Infusion (HAI) chemotherapy for CRC liver mets
Dr. Gholami
2021
Modern-day management of liver metastases
Dr. Soares
2022
Why liver transplant for mCRC is taking off
Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro
2022
Paths to long-term survival with CRC liver mets
Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro
2023
Categories
DocTalks Hide from search

LIVER LOVERS Legend: Dr. Yuman Fong on All Things Liver

LIVER LOVERS Legend: Dr. Yuman Fong on All Things Liver

DocTalk
2025
Dr. Fong
Liver
Stage IV

In this DocTalk, Dr. Yuman Fong from City Of Hope discusses all things liver. Recorded in August 2024.

Betsy Post 00:00
Welcome everyone, to tonight’s DocTalk. I am really excited about this one. I love all of our talks that we get to do, but this one, I think, is really special because we have a physician-patient panel. I think this is probably the first time I’ve done one of these. We get to hear from our expert physicians as well as our very experienced patients with their first-hand knowledge of HAI therapy for colorectal cancer liver mets. I’m going to have Keith help me to advance to the next slide. I’m going to do a few introductions and tell you how this is going to work, and then we will get started. This evening we’re very pleased and honored to have a medical oncologist from Indiana University, Dr. Anita Turk. She has a lot of experience with HAI from the medical oncology standpoint so she’s here to help us in that regard. And then we have one of her colleagues, Dr. Ryan Ellis, also from Indiana, and he is a surgical oncologist with of course, experience placing the pump, including in a robotic fashion, which I think is really interesting as well. And then, of course, for our patients, I’m going to go ahead and introduce our patients: we have one that I think hasn’t made it yet, but we’re going to go on without her, and hopefully she can join us. But we have Hope Brooks, and I think if you are a member of COLONTOWN, I think it’s okay for me to say that you probably know Hope. She received her HAI pump back in 2022 and we’re going to hear a lot from her tonight, about her experience with the pump. And then Michael Riehle, who received his HAI pump back in 2020. I think it’s really important to know that the pump helped him so much that he was actually able to have his pump removed in 2023, so he’s long-time disease free and had his pump removed. He can even speak to that from the very beginning to the end, truly. And then hopefully Megan will be able to hop on. She received her pump in 2022 and she is also a longer term NED patient as well, so hopefully she’ll be able to join us. Before we get to the next slide I wanted to tell you how this is going to work. This evening, we have a fireside chat-type of setup: I have a lot of questions for our panelists, I’m going to ask those questions, and then please put your questions in the chat or Q and A. You should see a button that will say either “Chat” or “Q and A”. Keith is here. He’s helping run the tech this evening. He can answer any questions that you have about that. You can send him a message and he’ll be happy to help. At the end, we will take those questions that you put in the chat or Q and A feature. So with that, I’m going to turn it over to Dr. Turk. She’s going to set us up with some slides and some knowledge of HAI and then we’re going to resume our Q and A.

Dr. Anita Turk 03:00
Thanks Betsy and hello everyone joining us today. Appreciate you all logging on, and those who may be joining us later, appreciate your time. So as Betsy said, I’m a medical oncologist. I specialize in taking care of patients, especially with advanced colorectal cancer, and we are a main site in the State of Indiana to provide hepatic arterial infusion pump therapy. So what does that exactly mean? Many patients have a port that allows them to get chemotherapy conveniently throughout the body; Patients have to wear 5-FU pumps over 48 hours – this is is very similar. How it’s different is that it’s placed in the abdomen instead of the chest, and instead of going into a vein, it’s actually going into an artery, specificly the hepatic artery, or the liver artery, which is one of the blood vessels that supplies blood to the tumors, as well as the liver. What’s unique about the liver is that you actually have two types of blood flow. You have ‘portal vein’ and you also have ‘hepatic artery’. Your normal liver actually requires mostly the portal vein for blood flow, whereas the hepatic artery will differentially supply the tumors inside the liver and that’s how we are able to take advantage of this therapy. When we deliver the drugs, specically Floxuridine-it’s a very, very potent form of 5-FU, and we’re able to do that directly in the liver for a couple of reasons. One, because of its unique anatomy, with two sources of blood flow. We’re able to try to target the cancer cells over the normal liver as much as possible. And number two, only a small amount of the drug is actually exposed to the rest of your body, so the fancy terminology for that is called, “first pass pharmacokinetics”. Essentially, what happens is that medication is taken up by the liver, is affecting the cancer cells, but the normal liver is then able to metabolize the chemotherapy into a benign substance that’s not harmful. So as it’s spreading through the rest of the body, you’re not getting effects like nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or low blood counts, and that’s why patients are largely able to tolerate this therapy pretty well. (Keith, you can do the next slide. …Oh yeah, we can play the sample. ) (Video begins to play on screen.) So I think what this video is essentially showing is that the chemotherapy goes directly into the hepatic artery, and because of that special blood flow I talked about, the chemotherapy is being exposed more to the cancer cells than it is to the regular liver. So the pump that’s currently approved right now is the Intera 3000 Hepatic Arterial Infusion Pump. It’s about the size of a hockey puck, fts in the size of your hand. And basically how it works is that there’s a chamber of gas that expands at body temperature, that pushes the chemotherapy into the body at a certain rate, usually about one or 1.4 CC’s per day so it’s kind of going through the liver continuously. You don’t need to worry about it. You can continue your regular activities. The pump does have to be filled every two weeks when it’s actively being used and the rate is very sensitive to altitude and heat changes. So if patients have a fever, or, if a patient steps in the sauna for too long, that is going to affect the rate. So we always like to counsel our patient about those things so we can take that into account when they’re doing their doses of chemotherapy. So generally, how this works is if a patient is considered a candidate, you usually start with meeting a hepatic arterial infusion pump team that’s going to involve both a medical oncologist and a surgical oncologist. We review the history/where did the cancer start/where has it spread/specific parts of the biology, often involveing DNA analysis/making sure there aren’t other, better options are available on the table/and what treatments the patient has already received/and probably the most important thing, what’s the baseline liver function of that patient. We then want updated scans, whether that’s a PET scan, CT or MRI, to ensure that we’re treating a patient where at least a majority, if not all of the disease that we’re concerned about is in the liver. As I mentioned, this drug is not going to spread throughout the rest of the body and isn’t going to kill cancer cells outside of the liver. Usually a couple of weeks before the pump is placed, chemotherapy’s stopped, so your body is recovered, your blood counts are up. You’re ready to go to the the OR, and then you head to the OR with someone like Dr. Ellis. And maybe I’ll turn things over to Dr. Ellis to briefly explain the procedure and anatomical considerations for patients.

Dr. Ryan Ellis 07:40
Sure. So thanks, and again, I’ll reiterate, I appreciate everyone’s time tonight. But for the operation itself, a lot of it is dictated by exactly what the operation entails. This can include a liver resection for some patients, meaning we do some liver surgery or remove some tumors, as well as placing the pump. Or it can be the pump by itself, and within that context, there can also be open and robotic approaches. So the range of the surgical experience can be pretty wide, but overall, I would say the vast majority of patients receive some sort of open operation with or without removing any tumors from the liver. Some patients may even still have a colon tumor that needs to be removed at the time of the pump placement and then when you wake up from surgery, you would have an incision from usually about your breast bone down to your belly button, if not a little bit longer, depending on the operation. And as Dr. Turk mentioned, the hockey puck is underneath the skin, usually on the left side of the belly. You recover from surgery, hopefully relatively quickly. And we can, maybe later in the talk, go through some of the real details of what can happen with this operation, both immediately after the operation and later down the line and during your hospital stay, we get a special scan that is among the most important studies in this entire pathway, where we verify that any medication that we put inside of the pump go to the liver, and only to the liver. The surgery involves essentially me, reconfiguring the arterial system to the liver so that any chemotherapy that goes in does not go to other places. Places like the stomach or the pancreas, because those parts of the body are not going to tolerate the level of chemotherapy that we’re delivering. So once we get that study done in the hospital and you’ve recovered and are eating and moving around and taking great care of yourself, then we send you out, and usually about two weeks later, or I should say, exactly two weeks after we put the pump, you come back to the office and see the team again and start talking with Dr. Turk about putting some medications in the pump.

Dr. Anita Turk 09:59
Thanks Dr. Ellis. Yeah, the two weeks after that pump was last filled, it is really important that the patient’s able to come back to be seen to have that pump filled. These pumps do need to be filled every two weeks. We don’t want them getting emptied and dry, because that puts the pump at risk for developing a blood clot and then making it difficult to use again in the future. Typically at that first visit, depending on how the patient’s doing and liver function tests are doing, if the patient’s doing very well, we can even start chemotherapy right away. But regardless of when you start, you’re coming in every two weeks for a pump fill, alternating between chemotherapy and then a two week break with heparin and so on and so forth. Most physicians recommend doing this course for about six months of treatment, so that’d be six rounds of floxuridine. Now, depending on the clinical scenario, that can be pretty variable: Patients are doing really well, the liver is doing fine,some patients may have a longer course. If they have a complication, some patients may have a shorter course. As we’ll get into this, there are some risks and complications from the chemotherapy itself with specific implications on the liver. Fortunately, things have gotten a little bit easier. Patients come from all over and may not be close to a tertiary cancer center where they have easy access to this pump therapy. Now there are nursing agencies that are able to do these pump fills at home, which makes it a lot easier for patients to get this type of treatment when they live hours and hours away where coming in every two weeks can be challenging, and we have increasing experience using these teams that come to your home at Indiana University. I know other institutions are doing it as well. Some patients may actually be on systemic chemotherapy at the same time, and again, depending on what the need is for that patient. Once the course of that hepatic arterial infusion pump is done, whether that’s six to eight months, again, depending on that clinical scenario, chemotherapy can be restarted if needed, kind of the routine, whether it was FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, a targeted agent, depending on, again, the biology or what’s going on with the patient. And then we follow the patient, whether that’s on or off chemotherapy, and monitor the liver closely. We have many patients that the liver will be in good shape, no active disease for a long period of time. In very rare scenarios, but it certainly does happen, you’re going to hear about today, there are people who have complete responses to the pump therapy where we can stop all the chemotherapy altogether, but this pump therapy can be repeated. So again, you’ll hear from one of our patients, even when we do one course, we do not remove that pump right away. We often keep it in for several years to ensure that the patient’s disease is stable or clear. And if the unfortunate situation does happen that the cancer does start growing again, we can always use that again. And again, knowing that important relationship that you’re going to have with your arterial infusion pump team is really important. So making sure you have good communication and contact with your tertiary care center is really important when you’re considering this type of therapy. So, how are we using it for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer? Specifically when we think about this in our patients, it’s when it cannot be surgically removed. The gold standard, if you are unfortunately, a patient that has metastatic colon cancer to the liver that can be surgically removed, that’s still the standard of care. But for patients where that’s not an option because disease is on both sides of the liver or for some other anatomic reason can’t be removed, this is an option we can certainly consider for patients. There is data that shows that this can potentially prolong survival, but it certainly improves outcomes within the liver for patients that don’t have resectable disease, that’s one area where we use it. We particularly use it, the data supports using it after patients have had some round of chemotherapy and that’s no longer working in what we call that second or even third-line space, where the current standard options aren’t working, the cancer is growing in the liver, and we need to be more aggressive. The other common indication for this is patients who are very high risk that did have a surgery and had the cancer removed from their liver, but we’re really worried about it coming back and we’re concerned there’s probably microscopic cancer cells left behind where we will use the pump after surgery to try to kill any cancer cells that may be in the liver that are left behind. There’s data showing that that helps, again, with liver outcomes and can potentially improve survival in addition to chemotherapy. Those are the two big areas where we use it right now. There is an ongoing clinical trial called EA2222, or The Pump Study, and we are one of those sites, and it is open at most hepatic arterial infusion consortium sites actually trying to answer the question, “Can we use this in the first line setting when a patient first walks in the door, gets chemotherapy, they’re doing okay, liver function’s good. Can we add the pump in and help improve outcomes?” And that will be a really important trial to see, is this pump going to be helpful for patients earlier in their course of treatment? So in terms of safety information the pump is only really authorized to be used for Floxuridine, Heparin, and then we even use Glycerin for it. Glycerin is just a really thick solution to slow down the pump. So in that period when a patient is not using their pump, where we’re in the monitoring zone, so they don’t have to come in every two weeks, then you can really can really space out their fills to every three, even four months. We don’t use this pump for anything else, at least at this time. The pump is not considered for patients who have a lot of disease outside of the liver. Again, when you have cancer, if unfortunately, a patient has bone involvement, lung involvement, that Floxuridine and chemotherapy is not going to get there, so those patients generally aren’t considered candidates. I will hand off side effects of the pump placement itself to Dr. Ellis.

Dr. Ryan Ellis 16:14
So the pump placement, I break the problems that we can have sort of in the perioperative period into two groups. There’s what’s called pump pocket complications, which if you think of a port, essentially its the same thing, a little bit bigger. And then there are intra-abdominal complications. The pump pocket complications are primarily related to fluidaccumulating within the pump. We have things called a seroma, which is a benign fluid, almost like water, that can accumulate on the inside. It can make it a little bit problematic to access the pump. You can imagine, if the pump is floating in a bubble of fluid, it’s hard to find with a needle after that, but that is not a particularly dangerous complication. In the same areas is hematomas– a little bit of bleeding around your pump immediately after surgery creates essentially a blood clot around it that can also cause some trouble. And then the third thing we worry about that happens is infections. It is hardware, it is not a natural substance to have under your skin. The rate of all that is, overall, quite low– infections, in the low, single digits. But all those things can happen. Regarding the issues that we canhave inside of the belly the most obvious one is some bleeding. This is essentially a vascular surgery operation that happens on the liver, so there is a small risk of bleeding around the pump insertion site within the arterial system, after surgery. And related to that are development of things called aneurysms, which usually occur at the site where the catheter enters the arterial system. Those are the bigger issues that we can have with the pump. Of course, if anybody has any more specific questions, we can talk about it later, but those are the ones to really consider when you’re when you’re thinking about having one of these placed.

Betsy Post 18:27
All right, so here we are at the Q and A. I’m going to turn my video back on, hopefully my internet’s going to cooperate. It did say that it was unstable, so if I go off camera, it’s just because of that. We’re going to kick off the Q and A and I’m going to start with a question for our doctors. Thank you for that awesome introduction. I think maybe we’ll just get a little bit more specific. On deciding to get HAI therapy, I know you talked a little bit about extra hepatic disease and maybe some of those limitations, but I’d love to know a little bit about who is generally a candidate for HAI. So, who might be a candidate, that’s the first question. And then it’s a two-prong question, because the other half of that is, what are some of the other factors that patients should consider when they’re considering a pump?

Dr. Anita Turk 19:20
Absolutely. With the data that we have, patients that seem to benefit from this therapy are patients that have liver-onlymetastases, meaning the cancer has only spread to the liver, and ideally, the original tumor is out. There are some small exceptions to that rule, as there is it to anything in medicine. I certainly myself, have patients where they have one little,tiny lung nodule, or two nodules where they may or may not be cancer, where we’ll certainly sometimes make some exceptions if a majority of the cancer is in the liver, knowing that that’s going to be the issue if the cancer grows, that liver failure is going to be the issue that will unfortunately take that person’s life. So those are generally the people that we think about. The data strongly supports it in that second and third line setting, meaning you kind of had your standard of care chemotherapy with some biologic agent, whether that’s Avastin or bevacizumab or Vectibix or panitumumab, and that patient’s now progressing in the liver. What are next steps? I often include a pump chemotherapy through the hepatic arterial infusion pump. There are some anatomic considerations as well in terms of blood flow to the liver. I’ll hand that off to Dr. Ellis – what he looks for on the CT scan.

Dr. Ryan Ellis 20:39
Right. So I vaguely alluded to this, essentially a vascular exclusion of the liver because most fundamentally, when we put this pump in that floxuridine can’t be traveling throughout the rest of the body. It can’t be going into the stomach or the pancreas or the small intestine. So for simplicity sake, the the majority of patients have the arteries going into the liver shaped like a “y”. Now that’s not a vast majority. It’s a little bit more than 50% of patients have what we call standard anatomy, and the other 40-some % have a combination of blood vessels that is usually accommodating of a hepatic artery infusion pump, and in rare cases, actually can make inserting the pump anatomically impossible. The classic example of that would be, if there’s only one blood vessel feeding the liver, I would not have a place to essentially tie that blood vessel off to insert the catheter without also cutting off all the blood flow to the liver. So I have to take advantage of what I would say is relatively normal anatomy. That’s an exception, but I will say periodically, we will review patients who are otherwise biological candidates that anatomically cannot accommodate having the pump placed.

Dr. Anita Turk 22:05
Now, getting to that second part of your question, — (speech interrupted with a brief interjection from Betsy Post)

Betsy Post 22:09
— I just wanted to say, (Didn’t realize that Dr. Turk had started speaking due to connection lag.) — go ahead. I’m sorry. We have, oh, sorry about that. I thought you were finished, and I do apologize. I did want to say for anyone that came late that we do have a Q and A, so I do see five questions already in the Q and A, and we will get to those. So I just want to make sure everybody knows we see them.

Dr. Anita Turk 22:25
I was just going to get to the second part of your question. You know, when you’re evaluating a patient, of course there’s a surgical component, the cancer biology component with the medical oncologist, there’s also the patient component. Part of this does have a dedication of time in that you’re coming in for a pump fill every two weeks, and we have to staypretty close to that as possible. There is some flexibility there, because we don’t want that pump to empty so I always emphasize with patients that you need to maintain a relationship with the institution that you’re going to, if that’s far away,that’s something you really need to take into account. Again, I did allude to the nursing agencies that will help take care of these pumps at home, but that doesn’t replace going and seeing the physician, making sure that pump is operating appropriately, that your liver numbers are doing okay, and that you’re getting appropriate dosing. So as much as I’d like to say, it’s a one time visit and we could do it all at home, it’s not that simple.

Betsy Post 23:26
Thank you. Have a question for one of our patients, or both. I think that I’ll start with Hope and then Hope when you’re finished, Michael, I’d love to hear from you as well. So how did your doctor decide that you were a candidate for HAI therapy? Well, I don’t think that we have Hope’s audio, at least I don’t. Can anyone hear her? No, okay, I don’t know if you can hear us Hope, but we don’t have your audio. Well, you work on that. Maybe I’ll go to you Michael, how about you? Can you answer that and Hope work on your audio?

Michael Riehle 24:27
Sure. I know Dr Turk has spoken a lot about it being like a second and third line treatment. Mine was like a second line treatment, but it wasn’t necessarily because I was progressing with my cancer or anything. MSK wanted to try to get ahead of the ball since I was doing so well on FOLFOX and Vectibix and that my liver tumors were responding so well and decreasing so much in size, they wanted to get in there and really just get the pump in to try to get them down the rest of the way to be able to get to a liver resection. So it’s more of, just to get ahead of the game, instead of a last ditch effort for me, which was really nice.

Dr. Anita Turk 25:16
Absolutely. It’ll still be exciting to see what that clinical trial shows but in many patients, where if we really throw everything we have at the tumor, and where there’s a place where we can get to resection, that’s another special circumstance where Dr. Ellis and I would certainly consider up-front pump placement to get that patient to the OR to surgically clear the disease.

Betsy Post 25:40
Yeah, not sure if Hope has audio, so I’m just gonna see, do you have audio? I don’t hear you. So sorry. Maybe she can join on the phone. We’ll try to figure that out. Oh, I’ll say, I’m gonna ask, …okay, Keith is gonna send you a message…. We’ll try to figure this out. Michael, I’m gonna go back to you for just one other question. I know that you did live somewhere where you had to travel. And I would just like to hear what a few of your considerations may have been when you did decide to make that commitment and get the pump.

Michael Riehle 26:26
Yeah, absolutely. I live in Buffalo, New York and obviously go to Sloan Kettering, New York City, so it’s a five plus-ish hour drive something like that, or fly, and like you said it’s an every two week commitment. There’s no ifs ands or buts. You have to go, you have to go. So knowing that the HAI pump is what was one of my only options that could help me get to NED, I basically just buckled down and said, “I gotta figure this out. I gotta make this work to be able to get this pump”. Luckily, I was able to utilize a non-profit charity here in Buffalo that actually flew me for free from Buffalo to New York City. And I know that there’s a lot of places all over the country that have these organizations that fly patients for treatment. So I definitely urge a lot of people to look into air charities, to try to get themselves to treatment for this, because it’s a big cost, it’s a big time dedication. It’s really all of those things above. So really that helped me be able to commit to it and know that it was something I was gonna be able to do.

Betsy Post 27:46
Thank you.

Hope Brooks 27:56
Is my audio working? Yes. I had to get out of the meeting and get back in the meeting. I’m so sorry.

Betsy Post 28:05
That’s okay. It’s no problem. That’s why Keith’s here to help me-help you. So that’s much appreciated. Let me go ahead and ask you, because I think it’s important, how did your doctor decide you were a candidate for HAI and then what considerations did you have when you were thinking about, “Do I want to do this or not? Do I want to make this commitment?”

Hope Brooks 28:28
At my first oncologist’s office, they didn’t offer me HAI, so I found it, and I moved to a different oncologist after doing some research, and I immediately was asking for it. And when I met Dr. Chung, he said I was a perfect candidate. I had already gone through FOLFIRINOX and had a remarkable response. So my tumor was roughly 10 by 8 centimeters on my liver, and it had gone down to about 7 centimeters to one tumor from that large amount just with FOLFIRINOX and I didn’t have other disease. So he gave me a list when I first met with Dr. Chung that said these are the things we can look at, and HAI was at the top of the list. A week and a half later, I met with the surgeon, and he said the same thing, if anatomically I could accept the pump, then we talked about what it would look like to get it and how my life would be afterwards. And I was already sold on it, I think before I actually had that meeting.

Betsy Post 29:32
Okay, so we wanted to talk a little bit about the surgery to implant the pump, and my question is about what patients can expect for that surgery. But we have a question in the chat that I want to tie into that, if that’s okay. We have a patient that was asking about recovery time. I just want to make sure Dr. Ellis, when you talk about that surgical aspect, maybe talk about that recovery time, maybe robotically versus open, with or without resection, I think is important. And then one of the other questions was, when you were talking earlier about some of those complications with the surgery, a patient was asking: How would I recognize, are there symptoms of an issue after that pump placement? What can patients look out for with regard to a surgical complication with pump placement? So hopefully Dr. Ellis, you can shed some light on it?

Dr. Ryan Ellis 30:34
Yeah, sure. So I’ll start out with surgical recovery. They I’ll start with an open operation, which, is in general, a vertical incision from the belly button to the breastbone. In some cases, if you have a complex liver resection, you may have what called a hockey stick incision, where it goes down and then around to the to the right underneath the rib cage. But the difference between those two doesn’t affect recovery all that much. For an open operation, you’re usually in the hospital around four or five days, depending on the overall recovery trajectory and having any small complications after the fact. The Pump Study, the special study I was talking about, is usually done on the third day after surgery. Everything’s gone well after your operation, you’re usually eating and drinking and moving around by the time you have a pump study, and then by the time you can tolerate a diet, move around, take care of yourself and your pain is controlled with oral medications you go home, again, around four or five days after surgery, for an open operation. The robotic operation is is a little bit faster. Again, in most patients, it’s a little bit of a struggle to get a pump in robotically. Those are primarily done at more experienced centers, or especially for patients who have not had a lot of surgery before. But if that is the case, when I put a pump in minimally invasive, I actually do the pump study often the day after surgery, and those patients can generally go home, sometimes even the day after surgery, but more often, I keep them one additional day, which will tie into the complication timeline we were talking about. After any type of operation the limitations are very similar. I say for the most part, common sense. Don’t lift anything heavy to risk tearing your incisions open. Don’t go in hot tubs or swimming pools or anything like that, and risk causing your skin to break down after the operation. But thinking a little bit about complications and what you would look out for, part of my job as a surgeon, and all the surgeons’ jobs, is to keep you in the hospital to watch for the earliest possible complications that is primarily bleeding, but the vast majority of bleeding happens in the first 24 to 48 hours after surgery. The other types of complications within the pump pocket that I talked about are generally not particularlydangerous, and the things you notice is new swelling, fullness, some people even notice a sensation that their pump is floating in that fluid. And then standard times of infection, redness, a little bit of drainage from the pump pocket and things like that. There are also some longer term complications that we haven’t really discussed, which is actually once you’ve recovered from the surgery and you’ve been getting floxuridine, a percentage of patients do have toxicity from the chemotherapy to the liver. Dr. Turk, when she initiated the conversation, talked about how the hepatic artery preferentially feeds blood to tumors, which is what we take advantage of to use this for treatment. But on the other end of that, the hepatic artery also supplies blood to what are called the bile ducts. So some patients will find andagain, this is fairly rare, months and months after their treatment, they start to get a yellow tinge to their skin, to their eyes, underneath their tongue, and that can be indicative of a longer term complication. That is something called biliary sclerosis that we can come back to if there’s more interest. But for the most part, we keep you in the hospital or the duration of the scariest complications, then after that, it’s mostly sort of common sense. It looks like the skin is infected, or maybe long term having some skin discoloration.

Betsy Post 34:40
Thank you. And for our patients, we can start with Hope and then move to Michael. I want to know, based on what Dr. Ellis said about surgery, what your experience was with that, and what he said about the hospital stay, the scar, the surgery, the recovery, how does what he said compare with your experience?

Hope Brooks 35:03
For me, it’s pretty spot on. We were going to do my surgery robotically. My body didn’t cooperate, so he did this open incision after we were already in the operating room. I went into the regular room after recovery. A few hours after surgery, an hour or so, I was up walking almost immediately, and for myself the pain meds put me to sleep, so I asked them to turn that off. They had done epidural. We turned the epidural off. We started managing pain the first night withmedication, oral versus intravenously. Removed the epidural the next morning. After surgery, I spent that day in the hospital managing pain. For me, a muscle relaxer actually worked a little bit better than some of the narcotics. I’d never had abdominal surgery. Those of you who know me, I work out every single day. You know I’m picking up 100 plus pounds of kettlebells off the floor on a regular basis. So it was kind of a joke that my abdomen freaked out a little bit, so the Robaxin helped me, and then I went home the next day. So I was in the hospital two nights, and I went home the next day. It was uncomfortable, because it is a large metal object. I think the attachment to the abdominal wall was more uncomfortable than the incision itself. Just having it there. It has to settle in a little bit. Every week that went by, it got a little bit better. Probably after about the third week I was like, I can tolerate this. By two months, we got to know each other, and we became friends.

Michael Riehle 36:43
Yeah, for me, my surgery was robotic to have the the pump placed, but it was also done at the time of my colon resection. So my recovery process was a little different, obviously, than just the pump itself. I was in the hospital for maybe five days. I think, like you said, I do remember the pump study being the day following the implant being placed. So that was surprising to me, just because it was my first surgery ever in my life, and I’m like, “Oh, they already want to poke me with stuff”, but no, it was a pretty straightforward recovery. I just had some typical nausea and the normal pains that would come with with incisions, and then my bowels, waking back up from the colon resection, but I was back at work within five weeks, lightly going at it a little bit at a time, not jumping right into it, and as Hope said, within a couple of months. For me personally, I learned to live with it, and it almost just became part of me. I could hardly ever feel it was there unless I was squeezing into a tight place and I bumped it by accident, or the only time, oddly enough, I would ever really feel it would be if I was sitting on the ground and I would bend over at a weird angle to tie my shoe. That’s the only time I would ever actually feel it inside my body, which is weird to say, but yeah, it was pretty straightforward, and the recovery was pretty much what I would have expected.

Hope Brooks 38:12
I want to add on to that. My pump study was done the week after. So, it was a: Wednesday surgery; home on Friday; pump study on Tuesday. So I had to go back for that. But the tying of the shoes is accurate. I started working out four weeks after surgery, modified lighter weights and things, but tying my shoes still is the thing that gets me.

Michael Riehle 38:41
Yeah, it doesn’t hurt, but it’s just that one time where you actually can feel it just wedge a little bit in your body. Yeah.

Hope Brooks 38:47
And my pump was installed, stand alone. I had no other surgery with it.

Betsy Post 38:54
Thank you. And Megan’s here.

Megan Stevens 38:56
I am so sorry.

Betsy Post 38:57
Megan, that’s okay. We are very happy to have you here. I’ll get you in on this next round.

Megan Stevens 39:26
I absolutely apologize. Absolutely.

Betsy Post 39:27
That’s okay. So in the next round of questions, I’m going to tap you in. The next question, we have on initiating the HAI therapy. I know Dr. Turk, you actually talked about this a little bit, but how soon does HAI therapy start following the surgery?

Dr. Anita Turk 39:48
I think it depends on the surgery the patient has. In the patients where they’re just going in to get their pump placed, we’re not removing any segments of the liver to try to clear disease, you can often start at that first follow up visit in two weeks, as long as liver functions look okay. For patients who are planning to do pump after a complex liver resection, and we were worried about their remnant liver being high risk for still having cancer, sometimes it’d be challenging to start right away, and those folks usually need four, five weeks-ish to recover before we could start putting in floxuridine mainly because we just want those liver numbers to start coming back down, make sure those bile ducts are healed up, before we start administering the agent. The main concern that Dr. Ellis alluded to the risk with this therapy is called biliary sclerosis. So for those who may be less familiar, you have the liver itself and then there are tubes running through the liver that help form bile and excrete that into your stool. And that biliary tree is supplied by the hepatic artery so those cells are also getting exposed to this really strong chemotherapy agent. And whether it happens while you’re on the chemo, and it can even happen several months afterwards, those bile ducts can scar down from all the inflammation, and then the bile just doesn’t have anywhere to go. It’s almost like, when you see patients with end stage liver disease from hepatitis or something like that, they can develop a cirrhosis-like picture, where there’s a lot of scarring, the bilirubin goes up, and then options can, unfortunately, become very limited. So we’re very, very diligent about that to make sure we minimize that risk as much as possible. Going in with good liver numbers and your medical oncologist being familiar with how to dose this medication is very important. Again why I say go to a place that does this regularly. You don’t want to be going to a small volume center, not only from the expertise of the surgeon, but the expertise of the medical oncologist,

Megan Stevens 41:47
You’re muted Betsy.

Betsy Post 41:51
Sorry, I always mute so no one can hear my dog… So, with the systemic chemotherapy that’s generally done at the same time, we’d love to hear about the management of that, and then the treatment regimen during active HAI therapy. And one thing I want to tag into that, one question we see quite a bit is folks asking about side effects. So I’d love for you to talk about side effects, just as it relates to the HAI versus the systemic.

Dr. Anita Turk 42:23
Yeah. So again, whether that’s paired with systemic or not, would be a risk/benefit discussion with your medical oncologist. And the big picture in patients where I’m worried there’s cancer also outside the liver, but the liver’s problem number one in that moment we’ll often combine systemic chemotherapy with the pump. Chemotherapy to emphasize treatment to that liver, but also address other sites of disease. Commonly, what’s paired with the pump is irinotecan sometimes also 5-FU with the 48 hour pump. The reason we don’t like to do oxaliplatin, is because oxaliplatin also can hurt the tubes in the liver, all the bile ducts, so we want to avoid overlapping those as much as possible. Often when I pair it with the FOLFIRI chemotherapy, I do reduce the dose. There is a phase one study showing that that is safer for the bile ducts and liver function in general. So normally we dose that pump at full dose. If you pay attention to your dosage, I know many patients do that, it’s 2400. We’ll often bring that down closer to 1500 and irinotecan down closer to 100 where normal is 180 to try to mitigate those risks of liver toxicity. Now in the pump, in and of itself, side effects. It’s not often I get to tell my patients pretty much nothing, most of the toxicity, so to speak, in terms of acute side effects, is related to the pump itself. So, tying your shoe and feeling it. I had a patient whose grandson kicked him right in the pump and it flipped over. Mechanical issues can certainly happen, but from the Floxuridine itself, if that’s the only thing you’re getting, and I’m sure Michael and Hope can comment on this, it’s incredibly well tolerated. I’ve actually really never had a patient with symptoms acutely from that medication, outside of that biliary sclerosis issue.

Betsy Post 44:13
I’m going to switch to a patient question, and I’m going to put Megan on the spot here. What was your experience with getting your pump refilled?

Megan Stevens 44:30
You blanked out a little bit, but I understand that the question was, what’s my experience with getting my pump refilled.

Betsy Post 44:35
…Megan is a patient at Duke.

Megan Stevens 44:37
Yeah, I’m at Duke. When I was in active treatment, I would get my pump refilled at Duke. And it, oddly, doesn’t hurt for the needle to go into your belly. It’s awkward and you feel nervous. But then when it actually happens, it’s a bit of pressure, it’s a little pin prick. Like that. It doesn’t really hurt, and they would fill my pump up, and my oncologist was really conservative. I would get it refilled every six weeks, and I still am getting it refilled every six weeks. I’ve been off active treatment for three years now. I am a three year colon cancer survivor, and I attribute the HAI pump to my survival. At this point, I have a group called “Pentec” that comes to my house, and they do it on my couch. And so when I first started getting it refilled, I would go to Duke and I’d get my blood drawn on one level, I’d talk to my oncologist, or get scans on the next level, they would figure out what my liver levels were and decide what kind of infusion I needed, and then go to the next level and get it infused. And it was amazing, because it was all in one building. It was all on one day. And so I would go deal with my cancer in one day, deal with the side effects of the treatment after the fact, of course, but it wasn’t spread out. So I really liked that about Duke. And once I left active treatment and went on surveillance, we need to keep the pump – I call it changing my oil… We got to keep changing my oil, and I was going down to Duke every six weeks just to get my oil changed. And now they come to my house, and instead of getting lifted up on a table and having the whole room hush and the bright lights come on, they say, “All right, get on the table and grab a pillow”. And she’s very professional. She’s become a friend, and they do it in my house. That’s great.

Betsy Post 46:55
A question that someone had in the chat, Dr. Turk, I’m going to point this to you, because it goes with this. And that’s, how many days can patients extend beyond two weeks due to vacations or other obligations?

Dr. Anita Turk 47:07
That’s a great question. When I counsel a patient, before we get started, I really emphasize the importance of the every two weeks. I don’t like to deviate more than a couple of days from that. Again, running that risk of it running empty. So with these Intera pumps, I can’t program the rate. I’m calculating that rate when I empty it, so I see how much comes out. And I think, “Okay, how many days ago did I refill it?” And I do the math and see how fast it’s running. Knowing the approximate rate of a patient, assuming their body temperature has recently been stable, I can do the math and see how safe it is to extend it, depending on that patient’s pump, but it’s usually not more than a couple of days. Anytime I have a patient with a trip coming up and things like that, we try to adjust their pump fills to make sure, whenever they’re going out of town or they can’t come in, I know their pump is safe and that it’s going to be full with, whether it’s Heparin, glycerin, chemotherapy, wherever they’re at in their round of treatment,

Betsy Post 48:12
Great. And one other question before we move on to the next topic: Can a patient get the pump after having Y90?

Dr. Anita Turk 48:23
Great question. I get a little bit hesitant. It depends. I guess first, let me say it depends on the type of Y90 they had. There’s several different ways Y90 can be administered. It really depends on, were they going after the whole lobe? Were they going after assignment of the lobe? It really depends on what was going on: if they had gotten what we call a bilobar, or Y-mining, means they targeted both the lobes, and they got a pretty high dose where they have some liver issues chronically afterwards. That’s the patient I’m going to be nervous about, that their bile ducts aren’t going to be handling this. But patients who either had an IR doctor that was mindful of their doses, and the liver functions are doing okay? Or it was what we call segmental Y90. Where only a segment of the liver got it, not the whole liver, those patients would still be considered candidates. Ryan, anything to add there?

Dr. Ryan Ellis 49:13
Yeah, I would say people who have undergone Y90 more recently, as our technologies advance, -we’ve been a little bit more selective – are more likely to be candidates. I have certainly put pumps in patients who have had Y90 before. I will add one thing, which is the anatomic considerations can be complicated by Y90 in a small number of people, because of some of the arteries that I have to tie off and the way that I have to reconfigure the system if an artery that I absolutely need for the pump also was the main artery that the Y90 was delivered, that can rule it out, but it’s a case by case basis.

Betsy Post 49:55
Thank you. There are some questions in the live chat as well as some things that I had prepared to ask the patients. And I know I’m trying to look at the clock and make sure we stay on a good pace here, but this is about living with the pump, your daily life, your activities and your quality of life while living with a pump. And I think that this is really important. So I definitely want to talk about that. Also in the live Q and A, there are questions about what kind of physical activity can folks do with the pump? There’s a patient that says, “If I get this pump, I have a 13 month old baby… will I be able to lift my baby, put him on my hip, things like that?”. I would love to hear, I think we’ll start off with Michael just about physical activity, day to day life with the pump, and then move to Hope, if that’s okay with you?

Michael Riehle 50:45
Sure. Yeah, so, day to day life for the pump with me was after the that kind of learning period of a couple months, was pretty normal. I worked full time. I have a pretty physical job where I was climbing all over my trucks and getting into tight spaces and everything like that. My wife and I like to travel a lot, go hiking, go camping. We have some four wheelers. We like to go play in the woods and everything else. There really wasn’t… — I had to stay away from my hot tub, which we had unfortunately just gotten a month before my diagnosis. So that was kind of ironic. But other than staying away from the hot tub and stuff, really, nothing changed in my in my day to day life. You get used to where the pump is and certain things that you can or cannot do. Not that there wasn’t much that I couldn’t do with it, but you just would do it a little differently. If your body would want to move one way, you just have to remember where it was and how to react to it. So yeah, for me personally, it was almost like it wasn’t even there once you get used to it.

Betsy Post 51:56
Thank you. Hope?

Hope Brooks 52:00
I was actually afraid of that. That was the only hesitation I had when I was discussing the pump and getting it implanted. But come to find out, I was testing all the waters. I started out with, I don’t know, 10, 20, pounds of weight, and then worked my way back up. I went back to yoga. I don’t practice quiet, sit down yoga. I’m very active style yoga, and so I’ve been able to do everything I did before the pump. And again, just like Michael said, there’s a few postures or movements that you do have to adjust, just like the shoe – putting it on, you find a new way to do it if it works for you. Certain things don’t work. The twisting to the left doesn’t work as well. I can’t go as far. Certain things I would do on that side I just avoid if it bothers me, but I do everything that I did before. There’s not one thing I can think of other than a hot tub that I don’t do. I also practice hot yoga. So that was a difficult step. My surgeon and I discussed it at length, and I did a few tests on temperature, and I keep track of all of my usage of the pump in a spreadsheet like Dr. Turk was talking about, to figure out what my daily consumption was, and it was average, whether I was in the room once a week or if I was there six times a week. It didn’t change my core body temperature. Didn’t affect the pump and how it operated. So for me, I really was able to do everything. I go swimming in the summer. I’m a big water person. Nothing I can think of that I’m really missing other than a hot tub. I do take a bath, though. At first I was afraid I couldn’t take a bath, but I do take a bath.

Betsy Post 53:45
Megan, if you want to answer quickly as well. There’s also a question for Megan in the chat, so I’m going to tack it on here to this for you, and that’s that you had talked about, you’re just doing surveillance now. Are you just getting glycerin now?

Megan Stevens 53:59
I am just getting glycerin and it’s going well. I don’t know when we’re going to talk about taking the pump out. I’m hoping we’ll start talking about it. I’m actually, two and three quarter years, but I think I’m starting to get ready to have it out if I can. I mean, it’s a luxury to be able to be seeing the light at the end of the tunnel on this, but it’s also pretty awesome to know that that is possible, and that’s a thing that’s out there, that it’s real, and science gets better every day. I personally have been very weary about my movements with the pump. I have an 11 year old, and he was seven,- six and a half, seven, – when this all began, and I’ve just been really careful about it. I think it just depends on — everybody’s always on board saying they’ll do anything, and that’s great, and it’s wonderful. I think it’s a psychological thing for me. I’ve been very, very conservative with my exercise, which is showing because I’ve gained some weight, and I need to figure out how to get it back in line. But I’m alive. …That’s what I did.

Betsy Post 55:26
There are a couple questions in the chat that I think we should definitely answer. And this is something that comes up inCOLONTOWN as well. You’re talking about the biliary sclerosis, some of those chemo toxicity issues that can happen. So I’m going to weave a couple of questions here into one. This is something that comes up all the time, the discussion of the role of Ursodiol following HAI placement. And are there any others with Ursodiol? We’d love to hear your thoughts on that, but also any recommended standard of care medications that you can take while on pump chemo to help prevent with any of those liver toxicities. Or are these things that maybe you just get if the liver numbers rise? And then also, what liver function numbers do you specifically watch out for?

Dr. Anita Turk 56:20
Great question. So yes, the rates of biliary sclerosis are probably around 20% so it’s not an insignificant number. I’ve unfortunately lost one patient to that complication. So we are very, very vigilant about it. There is no data, unfortunately, about preventative measures. Of course we will use ursodiol if we are seeing signs of that problem, and really work closely with hepatology to help manage the health of your biliary tract. But right now, I don’t have great data to support any medication to help it be preventative. I will say the healthier you’re walking into it the better. And of course, it’s not just dealing with the cancer itself, but your general body. So hearing patients like Megan, Hope and Mike going into this, following up on their appointments, being really active, eating a balanced diet, things to minimize having a liver that’s already ill at baseline in the background, I think probably does help. Patients who have underlying cirrhosis walking into this, or with fatty liver disease, are more likely to have outcomes related directly to the chemotherapy than those who don’t have those baseline problems. So I think general health is probably the best thing in our pocket going into something like this. Again, I cannot emphasize enough the importance of physical activity to help with all of that, and I apologize, what was the other question? Think it was not just the ursodiol, but if there are any other medications that you recommend or could take. But then also the other part was, at what point do those numbers become concerning, and is it a specific number you’re looking for, like the alkaline phosphatase? Right, yes. So the most important number–we look at all the liver numbers but the most important ones are the alkaline phosphatase, the bilirubin, we do also look at AST and ALT. I’m sure many people on this meeting today are familiar with looking at those numbers while they’re on chemotherapy, but they don’t have to be in the red to be a problem. So I have patients where I start this medication, and their alkaline phosphatase is in the 90’s, but they jump to the 120’s that’s still normal at our lab at IU. But that’s just the fact that it went up is a problem. So we take any rises very seriously. So the other medications that we use, in addition to ursodiol, would be for very severe cases, but where the patient’s doing fine, their liver numbers are still technically okay but have gone up from baseline, is adding steroid to those heparin days to help bring those numbers down and dose reducing that chemotherapy once those liver numbers have improved to make sure we don’t cause repeat injury. So again, I’ve said this again. I’m going to say it again. It is very important you’re going to a center that is familiar with how to dose floxuridine and manage these toxicities, because they can be very serious.

Betsy Post 59:22
This is for the patients: I would love to know what you would like to tell other patients that are considering the HAI pump, and then, along with what you’d tell them to consider, what might you want to tell them to ask their oncologist? Anyone want to go first? Hope maybe?

Hope Brooks 59:48
Oh, just one second, let me think. I guess my question would be, “Why am I a candidate for the HAI, if it is an opportunity for me?”, becausefrom what I understood when I met with Dr. Chung, because I had a good response to the FOLFIRINOX, it was assumed that I would likely have a very good response to the FUDR. So that’s a question for me is, how does that work? Had I known more than I know – the list of questions on the patient questionnaire that’s been recently published. Those are questions that a lot of them came from me, that I asked. Those are things I wish I had known outside of the single question. There’s several of them that I wish I had asked ahead of time, but I learned later. So hopefully that’s a guide to somebody.

Betsy Post 1:00:38
Great. Megan, anything you think patients should know?

Megan Stevens 1:00:55
It’s hard. So I had gone through several doctors before I made my way to Duke, and I’m driving three hours to get there every time, three hours back. And it was worthwhile, because I trusted them, and as soon as I knew I was in hands that I fully trusted, I just let go of all need to control, and I put my faith in them and let it be. But I think I would want to know if this was closing down any other opportunities for treatment. With the advancements of technology and medicine as it is, you want to always keep as many options open, and if something closes down options, to me, that’s a red flag, because the more options you have, the longer you will be able to fight this, and the closer you’ll get to having a solution and a resolution to it. So I guess that would be my question: “Does getting the HAI pump close down any options for me moving forward?” Because you’re always playing the long game, there’s not a short answer, there’s not a fast answer. You are in this for the long game, and you’ve got to have as many options as you can to get to the end. That’s what I would think.

Betsy Post 1:02:31
Thank you. Michael, anything to add?

Michael Riehle 1:02:34
I guess my biggest advice would be kind of similar to what Dr. Turk said about making sure you go to a reputable place for something like HAI therapy, instead of just going to maybe just your local center that they started picking them up last year or the year before, and they don’t have as much experience in it. Because the potential of risk is so high, you really want to have someone that knows what they’re doing and has the utmost experience with it. So if it’s something where you have to travel, try to find a way to make that work, to get to the best place, to give you the best care, as difficult as it may be. I mean, a lot of us are here because we got ourselves to these places to get these things done, through these top places. So that will be my biggest advice.

Betsy Post 1:03:25
Thank you. And it’s 8:04, so I’m going to wrap up a tiny bit, but there is a question in here I definitely think we should answer, and that’s if you have a recurrence with the pump. Can you still have resection or ablation, or is it more favorable to treat with chemo only? So I think that’s an important question for us to answer. Maybe Dr. Ellis, you could take that one.

Dr. Ryan Ellis 1:03:55
Sure. I apologize, my internet has been on the fritz, so if I fade away, that’s the issue. So yes, it is. It’s totally appropriate to have additional procedures on the liver after the hepatic artery pump has been placed. If I remember his story correctly, sounds like Michael actually started with a pump alone. There are multiple pathways, wherein when I see someone who we’re considering, Dr. Turk talked in general about the indications being unresectable disease, adjuvant disease, and in all cases, there’s chances that even after you’ve had all of your disease cleared either before or after the pump is placed initially, the disease can come back, and we do routinely do additional local therapies. Y90 is more or less off the table once a pump is in but the resections and ablations can absolutely happen if you have a local recurrence in the liver after the pump is placed.

Betsy Post 1:05:09
So I just want to leave it to the patients to wrap up. Is there anything Hope, Michael, Megan, that we haven’t talked about tonight, anything you think is important that you’d like to say to any of the patients that are watching tonight or in the future, but it’s okay if you don’t either. That’s okay. I don’t want to put you on the spot too much, but parting words from from our patients that have done this therapy and have had different types of results. You’re all from different centers and and your stories are all a little different.

Hope Brooks 1:05:47
I would like to say, because I’m not on active pump treatment right now. -We’re dealing with a few questionable lung mets, but otherwise, I’m clear of disease at this moment. I’ve two times used my pump for a recurrence, and it worked wonderfully. So I look at it like you have to know that you’re going to get married to this pump for three to five years and be ready for that long haul and be able to ask the questions. And there’s a lot of tools out there that weren’t even out there a year and a half ago or in December of ’22 when I got my pump. So ask for those materials. Ask to be educated on the pump. If you have hesitations, ask to speak with a patient. There’s a lot of oncologists and surgeons that will have patients of theirs that you can speak to, that might be local to you, or somebody in the groups in COLONTOWN that can help you as well. So one, don’t be afraid to ask the question. Two, don’t be afraid to travel and try to utilize the tools that are out there to see if this is the right fit for you. It changed my life. I don’t think I’d be here without it, I’m 99% sure of that.

Megan Stevens 1:06:51
Yeah, I think there’s one thing I’ve worked with, – I’ve been friends with, been close to other cancer patients, and a lot of times they were nervous that they would hurt the feelings of their doctor if they got a second opinion. They didn’t want to offend anybody by getting a second opinion. Doctors are not going to be offended by you getting a second opinion. You are in your absolute right to get as many opinions as you want from doctors all over the globe. And doctors are good people. They want to save your life. They want to give you an opinion. And you shouldn’t fear reaching out to other people.

Michael Riehle 1:07:45
I’ll echo what Megan hope said, just don’t be afraid to reach out to anyone, whether it’s another patient or other doctors, because they’re your lifelines. So don’t be afraid to reach out.

Betsy Post 1:07:59
Thank you, Dr. Turk, Dr. Ellis, thank you so much for being here on the panel this evening. I know I’ve learned some things too. And thank you so much to our patients. Hope, Michael, Megan, we really appreciate your time. And thanks to everyone that attended live and of course, all of those that will be watching the recording. And I just wanted to leave the final word to Dr. Turk, Dr. Ellis. Is there anything that you’d like to add, anything that we didn’t cover tonight that you think is important?

Dr. Anita Turk 1:08:32
No, I can’t think of anything. I think we’ve covered at least the basics of pump therapy. Again, a lot of it’s a case by case situation. And just get that second opinion. I promise you your oncologist is not going to be offended. We all just want to help.

Dr. Ryan Ellis 1:08:48
Likewise, great discussion. I thank the panelists for their time.

Betsy Post 1:08:55
Thank you all so much. Have a great evening. Thank you.

DocTalk
2025
Dr. Fong
Liver
Stage IV

In this DocTalk, Dr. Yuman Fong from City Of Hope discusses all things liver. Recorded in August 2024.

More Videos

Liver transplants — Examining the evidence
Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro
2024
Surgical options for peri-mets
Dr. Turaga
2024
ERASur trial: Local treatment options for limited stage IV CRC
Dr. Hitchcock
2023
Advanced surgical treatments for CRC liver mets
Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro
2021
Transplant patients are in the house!
2021
Hepatic Artery Infusion (HAI) chemotherapy for CRC liver mets
Hepatic Artery Infusion (HAI) chemotherapy for CRC liver mets
Dr. Gholami
2021
Modern-day management of liver metastases
Dr. Soares
2022
Why liver transplant for mCRC is taking off
Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro
2022
Categories
DocTalks Hide from search

Multimodal Management of Liver Mets

Multimodal Management of Liver Mets

DocTalk
2025
Dr. Rocca
Ablation
HAI
Histotripsy
Liver
Radiation
Stage IV
Surgery
Transplant
Y90

In this video, Dr. Rocca delves into the Multimodal Management of Colorectal Liver Metastases, exploring innovative therapeutic options and strategies to improve patient outcomes. Recorded in January 2025.

Betsy Post 0:00
(Video begins mid intro sentence) ….Histotripsy. But when I was speaking with him and preparing for the talk, he had mentioned that he really thinks it’s important for patients to understand not just histotripsy by itself, but all of the different liver directed treatments that are available, so patients can really make wise, informed decisions be part of their care. So I really want to thank him, on behalf of COLONTOWN for being here tonight, and I’m going to turn it over to him in just a second. I want to make sure everyone knows how it’s going to work. So Dr. Rocca is going to speak to us, present to us, give us his wisdom, and if you have questions for him at the end, there will be a time for questions. Please use the chat feature here in Zoom; You just click “chat” and add your question to the chat. The questions will be held to the end of the presentation, and then at the end, when we have time for Q and A, I will read the questions to him, and he will answer those questions. So without further ado, I’m going to turn it over to Dr. Rocca. Again, thank you for being here – we’re so excited to learn from you.

Dr. Juan Rocca 1:09
Thank you so much Betsy for inviting me to speak, and I hope that I can help you figure out different treatment options. I think that you know, here at Cornell, we are a division of surgeons that do liver surgery, liver transplantation, histotripsy. We work hand in hand with our oncologists and interventional radiologists with ablation, our radiation oncologists with radiation. And once a week, we have a meeting, which is called a multi disciplinary tumor board, where we bring our cases, and we have the input of absolutely every physician that is involved in the care of colorectal cancer. I think it’s an amazing meeting, because it really tries to bring the best treatment option for each individual patient. And this is the purpose of this talk today. I think that it’s important to try to clarify – I have no conflicts, – but I just wanted to clarify the purpose of the talk. I think that many of you may know about one or two options that were presented to you, but not all of the options. Maybe you feel you’re being boxed in, the care you’re getting, where you went to get your first consultation about the treatment of your situation. So the main purpose of this talk is to — you geta lot of different treatment options but then, many of you also may know about all the different options, and may be really confused about what is the best option for you, or if you want to know more about the benefits and the risk of each of the treatments or combination of treatments. And finally, I hope in the different situations I’m going to be presenting, I hope that you can relate to those situations, and you can decide what of these options may be working best for you.

Dr. Juan Rocca 3:38
The outline of the presentation has multiple components. First, we’re going to do a quick overview of the treatments that are available for colorectal liver metastasis. This is only metastasis to the liver, which is the main focus. Then we’re going to be discussing what is the gold standard in the treatment of colorectal liver metastasis, which today is a combination of systemic treatments, which is mainly chemotherapy and targeted therapies and surgery. That’s what weconsider the gold standard. From there, we have a lot of data about how that works, and from there, we can move on to other combinations of therapies when surgery is not a good option. For that, we need to discuss, what is resectable disease. That is disease that can be treated with surgery, versus unresectable disease. And then we are also going to be discussing the role of ablation. You’ve probably heard about ablation, different types of ablation, but ablation can be done with microwaves or radio frequency, and this can be used with surgery or can be used for resectable disease, but also can be used on unresectable disease. Then we’re going to go over the role of other local, regional therapies and the different combinations of them. We’re going to discuss the role of liver transplantation. It’s a very strict criteria for liver transplantation, but we’re going to go over that. And finally, we are going to discuss how histotripsy, can contribute to this multimodal management of colorectal liver metastases. It’s a new technology, it’s quite promising in many aspects, and everybody’s embracing it now. We don’t have too much data to really put it against the other treatments, and so it’s important to disclose that. It is promising, it is exciting, I do it quite often, it’s just that sometimes it’s hard to offer something that we don’t have complete proof that it works in the long term. So that’s why I left it for the end.

Dr. Juan Rocca 6:10
Okay, so let’s go with the treatments available for colorectal liver metastasis, starting with what we call the systemic therapies, which today is a mix of different regimes of chemotherapy. All of these sound familiar to you: Folfox, Folfoxiri, Folfiri, Capox; and different targeted therapies like Avastin, Cetuximab, Panitumumab, Pembro. And all these regimens can be combined depending on the different type of mutations that the tumors may have, like the MSI status, the RAS mutations, the BRAF mutations that are of worse prognosis. But now there are more trials and treatments for BRAF mutations, HER 2 mutations as well. The systemic therapies are the backbone of colorectal liver metastasis. In the past, we used to probably use it only in some situations. Now it’s pretty much in every situation. Now for locoregional therapies, I always include surgery as a locoregional therapy, because at the end of the day, when we do liver surgery, even liver transplantation, we are treating the disease in one spot in one region, so it’s a locoregional therapy. So it probably is better to divide it in those locoregional therapies that require an operation, require surgery like resectionwhich is surgery, with or without ablation. We do ablation at the time of an operation, an open operation, a robotic operation. We can do ablation on a laparoscopic operation. We can do ablation together with resection. We’re going to also touch on the role of the Hepatic Arterial Infusion pump and liver transplantation. All these require operations. And then some therapies that do not require an operation is also ablation, which can be done percutaneously with the interventional radiologist. Y-90 radioembolization, which is an injection of material with radioactive activity into the liver, radiation- external radiation and histotripsy.

Dr. Juan Rocca 8:36
So first, the management of colorectal liver metastasis in the last 20 years has improved significantly. The survival of patients who have colorectal liver metastasis improved for three reasons, mainly because we have much better chemotherapy and immunotherapies and different targeted therapies. We have been a lot more aggressive with the surgery that we perform for colorectal liver metastasis, and we also have better locoregional treatments that we’re going to go into in a little bit. But if you look at the last 20 years, the number of operations we’re doing for colorectal liver metastases has increased significantly, and when you divide those patients that made it to surgery versus those that could not have surgery, that’s a striking difference in the survival. So that’s why today, being able to say that we have resectable disease is really very important, because it impacts the prognosis, it impacts the survival and most of the survivors, we’re going to try to put it at the five year mark, which is what most of the papers are usually able to measure or compare survival of different combinations of techniques.

Dr. Juan Rocca 10:02
Let’s try to define resectable disease first. So, resectable disease is that, the tumor in the liver, or the tumors in the liver can be removed or treated with liver surgery. The goal of resectable disease is to get to a condition called NED, which is “”no evidence of disease”, because this is associated with the longest survival. If we can bring you to NED, even knowing that the tumor may come back later, each time we bring you to NED we are giving you the best chance of having the longest survival. Now, resectable disease may require systemic therapy before surgery more and more. In the past, we used to discuss that some situations were benefited, first with surgery and then chemotherapy. But now the data is moving more towards trying to do systemic therapy and then surgery in the liver, mostly when you have a higher number of tumors in the liver. Sometimes they require more than one operation. We call this staged hepatectomy, or staged operations, or a combination of an operation with a locoregional treatment afterwards, in order to get you to the NED status, and one of the conditions is that the patient has to be able to go through an invasive procedure and surgery.

Dr. Juan Rocca 11:31
Now, on the other hand, unresectable disease is the opposite of this. The tumors cannot be removed or treated with liver surgery, or we can, but by removing them, we are not going to be able to bring you to NED. We cannot get rid of all the disease, and this is usually conditioned by the number, the size and the location of the liver tumors. Sometimes you have small tumors that are in a poor location inside the liver that require a major operation of the liver. So that’s when other techniques may really be able to bring you closer to resectable. Sometimes due to the condition of the liver, the chemotherapy can be toxic, can give you fatty liver, can give you fibrosis, can give you some scarring on the liver, so the liver may not be able to tolerate a big operation. Sometimes, when we do systemic therapy, it’s a good test of time to understand the biology of that tumor, and if the tumor progresses while on chemotherapy it’s telling us that doing surgery on that liver tumor is probably not going to help too much, so that could be a reason for being unresectable. Technically, we can do the operation, but the biology of the tumor is telling us that it’s not going to help the operation. Sometimes you have disease outside the liver that dictates the survival more than the disease in the liver. And you can have disease outside the liver, for example, in the lungs. The disease in the lungs is quite indolent and easy to manage. The disease in the peritoneum, it’s difficult to make it respond to chemotherapy,…bone disease, etc. So there are different situations which require a multi disciplinary decision about what the best treatment option is. I want to highlight this, because again, in the past, and not long ago, we were discussing if pre-operative, systemic therapy before liver surgery was a good thing to do. And yeah, maybe for a single lesion that came years after removing the colon, and has a slow progression, maybe you can argue that you could do an upfront resection and then do chemotherapy later. But more and more data is coming out that the use of systemic therapy, mostly when you have a bigger number of lesions, is really important in making disease more controllable for surgery, and that improves the recurrence after the surgery.

Dr. Juan Rocca 14:50
So this is a nice study: It’s about 1000 patients that were matched between those that had only chemotherapy versus those that have had chemotherapy and surgery, but they were much based on the size of the tumors and the number of the tumors. And there are different scores that are standard, the CRS score, the TB score, the Game score. These are different scoring systems that we have to assess risk of liver metastasis and the risk of recurrence. And clearly, those that received chemo before the surgery did better in the overall survival, and did better if you look at the recurrence free survival for the first two, three years. The two groups were about the same, but then, after three years, they started spreading again. And those that didn’t receive chemo before surgery had less recurrence free survival than those that received chemo. So I think this is a one of the many studies that now are showing the benefit of having systemic treatment before surgery.

Dr. Juan Rocca 16:06
Now, a few other concepts of surgery in colorectal liver metastasis. First is, we want to resect the tumor with clear margins. That means that we want to cut the liver where there is no tumor, but we also want to leave enough liver volume. Clear margins for colorectal, liver metastasis can be as little as one millimeter. That’s enough, even when a tumor is sitting in a blood vessel near the liver, if we peel it off, that’s enough, too. So it’s not that we need to do a lot of surgery around the tumor. And this is important. The type of surgeries that we usually do, any liver surgery, we can have what we call the West Resection, where we take a little piece where the tumor is sitting. Or we can start taking segments of the liver. The liver has eight segments. And we can take, for example, this will be 25% of the liver. This will be almost a 35-40% of the liver, the left hepatectomy, the extent the left hepatectomy is almost 70% of the liver. We have different sections of the liver. So typically for colorectal liver metastasis, we try to avoid doing anatomical hepatectomies. We try to go around the lesion. The type of surgeries that we usually do for colorectal liver metastasis here in the first column, the Type A, is what we call the parenchyma sparing liver surgery. That means that, knowing that we need to have at least one millimeter of margin, we go around the lesion as many times as we can. Not always we can. Sometimes the lesions are too big, like you can see in the B column. And if the lesions are too big, either we are forced to cut the right side of the liver, for example, and remove maybe 60% of the liver. Or sometimes, if we feel that the rim on the liver is not enough, we might need to do some intermediate steps like what we call portal vein embolization, to deprive blood flow to the site of liver we’re going to remove and let the other side grow before doing the operation. Sometimes we do the two stage liver surgery when we have multiple lesions on both sides, we first do an operation on one side and we remove, for example, here, these two small lesions on the left side. We remove them, we wait for the liver to grow, and then maybe six weeks or eight weeks later, we can go back and remove the entire right side with all the lesions. But these are goals of surgeries with the goal of bringing the patient NED, without evidence of disease.

Dr. Juan Rocca 19:07
And this is the “ALPPS” procedure, which is another two stage procedure where we cut the liver halfway, we don’t cut it all, and we remove the tumors, and that will accelerate the growth of the liver. Instead of in six to eight weeks, we can go back in two weeks and remove the other side of the liver. Again, as you can see, the complexity of these operations increases when you have a bigger size of tumor, or a bigger number of tumors, or both sides of the liver. But these are all techniques that we use to be able to bring the disease to zero, at least with the method that we have today to see disease, which is CT scan and MRI or PET scan.

Dr. Juan Rocca 19:54
Now, why is it important to save as much liver as we can is because when you have multiple tumors, 70% end up coming back at some point. And if our goal is to prolong the survival as much as we can, we need to have enough liver to keep treating that liver. We sometimes do a second surgery in the long term, like two years later, or even a third operation to take care of new lesions that are coming back after a while.

Dr. Juan Rocca 20:37
But then also, it’s important to understand that ablation has a big role here because those patients that – when the tumor comes back, they could have a second operation or an ablation to treat the tumor, they have a better survival in the long term. Those are the ones that we manage to bring to the five year mark. I think it’s important to understand that sometimes patients that have resectable disease have the best prognosis for a five year survival, but many times may require more than one operation, more than one procedure, while still receiving systemic therapy. Okay, this is how we get you there.

Dr. Juan Rocca 21:14
This is just a study to show that the difference between doing a measures hepatectomy, like cutting half of the liver, versus doing a parenchymal sparing hepatectomy and ablation to take care of many lesions. And this is an important study that show that when you compare those strategies, they have the same survival, and the patients that have a parenchyma sparing hepatectomy and ablation have less complications than those who have a major hepatectomy, which is important. This is an important number here, back in 2014 only 31% of the cases were being done with parenchymal-sparing surgery and ablation. And that rose to almost 50% in 2022 which is is an important trend. We really use ablation a lot when it comes to colorectal liver metastasis. And this is a study that came out this week, actually another multicenter study that compares the role of ablation or surgery. When you are talking about tumors that are three centimeters or less in size, they have the same outcome. Okay, it’s not inferior to do ablation versus resection. Resection is a gold standard, but now ablation, up to tumors of three centimeters, is equivalent. And this is really important, because sometimes, if we do an operation, we clear your tumor, and in a year or two later, you have a new tumor coming back, you might be able to get away with ablation, without surgery.

Dr. Juan Rocca 23:01
Or if I do an operation and to treat three tumors, and I can safely remove two, but the third one is in a tough spot, or I may require to remove more liver, I can do an ablation of that tumor. That is equivalent, as long as the tumors are three centimeters or less, this is another important thing, as we have a higher number of tumors in the liver, we have less chance of surviving in the long, long term, or a higher size of tumors. This is the liver met survey registry. It’s the largest registry in colorectal liver metastasis. I wanted to show you that these are the things that we always consider for puttingsomeone in the category of being resectable or being unresectable. If sometimes, technically, we can remove all these lesions, but they tend to come back, resectability is not only a matter of a technical surgery, it’s also had to do with the tumor biology and the number, the size, but also how long it takes for that tumor to come back. Sometimes when we do operations and we have what we call the very early recurrence after we do an operation, we get the patient to NED, and then in about three months, we have a new new tumor that is telling us that the biology of the tumor is aggressive, and that usually is associated with the number of lesions that we have, or if there’s any extrahepatic disease, or if there’sany mutation, and it’s sometimes important to the surgery. The outcome after the surgery will tell us a bit more about the biology of that tumor, and that will guide our decisions about what to do next. So, in summary, liver surgery for resectable scenarios, I think it’s always important to understand that surgery always has risk. Liver surgery is always complex, even if we do it small, as small as we can. But you know, it offers really good long term outcomes. 50% can achieve long term survival after a successful resection, always, in my opinion, combined with systemic therapy, and it’s also important to understand that many of these tumors are going to come back in five years-60 to 70%, and that’s why we need to keep treating it as aggressive as we can.

Dr. Juan Rocca 25:44
Now, what happens for those that we consider that we cannot resect, that it’s beyond all these different scenarios that I just showed you where we can do an operation or an ablation? Well, first, I think if you do systemic therapy alone, chemotherapy and now with targeted therapies, the survival at five years is about 20%. But still, it’s important to understand that this is the backbone of the multimodal treatments. Over that backbone of systemic therapy, we can add the benefit of other locoregional therapies that can improve the survival. And those other locoregional treatments can be ablations that a non surgical ablation, percutaneous ablation, Y-90 radioembolization and external radiation. So a brief description of each of these. Ablations can be done with radio frequency or microwaves. We put a needle inside the tumor in the liver, and pretty much we burn the tissue. So that pretty much burns the tumor tissue and the liver tissue that is around with the margin. So the same thing we would do in surgery to make that tumor cells dead. That can increase, maybe 10% more the survival at five years if we combine it with systemic therapy. Now we don’t have a lot of data about Y-90 radioembolization at five years. But yes, we use it when we have tumors that are more than threecentimeters where ablation doesn’t really do a good job. And we inject the tumor inside with radioactive particles, and the tumor slowly gets radiated and becomes non-viable or dies. These injections can be done very focal at the level of the tumor or in different segments. Sometimes for liver transplantation, we use it in the whole liver to keep the tumor at bay until we get to a transplant. I think it’s really an important treatment, and it’s always important to consider.

Dr. Juan Rocca 28:13
And then we have the external radiation or SBRT, which, again, we don’t have long term data. We usually reserve for those patients that cannot receive other treatments. But yes, we do know that it’s able to achieve good local control of the tumor, at least in the first two years when we radiate a tumor in the liver. So I want to bring to the discussion also the role of the hepatic arterial infusion pump, which nowadays is not just that. It’s combined also with systemic therapy, but you’ve probably heard about this usually for unresectable disease, when you have tumors that are on both sides of the liver and multiple tumors. It’s a good method to downstage tumors to decrease the size and the number and sometimes convert them to resectable. So what it does is, because the chemotherapy is usually toxic to the entire system, we give only some specific chemotherapy into the liver, and that first passage into the liver will make the chemotherapy concentrate in the liver only and not give toxicity to the rest of the body. It does have survival benefits, because about 50% of those that receive a hepatic infusion pump may be able to be downstage to the point that they can be converted to surgery.

Dr. Juan Rocca 30:04
When you put it all together, the latest studies the overall five year survival for unresectable disease with the pump is about 50%. But then if you divide into those that responded to the pump and the systemic therapy and were able to have surgery, those had a survival of about 70% at five years. But then the other ones didn’t respond. It’s about 50/50. The other half that did not respond didn’t make it to the five years. But again, these are not only therapies that allow you to downstage treatment, but also to be able to understand the biology of the tumor. And those tumors that respond, they have a shot at having surgery or even transplantation, and those tumors that do not respond, at least we try very aggressive therapy, and if they do not respond, biology wasn’t clear.

Dr. Juan Rocca 31:09
All right, so now liver transplantation. Liver transplantation is the most radical treatment for liver disease from colorectal liver metastasis, and that’s why we call it the ultimate liver correctional treatment. Because what we do is, we take care of some cases of unresectable disease, liver transplant should not be offered to those that have resectable disease, because they have very good survival. But those who have unresectable disease, and they have a five year survival below 50%, below 30% some of them, they could benefit from having a complete removal of the liver, and by removing the entire liver, we’re not only removing the tumors, but also we’re removing the factors that are in that specific liver that allow the tumor to come back. Okay? So that’s the rationale behind it. But of course, for that, you need to be able to have a disease that is well controlled, right? So it’s kind of a long pathway to get to transplant, and many times all these different techniques that I told you beyond surgery, like ablation, like a radioembolization, or Y-90 radiation, or even the hepatic arterial infusion pump, are methods that we use to keep the disease at bay so we can make it to transplant. We use a lot of time, as a test of time, to tell us that the biology of that tumor is manageable to the point that we can do a liver transplant and not have an immediate recurrence, Okay?

Dr. Juan Rocca 33:08
So this is the latest study that we have in transplantation. We have some data from the United States. We have data from Norway, which were the pioneers on this more than 10 years ago, but this is the study that came out last year in 2024 and it’s a multicenter study in different countries of Europe. They show that if you tranplant patients with unresected liver metastases under central criteria of the stability of disease and the disease has to be restricted only to the liver. You cannot have peritoneal disease, you cannot have bone disease, you cannot have lung disease. So with that criteria, when they looked at the intention to treat, this is all the patients that were recruited to the trial. The five year survival was 56% for those that received a liver transplant, versus 12% for those that only received chemotherapy. Now, when you start tweaking a little bit the criteria to make it stricter, then the five year survival – that’s what they call the “per protocol” survival – the five year survival went up to 73% when you did liver transplant and chemotherapy, versus 9% for chemotherapy alone. So this is important, because this 73% is beyond what we consider the survival benefit of a liver transplant, which is about 60% at five years. Remember that liver transplant is a standard practice for many other diseases. It started with liver cirrhosis and many other diseases that are not related to cancer or some diseases that are related to liver cancer from primary liver tumors, and they have a high standard of survival. The survival of the liver transplant at five years nowadays is about 80% for most of the indications, and for some cancer indications about 70%. so it’s hard to really start doing liver transplants for colorectal liver metastases if you are going to be having a five year survival that is be below that benchmark of about 60%.

Dr. Juan Rocca 35:38
Now the other thing I wanted to show you about this data is that, as you can see, on the progression-free survival “per protocol”, those that received a liver transplant, with the red dotted line, they did have recurrence. They have a fair amount of recurrence, but by two years, 50% have some sort of recurrence, and we’re going to talk about that. Much of that recurrence could be treated. So if you can treat the recurrence after liver transplant, you have this concept that we have here, is the secondary progression-free survival. That is how you prolong the survival after treating the recurrence. So we’re going to go a little bit deeper into this and talk about the recurrence patterns after liver tranplant, and the difference with the liver surgery. If I do liver surgery for colorectal liver metasteses, the primary site of recurrence will typically be the liver because the liver that I did surgery on still has the conditions for a new tumor, and is harboring microscopic tumor or new tumor to be seeded and grow back and recur. Okay? When we do a liver transplant, not only are we removing the tumor, but we’re removing that liver with those factors, and we’re putting in a different liver that may not have those factors. So the recurrence pattern after liver transplant is not in the liver, it’s mostly in the lungs. And as I told you before, the lung metastases are indolent, usually they take a long time to progress, they are not as life threatening as a metastasis in the liver or the bones, or the brain. So it is important to consider this when we know that some patients have lung metastases after liver transplant, but they can be treated with surgery.

Dr. Juan Rocca 37:51
This is an example that I want to show you. This was done last year in Chicago. I trained in Northwestern Memorial, actually, many years ago, and a young patient that received a liver transplant for colorectal liver metastases was 8 years out from that liver transplant without problems, except for some lung metastases that had recurred and was stable, but they kept coming back after different treatments. So for the first time, it was decided to do a lung transplant for metastases in the lung, 8 years later after a liver transplant. So this is way far from what we consider standard of care, but at least it’s giving us a glimpse of what we could achieve by having a long term survival for unresectable, colorectal liver metastases.

Dr. Juan Rocca 38:52
Of course, we have to be very cautious with all this, and unfortunately, the patients that can be eligible for a liver transplant, the patients with colorectal metastasis, about 1 or 2% of all the patients that are there. So this is an important figure that can give you a sense of all the patients that have colorectal cancer, half of them have colorectal liver metastasis, about 30 to 50% of them have no evidence of extrahepatic disease, which means that we could consider liver transplantation. But you know, 70% of them are technically resectable, so we should resect them. And then there’s the 10% that, if we consider all the selection criteria, may be able to be considered for transplantation. But then, in the end, through the pathway of transplantation, which requires a wait time or requires treatments, requires them to go through a transplant evaluation and to receive an organ transplant from either a live donor, or a diseased donor, only 1 or 2% may be able to receive it. This is encouraging to be able to come with liver transplant, but still, it doesn’t have the scale to impact everyone. This is just to show you the protocol that we have at Weil Cornell for transplantation of colorectal liver metastases. We have a trial that is listed in the clinical trials.gov site. We did transplant five patients, but we did evaluate, (this is a bit old), more than 35 patients. The definition of unresectable is made at the tumor board. We look at the imaging, and we have surgeons, we have oncologist, we have interventional radiologists, and we come up with different strategies to decrease the tumor burden and see if there is a way to resect this patient and make them NED. If we don’t find a way, then that patient, if they only have disease limited to the liver, that patient may be able to go into liver transplantation. For that, we need to have different tests of the lungs, the liver, a PET CT, we usually do six months of chemotherapy, and we have to make sure that the disease remains stable or responds. And then sometimes we have to remove the primary tumor. If the colon tumor was still there, we had to remove it and wait and give another treatment session. And then closer to the transplant, we typically give lobar Y-90 which is this radioembolization to the both sides of the liver, because at some point we need to stop the immunotherapy before the liver transplant, and we need to wait about six to eight weeks for that immunotherapy to go away. We want to have some control in the tumor with with the Y-90. That’s why we usually give it. The product Y-90 is quite toxic to the liver, so we have a little window there to stop the immunotherapy with the effect of the Y-90, and then do the liver transplant.

Dr. Juan Rocca 42:13
This is a summary of the outcomes of different scenarios for colorectal liver metastases. So starting with the easier scenario, single liver metastasis, you can have a five year survival up to 60% with surgery and systemic chemotherapy. If you have multiple liver metastases that are resectable, you have a combination of different treatments and as I told you, you can have survival rates that go between 40 to 50% at five years. If you have multiple liver metastases that are unresectable, your five year survival can go from 10 to 20% if chemo only, up to 30% if you add ablation or chemoembolization or radiation to it. If you have a hepatic arterial infusion pump, your overall survival can stretch to 50% or more. It depends on if you respond to the arterial infusion pump. If you don’t respond, your five year survival won’t get to five years. It’s going to be hard, but you might be able to respond and become eligible to either having surgery or a transplant, for some cases, we do consider patients that are being downstaged with a hepatic infusion pump, we do consider for transplant in some situations, and then liver transplantation, if you make it to liver transplantation again, 1 to 2% only can make it there. You can get up to 75 to 80% of five year survival. It doesn’t have the scale, but yes, it’s very promising for those that can meet the criteria.

Dr. Juan Rocca 44:10
So now let’s put this into the right context. I think this is a great picture to tell us what the scale of all this is. Okay, so unresectable here at the bottom, if unresectable are in the 10,000, resectable is about 10% of that, in the 1000s. Okay, so the resectable disease as we define it, that we can do surgery, combined with chemotherapy, maybe with ablation, the tumor comes back, we do surgery again or ablation. That is in the proportion of the 1000 compared to the 10,000 of those that cannot have resection or cannot become NED. Then those that may be considered for liver transplantation are in this grey zone. Yes, they are not resectable, but the burden of disease is not too much, or the biology of the tumor is not too aggressive, like, for example BRAF mutations are not being accepted for liver transplantation because they are too aggressive, but some other RAS mutations are being accepted. And of course, there’s a test of time, etc. So, liver transplantation would be in the 10’s of transplants, okay. So this is just to give scale to, or to give a good context of the different treatment options.

Dr. Juan Rocca 45:45
Okay, now let’s talk about histotripsy now, and I gave you all the data about what the other options can accomplish in terms of survival. Histotripsy, because it’s a new method, and we’ve only been doing it for one year in the United States and in the world, we know we won’t have five year survival data. But how does it work? So first, it’s a non- invasive tumor treatment. It does not require surgery, it does not require a needle to be inserted into the liver. It’s just ultrasound, so in that regard, it’s very novel. It could be compared to external radiation therapy. But external radiation therapy is a lot more toxic. So, what it does is the ultrasound, the shock waves from the ultrasound, induces cavitation, that is, bubbles that expand and collapse so rapidly that it destroys the tissue and the cells, and makes them explode. It’s like an implosion. And that area that is being destroyed turns into what we call a lysate or a liquid, a liquid that only has proteins or different components of the cells, but has no viable cells. Now, the important thing is that these cells that are being mechanically disrupted are cells that are usually either cells like liver cells or tumor cells, but some cells that make blood vessels or bile ducts or scaffolding structures of the liver are not being destroyed because they have high collagen, so that allows the liver to regenerate back in that area. Once that lysate or that fluid is being reabsorbed by the lymphatic system of the liver, the liver will eventually regenerate in that area. This is a little video that you probably saw. But just to give you an idea, how the setup is for histotripsy: We do histotripsy in the intervention radiology suite. Some other centers to it in the operating room, some other centers are doing it in an intervention room that is not specific to anything, but we need to have the patient under general anesthesia. That’s important to understand. So you know patients that have severe heart disease or severe lung disease, some diseases that are not related to the cancer, but you know that they are unsafe for general anesthesia. Those patients cannot qualify for it. But we would put the patient under general anesthesia, and then we use a special water bath that has to be put over the the abdomen in the region of the liver to be able to transmit the ultrasound waves into into the liver. And we use a regular image in ultrasound that is coupled to it so we can see the lesions.

Dr. Juan Rocca 49:05
So this is how the device looks. This is pretty much how we set it up. And then this is a closer view of what happens inside the liver. If this is the tumor, these shock waves start creating these bubbles of implosion and expulsion, and with that, start destroying the cells and creates a bigger bubble. It’s like a chain reaction. And that bigger bubble starts going around. We usually have a very focal targeting of the beam, and we move it in around the the size of a golf ball, if you want, until we create that size. Here you can see what happens when you have this fluid or the lysate. The blood vessels are usually preserved and the lymphatics are usually preserved. So that would allow the liver to regenerate in the coming weeks after the destruction of the tissue.

Dr. Juan Rocca 50:23
This is a representation of once the lymphatic system absorbs the tissue-the lysate, the liver tissue, can grow back into the area. Let’s look at the difference between histotripsy and ablation, because they in some regards are comparable, because histotripsy can be used for lesions that are about three centimeters or less in order to treat the entire lesion. The difference between ablation and histotripsy is that, because ablation pretty much hits the area and cooks the tumor cells on the liver tissue, the regeneration of the liver is not as much. It takes a long time to reabsorb the tissue because it’s pretty much not liquid, it’s solid and it’s is like a burnt tissue instead. You can see the defect there. Here, that beginning is very similar to ablation. But then over time, the normal liver tissue starts growing already, until you have a minimal scar there. So this is one aspect of histotripsy. The other one is that there’re some areas that we can preserve blood vessels and bile ducts after doing histotripsy in areas of the liver.

Dr. Juan Rocca 51:50
The final one that maybe many of you have heard is what we call the abscopal effect, which is an effect that by treating one or two lesions, and by allowing the liver to reabsorb that lysate, with antigens of the tumor that unmasked for the immune system tumor antigens, and allows the immune system to be more active against other tumors that were not treated. That’s a very exciting, exciting effect. However, we don’t see it too often. We see it in about 20% of the cases. And we still don’t have a good way to take which cases are going to have that effect and which cases are not. It’s kind of a hit or miss. But I think it’s important to remark that this is another potential benefit, and I think with more data, we may be able to determine which type of tumors or which type of genetic mutations or what type of liver or location or size can really respond with this immunologic synergistic effect. This is another example of what we do prior to liver transplant for other disease, which is hepatocellular cancer, but hepatocellular cancer is a tumor from liverdisease that we transplant. But many times before transplant, we have to do different treatments of the tumor to keep it at bay. And these are very sick patients, and we are being able to do this treatment now, instead of doing invasive treatments like ablation. We can do histotripsy to reduce the tumors or even knock out that tumor until the patient gets into transplant.

Dr. Juan Rocca 53:41
I just wanted to remark the abscopal effect is a systemic immune response that is triggered by the tumor destruction, and it can expose the tumor antigens and that can potentially enhance the immune surveillance. Now this is observed not very frequently, but it’s something that is under investigation, and hopefully we can find a way to make it happen more often. We believe that keeping chemotherapy and immunotherapy while doing histotripsy, can really help synergize the effect of histotripsy. This is just to show you how in one year only, historipsy was embraced by many centers in early state, a total of 28 centers now have it, many here in New York. And this is the number of tumors that were treated in 2024. You can see that colorectal cancer is the majority of them, about 260 cases, neuroendocrine tumors, pancreatic cancer, cholangiocarcinoma. These are all metatsteses in the liver. Cholangiocarcinoma, HCC, which is a primary tumor of the liver, that we do transplants for and other types of tumors. The specialties that do this can be interventional radiology, in some centers radiation oncology does it as well, hepatology or surgery. There are different trials that led to the approval of this technology for treatment of liver tumors. Some initial trials a few years back. – But the trials that really led to the FDA approval was this Hope4Liver trial, which is a multicenter trial in the US and Europe that was able to demonstrate effective treatment once you target and you can go around the tumor and destroy the tumor and the tissue around it. That’s the effectiveness. It didn’t come back within 30 days, which is not long term, but at least within 30 days, and then that it is safe. That there were only a few adverse effects because it’s non- invasive. There were minimal cases of serious adverse events that we call, like infection, like liver failure or death. In those 44 there were a total of three cases only.

Dr. Juan Rocca 54:00
Now this is the important study, the BOOMBOX trial. The BOOMBOX trial is a prospective trial, where we enroll all the patients that are receiving histotripsy, and we follow them up for five years. This is why it’s so important, because we really need to get the five year data to be able to compare to all the existing tools that we have to treat liver tumors. We are participating in this study where we actually enrolled three patients already. And I think it’s it’s important that if you are the receiving histotripsy, you’re very likely going to be enrolled in the BOOMBOX trial, or you may be even enrolled in some other specific trials that are using historipsy in different contexts. For example, in the contexts of certain chemotherapy, certain immunotherapy, or associated to other treatments.

Dr. Juan Rocca 57:21
I have a clinical case that is a transplant case. Just wanted to highlight that there was a woman that had a diagnosis in 2020 and had surgery for the colon in 2021 January, and then had liver metastases and a year later had surgery in the liver in 2022 where they removed different lesions, they removed seven lesions. Okay, so there was resectable, but in the high risk end, and had ablations, then had chemo later, and then five months later, as soon as they stopped the chemo, there were some tumors that came back, they recurred. So she had another surgery in January of 2023 one year later, with resection of three lesions and ablation again, and then was followed by chemotherapy again. And so this is a colorectal cancer operated in 2021 liver surgery. In 2022 liver surgery in 2023, and every time that they stopped the chemotherapy, the tumors were coming back into the liver. The patient was sent to us to discuss different options of treatments. She had no mutations that were of concern for us. And then I just want to show you a little bit, at the top of presentation, the tumors that were active. There was one here, one here, one here, and another here, four liver tumors, and there was an area that was also non-viable of liver. So we did a first intake. We did a PET scan that showed us that the the metabolic volume of the tumors were not that big. A metabolic tumor of almost 90. Best survival is 70 or less, but 90 is quite acceptable. You can see here, 1-2-3-4- 4 tumors, and there was a question of a fifth tumor. In this case, we could say that there’s enough liver. And there are only four tumors, why don’t we go back and resect it again? Yes, but this is when the concept of biology and resectability can come together. Anytime you stop the chemotherapy after resection, the tumor came back, and it was the third recurrence. So, we were a bit skeptical about doing again a resection, and we presented this case at the tumor board. We looked everywhere, the chest, the the bones, and there was no evidence of disease anywhere else. So we presented this as different treatment options. One was to start the chemotherapy of course, to repeat resection and ablation. We could refer her to another center. -We don’t do the hepatic arterial infusion pump, but she could go to receive hepatic arterial push pump, then resection. The problem here was she already had multiple resections. We could include her on the transplant pathway. And so we reinitiated the chemotherapy. And then after three months later, after chemotherapy, she got stable disease, we decided to do a periportal lymphadenectomy to make sure that the lymph nodes around the liver were negative. These were negative, and then we continued again, chemotherapy for another three months, while we gave Y-90 to keep the tumors at bay,after stopping the chemotherapy. And we were able to restage again, we didn’t see any evidence of disease outside the liver. Disease in the liver was better. There was less tumor burden. Here you can see the lymphadenectomy. So after we did a final run of patient, and we find that it was controled liver disease with those four lesions that were smaller, the tumor volume on the PET scan went from 90 to 64, under 70, we considered that she was a good candidate for liver transplantation, and we were able to give a live donor liver transfer from her son. That was in May, and so far, at this point, she has no evidence of disease. So I think this can illustrate all the different therapies that we talk about, except for histotripsy for this case. But we would consider histotripsy in some cases that are going to transplantation, to show you that we always need to find a way to either make someone resectable, or someone that can have aggressive treatments like ablation, like a hepatic artery infusion pump, to see if they can respond and they can become resectable, or they can become transplantable and ultimately prolong the survival more than 50% at five years which is evolved. I’m going to open the floor for questions.

Betsy Post 1:03:16
Thank you so much. I’ve learned a lot. This was great. I think it really talks to all the different treatments and how they can be used together. And a great introduction on histotripsy. I know we appreciate it. So I’m gonna go through some of the questions, we have a question on transplant. Is it always best to have a transplant if one is a candidate for that and not resectable. So I think, sort of looking at that pathway.

Dr. Juan Rocca 1:03:45
I think it’s worth to have an early consultation if the diagnosis is unresectable and no evidence of disease outside the liver, I think it’s worth it to have a consultation. Remember, anytime you go to a transplant center to inquire about transplantation for this, they will put you on a protocol that will require at least one year of wait time from the time you get a diagnosis, and maybe six months after removing the colon and having chemo for about a year, at the very least, to show that you have stable disease. And then we do all this testing to make sure that there’s no disease outside the liver. Many centers do this surgery before the transplant to remove the lymph nodes to make sure that there’s no lymph nodes that are positive around the liver. So it really is a process. So if there is any question about eligibility for transplant, I think it’s important to go to a transplant center that has a protocol for that and inquire.

Betsy Post 1:04:56
We have a question about general anesthesia. So I think it’s obvious that a transplant liver resection are going to be done under general anesthesia. But I think as far as histotripsy, Y-90, the ablation, SBRT, some of those treatments, does a patient have to be under general anesthesia, or how would you handle that?

Dr. Juan Rocca 1:05:15
Yeah, that’s a great question. Any surgical procedure, of course, is under general anesthesia. Ablation – it depends on the center for percutaneous ablation. Some centers do it with sedation only, depending on the location. Some centers prefer to do it with anesthesia because they have a better control on the movements of the patient. With histotripsy it’s the same thing. Histotripsy requires anesthesia because when you target the lesion and you treat it, the respiratory movement has to be predictable. So with anesthesia, we can control the movement of the of lungs and how the liver moves, and we can decrease the amplitude of the movement to the minimum to try to stay in the area and not burn. For example, when we’re doing it, histotripsy or ablation, but mostly with histotripsy we don’t want that area to move too much, because maybe then the ultrasound beam can go into the colon or to the stomach or to the duodenum, to areas that are not liver, and can damage those areas. So that’s why it requires general anesthesia. Now, if we find a way to do a less invasive treatment, like with ventilation that doesn’t require general anthesthesia, that’s in discussion. But so far to my knowledge, none of the centers that do histotripsy are avoiding general anesthesia. Everyone is using general anesthesia so far. For radioembolization you might not need general anesthesia. That’s sedation only. For radiation, you don’t need anything.

Betsy Post 1:07:14
Is it logical to pursue partial histotripsy with the intent of down staging before other therapies such as SBRT or Y-90? In other words, is it logical to target one part of a tumor with histotripsy and then use another therapy to finish the areas that were not treated? For example, in cases where Y-90 or SBRT would not get all of the tumor alone or would be too risky?

Dr. Juan Rocca 1:07:42
Yes. So that’s a very important question, and this highlights the role of multimodal treatments, right? Yes, histotripsy can be done for what we call complete treatment or partial treatment. So if histotripsy can be done, let’s say, the liver has three tumors. The three tumors are under three centimeters, and they’re in spots that are safe to burn around the tumor or burn. Just do the histotripsy to lysate the tissues, so that will be a complete treatment. There were three lesions, the three lesions were completely treated with the histotripsy. That’s a complete treatment. Okay. Now, for most of the cases, we do histotripsy in situations that we have more tumor burden, multiple lesions, different sizes. And what we do is we try to do a stage histotripsy. We treat two or three tumors at a time. And sometimes, for example, if there’s a tumor that is five centimeters, we may treat three centimeters once, and then come back and treat the remainder two centimeters and to try to clear the entire tumor. Or sometimes we have multiple tumors. Some of them, we can target them with histotripsy, but some others may be in a difficult location for histotripsy, either because it’s close to the colon, close to the stomach, or high up, or surrounded by lung, and it’s hard to get the ultrasound beam to get there. So sometimes we use combined modalities of histotripsy with ablation or histotripsy with radiemobilization in order to treat all the tumors that are in the liver.

Betsy Post 1:09:39
Thank you. Could you provide your thoughts on getting a hepatic pump with replaced right hepatic artery abnormality?

Dr. Juan Rocca 1:09:50
Yeah, so the the arterial anatomy is an issue, and the eligibility of the hepatic infusion pump depends on different variations. But the problem would be, when you’re trying to inject, the catheter of the pump has to be in an artery that’s only to the liver and not anywhere else. So many times when you do this procedure, I don’t do this procedure, but Memorial Sloan is located across the street. They do it, and so they are very detailed about the different branches of the arteries where the catheter is to make sure that that chemotherapy goes only into the liver and doesn’t go into the stomach or into the pancreas, into the duodenum. Many times, when you have a right replaced hepatic artery it may be very difficult to control the flow, or can even reflux. And that could be a contraindication. That’s right. So if you were turned down because of having a right replaced hepatic artery, this could be a contraindication, yes.

Betsy Post 1:11:11
For tumors that are under three centimeters, is radiation equally as effective as ablation? I think you talked a little bit to that, but I did want to ask you that.

Dr. Juan Rocca 1:11:23
Yes. So this is the COLLISION study. The study that I showed was a multi center study in Europe. The research came out with the final results. Actually, the study was stopped earlier. So the study was designed as a non inferiority trial. This is the gold standard, was resection for tumors less than three centimeters. And they started comparing ablation for those same tumors, same size, and they couldn’t see any significant difference. They recruited 300 patients, 150 and 150, pretty much. And they stopped it early because there was no difference in the outcome. So this validates ablation as an equal treatment to resection for tumors under three centimeters. Of course, the devil is in the details, and that doesn’t mean that in your specific case, you should have an ablation, another resection. That depends on the location of the tumor. Sometimes the access with the ablation, sometimes we do it with surgery, but sometimes percutaneously, it’s not as easy to access every tumor in the liver than with a surgical ablation, or sometimes a resection makes more sense. No, that depends on the specifics of the case.

Betsy Post 1:12:49
Thank you. And this is from a patient that actually had the histotripsy procedure done to three lesions in the liver. The patients had two CT scans since the histotripsy, and is just wondering, other than comparing the size of tumors of those treated lesions on the CT scans, how would the patient know if histotripsy-induced abscopal effect has taken place?

Dr. Juan Rocca 1:13:17
Yeah, so far the way to tell is with imaging. This could be MRI or a CT scan that has contrast. And with that between two to four weeks after the procedure, you could see the abscopal effect is, if you got treated three tumors, but there are three tumors that were not treated. You should see a rim enhancement in the tumors that were not treated, like there’s some inflammatory activity around the tumors. If you do it early, maybe two weeks later, and if you do it later, like four weeks later, if that already happened, you should see a reduction in the size of the non-treated tumors. The only way to document abscopal effects nowadays is, like we did mention so far.

Betsy Post 1:14:13
Can you comment on the HAI pump for patients after resection to help prevent recurrence, so, when a patient would get a pump to help prevent recurrence. I think you did comment some on that, but I just wanted to ask that.

Dr. Juan Rocca 1:14:27
So the pump has benefits. It’s an aggressive therapy. It’s like two stage hepatectomy or even liver transplantation. These are aggressive therapies, and it has benefits, but also has some drawbacks or toxicities. The benefit is if you respond to the pump and you can downstage the tumors to make them resectable, which 50% can respond? Good news. You’re in a good spot if you respond and you can have resection. For example, the chances of recurrence is a lot less after using the hepatic arterial infusion pump. So not only it can reduce the burden of disease and make it resectable, but also it will prolong the amount of the recurrence-free survival. Okay, so that’s important. On the other hand, sustained treatment with the pump can lead to liver toxicity, and in some cases, can lead to some irreversible liver damage on the bile ducts. It is reported to be 1 to 3% but when it happens, it’s a real deal. So as part of an aggressive treatment that can be very effective, it’s always important to discuss the potential risks of having liver injury or having to interrupt the treatment because there’s liver toxicity. Not every patient can continue the treatment, and sometimes it has to be interrupted. The management of the pumps requires a multidisciplinary team that is not only the surgeon, but it’s very specific oncologists that know how to manage the dosing in order to manage the toxicity in the liver and to try to mitigate the potential injuries to the liver.

Betsy Post 1:16:36
In your opinion, how many times can you perform resection and targeted therapies on the liver before you would consider that transplant path would be the best path forward.

Dr. Juan Rocca 1:16:49
Yes, well, the clinical example I showed you was two times resected, and the third time that it recurred, we decided to do a liver transplant. It depends on the presentation. If someone presents with unresectable disease, but in that gray zone that is unresectable, but the size of the tumor is no more than five centimeters, there can be multiple tumors. The metabolic volume on the PET scan is not high. It’s not more than 90. Of course, that kind of patient has to be on chemotherapy. So if they are stable on chemotherapy, or responding on chemotherapy, and we see that there are more than six seven lesions, it could be considered for trouble, because we know that resecting six or seven lesions with surgery, the chances of recurrence is very high. And the long term survivors are showing one of the curves, of resection, chemotherapy, of seven or more lesions, the five year survival is about 25%. So some cases that present like they could be considered for transplant from the get-go based on how they present, in the number of lesions, the number and the type of mutations we would consider transplantation up front. But clearly resectable cases with low risk of recurrence, or a lower risk for recurrence, we would resect first.

Betsy Post 1:18:38
Does Weill Cornell have different criteria for transplant than Columbia?

Dr. Juan Rocca 1:18:45
Not too different. But Columbia just started doing this. I think that they just listed a patient so they’re trying to use the more recent criteria from the transplant trial. We have our own criteria. Our trial has been around since 2021, and we evaluated 35 patients. We transplanted five. So we actually work together. We are under New York Presbyterian we are two different universities, or two different types of faculty under the same hospital system. We work on two protocols together, and we are actually working on a common protocol based on our experience with transplantation and their experience.

Betsy Post 1:19:39
Does the liver regenerate in areas where you receive Y-90?

Dr. Juan Rocca 1:19:44
Not so much. No. The areas that were not affected by Y-90 will regenerate. But the liver areas that receive Y-90 will not. It depends on the doses of Y-90. They are very variable. It depends on some mapping studies to make sure there’s no — dosage chance into the lungs, depending the goal of the of the Y-90 if it is to destroy a specific area of the liver or to give lobar Y-90 like before transplant, to kind of keep the tumor at bay. But lobar Y-90 is very toxic too. So sometimes, if we give the lobar Y-90 too early before transplant, we may have some liver failure. So I think it’s important to understand, at the timing of the transplant, if you have a live donor, it’s a lot easier to really have a good timing and be able to to schedule the Y-90 3 months before transplant, knowing that at that time, if the liver has failure, it can be rescued with a transplant. When you go into the disease donor wait-list, and it’s more unpredictable when the transplant is going to happen so that we can run into liver decompensation or liver failure from the lobar Y-90 that was already beaten up by the chemotherapy too and prior resections, etc.

Betsy Post 1:21:15
Is histotripsy an option for patients with the BRAF mutation, and then, as well, a RAS mutation, such as NRAS or KRAS?

Dr. Juan Rocca 1:21:25
Yes, there’s no contraindication based on mutations for histotripsy. The limitations on histotripsy are certain size of tumors or certain locations where, we may not be able to clean the entire tumor from the liver. But if there’s no other therapy available,I think histotripsy is totally indicated, yeah.

Betsy Post 1:21:55
I just want to make sure.

Dr. Juan Rocca 1:21:56
We do histotripsy in patients that we would not be doing any other therapy because they have disease. We know that the liver disease is the one that really dictates survival. Many patients that present to us with liver metastases, but they have lung metastases, bone metastases, and they are generally doing well, and the liver disease is threatening their survival we do histotripsy on those patients.

Betsy Post 1:22:30
Is it possible if you have a tumor right next to the IVC?

Dr. Juan Rocca 1:22:35
With what technique?

Betsy Post 1:22:37
With histotripsy, sorry.

Dr. Juan Rocca 1:22:39
Yes, yes, the IVC is a big vessel, same as the hepatic veins. We usually anticoagulate for that, because even if the vessel is preserved, the skeleton of the vessel is preserved at the endothelium, which is the the cellular lining that is very delicate on the blood vessels. That one gets destroyed, but the structure remains. So the endothelial lining gets repopulated very quickly. But to prevent clotting, we give anticoagulation. So for the hepatic veins and the IVC, the venacava, it is safe to do it with anticoagulation. For the portal vein,t hough, it’s a bit trickier because the portal vein is a different type of flow. Sometimes despite anticoagulation, we can have clotting on the portal vein. And that’s something you have to be careful about. So lesions are very close to the center of the liver, where there’s a lot of portal branches, we try to avoid them.

Betsy Post 1:23:55
And I apologize if I missed this one. We just have a couple questions left. One is, what is the largest size that can be treated with histotripsy?

Dr. Juan Rocca 1:24:05
In different sessions, you can treat larger lesions. It all depends on the location. And sometimes large lesions, you may be able to access with the ultrasound being an area of the lesion, but the other area is too high, there’s too much lung that doesn’t let you deliver energy. But by six centimeter lesion, if there’s no other good option to treat it, I would try histotripsy. Now we should consider, usually, for lesions that size, we also consider Y-90 because Y-90 is very effective at reducing large size lesions if they are not resectable.

Betsy Post 1:24:47
Let’s see. I think all the liver-related questions are pretty good. I think we’ve got some people saying they’re going to make an appointment with you. I think you had your email on that prior slide, that last slide, so I just want to make sure that as part of the recording, everyone can see that. So if you do have questions specific to your case especially, and you want to seek a consult, this is the email with follow up questions, I feel like we got everything we could.

Dr. Juan Rocca 1:25:25
I’m not very reliable with emails. Some days I’m in the operating room all day, and I get many patients that send me emails. I think it’s probably better to leave an office number, because at least someone can be more accountable for replying, but yes, I can send the office number, and we have a free assistant that usually take all the calls.

Betsy Post 1:25:55
Perfect. If you send that to me, I’ll make sure that everyone gets it. And I appreciate that. I appreciate all of your time. You’ve spent an hour and a half with us tonight, late in the evening, and we are so appreciative. I learned a lot. This was great. I know that the patients and families here tonight got a lot out of this, and I just can’t thank you enough. So thank you so much, and there’s a lot of thank yous in the chat.

DocTalk
2025
Dr. Rocca
Ablation
HAI
Histotripsy
Liver
Radiation
Stage IV
Surgery
Transplant
Y90

In this video, Dr. Rocca delves into the Multimodal Management of Colorectal Liver Metastases, exploring innovative therapeutic options and strategies to improve patient outcomes. Recorded in January 2025.

More Videos

State of the art liver surgery with robotic technology
Dr. Sucandy
2024
ERASur trial: Local treatment options for limited stage IV CRC
Dr. Hitchcock
2023
Advanced surgical treatments for CRC liver mets
Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro
2021
Transplant patients are in the house!
2021
Hepatic Artery Infusion (HAI) chemotherapy for CRC liver mets
Hepatic Artery Infusion (HAI) chemotherapy for CRC liver mets
Dr. Gholami
2021
Modern-day management of liver metastases
Dr. Soares
2022
Why liver transplant for mCRC is taking off
Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro
2022
Paths to long-term survival with CRC liver mets
Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro
2023
Categories
DocTalks Hide from search

HAI Physician & Patient Panel

HAI Physician & Patient Panel

DocTalk
2025
Dr. Ellis
Dr. Turk
HAI
Liver
Stage IV

In this video, Dr. Ryan J. Ellis & Dr. Anita Turk delve into HAI Physician & Patient Panel. Recorded in March 2025.

Betsy Post 00:00
Welcome everyone, to tonight’s DocTalk. I am really excited about this one. I love all of our talks that we get to do, but this one, I think, is really special because we have a physician-patient panel. I think this is probably the first time I’ve done one of these. We get to hear from our expert physicians as well as our very experienced patients with their first-hand knowledge of HAI therapy for colorectal cancer liver mets. I’m going to have Keith help me to advance to the next slide. I’m going to do a few introductions and tell you how this is going to work, and then we will get started. This evening we’re very pleased and honored to have a medical oncologist from Indiana University, Dr. Anita Turk. She has a lot of experience with HAI from the medical oncology standpoint so she’s here to help us in that regard. And then we have one of her colleagues, Dr. Ryan Ellis, also from Indiana, and he is a surgical oncologist with of course, experience placing the pump, including in a robotic fashion, which I think is really interesting as well. And then, of course, for our patients, I’m going to go ahead and introduce our patients: we have one that I think hasn’t made it yet, but we’re going to go on without her, and hopefully she can join us. But we have Hope Brooks, and I think if you are a member of COLONTOWN, I think it’s okay for me to say that you probably know Hope. She received her HAI pump back in 2022 and we’re going to hear a lot from her tonight, about her experience with the pump. And then Michael Riehle, who received his HAI pump back in 2020. I think it’s really important to know that the pump helped him so much that he was actually able to have his pump removed in 2023, so he’s long-time disease free and had his pump removed. He can even speak to that from the very beginning to the end, truly. And then hopefully Megan will be able to hop on. She received her pump in 2022 and she is also a longer term NED patient as well, so hopefully she’ll be able to join us. Before we get to the next slide I wanted to tell you how this is going to work. This evening, we have a fireside chat-type of setup: I have a lot of questions for our panelists, I’m going to ask those questions, and then please put your questions in the chat or Q and A. You should see a button that will say either “Chat” or “Q and A”. Keith is here. He’s helping run the tech this evening. He can answer any questions that you have about that. You can send him a message and he’ll be happy to help. At the end, we will take those questions that you put in the chat or Q and A feature. So with that, I’m going to turn it over to Dr. Turk. She’s going to set us up with some slides and some knowledge of HAI and then we’re going to resume our Q and A.

Dr. Anita Turk 03:00
Thanks Betsy and hello everyone joining us today. Appreciate you all logging on, and those who may be joining us later, appreciate your time. So as Betsy said, I’m a medical oncologist. I specialize in taking care of patients, especially with advanced colorectal cancer, and we are a main site in the State of Indiana to provide hepatic arterial infusion pump therapy. So what does that exactly mean? Many patients have a port that allows them to get chemotherapy conveniently throughout the body; Patients have to wear 5-FU pumps over 48 hours – this is is very similar. How it’s different is that it’s placed in the abdomen instead of the chest, and instead of going into a vein, it’s actually going into an artery, specificly the hepatic artery, or the liver artery, which is one of the blood vessels that supplies blood to the tumors, as well as the liver. What’s unique about the liver is that you actually have two types of blood flow. You have ‘portal vein’ and you also have ‘hepatic artery’. Your normal liver actually requires mostly the portal vein for blood flow, whereas the hepatic artery will differentially supply the tumors inside the liver and that’s how we are able to take advantage of this therapy. When we deliver the drugs, specically Floxuridine-it’s a very, very potent form of 5-FU, and we’re able to do that directly in the liver for a couple of reasons. One, because of its unique anatomy, with two sources of blood flow. We’re able to try to target the cancer cells over the normal liver as much as possible. And number two, only a small amount of the drug is actually exposed to the rest of your body, so the fancy terminology for that is called, “first pass pharmacokinetics”. Essentially, what happens is that medication is taken up by the liver, is affecting the cancer cells, but the normal liver is then able to metabolize the chemotherapy into a benign substance that’s not harmful. So as it’s spreading through the rest of the body, you’re not getting effects like nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or low blood counts, and that’s why patients are largely able to tolerate this therapy pretty well. (Keith, you can do the next slide. …Oh yeah, we can play the sample. ) (Video begins to play on screen.) So I think what this video is essentially showing is that the chemotherapy goes directly into the hepatic artery, and because of that special blood flow I talked about, the chemotherapy is being exposed more to the cancer cells than it is to the regular liver. So the pump that’s currently approved right now is the Intera 3000 Hepatic Arterial Infusion Pump. It’s about the size of a hockey puck, fts in the size of your hand. And basically how it works is that there’s a chamber of gas that expands at body temperature, that pushes the chemotherapy into the body at a certain rate, usually about one or 1.4 CC’s per day so it’s kind of going through the liver continuously. You don’t need to worry about it. You can continue your regular activities. The pump does have to be filled every two weeks when it’s actively being used and the rate is very sensitive to altitude and heat changes. So if patients have a fever, or, if a patient steps in the sauna for too long, that is going to affect the rate. So we always like to counsel our patient about those things so we can take that into account when they’re doing their doses of chemotherapy. So generally, how this works is if a patient is considered a candidate, you usually start with meeting a hepatic arterial infusion pump team that’s going to involve both a medical oncologist and a surgical oncologist. We review the history/where did the cancer start/where has it spread/specific parts of the biology, often involveing DNA analysis/making sure there aren’t other, better options are available on the table/and what treatments the patient has already received/and probably the most important thing, what’s the baseline liver function of that patient. We then want updated scans, whether that’s a PET scan, CT or MRI, to ensure that we’re treating a patient where at least a majority, if not all of the disease that we’re concerned about is in the liver. As I mentioned, this drug is not going to spread throughout the rest of the body and isn’t going to kill cancer cells outside of the liver. Usually a couple of weeks before the pump is placed, chemotherapy’s stopped, so your body is recovered, your blood counts are up. You’re ready to go to the the OR, and then you head to the OR with someone like Dr. Ellis. And maybe I’ll turn things over to Dr. Ellis to briefly explain the procedure and anatomical considerations for patients.

Dr. Ryan Ellis 07:40
Sure. So thanks, and again, I’ll reiterate, I appreciate everyone’s time tonight. But for the operation itself, a lot of it is dictated by exactly what the operation entails. This can include a liver resection for some patients, meaning we do some liver surgery or remove some tumors, as well as placing the pump. Or it can be the pump by itself, and within that context, there can also be open and robotic approaches. So the range of the surgical experience can be pretty wide, but overall, I would say the vast majority of patients receive some sort of open operation with or without removing any tumors from the liver. Some patients may even still have a colon tumor that needs to be removed at the time of the pump placement and then when you wake up from surgery, you would have an incision from usually about your breast bone down to your belly button, if not a little bit longer, depending on the operation. And as Dr. Turk mentioned, the hockey puck is underneath the skin, usually on the left side of the belly. You recover from surgery, hopefully relatively quickly. And we can, maybe later in the talk, go through some of the real details of what can happen with this operation, both immediately after the operation and later down the line and during your hospital stay, we get a special scan that is among the most important studies in this entire pathway, where we verify that any medication that we put inside of the pump go to the liver, and only to the liver. The surgery involves essentially me, reconfiguring the arterial system to the liver so that any chemotherapy that goes in does not go to other places. Places like the stomach or the pancreas, because those parts of the body are not going to tolerate the level of chemotherapy that we’re delivering. So once we get that study done in the hospital and you’ve recovered and are eating and moving around and taking great care of yourself, then we send you out, and usually about two weeks later, or I should say, exactly two weeks after we put the pump, you come back to the office and see the team again and start talking with Dr. Turk about putting some medications in the pump.

Dr. Anita Turk 09:59
Thanks Dr. Ellis. Yeah, the two weeks after that pump was last filled, it is really important that the patient’s able to come back to be seen to have that pump filled. These pumps do need to be filled every two weeks. We don’t want them getting emptied and dry, because that puts the pump at risk for developing a blood clot and then making it difficult to use again in the future. Typically at that first visit, depending on how the patient’s doing and liver function tests are doing, if the patient’s doing very well, we can even start chemotherapy right away. But regardless of when you start, you’re coming in every two weeks for a pump fill, alternating between chemotherapy and then a two week break with heparin and so on and so forth. Most physicians recommend doing this course for about six months of treatment, so that’d be six rounds of floxuridine. Now, depending on the clinical scenario, that can be pretty variable: Patients are doing really well, the liver is doing fine,some patients may have a longer course. If they have a complication, some patients may have a shorter course. As we’ll get into this, there are some risks and complications from the chemotherapy itself with specific implications on the liver. Fortunately, things have gotten a little bit easier. Patients come from all over and may not be close to a tertiary cancer center where they have easy access to this pump therapy. Now there are nursing agencies that are able to do these pump fills at home, which makes it a lot easier for patients to get this type of treatment when they live hours and hours away where coming in every two weeks can be challenging, and we have increasing experience using these teams that come to your home at Indiana University. I know other institutions are doing it as well. Some patients may actually be on systemic chemotherapy at the same time, and again, depending on what the need is for that patient. Once the course of that hepatic arterial infusion pump is done, whether that’s six to eight months, again, depending on that clinical scenario, chemotherapy can be restarted if needed, kind of the routine, whether it was FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, a targeted agent, depending on, again, the biology or what’s going on with the patient. And then we follow the patient, whether that’s on or off chemotherapy, and monitor the liver closely. We have many patients that the liver will be in good shape, no active disease for a long period of time. In very rare scenarios, but it certainly does happen, you’re going to hear about today, there are people who have complete responses to the pump therapy where we can stop all the chemotherapy altogether, but this pump therapy can be repeated. So again, you’ll hear from one of our patients, even when we do one course, we do not remove that pump right away. We often keep it in for several years to ensure that the patient’s disease is stable or clear. And if the unfortunate situation does happen that the cancer does start growing again, we can always use that again. And again, knowing that important relationship that you’re going to have with your arterial infusion pump team is really important. So making sure you have good communication and contact with your tertiary care center is really important when you’re considering this type of therapy. So, how are we using it for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer? Specifically when we think about this in our patients, it’s when it cannot be surgically removed. The gold standard, if you are unfortunately, a patient that has metastatic colon cancer to the liver that can be surgically removed, that’s still the standard of care. But for patients where that’s not an option because disease is on both sides of the liver or for some other anatomic reason can’t be removed, this is an option we can certainly consider for patients. There is data that shows that this can potentially prolong survival, but it certainly improves outcomes within the liver for patients that don’t have resectable disease, that’s one area where we use it. We particularly use it, the data supports using it after patients have had some round of chemotherapy and that’s no longer working in what we call that second or even third-line space, where the current standard options aren’t working, the cancer is growing in the liver, and we need to be more aggressive. The other common indication for this is patients who are very high risk that did have a surgery and had the cancer removed from their liver, but we’re really worried about it coming back and we’re concerned there’s probably microscopic cancer cells left behind where we will use the pump after surgery to try to kill any cancer cells that may be in the liver that are left behind. There’s data showing that that helps, again, with liver outcomes and can potentially improve survival in addition to chemotherapy. Those are the two big areas where we use it right now. There is an ongoing clinical trial called EA2222, or The Pump Study, and we are one of those sites, and it is open at most hepatic arterial infusion consortium sites actually trying to answer the question, “Can we use this in the first line setting when a patient first walks in the door, gets chemotherapy, they’re doing okay, liver function’s good. Can we add the pump in and help improve outcomes?” And that will be a really important trial to see, is this pump going to be helpful for patients earlier in their course of treatment? So in terms of safety information the pump is only really authorized to be used for Floxuridine, Heparin, and then we even use Glycerin for it. Glycerin is just a really thick solution to slow down the pump. So in that period when a patient is not using their pump, where we’re in the monitoring zone, so they don’t have to come in every two weeks, then you can really can really space out their fills to every three, even four months. We don’t use this pump for anything else, at least at this time. The pump is not considered for patients who have a lot of disease outside of the liver. Again, when you have cancer, if unfortunately, a patient has bone involvement, lung involvement, that Floxuridine and chemotherapy is not going to get there, so those patients generally aren’t considered candidates. I will hand off side effects of the pump placement itself to Dr. Ellis.

Dr. Ryan Ellis 16:14
So the pump placement, I break the problems that we can have sort of in the perioperative period into two groups. There’s what’s called pump pocket complications, which if you think of a port, essentially its the same thing, a little bit bigger. And then there are intra-abdominal complications. The pump pocket complications are primarily related to fluidaccumulating within the pump. We have things called a seroma, which is a benign fluid, almost like water, that can accumulate on the inside. It can make it a little bit problematic to access the pump. You can imagine, if the pump is floating in a bubble of fluid, it’s hard to find with a needle after that, but that is not a particularly dangerous complication. In the same areas is hematomas– a little bit of bleeding around your pump immediately after surgery creates essentially a blood clot around it that can also cause some trouble. And then the third thing we worry about that happens is infections. It is hardware, it is not a natural substance to have under your skin. The rate of all that is, overall, quite low– infections, in the low, single digits. But all those things can happen. Regarding the issues that we canhave inside of the belly the most obvious one is some bleeding. This is essentially a vascular surgery operation that happens on the liver, so there is a small risk of bleeding around the pump insertion site within the arterial system, after surgery. And related to that are development of things called aneurysms, which usually occur at the site where the catheter enters the arterial system. Those are the bigger issues that we can have with the pump. Of course, if anybody has any more specific questions, we can talk about it later, but those are the ones to really consider when you’re when you’re thinking about having one of these placed.

Betsy Post 18:27
All right, so here we are at the Q and A. I’m going to turn my video back on, hopefully my internet’s going to cooperate. It did say that it was unstable, so if I go off camera, it’s just because of that. We’re going to kick off the Q and A and I’m going to start with a question for our doctors. Thank you for that awesome introduction. I think maybe we’ll just get a little bit more specific. On deciding to get HAI therapy, I know you talked a little bit about extra hepatic disease and maybe some of those limitations, but I’d love to know a little bit about who is generally a candidate for HAI. So, who might be a candidate, that’s the first question. And then it’s a two-prong question, because the other half of that is, what are some of the other factors that patients should consider when they’re considering a pump?

Dr. Anita Turk 19:20
Absolutely. With the data that we have, patients that seem to benefit from this therapy are patients that have liver-onlymetastases, meaning the cancer has only spread to the liver, and ideally, the original tumor is out. There are some small exceptions to that rule, as there is it to anything in medicine. I certainly myself, have patients where they have one little,tiny lung nodule, or two nodules where they may or may not be cancer, where we’ll certainly sometimes make some exceptions if a majority of the cancer is in the liver, knowing that that’s going to be the issue if the cancer grows, that liver failure is going to be the issue that will unfortunately take that person’s life. So those are generally the people that we think about. The data strongly supports it in that second and third line setting, meaning you kind of had your standard of care chemotherapy with some biologic agent, whether that’s Avastin or bevacizumab or Vectibix or panitumumab, and that patient’s now progressing in the liver. What are next steps? I often include a pump chemotherapy through the hepatic arterial infusion pump. There are some anatomic considerations as well in terms of blood flow to the liver. I’ll hand that off to Dr. Ellis – what he looks for on the CT scan.

Dr. Ryan Ellis 20:39
Right. So I vaguely alluded to this, essentially a vascular exclusion of the liver because most fundamentally, when we put this pump in that floxuridine can’t be traveling throughout the rest of the body. It can’t be going into the stomach or the pancreas or the small intestine. So for simplicity sake, the the majority of patients have the arteries going into the liver shaped like a “y”. Now that’s not a vast majority. It’s a little bit more than 50% of patients have what we call standard anatomy, and the other 40-some % have a combination of blood vessels that is usually accommodating of a hepatic artery infusion pump, and in rare cases, actually can make inserting the pump anatomically impossible. The classic example of that would be, if there’s only one blood vessel feeding the liver, I would not have a place to essentially tie that blood vessel off to insert the catheter without also cutting off all the blood flow to the liver. So I have to take advantage of what I would say is relatively normal anatomy. That’s an exception, but I will say periodically, we will review patients who are otherwise biological candidates that anatomically cannot accommodate having the pump placed.

Dr. Anita Turk 22:05
Now, getting to that second part of your question, — (speech interrupted with a brief interjection from Betsy Post)

Betsy Post 22:09
— I just wanted to say, (Didn’t realize that Dr. Turk had started speaking due to connection lag.) — go ahead. I’m sorry. We have, oh, sorry about that. I thought you were finished, and I do apologize. I did want to say for anyone that came late that we do have a Q and A, so I do see five questions already in the Q and A, and we will get to those. So I just want to make sure everybody knows we see them.

Dr. Anita Turk 22:25
I was just going to get to the second part of your question. You know, when you’re evaluating a patient, of course there’s a surgical component, the cancer biology component with the medical oncologist, there’s also the patient component. Part of this does have a dedication of time in that you’re coming in for a pump fill every two weeks, and we have to staypretty close to that as possible. There is some flexibility there, because we don’t want that pump to empty so I always emphasize with patients that you need to maintain a relationship with the institution that you’re going to, if that’s far away,that’s something you really need to take into account. Again, I did allude to the nursing agencies that will help take care of these pumps at home, but that doesn’t replace going and seeing the physician, making sure that pump is operating appropriately, that your liver numbers are doing okay, and that you’re getting appropriate dosing. So as much as I’d like to say, it’s a one time visit and we could do it all at home, it’s not that simple.

Betsy Post 23:26
Thank you. Have a question for one of our patients, or both. I think that I’ll start with Hope and then Hope when you’re finished, Michael, I’d love to hear from you as well. So how did your doctor decide that you were a candidate for HAI therapy? Well, I don’t think that we have Hope’s audio, at least I don’t. Can anyone hear her? No, okay, I don’t know if you can hear us Hope, but we don’t have your audio. Well, you work on that. Maybe I’ll go to you Michael, how about you? Can you answer that and Hope work on your audio?

Michael Riehle 24:27
Sure. I know Dr Turk has spoken a lot about it being like a second and third line treatment. Mine was like a second line treatment, but it wasn’t necessarily because I was progressing with my cancer or anything. MSK wanted to try to get ahead of the ball since I was doing so well on FOLFOX and Vectibix and that my liver tumors were responding so well and decreasing so much in size, they wanted to get in there and really just get the pump in to try to get them down the rest of the way to be able to get to a liver resection. So it’s more of, just to get ahead of the game, instead of a last ditch effort for me, which was really nice.

Dr. Anita Turk 25:16
Absolutely. It’ll still be exciting to see what that clinical trial shows but in many patients, where if we really throw everything we have at the tumor, and where there’s a place where we can get to resection, that’s another special circumstance where Dr. Ellis and I would certainly consider up-front pump placement to get that patient to the OR to surgically clear the disease.

Betsy Post 25:40
Yeah, not sure if Hope has audio, so I’m just gonna see, do you have audio? I don’t hear you. So sorry. Maybe she can join on the phone. We’ll try to figure that out. Oh, I’ll say, I’m gonna ask, …okay, Keith is gonna send you a message…. We’ll try to figure this out. Michael, I’m gonna go back to you for just one other question. I know that you did live somewhere where you had to travel. And I would just like to hear what a few of your considerations may have been when you did decide to make that commitment and get the pump.

Michael Riehle 26:26
Yeah, absolutely. I live in Buffalo, New York and obviously go to Sloan Kettering, New York City, so it’s a five plus-ish hour drive something like that, or fly, and like you said it’s an every two week commitment. There’s no ifs ands or buts. You have to go, you have to go. So knowing that the HAI pump is what was one of my only options that could help me get to NED, I basically just buckled down and said, “I gotta figure this out. I gotta make this work to be able to get this pump”. Luckily, I was able to utilize a non-profit charity here in Buffalo that actually flew me for free from Buffalo to New York City. And I know that there’s a lot of places all over the country that have these organizations that fly patients for treatment. So I definitely urge a lot of people to look into air charities, to try to get themselves to treatment for this, because it’s a big cost, it’s a big time dedication. It’s really all of those things above. So really that helped me be able to commit to it and know that it was something I was gonna be able to do.

Betsy Post 27:46
Thank you.

Hope Brooks 27:56
Is my audio working? Yes. I had to get out of the meeting and get back in the meeting. I’m so sorry.

Betsy Post 28:05
That’s okay. It’s no problem. That’s why Keith’s here to help me-help you. So that’s much appreciated. Let me go ahead and ask you, because I think it’s important, how did your doctor decide you were a candidate for HAI and then what considerations did you have when you were thinking about, “Do I want to do this or not? Do I want to make this commitment?”

Hope Brooks 28:28
At my first oncologist’s office, they didn’t offer me HAI, so I found it, and I moved to a different oncologist after doing some research, and I immediately was asking for it. And when I met Dr. Chung, he said I was a perfect candidate. I had already gone through FOLFIRINOX and had a remarkable response. So my tumor was roughly 10 by 8 centimeters on my liver, and it had gone down to about 7 centimeters to one tumor from that large amount just with FOLFIRINOX and I didn’t have other disease. So he gave me a list when I first met with Dr. Chung that said these are the things we can look at, and HAI was at the top of the list. A week and a half later, I met with the surgeon, and he said the same thing, if anatomically I could accept the pump, then we talked about what it would look like to get it and how my life would be afterwards. And I was already sold on it, I think before I actually had that meeting.

Betsy Post 29:32
Okay, so we wanted to talk a little bit about the surgery to implant the pump, and my question is about what patients can expect for that surgery. But we have a question in the chat that I want to tie into that, if that’s okay. We have a patient that was asking about recovery time. I just want to make sure Dr. Ellis, when you talk about that surgical aspect, maybe talk about that recovery time, maybe robotically versus open, with or without resection, I think is important. And then one of the other questions was, when you were talking earlier about some of those complications with the surgery, a patient was asking: How would I recognize, are there symptoms of an issue after that pump placement? What can patients look out for with regard to a surgical complication with pump placement? So hopefully Dr. Ellis, you can shed some light on it?

Dr. Ryan Ellis 30:34
Yeah, sure. So I’ll start out with surgical recovery. They I’ll start with an open operation, which, is in general, a vertical incision from the belly button to the breastbone. In some cases, if you have a complex liver resection, you may have what called a hockey stick incision, where it goes down and then around to the to the right underneath the rib cage. But the difference between those two doesn’t affect recovery all that much. For an open operation, you’re usually in the hospital around four or five days, depending on the overall recovery trajectory and having any small complications after the fact. The Pump Study, the special study I was talking about, is usually done on the third day after surgery. Everything’s gone well after your operation, you’re usually eating and drinking and moving around by the time you have a pump study, and then by the time you can tolerate a diet, move around, take care of yourself and your pain is controlled with oral medications you go home, again, around four or five days after surgery, for an open operation. The robotic operation is is a little bit faster. Again, in most patients, it’s a little bit of a struggle to get a pump in robotically. Those are primarily done at more experienced centers, or especially for patients who have not had a lot of surgery before. But if that is the case, when I put a pump in minimally invasive, I actually do the pump study often the day after surgery, and those patients can generally go home, sometimes even the day after surgery, but more often, I keep them one additional day, which will tie into the complication timeline we were talking about. After any type of operation the limitations are very similar. I say for the most part, common sense. Don’t lift anything heavy to risk tearing your incisions open. Don’t go in hot tubs or swimming pools or anything like that, and risk causing your skin to break down after the operation. But thinking a little bit about complications and what you would look out for, part of my job as a surgeon, and all the surgeons’ jobs, is to keep you in the hospital to watch for the earliest possible complications that is primarily bleeding, but the vast majority of bleeding happens in the first 24 to 48 hours after surgery. The other types of complications within the pump pocket that I talked about are generally not particularlydangerous, and the things you notice is new swelling, fullness, some people even notice a sensation that their pump is floating in that fluid. And then standard times of infection, redness, a little bit of drainage from the pump pocket and things like that. There are also some longer term complications that we haven’t really discussed, which is actually once you’ve recovered from the surgery and you’ve been getting floxuridine, a percentage of patients do have toxicity from the chemotherapy to the liver. Dr. Turk, when she initiated the conversation, talked about how the hepatic artery preferentially feeds blood to tumors, which is what we take advantage of to use this for treatment. But on the other end of that, the hepatic artery also supplies blood to what are called the bile ducts. So some patients will find andagain, this is fairly rare, months and months after their treatment, they start to get a yellow tinge to their skin, to their eyes, underneath their tongue, and that can be indicative of a longer term complication. That is something called biliary sclerosis that we can come back to if there’s more interest. But for the most part, we keep you in the hospital or the duration of the scariest complications, then after that, it’s mostly sort of common sense. It looks like the skin is infected, or maybe long term having some skin discoloration.

Betsy Post 34:40
Thank you. And for our patients, we can start with Hope and then move to Michael. I want to know, based on what Dr. Ellis said about surgery, what your experience was with that, and what he said about the hospital stay, the scar, the surgery, the recovery, how does what he said compare with your experience?

Hope Brooks 35:03
For me, it’s pretty spot on. We were going to do my surgery robotically. My body didn’t cooperate, so he did this open incision after we were already in the operating room. I went into the regular room after recovery. A few hours after surgery, an hour or so, I was up walking almost immediately, and for myself the pain meds put me to sleep, so I asked them to turn that off. They had done epidural. We turned the epidural off. We started managing pain the first night withmedication, oral versus intravenously. Removed the epidural the next morning. After surgery, I spent that day in the hospital managing pain. For me, a muscle relaxer actually worked a little bit better than some of the narcotics. I’d never had abdominal surgery. Those of you who know me, I work out every single day. You know I’m picking up 100 plus pounds of kettlebells off the floor on a regular basis. So it was kind of a joke that my abdomen freaked out a little bit, so the Robaxin helped me, and then I went home the next day. So I was in the hospital two nights, and I went home the next day. It was uncomfortable, because it is a large metal object. I think the attachment to the abdominal wall was more uncomfortable than the incision itself. Just having it there. It has to settle in a little bit. Every week that went by, it got a little bit better. Probably after about the third week I was like, I can tolerate this. By two months, we got to know each other, and we became friends.

Michael Riehle 36:43
Yeah, for me, my surgery was robotic to have the the pump placed, but it was also done at the time of my colon resection. So my recovery process was a little different, obviously, than just the pump itself. I was in the hospital for maybe five days. I think, like you said, I do remember the pump study being the day following the implant being placed. So that was surprising to me, just because it was my first surgery ever in my life, and I’m like, “Oh, they already want to poke me with stuff”, but no, it was a pretty straightforward recovery. I just had some typical nausea and the normal pains that would come with with incisions, and then my bowels, waking back up from the colon resection, but I was back at work within five weeks, lightly going at it a little bit at a time, not jumping right into it, and as Hope said, within a couple of months. For me personally, I learned to live with it, and it almost just became part of me. I could hardly ever feel it was there unless I was squeezing into a tight place and I bumped it by accident, or the only time, oddly enough, I would ever really feel it would be if I was sitting on the ground and I would bend over at a weird angle to tie my shoe. That’s the only time I would ever actually feel it inside my body, which is weird to say, but yeah, it was pretty straightforward, and the recovery was pretty much what I would have expected.

Hope Brooks 38:12
I want to add on to that. My pump study was done the week after. So, it was a: Wednesday surgery; home on Friday; pump study on Tuesday. So I had to go back for that. But the tying of the shoes is accurate. I started working out four weeks after surgery, modified lighter weights and things, but tying my shoes still is the thing that gets me.

Michael Riehle 38:41
Yeah, it doesn’t hurt, but it’s just that one time where you actually can feel it just wedge a little bit in your body. Yeah.

Hope Brooks 38:47
And my pump was installed, stand alone. I had no other surgery with it.

Betsy Post 38:54
Thank you. And Megan’s here.

Megan Stevens 38:56
I am so sorry.

Betsy Post 38:57
Megan, that’s okay. We are very happy to have you here. I’ll get you in on this next round.

Megan Stevens 39:26
I absolutely apologize. Absolutely.

Betsy Post 39:27
That’s okay. So in the next round of questions, I’m going to tap you in. The next question, we have on initiating the HAI therapy. I know Dr. Turk, you actually talked about this a little bit, but how soon does HAI therapy start following the surgery?

Dr. Anita Turk 39:48
I think it depends on the surgery the patient has. In the patients where they’re just going in to get their pump placed, we’re not removing any segments of the liver to try to clear disease, you can often start at that first follow up visit in two weeks, as long as liver functions look okay. For patients who are planning to do pump after a complex liver resection, and we were worried about their remnant liver being high risk for still having cancer, sometimes it’d be challenging to start right away, and those folks usually need four, five weeks-ish to recover before we could start putting in floxuridine mainly because we just want those liver numbers to start coming back down, make sure those bile ducts are healed up, before we start administering the agent. The main concern that Dr. Ellis alluded to the risk with this therapy is called biliary sclerosis. So for those who may be less familiar, you have the liver itself and then there are tubes running through the liver that help form bile and excrete that into your stool. And that biliary tree is supplied by the hepatic artery so those cells are also getting exposed to this really strong chemotherapy agent. And whether it happens while you’re on the chemo, and it can even happen several months afterwards, those bile ducts can scar down from all the inflammation, and then the bile just doesn’t have anywhere to go. It’s almost like, when you see patients with end stage liver disease from hepatitis or something like that, they can develop a cirrhosis-like picture, where there’s a lot of scarring, the bilirubin goes up, and then options can, unfortunately, become very limited. So we’re very, very diligent about that to make sure we minimize that risk as much as possible. Going in with good liver numbers and your medical oncologist being familiar with how to dose this medication is very important. Again why I say go to a place that does this regularly. You don’t want to be going to a small volume center, not only from the expertise of the surgeon, but the expertise of the medical oncologist,

Megan Stevens 41:47
You’re muted Betsy.

Betsy Post 41:51
Sorry, I always mute so no one can hear my dog… So, with the systemic chemotherapy that’s generally done at the same time, we’d love to hear about the management of that, and then the treatment regimen during active HAI therapy. And one thing I want to tag into that, one question we see quite a bit is folks asking about side effects. So I’d love for you to talk about side effects, just as it relates to the HAI versus the systemic.

Dr. Anita Turk 42:23
Yeah. So again, whether that’s paired with systemic or not, would be a risk/benefit discussion with your medical oncologist. And the big picture in patients where I’m worried there’s cancer also outside the liver, but the liver’s problem number one in that moment we’ll often combine systemic chemotherapy with the pump. Chemotherapy to emphasize treatment to that liver, but also address other sites of disease. Commonly, what’s paired with the pump is irinotecan sometimes also 5-FU with the 48 hour pump. The reason we don’t like to do oxaliplatin, is because oxaliplatin also can hurt the tubes in the liver, all the bile ducts, so we want to avoid overlapping those as much as possible. Often when I pair it with the FOLFIRI chemotherapy, I do reduce the dose. There is a phase one study showing that that is safer for the bile ducts and liver function in general. So normally we dose that pump at full dose. If you pay attention to your dosage, I know many patients do that, it’s 2400. We’ll often bring that down closer to 1500 and irinotecan down closer to 100 where normal is 180 to try to mitigate those risks of liver toxicity. Now in the pump, in and of itself, side effects. It’s not often I get to tell my patients pretty much nothing, most of the toxicity, so to speak, in terms of acute side effects, is related to the pump itself. So, tying your shoe and feeling it. I had a patient whose grandson kicked him right in the pump and it flipped over. Mechanical issues can certainly happen, but from the Floxuridine itself, if that’s the only thing you’re getting, and I’m sure Michael and Hope can comment on this, it’s incredibly well tolerated. I’ve actually really never had a patient with symptoms acutely from that medication, outside of that biliary sclerosis issue.

Betsy Post 44:13
I’m going to switch to a patient question, and I’m going to put Megan on the spot here. What was your experience with getting your pump refilled?

Megan Stevens 44:30
You blanked out a little bit, but I understand that the question was, what’s my experience with getting my pump refilled.

Betsy Post 44:35
…Megan is a patient at Duke.

Megan Stevens 44:37
Yeah, I’m at Duke. When I was in active treatment, I would get my pump refilled at Duke. And it, oddly, doesn’t hurt for the needle to go into your belly. It’s awkward and you feel nervous. But then when it actually happens, it’s a bit of pressure, it’s a little pin prick. Like that. It doesn’t really hurt, and they would fill my pump up, and my oncologist was really conservative. I would get it refilled every six weeks, and I still am getting it refilled every six weeks. I’ve been off active treatment for three years now. I am a three year colon cancer survivor, and I attribute the HAI pump to my survival. At this point, I have a group called “Pentec” that comes to my house, and they do it on my couch. And so when I first started getting it refilled, I would go to Duke and I’d get my blood drawn on one level, I’d talk to my oncologist, or get scans on the next level, they would figure out what my liver levels were and decide what kind of infusion I needed, and then go to the next level and get it infused. And it was amazing, because it was all in one building. It was all on one day. And so I would go deal with my cancer in one day, deal with the side effects of the treatment after the fact, of course, but it wasn’t spread out. So I really liked that about Duke. And once I left active treatment and went on surveillance, we need to keep the pump – I call it changing my oil… We got to keep changing my oil, and I was going down to Duke every six weeks just to get my oil changed. And now they come to my house, and instead of getting lifted up on a table and having the whole room hush and the bright lights come on, they say, “All right, get on the table and grab a pillow”. And she’s very professional. She’s become a friend, and they do it in my house. That’s great.

Betsy Post 46:55
A question that someone had in the chat, Dr. Turk, I’m going to point this to you, because it goes with this. And that’s, how many days can patients extend beyond two weeks due to vacations or other obligations?

Dr. Anita Turk 47:07
That’s a great question. When I counsel a patient, before we get started, I really emphasize the importance of the every two weeks. I don’t like to deviate more than a couple of days from that. Again, running that risk of it running empty. So with these Intera pumps, I can’t program the rate. I’m calculating that rate when I empty it, so I see how much comes out. And I think, “Okay, how many days ago did I refill it?” And I do the math and see how fast it’s running. Knowing the approximate rate of a patient, assuming their body temperature has recently been stable, I can do the math and see how safe it is to extend it, depending on that patient’s pump, but it’s usually not more than a couple of days. Anytime I have a patient with a trip coming up and things like that, we try to adjust their pump fills to make sure, whenever they’re going out of town or they can’t come in, I know their pump is safe and that it’s going to be full with, whether it’s Heparin, glycerin, chemotherapy, wherever they’re at in their round of treatment,

Betsy Post 48:12
Great. And one other question before we move on to the next topic: Can a patient get the pump after having Y90?

Dr. Anita Turk 48:23
Great question. I get a little bit hesitant. It depends. I guess first, let me say it depends on the type of Y90 they had. There’s several different ways Y90 can be administered. It really depends on, were they going after the whole lobe? Were they going after assignment of the lobe? It really depends on what was going on: if they had gotten what we call a bilobar, or Y-mining, means they targeted both the lobes, and they got a pretty high dose where they have some liver issues chronically afterwards. That’s the patient I’m going to be nervous about, that their bile ducts aren’t going to be handling this. But patients who either had an IR doctor that was mindful of their doses, and the liver functions are doing okay? Or it was what we call segmental Y90. Where only a segment of the liver got it, not the whole liver, those patients would still be considered candidates. Ryan, anything to add there?

Dr. Ryan Ellis 49:13
Yeah, I would say people who have undergone Y90 more recently, as our technologies advance, -we’ve been a little bit more selective – are more likely to be candidates. I have certainly put pumps in patients who have had Y90 before. I will add one thing, which is the anatomic considerations can be complicated by Y90 in a small number of people, because of some of the arteries that I have to tie off and the way that I have to reconfigure the system if an artery that I absolutely need for the pump also was the main artery that the Y90 was delivered, that can rule it out, but it’s a case by case basis.

Betsy Post 49:55
Thank you. There are some questions in the live chat as well as some things that I had prepared to ask the patients. And I know I’m trying to look at the clock and make sure we stay on a good pace here, but this is about living with the pump, your daily life, your activities and your quality of life while living with a pump. And I think that this is really important. So I definitely want to talk about that. Also in the live Q and A, there are questions about what kind of physical activity can folks do with the pump? There’s a patient that says, “If I get this pump, I have a 13 month old baby… will I be able to lift my baby, put him on my hip, things like that?”. I would love to hear, I think we’ll start off with Michael just about physical activity, day to day life with the pump, and then move to Hope, if that’s okay with you?

Michael Riehle 50:45
Sure. Yeah, so, day to day life for the pump with me was after the that kind of learning period of a couple months, was pretty normal. I worked full time. I have a pretty physical job where I was climbing all over my trucks and getting into tight spaces and everything like that. My wife and I like to travel a lot, go hiking, go camping. We have some four wheelers. We like to go play in the woods and everything else. There really wasn’t… — I had to stay away from my hot tub, which we had unfortunately just gotten a month before my diagnosis. So that was kind of ironic. But other than staying away from the hot tub and stuff, really, nothing changed in my in my day to day life. You get used to where the pump is and certain things that you can or cannot do. Not that there wasn’t much that I couldn’t do with it, but you just would do it a little differently. If your body would want to move one way, you just have to remember where it was and how to react to it. So yeah, for me personally, it was almost like it wasn’t even there once you get used to it.

Betsy Post 51:56
Thank you. Hope?

Hope Brooks 52:00
I was actually afraid of that. That was the only hesitation I had when I was discussing the pump and getting it implanted. But come to find out, I was testing all the waters. I started out with, I don’t know, 10, 20, pounds of weight, and then worked my way back up. I went back to yoga. I don’t practice quiet, sit down yoga. I’m very active style yoga, and so I’ve been able to do everything I did before the pump. And again, just like Michael said, there’s a few postures or movements that you do have to adjust, just like the shoe – putting it on, you find a new way to do it if it works for you. Certain things don’t work. The twisting to the left doesn’t work as well. I can’t go as far. Certain things I would do on that side I just avoid if it bothers me, but I do everything that I did before. There’s not one thing I can think of other than a hot tub that I don’t do. I also practice hot yoga. So that was a difficult step. My surgeon and I discussed it at length, and I did a few tests on temperature, and I keep track of all of my usage of the pump in a spreadsheet like Dr. Turk was talking about, to figure out what my daily consumption was, and it was average, whether I was in the room once a week or if I was there six times a week. It didn’t change my core body temperature. Didn’t affect the pump and how it operated. So for me, I really was able to do everything. I go swimming in the summer. I’m a big water person. Nothing I can think of that I’m really missing other than a hot tub. I do take a bath, though. At first I was afraid I couldn’t take a bath, but I do take a bath.

Betsy Post 53:45
Megan, if you want to answer quickly as well. There’s also a question for Megan in the chat, so I’m going to tack it on here to this for you, and that’s that you had talked about, you’re just doing surveillance now. Are you just getting glycerin now?

Megan Stevens 53:59
I am just getting glycerin and it’s going well. I don’t know when we’re going to talk about taking the pump out. I’m hoping we’ll start talking about it. I’m actually, two and three quarter years, but I think I’m starting to get ready to have it out if I can. I mean, it’s a luxury to be able to be seeing the light at the end of the tunnel on this, but it’s also pretty awesome to know that that is possible, and that’s a thing that’s out there, that it’s real, and science gets better every day. I personally have been very weary about my movements with the pump. I have an 11 year old, and he was seven,- six and a half, seven, – when this all began, and I’ve just been really careful about it. I think it just depends on — everybody’s always on board saying they’ll do anything, and that’s great, and it’s wonderful. I think it’s a psychological thing for me. I’ve been very, very conservative with my exercise, which is showing because I’ve gained some weight, and I need to figure out how to get it back in line. But I’m alive. …That’s what I did.

Betsy Post 55:26
There are a couple questions in the chat that I think we should definitely answer. And this is something that comes up inCOLONTOWN as well. You’re talking about the biliary sclerosis, some of those chemo toxicity issues that can happen. So I’m going to weave a couple of questions here into one. This is something that comes up all the time, the discussion of the role of Ursodiol following HAI placement. And are there any others with Ursodiol? We’d love to hear your thoughts on that, but also any recommended standard of care medications that you can take while on pump chemo to help prevent with any of those liver toxicities. Or are these things that maybe you just get if the liver numbers rise? And then also, what liver function numbers do you specifically watch out for?

Dr. Anita Turk 56:20
Great question. So yes, the rates of biliary sclerosis are probably around 20% so it’s not an insignificant number. I’ve unfortunately lost one patient to that complication. So we are very, very vigilant about it. There is no data, unfortunately, about preventative measures. Of course we will use ursodiol if we are seeing signs of that problem, and really work closely with hepatology to help manage the health of your biliary tract. But right now, I don’t have great data to support any medication to help it be preventative. I will say the healthier you’re walking into it the better. And of course, it’s not just dealing with the cancer itself, but your general body. So hearing patients like Megan, Hope and Mike going into this, following up on their appointments, being really active, eating a balanced diet, things to minimize having a liver that’s already ill at baseline in the background, I think probably does help. Patients who have underlying cirrhosis walking into this, or with fatty liver disease, are more likely to have outcomes related directly to the chemotherapy than those who don’t have those baseline problems. So I think general health is probably the best thing in our pocket going into something like this. Again, I cannot emphasize enough the importance of physical activity to help with all of that, and I apologize, what was the other question? Think it was not just the ursodiol, but if there are any other medications that you recommend or could take. But then also the other part was, at what point do those numbers become concerning, and is it a specific number you’re looking for, like the alkaline phosphatase? Right, yes. So the most important number–we look at all the liver numbers but the most important ones are the alkaline phosphatase, the bilirubin, we do also look at AST and ALT. I’m sure many people on this meeting today are familiar with looking at those numbers while they’re on chemotherapy, but they don’t have to be in the red to be a problem. So I have patients where I start this medication, and their alkaline phosphatase is in the 90’s, but they jump to the 120’s that’s still normal at our lab at IU. But that’s just the fact that it went up is a problem. So we take any rises very seriously. So the other medications that we use, in addition to ursodiol, would be for very severe cases, but where the patient’s doing fine, their liver numbers are still technically okay but have gone up from baseline, is adding steroid to those heparin days to help bring those numbers down and dose reducing that chemotherapy once those liver numbers have improved to make sure we don’t cause repeat injury. So again, I’ve said this again. I’m going to say it again. It is very important you’re going to a center that is familiar with how to dose floxuridine and manage these toxicities, because they can be very serious.

Betsy Post 59:22
This is for the patients: I would love to know what you would like to tell other patients that are considering the HAI pump, and then, along with what you’d tell them to consider, what might you want to tell them to ask their oncologist? Anyone want to go first? Hope maybe?

Hope Brooks 59:48
Oh, just one second, let me think. I guess my question would be, “Why am I a candidate for the HAI, if it is an opportunity for me?”, becausefrom what I understood when I met with Dr. Chung, because I had a good response to the FOLFIRINOX, it was assumed that I would likely have a very good response to the FUDR. So that’s a question for me is, how does that work? Had I known more than I know – the list of questions on the patient questionnaire that’s been recently published. Those are questions that a lot of them came from me, that I asked. Those are things I wish I had known outside of the single question. There’s several of them that I wish I had asked ahead of time, but I learned later. So hopefully that’s a guide to somebody.

Betsy Post 1:00:38
Great. Megan, anything you think patients should know?

Megan Stevens 1:00:55
It’s hard. So I had gone through several doctors before I made my way to Duke, and I’m driving three hours to get there every time, three hours back. And it was worthwhile, because I trusted them, and as soon as I knew I was in hands that I fully trusted, I just let go of all need to control, and I put my faith in them and let it be. But I think I would want to know if this was closing down any other opportunities for treatment. With the advancements of technology and medicine as it is, you want to always keep as many options open, and if something closes down options, to me, that’s a red flag, because the more options you have, the longer you will be able to fight this, and the closer you’ll get to having a solution and a resolution to it. So I guess that would be my question: “Does getting the HAI pump close down any options for me moving forward?” Because you’re always playing the long game, there’s not a short answer, there’s not a fast answer. You are in this for the long game, and you’ve got to have as many options as you can to get to the end. That’s what I would think.

Betsy Post 1:02:31
Thank you. Michael, anything to add?

Michael Riehle 1:02:34
I guess my biggest advice would be kind of similar to what Dr. Turk said about making sure you go to a reputable place for something like HAI therapy, instead of just going to maybe just your local center that they started picking them up last year or the year before, and they don’t have as much experience in it. Because the potential of risk is so high, you really want to have someone that knows what they’re doing and has the utmost experience with it. So if it’s something where you have to travel, try to find a way to make that work, to get to the best place, to give you the best care, as difficult as it may be. I mean, a lot of us are here because we got ourselves to these places to get these things done, through these top places. So that will be my biggest advice.

Betsy Post 1:03:25
Thank you. And it’s 8:04, so I’m going to wrap up a tiny bit, but there is a question in here I definitely think we should answer, and that’s if you have a recurrence with the pump. Can you still have resection or ablation, or is it more favorable to treat with chemo only? So I think that’s an important question for us to answer. Maybe Dr. Ellis, you could take that one.

Dr. Ryan Ellis 1:03:55
Sure. I apologize, my internet has been on the fritz, so if I fade away, that’s the issue. So yes, it is. It’s totally appropriate to have additional procedures on the liver after the hepatic artery pump has been placed. If I remember his story correctly, sounds like Michael actually started with a pump alone. There are multiple pathways, wherein when I see someone who we’re considering, Dr. Turk talked in general about the indications being unresectable disease, adjuvant disease, and in all cases, there’s chances that even after you’ve had all of your disease cleared either before or after the pump is placed initially, the disease can come back, and we do routinely do additional local therapies. Y90 is more or less off the table once a pump is in but the resections and ablations can absolutely happen if you have a local recurrence in the liver after the pump is placed.

Betsy Post 1:05:09
So I just want to leave it to the patients to wrap up. Is there anything Hope, Michael, Megan, that we haven’t talked about tonight, anything you think is important that you’d like to say to any of the patients that are watching tonight or in the future, but it’s okay if you don’t either. That’s okay. I don’t want to put you on the spot too much, but parting words from from our patients that have done this therapy and have had different types of results. You’re all from different centers and and your stories are all a little different.

Hope Brooks 1:05:47
I would like to say, because I’m not on active pump treatment right now. -We’re dealing with a few questionable lung mets, but otherwise, I’m clear of disease at this moment. I’ve two times used my pump for a recurrence, and it worked wonderfully. So I look at it like you have to know that you’re going to get married to this pump for three to five years and be ready for that long haul and be able to ask the questions. And there’s a lot of tools out there that weren’t even out there a year and a half ago or in December of ’22 when I got my pump. So ask for those materials. Ask to be educated on the pump. If you have hesitations, ask to speak with a patient. There’s a lot of oncologists and surgeons that will have patients of theirs that you can speak to, that might be local to you, or somebody in the groups in COLONTOWN that can help you as well. So one, don’t be afraid to ask the question. Two, don’t be afraid to travel and try to utilize the tools that are out there to see if this is the right fit for you. It changed my life. I don’t think I’d be here without it, I’m 99% sure of that.

Megan Stevens 1:06:51
Yeah, I think there’s one thing I’ve worked with, – I’ve been friends with, been close to other cancer patients, and a lot of times they were nervous that they would hurt the feelings of their doctor if they got a second opinion. They didn’t want to offend anybody by getting a second opinion. Doctors are not going to be offended by you getting a second opinion. You are in your absolute right to get as many opinions as you want from doctors all over the globe. And doctors are good people. They want to save your life. They want to give you an opinion. And you shouldn’t fear reaching out to other people.

Michael Riehle 1:07:45
I’ll echo what Megan hope said, just don’t be afraid to reach out to anyone, whether it’s another patient or other doctors, because they’re your lifelines. So don’t be afraid to reach out.

Betsy Post 1:07:59
Thank you, Dr. Turk, Dr. Ellis, thank you so much for being here on the panel this evening. I know I’ve learned some things too. And thank you so much to our patients. Hope, Michael, Megan, we really appreciate your time. And thanks to everyone that attended live and of course, all of those that will be watching the recording. And I just wanted to leave the final word to Dr. Turk, Dr. Ellis. Is there anything that you’d like to add, anything that we didn’t cover tonight that you think is important?

Dr. Anita Turk 1:08:32
No, I can’t think of anything. I think we’ve covered at least the basics of pump therapy. Again, a lot of it’s a case by case situation. And just get that second opinion. I promise you your oncologist is not going to be offended. We all just want to help.

Dr. Ryan Ellis 1:08:48
Likewise, great discussion. I thank the panelists for their time.

Betsy Post 1:08:55
Thank you all so much. Have a great evening. Thank you.

DocTalk
2025
Dr. Ellis
Dr. Turk
HAI
Liver
Stage IV

In this video, Dr. Ryan J. Ellis & Dr. Anita Turk delve into HAI Physician & Patient Panel. Recorded in March 2025.

More Videos

State of the art liver surgery with robotic technology
Dr. Sucandy
2024
ERASur trial: Local treatment options for limited stage IV CRC
Dr. Hitchcock
2023
Advanced surgical treatments for CRC liver mets
Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro
2021
Transplant patients are in the house!
2021
Hepatic Artery Infusion (HAI) chemotherapy for CRC liver mets
Hepatic Artery Infusion (HAI) chemotherapy for CRC liver mets
Dr. Gholami
2021
Modern-day management of liver metastases
Dr. Soares
2022
Why liver transplant for mCRC is taking off
Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro
2022
Paths to long-term survival with CRC liver mets
Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro
2023
Categories
DocTalks Hide from search

Advancements in Liver Transplant Oncology for Stage IV CRC

Advancements in Liver Transplant Oncology for Stage IV CRC

DocTalk
2025
Dr. Nadig
Liver
Stage IV
Transplant

In this panel DocTalk, Dr. Nadig discusses liver transplant oncology. Recorded May 2025.

Manju George  0:00 
Hi, everyone. I’m Dr. Manju George, the Scientific Director of Paltown. Today we have with us Dr. Michael Lee. He’s an assistant professor at MD Anderson. And he finished his MD from Duke University. And he’s board certified in internal medicine, hematology and oncology. Dr. Lee, I’m really excited and happy to have you here with us. Please take it away.

Dr. Michael Lee  0:24 
Thank you very much. Can I just confirm you’re seeing my slides and slide screen view?

Manju George  0:30 
Yes, I think yeah, yes.

Dr. Michael Lee  0:32 
There we go. All right. So I’m very pleased to be here. Thank you so much for inviting me to talk about this exciting new study, that we and many other centers are getting underway, looking at novel targeted therapy combinations, particularly focused on this new class of drugs called ERK inhibitors, in certain molecularly defined subclasses of colorectal cancer. This is the HERKULES 3 study. So just as a way of background, cancer cells in general, or cells in general, are very finely tuned regarding when they proliferate and multiply. Typically, when a cell multiplies, it only does so in response to when the environment is right. And usually in that situation, there will be molecules called growth factors released around the cells and these bind to receptors on the surface of the cell. In particular, in colorectal cancer, something called the epidermal growth factor receptor, or EGFR is a very important growth factor. Now typically, when this binding occurs, this triggers kind of the cascade of proteins being activated into an active state, and kind of propagating the signal through one protein through another through another, until it eventually leads to a number of cellular changes that actually cause the cell to multiply, you can think of these intermediate steps as a series of molecular switches. In particular, this MAP kinase pathway, so to speak, which is downstream of this EGFR receptor is a very important kind of modulator of cell multiplication. Normally, this process is very tightly regulated, as I said, in a normal cell. However, in the process of colorectal cancers going from a normal colon cell to a cancer cell, typically, these cells acquire abnormal activating mutations in one of these molecular switches. And we know that a significant proportions of patients with colorectal cancer actually have activating mutations, in one of these key genes, that eventually leads to this kind of pro growth switch being turned on all the time, inappropriately.

Dr. Michael Lee  2:41 
So we know about 45 to 50% of patients have a mutation in a gene called KRAS or NRAS, which causes constant activation of these growth pathways. Another 5 to 10% of patients have activating mutation in a gene called BRAF, with the particular mutation in BRAF called the V600E mutation most common among the BRAF mutations. These are very clearly driver mutations driving the biology of these cancers. And while we’re starting to develop new therapies, kind of targeting these very clear potential vulnerabilities of these cells, we need more novel, more effective therapies for these ranges of mutations.Clearly, the cells are being driven by abnormal signaling through these kinds of constantly turned on genes. And if we can find more effective ways to switch off these genes, or kind of block the downstream signaling that is a consequence.and this is a potentially very powerful strategy. ERK is one of the key downstream kind of effectors –downstream of activated RAS or BRAF. ERK is one of the last kind of switches that then goes on to directly activate a number of these kind of transcription factors that cause the cell to go on to multiply, and so on and so forth. So it’s one of the last common nodes in this pathway that we could target. And kind of because it’s further downstream, there’s a lot of preclinical and laboratory data showing that targeting ERK maybe a particularly potent strategy, even more so than targeting some of these upstream components. And in fact while they’re not currently ERK inhibitors that are FDA approved, there are several novel ERK inhibitors that are being developed, and one that’s particularly exciting is being studied in the HERKULES 3 study. This is the ERAS-007 compound. This is an oral pill based treatment, that’s a selective inhibiting ERK and it’s been active in the laboratory. So without going into too many nitty gritties actually, shown here are on the left hand panel are a number of mouse models of KRAS or BRAF, mutated colorectal, or pancreatic, or other cancers. And you can see here the red line on the bottom actually shows the activity of the ERK inhibitor, which was previously called a different name. And you can see that kind of when you looked at it compared to other kinds of earlier ERK inhibitors, or other classes of drugs targeting upstream like at MEK or BRAF, that the ERK inhibitor, at least as a single agent for a limited period of time in these mouse models seem to have the most promising level of activity. On the right here, you can see specifically in a range of colorectal cancers, that the ERK inhibitor was active in the majority of the mouse models that were studied. And in particular, here, the shaded kind of  maroon or blue bar show KRAS or BRAF mutated mouse models where you can particularly see benefit.

Dr. Michael Lee  6:00 
Now, with all that being said as much as  we’ve studied single agent or inhibitors and the early phase studies looking at single agent drugs, we know that from long experience with kind of inhibitors of this pathway, that you have better activity for a longer duration of time, if you target in combinations of therapies. Without going into too much detail, generally in the past when we tried targeting this path of the single agent, for example, MEK inhibitors or BRAF inhibitors, there’s been a lot of kind of adaptation within the cancer cell, that kind of reactivates upstream signaling, and it can kind of bypass the level of drug inhibition. As a consequence, we’ve learned that we -and studies in the lab have also shown- that we have better outcomes, if you treat with combinations of therapies, we really think the best chance of having more activity that’s clinically significant for our patients, is using combinations of ERK inhibitors with other rationally targeted drugs. So one combination that’s being studied in the HERKULES-3  study in KRAS and NRAS mutated patients, which again, about 45 to 50%, of colorectal cancers, is combining this ERK inhibitor with a compound of drugs called the cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor CDK4/6 . The reason this is rational is that one of the other key pathways that is activated when you have activation of the signaling pathway, it leads to activation of CDK 4/6 –which is very important for helping the cell multiply its DNA and ultimately divide. The cell cannot multiply and divide without actually going through the cell cycle process to replicate its DNA. So if you can block that process, the thought is that if you’re blocking it at 2 different levels, both kind of at the ERK inhibitor level plus at the cell cycle pathway level, that this would be more effective. Andactually, our laboratory has shown that impairing that kinase pathway in combination CDK 4/6 inhibitors was synergistic -was particularly effective- in a range of KRAS mutated models, both in cells in the laboratory and also in mouse models. And consequently that’s combining ERK inhibitors -which again, as we think would be a more potent strategy with the CDK 4/6 inhibitors- we’re hopeful will be even more likely to be effective. Palbociclib  is the drug that’s being studied in combination with the ERAS-007 compound. And this is a CDK 4/6 inhibitor that is actually currently standardly used in some other cancer types, like breast cancer,  is being studied in clinical trials in a number of other cancer types as well, typically in combination with other kind of targeted drugs. And so that’s one rational combination that we’re looking to study. In the BRAF mutated patients, this study will be looking to combine ERK inhibitors with other targeted therapies, targeting BRAF. In particular, as we’ve kind of learned in the last couple of years, the current standard of care for patients with BRAF mutated Colorectal cancer is to treat with a combination of drugs called encorafenib and it is a BRAF inhibitor directly impairing BRAF. And again, kind of talking about this multi level inhibition strategy, combining it with a drug targeting upstream at the EGFR level, called cetuximab. So the combination of encorafenib and cetuximab is currently FDA approved for BRAFV600E mutated colorectal cancer.

Dr. Michael Lee  9:40 
And this is based on the positive results of a large phase III study the Beacon CRC study, which did kind of represent an important advance in our management of these patients with BRAF mutated cancer. While this was absolutely an important step, we also know that there’s more improvement to go. We know from the Beacon CRC study that the response rate among patients was about 20%, which means only about one in five patients were having a significant shrinkage of their tumors, the remainder of the patients are having stable disease or even growth, despite this being our kind of active, a combination, targeted therapy approach. We know that the median duration of time that patients did not progress through the study was about 4 months, 4.3 months, and the median survival for the patients receiving this combination was 9.3 months. Now, this was actually a significant improvement compared to the prior standard treatment. But I think we all acknowledge that we want to improve on these numbers, there’s more we need to do for these patients. And that’s motivated kind of new strategies to look at how can we build on this ground to further improve outcomes here. There has been a range of laboratory studies that actually shows that another level of inhibition, hopefully more potent inhibition, would better allay the resistance that can develop when you’re treating with just the BRAF inhibitor plus the EGFR antibody. For example, we’ve seen that you can see emergence of small sub clones of mutated cells with other kinds of resistance mutations elsewhere in this pathway, which renders resistance to just the encorafenib and cetuximab . And as a consequence, there’s additional preclinical data showing that adding an ERK inhibitor, like ERAS-007, to the BRAF inhibitor and the EGFR antibody, may well be more effective in treating or preventing the onset of resistance. And that has motivated another arm of the study looking at encorafenib and cetuximab plus ERAS-007.

Dr. Michael Lee  11:44 
Now you may be asking, what do we know about the tolerability and side effects ERAS-007. So this is a drug that was previously studied in a single agent, prior clinical trial. So they looked at just the tolerability of ERAS-007 alone. I will note that in that single arm study, while this was a single drug given –not even a combination, there were some patients with a range of BRAF or other RAS mutated cancers that actually did have significant shrinkage of their tumors. Now granted, none of the tumors that shrink was meant to be colorectal cancer. But I think this does provide an important proof of concept that this ERK inhibitor approach can be quite potent in the right patient with the right kind of mutational profile, further motivating this, the HERKULES 3 study. The side effects from this study were as expected, and generally included side effects we would have expected with this class of drugs we have learned to manage pretty well. And they include things like nausea, diarrhea, rash, and eye side effects, which do require kind of being vigilant for any new changes in vision or other concerning eye side effects. And the study does require ongoing eye exams just for safety through the course of the study. With that being said, these are side effects that are pretty common to this class of MAP kinase inhibitors. And so these are not unexpected per se, and certainly things that we would aim to be able to manage with supportive care.

Dr. Michael Lee  13:18 
So that’s motivated the HERKULES 3 study. So this is a study that has two different arms based on the mutational profile of the patients. This study at present is currently up, enrolling patients only who have either a KRAS or NRAS activating mutation –again, about 45 to 50% of patients, or patients who have a BRAF V600E mutation, about 5 to 10% of patients. Unfortunately, if your cancer does not harbor one of those mutations at this point, you would not be a candidate for this study, just based on the principle that we’re trying to kind of find the best personalized approaches based on the underlying mutational profile. There are other trial options. Aside from HERKULES 3 for patients who don’t have a mutation in any of these genes. Patients who have a mutation in KRAS or NRAS as I mentioned, they will be studying the combination of the ERK inhibitor ERAS-007 with the CDK4/6 inhibitor, palbociclib. For patients who have a BRAF V600E mutation study will look at the combination of the ERK inhibitor ERAS-007 with an otherwise standard approach of encorafenib and cetuximab.

Dr. Michael Lee  14:36 
It is important to make sure that patients who are interested in this study know what the key eligibility criteria are when at the point in their disease, it is really important for you to be evaluated for this study. All clinical trials have particular time points –or are kind of they’re designed around particular points in a patient’s journey with typically stage four colorectal cancer, at which they should be considered for the study. And if you’re not quite at the right point in your journey, the trial would not be the right fit for you. So in particular, the HERKULES 3 study is looking at patients who have had some prior standard chemotherapy regimen. So for the most part, this specific study is not for patients who have had no prior therapy. But usually they will have gotten a standard prior chemotherapy based regimen. It also requires that they haven’t been given drugs that are usually given in patients who are more refractory to standard chemo therapies, drugs like regorafenib or tipiracil/trifluridine — these are oral drugs that are FDA approved, are usually given after kind of prior lines of IV based chemotherapeutic regimens. And so, if you’ve gotten one of those treatments before, this wouldn’t be a good fit. So you really should come evaluated for this study, before your oncologist is talking about putting you on regorafenib or tipiracil/trifluridine, because if we start that you won’t be eligible for this study anymore. It also requires the patients who have not had prior RAS, MEK, ERK inhibitors, these are not currently standardfor patients. So I wouldn’t expect you to have gotten this unless you were on a prior clinical trial. And while the criteria are evolving, it’s preferred that patients with the BRAF V600E mutation have not previously received encorafenib and cetuximab. So ideally, if your oncologist is talking about putting you on that combination, you would kind of quickly get into a center which has the study open to try to get onto this study, if you’re interested.

Dr. Michael Lee  16:45 
I think a lot of the patients are probably familiar with clinical trials.gov. But you can get more information for this study, look up the sites that are currently enrolling on the study, because it’s several sites, not just MD Anderson. So you can go to clinical trials.gov and type in a keyword like HERKULES 3 or this specific identifier number. This was just kind of the header. But if you scroll down, you’ll see more extensive inclusion and exclusion criteria, the sites that are currently enrolling, contact information for the study. So I would encourage anyone who’s interested to go to this site for more information. Again, this is a very exciting study, it only recently got underway. So we do think that there will be a lot of slots in the upcoming months for patients to go on the study. There are a number of sites that are active and continuing to be activated across the country. So looking to kind of where your closest site is, we’re always happy to see folks here at MD Anderson. But I’m very excited about the study. I think it’s very promising and I  I’m happy to answer any questions from anyone.

Manju George  17:57 
Yeah Dr. Lee, thank you very much. This was very informative. There are a couple of questions in the chat. So maybe we can go through that first. So this question is about prior BRAF and MAPK pathway treatments, are you okay, if people wait for a little bit? Or you said ideally, you don’t want any prior BRAF or —

Dr. Michael Lee  18:19 
Yeah, so it’s a great question. I think in general, patients try to determine what’s the best timing for coming into being evaluated for a clinical trial. It can be hard, because the reality is that logistically, there’s always a little bit of lead time that’s required to get in a new study, especially if you have to travel and figure out kind of life issues with that. And the reality is, if you’re kind of actively progressing, sometimes patients may have more significant symptoms that are building. What we don’t want is for a patient to wait, not get any active therapy before they know that they’ve been off of therapy for a couple of months and then start having worsening symptoms or other issues. I’d encourage patients in general, if you’re interested in the study, you know that you have a potential activating mutation in one of these key genes, to get an opinion at one of the sites that has the study. While you’re in the middle of your first line therapy, you may be able to get a kind of with a planned restaging scan. That way you can get plugged in well in advance, you talked about the study, you have an updated sense of the actual slot availability. Particularly in earlier phase, the earliest portion of the study, I will tell you we do have to be a little bit slow and methodical in how we enroll patients, just because we were looking very cautiously for safety of these new combinations. And so we don’t want to enroll a ton of patients all at once and find out there was a significant toxicity and we have to adjust the dose. So there are kind of slots that come and go particularly in the early phase of the study. So it is helpful to get plugged in and really get an updated sense of what are the study options — really other study options other than HERKULES 3. While this is a very promising study, there may be other study options that may be right for you. So rather than waiting until you’re progressing, and then risking a long wait time to try to get into the center, I think it’s good to try to get in kind of earlier, when you have a little bit more breathing room to figure out what the options are, so that when the time comes, you can get in quickly.

Manju George  20:21 
Yeah. Okay. So what you’re saying is that, so is it true that when a person starts, say, for example, FOLFOXIRI, and do they have to wait through like eight cycles or till progression to start thinking about this trial? Or should they initially  start thinking about it and get talking about it?

Dr. Michael Lee  20:42 
Well, I encourage patients in general to think about trial options, even from the beginning. So if  know you’re very motivated to go for trials, you understand. I mean, I always advise all my patients, there’s always kinds of downsides, particularly having to travel  farther than normal to get on a study –it is important to be aware of logistically what’s involved. With all that being said, if you know you’re interested in a trial, I think it always behooves you to get plugged in to a center with a large number of trials earlier in your course. When you’re getting standard FOLFOXIRI based therapy,  or even a chemotherapy doublet, if that’s whatever standard therapy you’re getting. If you’re having a really amazing response to therapy, I don’t think anyone would tell you to stop what’s working. And we would hope that that response would last for a long time. But of course, we also understand that at some point, that response may run its course, and we want to be prepared and have this plan ready to go at that time. Usually, that requires restaging every two to three months, we typically will do it every two months at our center to keep an eye on things. And so if you already know you’re interested in the study, many patients will actually get their restaging scans done with us, for example, so that we are immediately aware of when we need to switch gears.

Manju George  22:02 
Yeah. I had a question about the side effects of ERAS-007. You talked about the ocular side effects, what particularly are you seeing or what is known?

Speaker 1  22:13 
Well, these classes of side effects in general can be associated with a retinopathy, which is a retinal inflammation, or, specifically, if you recognize it, and you hold the drug, it does get better. And it may manifests in things like blurred vision or flashers or floaters. The study is building in regular eye exams, but you should also be aware, and kind of letting us know if you’re having any of those side effects. This is a class of side effects that generally we’ve seen with other kinds of MAP kinase inhibitors, even other nodes of that pathway. So for example, this is a common side effect we see with MEK inhibitors as well. So it’s not unexpected, but it is something we need to be aware of. And of course, when you’re giving drugs in new combinations, we have to be aware of that maybe a different side effect profile, again, kind of part of the reason in the early phases study, we proceed with due diligence and caution to make sure we’re maximizing patient safety.

Manju George  23:13 
Okay. So the other question was you mentioned a couple of doses, right for thyroid cancer and for the other cancers, 180 milligrams and 250. So what is the dosing? Are you also dose escalating during this initial part of the study?

Speaker 1  23:27 
The initial part of the study does have a dose escalation. Now the initial that’s kind of part of the slot, the slow and steady kind of slot determination, there is an ultimate dose expansion that’s planned. But we are planning a priori for the potential for needing to modulate the doses based on the toxicities we’re seeing –the unique novel combinations. So there will be ongoing tweaking of those doses.

Manju George  23:49 
Okay. And then about this ERK inhibitor, this is ERK1 and 2 inhibitor combined, right, blocking both? –And how does it compare to say the other ones available? Like ulixertinib or the BVD drug? –What is the difference?

Dr. Michael Lee  24:06 
So, I mean, every drug pharmacologically has different kinds of affinity for binding for the receptor and different kind of selectivity. Generally, the more selective the drug is for its intended target, and the less it hits off target, we would hope for better toxicity profiles, we do also see differences in the pharmacokinetics, which is kind of how long the drug persists. And that not only affects dosing, but the idea is that it can affect the optimal effectiveness level of the drug. This is a little bit subjective. But there are folks who will even say that this is more promising, I think you had seen in those preclinical studies that responses did tend to look better than then some of the predecessor ERK inhibitor –the prior ERK inhibitors. So we’re very hopeful that this will be even more effective than kind of prior drugs in the class.

Manju George  25:07 
Okay, I think there’s a question about what information do you have on palbociclib? In other cancers, what is the toxicity or efficacy, what have you seen?

Speaker 1  25:16 
Sure. So we have a pretty good handle on the expected side effects of palbociclib — at least kind of as a single drug. As I mentioned, it is approved with kind of estrogen directed hormonal therapies in combination in a range of estrogen receptor positive breast cancers. In that context we typically will see the biggest potential side effects with palbociclib typically is your blood counts. So it can cause low red blood cells or white blood cells or platelets. So that’s a known side effect we would have to follow, it actually doesn’t usually cause too bad of like febrile neutropenia, which is what we usually worry about with, say, chemotherapy and low blood counts. But that being said, we obviously do have to monitor and be very wary of potential infection and keep an eye on your counts. It can be other side effects like fatigue, like, rarely lung toxicity, or pneumonitis. Rarely, things like mouth sores. These are things we would obviously pay attention to. And obviously, their risk in combination will be more potentially there. Palbociclibn isn’t really given as a single agent, really, in any disease type, it hasn’t shown much activity, it tends to probably work best in combination, when there’s another targeted drug that’s already partially impairing cell cycle pathways, and then you further hit the cell cycle pathway. So tends to synergize better with other targeted drugs.

Manju George  26:37 
Yeah, I think there’s another question about the combination of the ERK inhibitor with KRAS-G12C inhibitors, do you know anything about it?

Speaker 1  26:49 
That would obviously be very exciting. There are a range of trials that are ongoing, obviously, specifically for the G12C patients. If you hypothetically had a KRAS-G12C  inhibitor, you could go on this study in the KRAS arm. With that being said, there are a wealth of studies that are specifically looking at direct KRAS-G12C inhibitors, as we’re all aware of. And it’s actually there’s an increasing number of compounds and an increasing number of combination approaches. And frankly, that would be a really good option. And something that’d be more unique to you if you had a KRAS-G12C mutation. So while you certainly could consider the study, and I would consider it, I would also look very hard into KRAS-G12C  inhibitor based combinations, because, there is a rationale to look at G12C plus other inhibitors of the EGFR MAP kinase pathway that is being studied in colorectal cancer. The exact best strategy remains to be seen, but most of the studies we have we’ve enrolled a number of patients on on other G12C  inhibitor trials, and they’re looking at an ever increasing number of potential new combinations to look to see, is there a signal of being more active while remaining tolerable compared to just single agent? So there’s a lot more options if you do have a G12C  mutation.

Manju George  28:13 
Yeah, and the other one question here is about EGFR inhibitors. So prior EGFR inhibitors don’t affect being on the trial at all right?

Speaker 1  28:24 
Well, if you have a KRAS, or NRAS mutation, you should not have gotten a prior EGFR antibody. So it would be a moot point. For the BRAF arm, it’s more relevant about if you’ve had prior BRAF in general, I wouldn’t expect you to be getting an EGFR antibody alone. But even if you hypothetically did, it will really depend on whether the trials at that phase of whether it’s enrolling patients with prior BRAF and or EGFR antibody therapy or not. But I would say if you have a BRAF mutation, even if you’re getting standard of care, it really should be in combination with another targeted agent, like the BRAF.

Manju George  29:07 
Okay. Okay. And then so the exclusion or  you prefer to have people who don’t have prior BRAF inhibitor exposure, right?

Speaker 1  29:20 
The study actually, the reason I phrase it that way is actually different phases of the study, it may allow or may specifically prohibit prior therapy. So generally, it will be safer if you haven’t had prior therapy, because at some point, the study will reach a phase where if you’ve had prior therapy it will actually probably be an exclusion criterion for this study.

Manju George  29:42 
Okay, so that means that for right now, prior BRAF inhibition is not an exclusion but it could be later. Yes, okay. Okay. And then we have one question from a patient she’s currently on FOLFOXIRI plus Avastin. And then she’s asked she’s got an HAI pump and to get to the liver resection and she’s asking, this would be the best time to think about this trial, right? For her?

Speaker 1  30:07 
I would think about it for sure, I think the biggest question for you specifically is going to be do you in fact, get to the point of a liver resection happening. Because if you have, what it would mean is that your liver metastases have responded very well, and that you’re actually having your shot at surgery. So, if you actually do have surgery and have all visible, known tumors removed with no evidence of radiographic disease remaining, then frankly, wouldn’t really be a candidate for this study. But that’d be great. So I would think about it just in case it doesn’t happen. But obviously, the hope would be that you would get to resection.

Manju George  30:46 
Okay. How can a BRAF V600 patient decide between Beacon doublet and this trial and which is more likely to help?

Dr. Michael Lee  30:57 
Well, Beacon is your standard of care doublet, right? That’s always available to you, as a standard of care with your local oncologist. I think but knowing what we know, about expected response rate, progression free survival and wanting to continue to push things forward, improve outcomes, I do think there’s an important role for novel therapies, looking at trying to see if the addition of the ERK inhibitor will build on the Beacon kind of backbone. So, ultimately, I think, if you’re willing to go on a trial and kind of have the logistical bandwidth to go on a study, I would highly encourage you to at least look into it. I think if for other reasons lifestyle, quality of life, it just doesn’t make sense, that’s totally understandable. And the Beacon regimen is going to be totally reasonable to get as your standard of care and is obviously the best standard care approach you could take.

Manju George  32:05 
The next question is about washouts. So if somebody is on chemo, how long do they have to wait till they get on the trial?

Speaker 1  32:13 
I believe it’s three weeks,  let me confirm it. It would. It would be in the clinical trials. I believe it’s three weeks though.

Manju George  32:24 
Okay. So not too much of a wait time. Yes. Yeah. Okay. Any other questions? When you showed the figure with the mouse models, you had some wild type animals in there, too. Right?

Dr. Michael Lee  32:43 
In the mouse models, there were wild type as well. Yes.

Manju George  32:47 
So it’s responding to people who don’t have the cancers which don’t have mutations in the BRAF and KRAF too?

Speaker 1  32:58 
So at least from the mouse data, it did look like that was the case now. Certainly, that the potential future area of investigation, because we obviously know that all patients with a range of kind of mutation profiles, we want to push things forward and have new trial options. So, but I think the study was designed with this priority for now, because we know there’s a particular need for patients with these mutations. I think I saw a question about what is the known toxicity profile. The study has started enrolling, but it’s actually quite early in its course, there haven’t been any major unexpected toxicity so far. But this is with a very small handful of patients. And certainly hasn’t been, like, reported at a meeting or anything, just because it’s still so small. I can assure you there are very regular safety calls ongoing to make sure all investigators in the study are staying abreast of any updated safety kind of in real time, which we do standardly for any new combination of drugs, and that’s certainly happening with this as well.

Steve Schwarze  34:01 
Manju, can I jump in? Sorry. Yeah, just I mean, obviously, we know something or like we have some data about CDK 4/6 for KRAS patients. Do we have any sort of evidence about what that would do for BRAF patients?

Speaker 1  34:25 
The CDK 4/6? Yeah. It’s a great question. We are increasingly looking, we’ve been looking at CDK 4/6 in a range of mouse models, actually. And while there certainly is kind of some promising preclinical data, I think. It certainly would be another realm of investigation for us to want to look into. There are a lot of really promising BRAF trials right now actually, that are trying to build on Beacon so really the question has been a matter of what is the most promising way to go? So CDK 4/6, certainly there’s a lot of interest in it. I will tell you at our center, my colleague, Van Morris, who I’m sure you all are very familiar with, has probably talked to you about some other emerging data about kind of the Beacon regimen plus immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, and that he’ll actually be discussing those outcomes at the upcoming GI ASCO meeting. With the early data, and, there’s ongoing discussions about that becoming a larger, kind of much larger study. So I think we’re very excited about that data, in particular for BRAF patients.

Manju George  35:44 
Okay. Again, going back to the mouse data, so you had the HCT 119 cell lines right? In that figure, so is that like a subcutaneous model? Or do you have you checked in like a PDX model or something?

Speaker 1  35:59 
So it’s looked both kind of traditional cell line models, right. But on the right side of that figure was actually a range of colorectal PDX , is specifically patient derived xenografts. So it was looking both at kind of traditional cell line models plus PDXs.

Manju George  36:18 
What else? This is very useful. Thank you so much for your time. And we’ll probably give like one or two minutes, if anybody has any other questions.

Speaker 1  36:29 
I think someone had asked about efficacy even in the last few months. I wish I could tell you something more concrete. But right now, it’s still extremely early in the course of the study. We’re still even kind of at a point of getting dosing or firming up the dosing and the tolerability. So it’s very hard to say right now anything broadly with just a handful of patients.

Steve Schwarze  36:58 
Can I ask one, Manju? That dosing question is really important. I mean, so I was on a Beacon doublet, on the trial arm,  like four years ago, and then over the past year, I did it again with ulixertinib, through their expanded access program, and like I ended up getting eight months, I got twice as long on this combo with ERK inhibitor –I got four months on the trial, even though I’m much farther out. But it was a real challenge to try to juggle those doses, because we really didn’t know how much and I had a lot of toxicities related to it. So, yeah, I don’t really have a question. It’s just more of an n of 1 example, that it was figuring out what those right dosage was gonna be.

Speaker 1  37:52 
And I think that’s really important, because it’s exactly what we’re getting at. And I will say that targeted therapies, some patients think, oh, targeted therapies are not going to have any side effects like cytotoxic chemotherapy. And that’s, of course, not the case. It’s a different side effect profile, right? It’s more not like the really bad toxicity that gets better. It’s more like we have to learn how to live with these toxicities over a long time. So like a moderate toxicity that just never goes away, is quite bothersome as well, and perhaps arguably more so than a more significant toxicity that goes away in a couple of days. Right? And so part of the study is looking very carefully at what is the best dosing schedule along with dosing there are. That’s all kind of being pre specified, and still active discussion, and that’s kind of a key point of the early phase of the study. So we know what is the best strategy to go to before we kind of go into a larger expansion phase where the slots aren’t going to be so limited, we will have a better handle so that other clinicians, the investigators on the study, have a better sense instead of feeling like they’re having to go it alone to figure out the dosing, right?  which may have been your n of 1 experience.

Manju George  39:05 
Yeah, I think there’s a question. He’s asking, do you have a sense of how quickly you expect to see results or not? So are you going to have like interim results when you have the safety part done before you go into a dose expansion?

Speaker 1  39:21 
Yes, and no, I mean, so, of course there will be ongoing evaluation of the results, but it’s always very tricky when you have only like a handful of patients to make a firm conclusion about the efficacy of the study. Even the Beacon regimen, which as we all recognize was a major advance, had a response rate of about 20%. So hypothetically, I mean, I know actually, the earlier patients actually had a really high response rate, but hypothetically, if you’d had a treatment that had a one in five response rate and your first five patients you didn’t happen to see anyone have a response, you might prematurely say, “Oh, that’s not active” — and that wouldn’t really be accurate. So you do have to be really careful about that. We obviously do want to get the results as quickly as you can, but we also need to recognize that we need to get a large enough sample to know really what the true efficacy is.

Manju George  40:20 
Yeah. Okay. I have a question. So, in Dr. Corcoran’s trial, where he had the Spartalizumab with the MEK inhibitor and the BRAF inhibitor, he was using CtDNA to see whether the BRAF levels go down, and that would be an early indicator of effficacy, right? Are you planning to do something like that? What exploratory endpoints are you looking at?

Speaker 1  40:42 
Sure I mean, there are a range of –any early phase study has a lot of endpoints like, additional correlative studies, a lot of them are pharmacokinetic studies where they’re really looking to see what is the dosing level obtained by the drug and like, what is the level of the drug in your body at that time point that standard. It’s pretty cumbersome, honestly, for the patient to have, but that standard. CtDNA is built into practically every study at this point, I will tell you, it’s probably not like an immediate readout or necessarily going to be used to determine if it’s working or not–continue or stop. From that perspective, we’ll still be using the tried and true kind of radiographic imaging based endpoints. But, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics are a key point of what happens in these early studies. We’re very grateful that patients are so willing to take those steps, we can truly know was the drug working, was it doing what we intended it to do, because we really need patients to be willing to get extra blood draws or even biopsies and things as needed. So we’re very thankful for patients to be willing to do that.

Manju George  42:03 
Okay, thank you for that. Yeah, I think we covered all the questions. And this has been very useful. So what I’ll do is that I’ll have the video available in Colontown University as well as Colontown. And if you want, if you’re interested in having your patients watch it, or somebody who’s interested in the trial watching it, I’ll be happy to share a link so that you can have them watch it.

Dr. Michael Lee  42:31 
Yeah, that would be great. Thank you so much.

Manju George  42:34 
Yeah. Okay. Thank you very much for your time.

Dr. Michael Lee  42:37 
Thank you, everyone.

Steve Schwarze  42:38 
Thank you. Bye bye.

DocTalk
2025
Dr. Nadig
Liver
Stage IV
Transplant

In this panel DocTalk, Dr. Nadig discusses liver transplant oncology. Recorded May 2025.

More Videos

State of the art liver surgery with robotic technology
Dr. Sucandy
2024
ERASur trial: Local treatment options for limited stage IV CRC
Dr. Hitchcock
2023
Advanced surgical treatments for CRC liver mets
Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro
2021
Transplant patients are in the house!
2021
Hepatic Artery Infusion (HAI) chemotherapy for CRC liver mets
Hepatic Artery Infusion (HAI) chemotherapy for CRC liver mets
Dr. Gholami
2021
Modern-day management of liver metastases
Dr. Soares
2022
Why liver transplant for mCRC is taking off
Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro
2022
Paths to long-term survival with CRC liver mets
Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro
2023
Categories
DocTalks Hide from search

Histotripsy: New Technology for Liver Tumor Treatment

Histotripsy: New Technology for Liver Tumor Treatment

DocTalk
2024
Dr. Miller
Histotripsy
Stage IV

In this panel DocTalk, Dr. Burns breaks down histotripsy — an exciting, noninvasive technology that uses sound waves to destroy liver tumors without heat or radiation. Recorded in July, 2025.

Betsy Post 0:27
Welcome everyone to this evening’s DocTalk. We’re really excited to have Dr. Kevin Burns with us. A lot of you in the LIVER LOVERS group requested him, and you talked about how much you respect his work in histotripsy. So I reached out to him and asked him if he could present to us on this DocTalk. And he said, “Sure”. So we feel very fortunate to have him with us this evening to talk to us about histotripsy. I’m going to go over just a little bit about how this is going to work in just a second. But I also wanted Dr. Burns to see a few anonymous comments about him. These are just three that I pulled just so you could see what your patients are saying about you. So I hope that the positive feedback is something that is encouraging to you. You’re very well respected and we’re really excited to have you here, just so everyone knows. If you’ve not attended a DocTalk with me before, or if you’ve forgotten, I’ll ask politely that you stay muted throughout the presentation and put questions for Dr. Burns in the chat. Use the chat feature to ask questions, and then at the end, we will answer questions as much as we have time for. I will go over those questions at the end with him. So without further ado, I will turn it over to you. I will stop sharing and let you share. And again, we really thank you so much for being here with us tonight. We’re excited to learn from you.

Dr. Kevin Burns 1:51
Thank you for having me. I’m Dr. Kevin Burns. Thank you for having me. This will just be like an informational thing. I’m not going to show any cases necessarily, of how this is used, but kind of just what is the technology; How does this compare to any other sort of technology that’s out there; And I think one of the important things to know is, obviously, this is a new procedure. There are a lot of things we’re going to be learning over time. And, we learned something from every case. There’s probably been almost 2000 procedures now performed worldwide. So, people are learning things as we go. We had our first international historipsy summit, it was actually about six weeks ago, that was held in Minnesota. We had doctors from all over the US, and then as well, some of the international sites. So there’s physicians from Hong Kong, some from Europe, that were all there, and we were discussing how we all do these cases differently, and how we can learn from each other. So I think there’s a lot to learn, and this procedure is going to get better and better over time, as you can see here on this slide. So this on the right, is the Edison machine. So this is the, basically, the machine that currently delivers histotripsy. So histotripsy is basically a mechanism, and this company, HistoSonics, makes this machine called Edison. I will disclose I am a consultant for this company, but in this regard, I’m speaking as myself, and I don’t represent the company during this talk, so anything I say will just be my personal opinion. So they’re the only ones that commercially make a platform for this. On the other side of the screen here is what we call the ‘bubble cloud’. This is what is happening inside, just a pictorial, and so histotripsy creates this bubble cloud which can go in and dissolve tissue. So hisotripsy, so it’s a novel mechanism of action. That means it’s a new way to destroy tissue compared to anything we had before, and it’s a mechanical disruption.

Dr. Kevin Burns 4:13
As you can see in this depiction over on the right, this is a kind of a phantom, and histotripsy is happening. And you see it really just completely takes out the center of this phantom here. And you can see how precise the margins are. It’s very, very, very very precise, meaning you can get right up to a critical structure without entering it. And so this causes instant tissue liquefaction and cell death. And it’s very precise and controlled. And I think important too is you can see that there’s no damage in the tissue, around this lesion. This is what a treatment head would look like. And so this would be positioned inside of the water bath on you, and we’d use this to localize the tumor. There’s an ultrasound probe built in, so we can use live imaging to see and then just think about this like a satellite dish and setting all these beams, and it’s only where they meet at this one focal point. Think about it like the size of a grain of rice, where this histotripsy happens, and if there’s not enough power, histotripsy doesn’t happen. Also importantly, as you can see, that histotripsy doesn’t happen on any of the way into the tissue. And so that means that we can treat through structures and it doesn’t damage them. So we could treat through the gallbladder, through the ribs, potentially through the stomach, but as long as the lesion is safe, then we’re able to treat it.

Dr. Kevin Burns 1:51
This is just another depiction. It’s what would be happening on a microscopic level. And this is that bubble cloud. Basically the histotripsy creates this intense negative pressure, it rapidly expands and contracts all the air that is present in the cells, and it uses this to instantly destroy the cell. So as you’ll note, too, histotripsy either is on or off. There’s no gradient. So when we talk about other therapies like microwave ablation, cryoablation, other therapies like that, there’s different levels of ablation, so the center of the lesion will generally get to a hotter temperature or colder temperature, depending on the device. And then as you spread out, there’ll be areas that may not be completely dead, but when you look with histotripsy, it’s all histotripsy or it’s not and so that’s another differentiating factor as well. There’s going to be some videos that we’re going to play here. So this is a demonstration video. I’ll let this play through, and this will simulate what would happen during a procedure if you were there.

Dr. Kevin Burns 1:51
This is the machine that the physician would be controlling, and this is how the procedure room setup is. Generally, this is going to be done in an operating type of room. It’s the procedure, I think, importantly, it’s not sterile. So there’s no incisions. Nothing breaks your skin anywhere. We are doing these under anesthesia in almost all situations now, and so that’s why, most commonly it’s going to be done in a procedure room. But I think as we learn more and more, I think this is going to move to the outpatient setting, where we can do this in a surgery center so we can get you in and out faster because of this procedure, it’s non invasive. So this would be to set up. There’s an ultrasound here that we can use to ultrasound you as well as provide the signal of the ultrasound. This is the water bath that sits on you. This is put on after you’re asleep, and the treatment head goes inside of this water. So if you think about ultrasound waves, if you ever had an ultrasound, they put that ultrasound gel on that’s to get rid of any air that’s between the ultrasound probe and your skin, because the sound waves don’t really transmit through air. And so this water bath will create a consistent water from the treatment head all the way to your skin. And so the treatment can successfully be delivered. This water bath can be positioned in different ways. In this example, the patient is lying face up, but we can put people on their side to move things around, or get to tumors that are in other locations. We’ve got many liters of water in here. So this is actually quite heavy, and so it takes a couple people to get this all positioned for you. – I’ll continue this video. – and so this is, again, what the treatment head would look like. And so this was going to simulate a procedure of treating one tumor inside of a patient. Here’s the treatment head inside of the water bath and here’s the simulated ultrasound waves coming down. And then at the center, this is the targeted tumor. And so the doctor can basically decide how big in all of the dimensions we wanted to do this. This is showing some fusion imaging. So in certain situations, we can take your pre-existing CT or MRI, and we can try to fuse it with the ultrasound, so that can help us find locations that maybe are hard to see or we’re not confident we’re in the correct location. So this fusion can help us localize more difficult to reach tumors and then after we program everything out, we basically set all the voltages. That just means, how much power does it take to kill your tumor? And that’s personal to every patient. Then we start this process. The robotic arm will move the treatment head through our pre program path in order to deliver that histotripsy throughout the tumor, including a margin. Next, we’re going to see what this would look like internally. So again, this is a simulation of what this will look like. This bubble cloud is going to go through, and it’s really liquefying everything in the treatment field.

Dr. Kevin Burns 9:21
And so if you had one tumor that was small that we are going after, this procedure can be fairly quick. I would say it’s pretty common that we’re going to be treating multiple tumors, and multiple tumors can be treated in one session. So that’s just kind of an overall of what the procedure would look like while you’re asleep, if this was something you were going to go through. Again, this was another demonstration here. I’ll pause this here. This is just more about how this works. So this is the treatment head again, and in the bottom corner, you can see there’s a number turning up. That’s the physician dialing the voltage up. Once you hit the critical voltage for your tissue and your body, histotripsy will happen. And then you could keep turning it up and nothing else happens. So we try to calibrate that for every patient to use the least amount of power in order to enable histotripsy to happen. And then if we look at what happens here, this would be what the physician would be doing. This is a simulation, again, of what would be happening. I think it’s helpful to actually see what would be happening inside, to visualize this. This is a piece of animal liver that’s sitting in this phantom, and this is very sped up, but this is what would be happening to the tissue internally. And I think it’s also important to know that there’s no damage anywhere else in the structure. It’s only in this treatment volume and where the histotripsy is happening. And then we’ll see that we’re actually going to cut this open, and you can see that this liver tissue is actually turned into a liquid, so basically, completely liquefied. So inside of your body, your body’s natural repair processes and lymphatic system would go through and reabsorb this and the cavity would decrease over time.

Dr. Kevin Burns 11:26
Now, if you did histotripsy, and then you immediately removed a tumor, and then you gave it to a pathologist, they would be able to do the staining. This would be similar to any biopsy you would have, and they would see that the histotripsy area is this acellular lysate, meaning that on the outside, we can see all these cells. They’re perfectly preserved, not damaged at all. So, very thin margin here, but you can see that it’s completely killed and then completely alive. So you can get very close to critical structures without damaging them. And you can also preserve more liver parenchyma than other therapies, potentially. And so this is that acellular lysate. This is something where the pathologist can’t actually tell what tissue this is from, and that means this is basically completely destroyed. Another important feature of histotripsy is kind of some tissue selectivity. So if the type of tissue has a lot of collagen in it, it’ll be resistant to the damage from histotripsy. In the liver, that would be the bile ducts, the portal vein, the hepatic arteries. You can see these are examples inside of animals where you can see histotripsy was performed, and then the liquid was washed out. And you can see that these vessels still run completely through the treatment zone. And in this video here, you can see that they’re actually washing everything out. And you can see the stroma and the structure of the liver remains, but all of the tissue is completely destroyed. This allows us to treat potentially in some more dangerous areas, in the hilum or the center of the liver, maybe a tumor that’s right on a vein or right on a bile duct. And we can maybe do this a little bit more safety than other therapies could, compared to microwave ablation or radiation.

Dr. Kevin Burns 12:50
This would be an example of a preserved vessel. This patient was treated with histotripsy and then they had an MRI. And this big black cavity is the histotripsy zone, and then this is a portal vein branch running through. You can see that this vessel is still open, even though it was completely inside of the treatment zone. If this patient had a microwave ablation here, likely this whole area would get scarred down, or potentially there could be a recurrence, because the vein would keep flowing in blood, and it wouldn’t allow enough temperature here to destroy the tumor right along the vein. And so histotripsy gives us a way to instantaneously and completely destroy a tumor so it’s a for a lesion that’s an appropriate size this is a one-time procedure to go in to try to kill it. We can potentially alter the microenvironment and immune system, we’ll touch on this in a moment. In certain patients, we can reduce the disease burden, and we can improve patient’s quality of life. If you have a tumor, let’s say you have many tumors, and we know that the chemotherapy is not working anymore, if you have a lot of pain, we’ve been able to treat tumors in patient that have pain, and that’s reduced their pain, or maybe it’s pressing on a bile duct, and you need to have a drain placed. So there can be ways to use histotripsy, even if we’re not curing the disease, in order to make you have a better quality of life with very minimal side effects related to the procedure.

Dr. Kevin Burns 14:16
There’s a lot of literature, again, this is all in animals on “immune modulation”. That means that doing histotripsy is doing something to alter the immunologic response to the tumor. This does not happen in most patients. This happens in some patients but obviously we study things in animals, so there’s many animal models kind of showing that this does happen. And so I think with all the data we’re collecting now, especially in the BOOMBOX study and other studies, we’re trying to learn who is benefiting from this the most, which tumor types, which mutations, and which therapies may augment this because I think this will be an important part of histotripsy’s future. So, this would just be an example of immune infiltration. So, if you look at a control animal versus a tumor that was treated with histotripsy, you can see that there’s a lot more immune cell infiltration into this non-targeted tumor. Looking at other modalities, so external beam radiation, radio frequency, those weren’t really much different than controls, but a mouse model treated with histotripsy had a much higher percentage of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, and that’s one of this markers of having an immune response. And then looking at the tertiary lymphoid structures, or tumor infiltrating cells in other models, you can see that again, more papers show that in non-treated tumors, there’s some immune cell infiltration which does not exist in the controls. And again, a lot of this data is available if it’s something that you want to do further research on. And then in humans, hopefully we have some more answers for this in the next coming years.

Dr. Kevin Burns 15:54
So again, the procedure is non-invasive, and so that’s one of the hallmarks here. We are generally putting everyone under general anesthesia, so it’s non-invasive, but we’re still getting put to sleep so there are some risks related to anesthesia. I would say most patients have mild pain. There are some patients who have more severe pain, and that’s going to be based on the tumor location, and generally, your physician will be able to tell you that ahead of time. So if I’m going to treat something on the edge of the liver or right under one of the ribs, I’m going to let the patient know ahead of time that that that lesion is probably likely going to hurt afterwards, just so when you wake up, you don’t think something’s wrong because you’re having pain. So I would say, “You know what? The maximum pain can go up to a five or six, usually that’s right after the procedure, and then it can die down after that”. There are definitely some people who have no pain. They walk out of the procedure like nothing happened. It is again, a single session procedure for an appropriate lead, and that means one that we can completely cover at one time. Again, here’s just another setup of what the room would look like if you were there.

Dr. Kevin Burns 16:52
These are just some general things, in case you want to come back and reference a video. So, just some things about the procedure. Oftentimes, we will give you some dietary restrictions prior that helps reduce the amount of gas that’s in the abdomen. As you can imagine, you can have gas in the colon and the small bowel, and if that moves around or gets near the liver, that may eliminate a window in order to see some of the tumor. So oftentimes, we will do a bowel preparation, and you usually will be provided instructions on that by your physician that’s performing the procedure. A closer look up here, so you can see that this is a simulated patient here. There is some kind of oil on the patient, you actually get castor oil rubbed on your skin, and that helps, again, create this contact between this membrane here. This is a very pliable surface, we fill this with water, and this conforms to your body well, and then the treatment sits right in here. So this is really all that contacts you, and this is a disposable part, it gets changed out with each patient here. So this would be a simulation of what the physician would be seeing during the procedure. So again, this is in a phantom, but during the therapy we can monitor this live. Once we turn it on, we can monitor live if something changes, if the breathing changes, or the tumor moves in location, we’ll see that live. We can pause the therapy. We can replan and move things out. We’re monitoring this live here. And so this little crosshairs here is the histotripsy happening. You can see on ultrasound, we can already see that this tumor area is much more dark than the surrounding area. And so that we can see that we gave histotripsy into that area. So this is just an overview of what the console looks like when your physician is performing the procedure.

Dr. Kevin Burns 18:30
After the procedure, you can definitely have some pain. Most patients, at least in my practice, are discharged the same day, a couple hours after the procedure. Some patients may stay overnight for certain reasons, but I would say, 95% of patients will go home the same day. And there’s definitely normal things that happen after this. The following day, it’s fairly common that you would have a fever, a flu-like illness. If you’ve had other therapies like microwave ablation or an embolization, they can be very similar to that. And you can also have some fatigue, and that can last for several days. Looking at some of the data that helped get this procedure accepted, and the first was the THERESA trial. This was conducted in Barcelona, Spain, and this was a safety study, to make sure this works and make sure it’s safe. And so just an example of a tumor that would have been treated in there. This is an MRI showing this white spot here. This is a tumor that they did histotripsy on it, one week afterwards. You can see it’s larger, that’s very important to note, if you have histotripsy or any therapy, and then you get an image a week two weeks later, most likely it’ll be much larger than it was, because oftentimes we treat a tumor, plus a margin, that means we’re treating the tumor plus some of the normal liver around it to make sure there’s no cell that’s trying to escape already, to make sure we encompass all of that. And then in this patient, for example, once you get out to eight weeks, you can see that it really has a dramatic size decrease compared to that one month imaging.

Dr. Kevin Burns 20:02
Next was the HOPE4LIVER trial. Up. So again, this was basically a technical success and safety trial, and this had a total of 44 subjects that were both in the in the EU and in the US, and looking at the breakdown of tumors that were treated. Most of them were not primary liver cancer so the most common would be metastasis from the colon, rectum, breast and pancreas, and then the others were hepatocellular carcinoma. So really, in all comers to compare this, and this is really a safety trial and efficacy and the one year data was just published from this, and this showed that the success rate was about 95%, meaning that in 95% of the patients, the tumor was correctly targeted and treated. And this is based on the immediate imaging, and the safety showed that there was only about 7% of patients who had any sort of complication- related – and one patient had pain. There was one patient of note, that did have liver failure after this procedure. So this is just something to note, and your doctor would likely discuss this with you if they thought you were at risk for this. This patient had greater than 20 tumors, and this patient unfortunately passed away about one month after the procedure, likely due to just the progression of the remaining tumors in the liver.

Dr. Kevin Burns 9:21
And so again, looking at some example images. This top image would be a small tumor here that was treated. So you can see on the first day afterwards, tumor is much larger, but you see it’s kind of black now, so it doesn’t take up any of the contrast dye. And then at one month, you see it’s getting smaller. And then by six months, one year and two years, you really see that you can barely tell anything was there. So that’s another powerful attribute of histotripsy, is that we get reabsorption of the cavity, so over time, they shrink down a lot. If we were to treat this with a microwave ablation, you would just see a big area of scar tissue, of all dead tissue around it, and that would pretty much just stay the same size forever. Sometimes that can be similar with radiation so it can be helpful with histotripsy that this really gets reabsorbed. And so it can be helpful for follow up because if we see that it’s getting smaller, and then maybe you’re out two, three years, it starts growing again, then we can be concerned that there could be a recurrence, and we may need to address that. Looking at the one year data, they showed that there was basically a 90% local tumor control at one year. So in 90% of the tumors that were treated at one year, there was no evidence of recurrence. So this is pretty comparable to other local therapies, and this is considered a very good effect. And again, in these, 96% of these had complete tumor coverage immediately post procedure. Again, very overall safe procedure.

Dr. Kevin Burns 22:41
And then if you look at the survival rates here, so about 73% of the patients with primary liver cancer were still alive at one year, which is very favorable with current data. And then in liver metastatic disease, about half the patients at one year were still alive. Again, this is a very sick patient population that was in this trial. These patients had to progress through all lines of systemic therapy, and so these are much sicker patients than somebody who’s still able to get chemotherapy or still has other options. We also published as part of this, this study of some of the first nine centers that came online. We looked at the first 230 cases treated clinically. So this means not part of a trial, this is a real-world user. So we participated, and you can see the other sites that participated here. We, overall, showed that this was a very safe procedure. That was the the point of this. We’re doing something new. We need to make sure that it’s safe. And so this looked at a total of 230 patients again, across these nine centers. Looking at these, almost half were colorectal liver metastasis. So that’s a very common patient population that we’re treating. And then you look at these, 95% of these patients had no complications. That means 5% of patients had some minor complications and there was one major complication in this as well, again, that was a patient who, unfortunately did pass away from progressive disease elsewhere, outside of the treatment zone, but overall, a very safe procedure. And so whenever you have a new procedure, we need to prove that it works, and so this is the hardest part.

Dr. Kevin Burns 9:21
The company is sponsoring a study, and you may be asked to participate in some studies. When you get your procedure done, there are a lot of individual doctors looking at very specific things, and there’s a lot, I think, that we’re going to learn over the next coming year. One of the ones is called BOOMBOX. This is a study that we’re just going to collate the results from multiple sites in order to get a large number of patients with each kind of tumor type and see how patients are progressing over time. So when we talk about liver-directed therapies, there are a lot of options for colorectal liver metastasis. One of them is surgery, which I didn’t put on this slide, but surgery is definitely an option if you have all your disease confined to one lobe of the liver, potentially, you could have that lobe removed. You can even get liver transplants now. You can have hepatic arterial infusion pumps. And so those are some of the things I won’t mention here, because I’m just talking about some targeted therapy. So we have histotripsy. We have Y-90, which I’m sure you guys are familiar with as well. We have microwave ablation and SBRT. We can also mention chemoembolization on here as well. And so if you kind of compare the mechanism of these – so histotripsy is non-invasive, and it’s ultrasound based, and it mechanically lyses the tissue. Y-90 uses radioactive beads that emit this very strong radiation in order to kill the tumor with radiation, microwave ablation uses intense heat in order to coagulate the tissue and kill it, and then SBRT, or external mean radiation, again, uses highly focused external radiation that can be delivered over the course of many sessions in order to give critical radiation to kill a tumor. So some of the benefits of these procedures, histotripsy and external beam radiation are both non invasive. Histotripsy generally will require anesthesia, whereas SBRT will not. Histotripsy in general is a single session procedure, whereas SBRT has multiple procedures that you would have to come back for. Another benefit, histotripsy doesn’t damage any of the tissue on the way in or the way out. When you get treated with radiation, although it’s very precise now, and it’s much more tolerated than it was before, there is some radiation that is affecting the organs on the way in and so that can be of a concern in lesions that are in a certain location.

Dr. Kevin Burns 9:21
Y-90 or radioembolization is very minimally invasive, all done through a small catheter that’s in the artery. It’s very effective if you have a larger tumor or you have multiple tumors all in the same area of the liver. And again, this is also an outpatient procedure. And microwave ablation is also a very fast procedure. So microwaves can be very fast. It’s well established. It’s been around for over a decade, and so we have a lot of evidence showing for microwave ablation that it’s equivalent to surgery, based on a trial called the COLLISION trial that came out for lesions under under three centimeters. Histotripsy is new, so there is still some limited availability. There’s spotty insurance coverage so that’s one of the other things we deal with and the ideal candidates for these procedures. So histotripsy kind of opens up… There’s some more patients who can be treated but in general, we’re thinking about someone who has oligometastatic disease. That means you can count the number of lesions, and you think there’s a chance you might be able to get all of them. In some cases, we’re just debulking patients, so let’s say you’re trying to get to a transplant, and your CEA has to be under a certain level. Histotripsy could be beneficial to start debulking some of the tumor to see if we can get the CEA level down, or if you’re having pain, or if there’s a tumor in one location that’s causing a problem, that may be a reason to go after that one as well. Again, once we get more data on the immune effects of this, this could get into more widespread practice as well. So these are just the different therapies, and if there’s questions about these later, we can talk about these.

Dr. Kevin Burns 15:46
When we talk about histotripsy, when people ask, can my tumor be treated with histotripsy it’s a very complex question, because we have to, one – be able to see the location of the liver. And so this is just a depiction of what the liver segments are. The liver is divided into eight segments based on their blood supply. And the liver is also different in every patient. Some people’s livers are bigger, some are smaller, some are higher in the chest. And so if you tell me you have a tumor in segment four, that’s one centimeter, can you treat it with histotripsy, you still need to see the pictures, but pictures, because everybody is different, really, on the inside. If you’ve had surgery before, that will also alter where your liver is and so it’s really important to review these images to make sure that it’s something that can be treated. If you consult with someone who does histotripsy, and I don’t think it’s good for histotripsy, we’re going to let you know what some of the other options are, in case you haven’t been told about them. But I think point of the slide is that every segment is currently being treated. At the beginning, we were not treating segment eight, segment seven, and now those are much more common for us to be able to treat.

Dr. Kevin Burns 15:46
And so some of the strengths of histotripsy really, is that it preserves the liver parenchyma. It can preserve the hepatic veins, the portal veins, the bile ducts. This means that we can treat the more dangerous tumor locations. We have good radiologic results. That means over time, the tumors get smaller, and so they can be easy to follow on imaging. It’s also non-invasive, and you get immediate results. The tumor is dead before you wake up from the procedure. So looking at histotripsy in general right now, we’re really focused on the liver, but this is a technology that will probably come to a lot of other organs in the future. The kidney trial called HOPE4KIDNEY, that one just closed, so we’re waiting on the results for that, and that would be to treat primary kidney cancer. The trial to treat pancreas tumors is underway. A safety trial is underway in Europe, and so that will hopefully come to the US soon. And then, as you can imagine, this technology may be able to be adapted to other areas throughout the body. So I will stop here, and if anyone has questions, I can check the chat as well.

Betsy Post 30:22
Yes, we have a lot of questions. Okay, I can read these off. And if any of these regarding insurance are not something that you can speak to, that’s fine. So just let me know because we do have a couple about that. If you have knowledge if histotripsy is covered by the VA, and if not, do you have any idea on the timeline to getting it covered?

Dr. Kevin Burns 30:46
Sure, yeah we have treated VA patients, and we’ve had referrals from the VA directly. I can’t say it would be covered 100% of the time, but I know that I think the VA is supportive of this technology now. So I would say that I would go to your doctor at the VA and see if they can get a referral to try to get a review approved, because I know we have treated patients with VA insurance. That wasn’t the case at the beginning, but I would say, since this year, we have been able to do that. I don’t know the specifics of that, but, but we have treated VA patients or with VA insurance.

Betsy Post 31:18
Well that’s great. Now this question I’m really interested in, too, so I’m glad someone asked it: what was the biggest breakthrough or learning that happened at the recent conference you mentioned?

Dr. Kevin Burns 31:33
I think it’s just that there’s so much people have come up with a technology and then doctors will figure out the best way to use it. So there’s a lot of different use cases. So, when this first came out, we were just going to treat tumors that are in the left liver that are very easy to see. And you’ll see that now we’re doing using different anesthesia tricks. We can get the liver to move around, and we can treat these very tough locations that maybe when this technology was thought of, that wasn’t really something that was thought to be possible. And so as doctors are doing more and more cases, they’re getting more experience in how this works. And so I think that’s one of the things, and it’s also to see that a doctor in Hong Kong learned to do the same thing, and we’re all doing the same thing. And so it’s nice to see that the worldwide community is really participating in this.

Betsy Post 32:31
Great and I know you talked about this a little bit, but we have a big following of histotripsy, a lot of interest in it. We did have a prior talk, but that was a while ago. So if you could speak to this question, it sounds like you can go through ribs safely now, so the right side is on the table, because we did have a prior talk on that, and they said that would be sort of a no go. So I’d love to hear more about that.

Dr. Kevin Burns 32:55
Yeah, that was at the beginning where they thought that this was all going to have to do what’s called subcostal, meaning under the rib cage, and so that really limits the liver. I would say, pretty quickly into treating – so all the trial patients, those are all subcostal treatments. All the initial treatments were generally subcostal. Pretty early into our experience, we started doing transcostal treatments, meaning that we put you on your side, so you generally your left side down, and we could treat through the ribs. And so as an I’m an interventional radiologist, we do a lot of procedures in the liver, transcostal, meaning between the ribs. That’s how we put in biliary drains. That’s how we do microwave ablations, that’s how we do biopsy. So that’s a very common way for us to access the liver. And so we’re really familiar with that anatomy. And so now I would say most of our treatments are probably right sided and through the ribs now, so that’s probably the most common things that we treat now the there’s a newer histotripsy machine, and so anyone that gets a machine now gets the new one, and all the other ones are being replaced, so everyone’s going to have the same one, and it does allow maybe some deeper lesions to get treated. There’s some subtle differences between it. histotripsy still happens on either one, but I think the point of that is treatment times are faster now. Treatments are about 40% faster than they were a year ago, and that’s through software improvements as well as hardware improvements. At the beginning, when we were treating transcostal, it was through the ribs. There’s a lot of pain associated with that. I think there’s a little bit, potentially some less pain now with this new treatment, and just because the procedure time is a little bit faster.

Betsy Post 32:41
In the portal vein picture that you showed, how long does it take for the liver to repair itself?

Dr. Kevin Burns 34:16
So generally, when we have a patient and we’re out one month from the procedure, the tumor will likely be around the same size, but it’ll be hopefully dead as long as we are able to deliver effective histotripsy. But once you get out to three months, that cavity is a lot smaller. And then at six months, sometimes it’s just a little speck. So the liver can repair pretty quickly and process that dead tissue in there.

Betsy Post 34:58
We do serve an international community in COLONTOWN so I was happy to see some of that information. And we do have a question here. I’m curious if any Canadian doctors joined the international conference you mentioned earlier, or maybe if you know of anyone in Canada that’s doing this now, or any information on that? This patient had had ALPS, so an aggressive extended in 2020, recently, facing recurrence. And would histo be something worth exploring?

Dr. Kevin Burns 35:26
Yeah. So currently, there’s no one practicing this in Canada. I know there’s a lot of interest in bringing it there, and I think every country has its own regulatory bodies that have to approve these things. So I think it will get there soon. I don’t have any knowledge of when that would actually happen, and I’m sure it will get adopted there as well. But there are many Canadian patients who seek medical care in the US, and many of them travel down to have this procedure. I would say, in a patient who’s had a liver resection hisotripsy, for an appropriate lesion would be a very good technology, because you’ve had surgery before. That means that likely, you’re probably not going to go through surgery again. And so you’re looking at probably microwave ablation, potentially, Y-90 or TAS radiation. So I think histotripsy does offer a unique advantage. You’ve been through surgery, so we can avoid needles to go through. And since you have probably less liver, although the liver is probably hypertrophy, we can, we can not damage as much liver as you could in another procedure. So I would say recurrence after a resection is a very common indication for histotripsy currently.

Betsy Post 36:37
Thank you. How long is one under general anesthesia?

Dr. Kevin Burns 36:41
I would say, depending on the number of lesions and the size the procedure it can take anywhere from one to three hours.

Betsy Post 36:50
How many tumors can be treated in one session?

Dr. Kevin Burns 36:53
There’s not realy a limit on number of tumors, more of some volume limitation. So if you think that there’s going to be a lot of tissue getting destroyed, your body has to process that. We didn’t speak to this earlier, but it’s very rare, some patients can have some kidney issues after this procedure. That’s extremely uncommon, and we think that may be due to potentially high volume treatment. So it’s also going to be a lot for your body to process. You probably have very severe side effects as well. And so if you had five small tumors, those could be all treated at the same time. But if you had one large tumor, that may be all that the physician or myself would be comfortable going after at one time just due to the volume of the lesion.

Betsy Post 37:34
What about histotripsy triggers an immune response? I think you spoke a little to this that.

Dr. Kevin Burns 37:39
Yeah. So again, in humans, we still have a lot more to learn on this. There are definitely case reports. That means it’s not a peer reviewed study, but case reports of patients who have had this response. That means that, because this is not thermal and not radiation it doesn’t just necose everything, and so the cells are completely destroyed, but there may be some protein or antigen that is left in the acellular lysate, and as your body cleans that up, it may learn to recognize something that was hidden from the body. So cancer generally progresses because it can escape the body’s natural processes. So if we can show it some antigen or some way to recognize the tumor, then potentially, I say potential, because we still need to prove this out in humans, that you could help stabilize disease elsewhere in the liver.

Betsy Post 38:28
What would be some of the more common things that would disqualify a patient from being able to receive histotripsy?

Dr. Kevin Burns 38:35
I’d say most common would be size and location of the tumor. A tumor that’s on the liver dome, if you’ve heard that, it’s probably not a great location to treat, because there are some better options; and size, if you had a single six centimeter tumor, this is probably not the best option for you. This could be combined with other things. And so I think those are the most common things. If you have very bad liver function, that would be another discussion we do. There are people who we do treat with poor liver function, but and there are people who get better after this procedure. So it’s a case by case basis with that. So I would say those are the most common things. Or if for some reason, you can’t have anesthesia, that would be one of the other disqualifying factors. There have been cases done not under general anesthesia. But I would just say in general, the reason we use general anesthesia is so that we can control your breathing. So if you imagine, the liver is going to move, it’s right under the diaphragm, so it moves every time you take a breath. So if we put you under anesthesia, we can augment that, make it less or more and we can make it predictable, meaning it’s the same every single time we take a breath. And so that we can make sure we can treat a tumor that might be right next to the stomach or right next to the pancreas, and nothing’s going to move and injure any other organ.

Betsy Post 39:46
How many procedures have you performed?

Dr. Kevin Burns 39:49
I — hundreds. I don’t know the exact number. One of my practices is myself and my two partners performing it. I think we’re almost 300 cases here. I work at another facility as well, and I know we’re over 100 cases there, yeah. So something like that.

Betsy Post 40:15
Can histotripsy be used for lymph nodes?

Dr. Kevin Burns 40:20
Yes. Speaking not for the company, talking about this, histotripsy is a technology, so think about it like radiation. If you’ve ever had radiation, you might have had, let’s just say you had rectal cancer. You might have radiation to your rectal area. You might have radiation to a lesion in the bone, to the liver. So you can have radiation anywhere in the body, as long as it’s something that’s safe. So histotripsy is a technology that can be applied to other organs in the body. Right now, in practice, it’s in the liver. The kidney trial just ended. The pancreas trial is starting. And so if you fast forward, you can think that this is probably going to move to a lot of other organs throughout the body, and mainly be ‘can the lesion be seen and safely treated without injuring another organ?’. I would say this, treating lymph node now would not be something that’s like an approved therapy, and it wouldn’t have any sort of insurance coverage at this point.

Betsy Post 41:16
Is there any risk of histotripsy causing metastasis via tumor cells not being destroyed and becoming dislodged?

Dr. Kevin Burns 41:23
That’s a common question that we do get and I understand the question. It makes sense. I’ll speak at this histotripsy summit we were just at. The scientists who helped discover this, and this question was brought up, and basically what they had said is, they tried to make this happen in animals, and they couldn’t do it again. Animals may not always apply to humans, but it’s something that hasn’t really been seen. And so that’s all I can say on this right now.

Betsy Post 41:51
Do you have to stop chemotherapy for a certain amount of time before getting this procedure, or can it be done while getting chemotherapy?

Dr. Kevin Burns 42:04
Great question, I usually mention this. I forgot to mention that. In general, we do not stop any systemic therapy for this so that is another advantage for a patient who may have very good control on a systemic therapy and they don’t want to stop. You know, to have surgery is one of the most common ones where you need to stop for quite some time. And so we generally treat patients on their therapy. If you have very severe side effects right after you get your chemotherapy, it’s probably not the best time to schedule your procedure, but it can be done around the therapy. And we like to think this is going to be synergistic, kind of with the chemotherapy. I would say in a future state, we may learn that there are certain immunotherapies that may augment or enhance the effects of this, and that’s something that’ll take years to tease out. But in general, you do not need to stop your chemotherapy. I’ll mention, if you’ve had a hepatic arterial infusion pump, you can still be treated. That’s another question that I commonly get. And we don’t need to stop the pump or anything like that.

Betsy Post 43:02
Can patients with underlying health conditions qualify to receive histotripsy?

Dr. Kevin Burns 43:08
Yeah, I think it’ll be dependent on whether or not you’re a candidate to have any procedure. First, would you be able to have anesthesia? If you have really bad cardiac disease, that may be a disqualifying factor, or whether your liver, we think is healthy enough to take any sort of procedure.

Betsy Post 43:27
I think you probably talked a little bit about this, but can this be done on a patient who has multiple tumors, such as 10 plus?

Dr. Kevin Burns 43:35
Yeah, so if 10 plus tumors, it’d probably be quite hard to get all of them. We have to make sure that the treatment goal is aligned but it definitely can be done on patients with that many tumors. I would classify that was probably going to be a debulking procedure, or, let’s say, maybe you have nine tumors in the right liver, and there’s one on the left. If the left sided one could be treated, maybe you could qualify for some other procedure for the right, and so every patient is different. There are a lot of patients who are seeking this procedure out to see if they can have any immunologic benefit from this, because they know they’re not really a candidate for anything else.

Betsy Post 44:14
I’ve been told Medicare covers histotripsy. Has this been your experience?

Dr. Kevin Burns 44:19
Yes, yeah. Medicare seems to be covering this as far as we’re aware.

Betsy Post 44:28
Are you aware of any centers offering or planning to offer histotripsy in Australia?

Dr. Kevin Burns 44:35
No one currently. I think there’ll be more news to come on that, maybe later in the year. But I know there’s a lot of advocacy trying to bring this to a lot of countries. I think this is very patient driven so if you live in Australia, or if you are in another country trying to bring this, I think it’s going to be very patient driven at this point to bring it up to the appropriate people. Probably get a doctor involved that maybe you think would be a person to advocate for this and then try to bring that into the system. I think it’s going to depend a lot on regulatory bodies in those countries. This is available in Hong Kong, outside of the US, this is available in Hong Kong and in Dubai or in UAE. I think it’s in Abu Dhabi.

Betsy Post 45:19
I don’t know if you can answer this so it’s okay if you can’t, but how much would it cost if you paid out of pocket?

Dr. Kevin Burns 45:29
It changes, I’m not going to answer that on a video, because this changes in every site is going to have different prices. What I’ve learned in this, is medical costs are very complicated, and so this can change frequently, and it can vary by site. So I would say it’s not steep, but it’s cheaper than other things that I know of that can be done as well.

Betsy Post 45:56
Yeah, I think that this patient has said she’s tried four different insurance approvals and all of that, and been denied, which is unfortunate.

Dr. Kevin Burns 46:05
Yeah and I would say, just speaking to this there, I’m sure people know who Jenny Stein is. She’s somebody who works trying to get approval. So a lot of hospitals, and we use her. She basically, all she does is try to get histotripsy patients approved. And so just know that if you see somebody for histotripsy and then we submit your stuff, there’s this SWAT team of really good people, really working behind the scenes, trying to get all these approved. And no matter what your insurance is, they’ll try to get everything approved. We’re doing peer to peers. We’re doing appeals. I’ve had to go on, I’ve had to go on a telephone court case to argue my case. So there’s a lot that’s being done for this. It’s a new therapy, and so it is expected, and I think over time, there’ll be more acceptance from this. Main thing is we just need to publish more data and so we can support. I did a peer to peer. They got overturned because I sent the person the new one year HOPE4LIVER data, and she said, that’s long term evidence. I think this is appropriate for the patient. I’ll approve it. So as we get more data, we’re going to get more approvals for patients.

Betsy Post 47:13
Is there a size limit for treating a tumor? I heard you mentioned a six centimeter tumor was too large.

Dr. Kevin Burns 47:20
There’s no size limit for the tumor, but if you had a single tumor, there could be a better option. And so I think that’s why it’s appropriate to speak with a physician. I’m an interventional radiologist. This is done by interventional radiologists as well as liver surgeons. There’s also a radiation oncologist that does this, so they can probably discuss with you what the other options are, and make sure you choose the appropriate thing for your tumor. If you had a six centimeter tumor in the hilum of the liver, and there’s no other option, then, yes, this can be a therapy where we’re going to try to treat as much of the tumor as possible, prevent, and potentially relieve a biliary obstruction. Maybe you have a biliary drain that you’re trying to get out. So there can be other reasons why we would still go after a tumor that’s larger. You know, this is a colon cancer forum, but there’s a lot of patients with cholangiocarcinoma that are these very large, aggressive tumors, and so this can be used to start kind of debulking those tumors, maybe allow a patient to get to another procedure, potentially a resection. So there can be reasons to go after a larger tumor.

Betsy Post 48:17
Are you aware of any ongoing histotripsy trials for lung mets?

Dr. Kevin Burns 48:22
No. The only trial currently enrolling is the pancreas safety trial in Barcelona, Spain. I think lung is going to be a long ways off. As you can imagine, this therapy doesn’t work there. And so you can imagine that that may have a lot of factors that would make this much more complicated to treat something in the lung. So I think that that is going to be probably quite far off into the distance. There are a lot of other procedures for lung mets, so I would say SBRT, or radiation, which we mentioned later, is fairly common for that. And then if you speak with an interventional radiologist, there’s a lot of ablation modalities that can be done for lung mets as well.

Betsy Post 48:58
I should have asked this earlier with the chemo question I knew it was going to be asked, Can this be used with Avastin?

Dr. Kevin Burns 49:04
Yes, we are not stopping Avastin with this. So that is also what differentiates this from from some other therapies. I’ll speak to, kind of related to Avastin. Avastin, we know, impairs wound healing and may mess with vessels. So if you’re having a TAS or a Y-90, that can make the vessels more friable, and obviously it impairs wound healing. So we haven’t seen any issues with Avastin. We talked about this procedure being extremely safe, now that we have done more procedures total, there are some patients who have some very rare complications, so there definitely have now been patients that have had some bleeding related to this, but that’s still going to be very, very small compared to any other therapy that we offer and so far, I haven’t seen that associated with Avastin.

Betsy Post 49:49
That is the last question that I see. So I just wanted to thank you again for being with us this evening, and if there’s anything you’d like to add before we sign off. This has been enormously helpful. I have learned a ton. So I truly appreciate it. And of course, everyone in the comments is agreeing, just saying how helpful it was. So this is truly a huge update from the last DocTalk we had on histotripsy so I really appreciate it, and I’ll turn it over to you to say anything else that you’d like to.

Dr. Kevin Burns 50:19
Yeah if you can still see my screen, this is just the contact information for Mission Hospital, which is one of the sites I operate at, just in case you want to get in contact with our nurse navigator to ask any questions or try to get into our system. This is the contact information, so I’ll leave that there. So I think, in summary, this is a new procedure. This is not magic. It’s still a procedure that requires a lot of skill and learning in order to treat these tumors and first decide, should we treat the tumor? That’s one of the other important things. And so when you consult with either a surgeon, interventional radiologist, or another physician performing this, you can ask, what are the other alternatives? And we can decide, or help you decide, what you think is best for you to do. There’s lots to learn with this. So every patient we treat, we are learning. When we treat a patient, we treat a lot of patients who travel to us. We’re going to want to see you back virtually. We do a lot of virtual consultations. We’re going to want to see you back at one month, three month, potentially six months, depending on how things are going. Because we want to see what is happening to these lesions over time so that we can learn, we can improve our techniques, and we can offer even better therapies over the course of years.

Betsy Post 51:33
Thank you so much, and thanks for everyone for attending and all of your great questions and participation. So have a great night. Thank you, bye, bye.

Dr. Kevin Burns 51:40
All right. Thank you, everyone, bye.

DocTalk
2024
Dr. Miller
Histotripsy
Stage IV
Doc Talks

In this panel DocTalk, Dr. Burns breaks down histotripsy — an exciting, noninvasive technology that uses sound waves to destroy liver tumors without heat or radiation. Recorded in July, 2025.

Recommended Resources

Research article
Encorafenib, cetuximab and chemotherapy in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial
Scott Kopetz | Nature Medicine
Join COLONTOWN
Join the conversation →

More Videos

State of the art liver surgery with robotic technology
Dr. Sucandy
2024
ERASur trial: Local treatment options for limited stage IV CRC
Dr. Hitchcock
2023
Advanced surgical treatments for CRC liver mets
Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro
2021
Transplant patients are in the house!
2021
Hepatic Artery Infusion (HAI) chemotherapy for CRC liver mets
Hepatic Artery Infusion (HAI) chemotherapy for CRC liver mets
Dr. Gholami
2021
Modern-day management of liver metastases
Dr. Soares
2022
Why liver transplant for mCRC is taking off
Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro
2022
Paths to long-term survival with CRC liver mets
Dr. Hernandez-Alejandro
2023